Introduction (originally entitled “Metropolitan Philaret of New York”) by the Editors of The Orthodox Word to St. Philaret’s Epistle, "The Thyateira Confession"
Source: The
Orthodox Word, Vol. 12, No. 1 (66), January-February 1976, pp. 3-5.
Among the Primates of the
Orthodox Churches today, there is only one from whom is always expected—and not
only by members of his own Church, but by very many in a number of other
Orthodox Churches as well—the clear voice of Orthodox righteousness and truth
and conscience, untainted by political considerations or calculations of any
kind. The voice of Metropolitan Philaret of New York, Chief Hierarch of
the Russian Church Outside of Russia, is the only fully Orthodox voice
among all the Orthodox primates. In this he is like to the Holy Fathers
of ancient times, who placed purity of Orthodoxy above all else, and he stands
in the midst of today's confused religious world as a solitary champion of
Orthodoxy in the spirit of the Ecumenical Councils.
The chief heresy of our age,
ecumenism, against which the voice of Metr. Philaret has been directed, is by
no means an easy one to define or combat. In its "pure"
form—the declaration that the Church of Christ does not exist in fact but is
only now being formed—it is preached by very few among those who call
themselves Orthodox. Most often it is manifested by anti-canonical acts,
especially of communion in prayer with heretics, which reveal the absence of an
awareness of what the Church of Christ is and what it means to belong to
her. But no one anti-canonical act in itself is sufficient to define a
heresy; and therefore it is the greatness of Metr. Philaret at this critical
hour of the Church's history that, without insisting pharisaically on any one
letter of the Church's law, and without twisting to the slightest degree the
words of any ecumenist hierarch in order to "prove" he's a heretic,
he has grasped the heretical, anti-Orthodox spirit behind all
the ecumenist acts and pronouncements of our day and boldly warned the Orthodox
hierarchs and flock about the present danger of them and their future ruinous
outcome. It is most unfortunate that too few Orthodox Christians today
have as yet grasped the full import of his message to the Orthodox Churches—a
lack of understanding that has come both from the "left" side and
from the "right."
On the "left" side
Metr. Philaret is senselessly regarded as a "fanatic" and is accused
of a number of extreme views which he has never expressed or held. His
voice of true Orthodox moderation and sobriety is reviled and slandered by
those—one must strongly suspect—whose conscience, weakened by compromise and
openness to modernist renovationism, is not clean. To such ones the bold
voice of Metr. Philaret ruins the harmony and accord; by which most of the
other Orthodox Churches are proceeding to their dreamed-of "Eighth
Ecumenical Council," at which renovationism will become the
"canonical" norm and the Unia with Rome and the other Western
heresies will become the official "Orthodox" position.
But no less on the
"right" side is the position of Metr. Philaret misunderstood and even
condemned. There are those who, in their "zeal not according to
knowledge" (Rom. 10:2), wish to make everything absolutely "simple"
and "black or white." They would wish him and his Synod to
declare invalid the Mysteries of new calendarists or Communist-dominated
Churches, not realizing that it is not the business of the Synod to make
decrees on such a sensitive and complex question, and that the church
disturbances of our time are far too deep and complicated to be solved solely
by breaking communion or applying anathemas, which—save in the few specific
instances where they might be applicable—only make the church disturbances
worse. Some few even think to solve the tragic situation of Orthodoxy
today with the declaration, "We are the only pure ones left," and
then abuse those who take a stand of true Orthodox moderation with a most
un-Orthodox mechanistic logic ("If they have grace, why don't you join
them or receive communion from them?"). At various times the Russian
Church Outside of Russia has avoided or discouraged communion with several
other Orthodox bodies, and with one in particular (the Moscow Patriarchate) it
has no communion at all, on grounds of principle; and separate hierarchs have
warned against contact with the "modernist" bodies; but this is not
because of any legalistic definition of the lack of grace-giving Sacraments in
such bodies, but because of pastoral considerations which are respected and obeyed
by all true sons of the Church without any need for a merely
"logical" justification.
The Orthodox stand of
Metropolitan Philaret is rooted in his experience from childhood of the age-old
Orthodox way of life. His family was devout; his father (Archbishop
Dimitry) knew St. John of Kronstadt and in the Diaspora was a hierarch in the Far
East. In his formative years in the Far East, Metr. Philaret was in
contact with holy men: Bishop Jonah, a wonderworker and disciple of Optina
Elder Barsanuphius; the clairvoyant elders of the Kazan Monastery in Harbin,
Michael and Ignatius (the latter of whom he buried); Abbess Rufina, whose
convent was transformed by its numerous miraculously-renewed icons; and he had
clearly before him the example of a number of holy hierarchs, including
Metropolitan Innocent of Peking, champion of the Old Calendar, the wonderworking
bishops of Shanghai, Simon and John (Maximovitch), and Metropolitan Meletius of
Harbin. His love for holy men and champions of Orthodoxy in the past is
evident in the fact that he took a leading part in the publication of the Lives
of "Standers for Orthodox Faith" such as Elders Ambrose and Macarius
of Optina, writing in addition an excellent introduction to the Life of Elder
Ambrose. In all this, and in his uncompromising stand for true Orthodoxy,
he is very like his namesake in 19th-century Russia, Metropolitan Philaret of
Moscow, the champion of Patristic Orthodoxy against the anti-Orthodox
influences coming from the West, and the protector of Optina Monastery and its
elders.
For over ten years now the voice
of Metropolitan Philaret has resounded unwearyingly in a succession of letters
of protest and warning to Orthodox hierarchs, particularly of the Patriarchate
of Constantinople, and in two "Sorrowful Epistles" addressed
to the world-wide Orthodox episcopate. The present letter ["The
Thyateira Confession"] is a kind of third sorrowful epistle to all the
Orthodox bishops, occasioned by the first Orthodox-ecumenist "confession,"
which makes much more definite the errors which had been perhaps only
"tendencies" up to now. It should be noted that, despite the
shocking lack of response by Orthodox hierarchs to his earlier "Sorrowful
Epistles," the present epistle is still addressed to "the Orthodox hierarchs,"
"the hierarchs of God," letting them know that it is the least of
their brothers who is addressing them, not in order to call them names or make
a public spectacle of them, but in order to call them back to
Orthodoxy before they have departed from it entirely, without any hope
of return. It should also be noted that there is no trace whatever of the
lightmindedness and mockery which mar some of the otherwise welcome
anti-ecumenist writings of our day, especially in the English language.
This is a document of the utmost seriousness, a humble yet firm entreaty to
abandon a ruinous path of error, a document whose solemn tone exactly matches
the gravity of its content, proceeding from the age-old wisdom and experience
of Patristic Orthodoxy in standing in the truth and opposing error. May it be
read and its message heeded!
Russian translation:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.