Monday, July 20, 2026

An Edifying and Moving Story from the Holy Mountain


 

There was once a monk on Mt. Athos who dwelled in Karyes. [1] He drank every day to the point of inebriation and came to be a source of scandal to pilgrims. Eventually he died and some faithful went to Elder Paisios to tell him, with particular joy, that at last this enormous problem was solved.

Father Paisios replied to them that he was aware of the death of the monk, since he had seen an entire host of Angels coming to receive his soul.

The pilgrims were taken aback and protested, as some of them tried to explain to Elder Paisios just who it was about whom they were speaking, thinking that the Elder had not understood. The Elder told them: “The monk in question was born in Asia Minor, shortly before the destruction, [2] when the Turks rounded up all of the males. So that he would not be taken from them, his parents took him with them to the harvest, and so that he would not cry, they put raki [3] in his milk, so that he could sleep. On this account, when he grew up, he became an alcoholic. At one point, after being persuaded by advice from various physicians not to have a family, he went to Mt. Athos and became a monk.

“There he found an Elder, and he told him that he was an alcoholic. The Elder told him to do prostrations and prayers every evening and to ask the Panagia [4] to help him to reduce by one the glasses of liquor that he drank each day.

“After one year, he succeeded, by struggle and repentance, reducing the twenty glasses that he drank to nineteen. His struggle continued with the passing of time, and he reached the point that he drank only two or three glasses of liquor a day, with which, nonetheless, he would become inebriated. The world for years saw an alcoholic monk who scandalized pilgrims; God beheld a combative fighter engaged in a great struggle to subdue his passion...

 

NOTES

1. Administrative center of the monastic republic of Mt. Athos, Greece.

2. The Turkish onslaught against the Greeks in Asia Minor (1916 to 1922), ending in the final expulsion of the Greeks by a population exchange.

3. An anise-flavored liqueur similar to ouzo.

4. The “All-Holy One,” or the Mother of God (Theotokos).

 

Source: Orthodox Tradition, Vol. XXXII (2015), No. 2.

Pastoral Theology and Depression: A Ministry of Love

THE NEGATIVE REPERCUSSIONS OF A STEREOTYPICAL AND SIMPLISTIC APPROACH TO DEPRESSION IN PASTORAL PRACTICE AND

THE THERAPEUTIC POTENTIALITY OF UNCONDITIONAL LOVE

Nikitas Kafkios, clinical psychologist | September 9, 2012

 

 

I. Grief and Depression

In our presentation, we intend to show analytically the negative effects that habitually arise out of a simplistic pastoral approach to depression and to argue that unconditional respect for the freedom of the individual person in conjunction with Christian love is the foundation of true, supportive pastoral intervention.

In psychiatry and clinical psychology, grief is considered a physiological and demiurgic reaction of a person confronting unforeseen traumatic events that contravene one’s security and worth or upset his existential equilibrium. However, when grief becomes more and more intense with the passage of time and impedes one’s physical activities, such as work, eating, sleep, and personal interactions, we can diagnose it as depression.

More precisely, the clinical symptoms of depression are the following: constant grieving, loss of energy, and exhaustion; an increased or decreased desire for food; a proclivity towards isolation and social detachment; anxiety or worry about everything; vacillation, difficulty in making decisions; loss of interest in seeking loving companionship or for intimate relations; feelings of guilt, self-loathing, and unworthiness; too much or too little sleep; a poor disposition during the greater part of the day, almost daily; a reduction of interest in, or enjoyment of, nearly all activities; worry and gloom concerning the future; no hope in any area.

II. The Stereotypes of a Simplistic Approach to Depression:

The Initial Error of “Theological Reductionism”

The stereotypes that we will analyze derive, to a greater or lesser degree, from a corresponding error in assumptions about the experience of depression in the hermeneutic dimensions of pastoral theology. Personal life events, the knowledge and experience of each individual, define his existential horizon and his concept of the world. The more fixed one is on this horizon, that is, the more complete and unique he considers his way of life and his view of reality, the more difficult it is for him to feel what another is feeling and to see reality through another’s eyes: “We can never assume his personality, his life, and his person in such a way as to experience his life exactly as he lives it.” [1]

A spiritual Father, like any other person, is handicapped in comprehending and grasping the existential outlook of an individual who suffers from depression. He perceives and explains the experience and the existential condition of the sufferer [2] by way of his own person and his own experiences of grief. For this reason, he many times finds it difficult to conceive of and understand the seriousness of the symptoms of depression, and believes that a patient can be cured if he or she simply tries harder to apply the Will of God in his or her life. However, it is obvious that it is not possible to understand and to help a sufferer if one assesses the sufferer’s life experience and behaviors by way of one’s own interpretive filters and ethical and religious standards.

As well, it is not correct to make a patient guilty after the fact, when pastoral intervention does not function therapeutically in his or her case. In assessing the experience of depression through the prism of Scripture or the writings of the Holy Fathers, a spiritual Father removes himself from the Weltanschauung and experiential horizon of the believer and falls to the error of theological reductionism; that is, the reduction of the biopsychological phenomenon of depression to the level of theology. Depression is a psychopathological phenomenon, and it is not correct to overlook its psychopathological dimension and to explain it by the principles and axioms of theology. Committing such an error, we wrongly come to think of pathological depression as an experience of grief, the reasons for which derive from selfishness and a distancing of oneself from God.

By this alien theological explanation and the pastoral guidance that it entails, the believer who is afflicted by depression, instead of finding relief, feels that his spiritual Father does not understand him and does not accept him, but rejects him. The error of theological reductionism contributes to the creation of various stereotypes. We will analyze seven of these stereotypes and ascertain what their consequences are for pastoral practice:

1. “Depression is a matter of choice. One who is afflicted by depression chooses to be afflicted.”

This stereotype is based on the following widely held notion: each person is responsible for his actions and his life experiences; therefore, his suffering means that his grief is by choice. “In the case of certain people—do not let this strike you as strange— they like to be in constant perplexity, to be anxious, to be gloomy, to be suspicious, to be jealous, and to be angry.” [3]

In keeping with the Church’s theology, the fall of man to ruination, illness, and death occurred because of the urging of the Devil, but also with the free consent of man. Just as the first man freely chose to fall, so every person freely chooses to distance himself from God and to fall to sin. Since ruination, illness, and death result from sin, this means that an individual who suffers from depression chooses to fall to the sin of depression.

Personally, I believe that the fall to which the First-Created [Adam and Eve] succumbed has not the slightest connection with a “fall” to depression. I personally believe that depression is not a choice; the choice is in how one chooses to deal with depression. No one would consciously choose to be afflicted or to suffer. A patient cannot choose to be free from depression, though he can learn to cope, as best he can, with negative feelings.

Even in a case where someone becomes accustomed to expressing himself in a depressed manner, such that he somehow gets something from his depression, such as the sympathy and concern of others, in reality this involves an unconscious choice or a neurotic indicator. The phrase, “You do not want to change,” or “If you wanted to, you could,” demonstrates a lack of respect for the peculiar uniqueness and the weakness of a patient. It constitutes an act of violence against his person, which leads to feelings of despondency and abandonment. When a spiritual Father to whom the patient turns to get help considers the patient responsible for his difficulties and attributes guilt to him, the patient inevitably feels betrayed and hopelessly alone.

2. “A depressed person is not suffering from something pathological. He is healthy, but does not try hard enough to help himself”

This stereotype is related to the foregoing one. Since one chooses to fall to depression, he is not ill, but a tormented sinner. Additionally, if he would put forth enough effort, he could overcome his depression by his own strength, calling on the help of God. Anyway, whatever the case, he is surely responsible for his sick condition; for even if God will not help him, this simply means that he is not calling on God in the right way, or stems from his not fulfilling the requirements for receiving God’s help.

In reality, however, with depression it is precisely the ability for conscious effort that has suffered injury. The patient finds it difficult to achieve practical goals. He knows the ways by which he could help himself, but he feels as though he cannot put forth the effort to apply in practice all of the things that could help him. He does not need direction, but strength and energy; he does not need advice, but the necessary existential basics that would allow him to trust his own abilities and to cure himself.

The spiritual Father asks the patient to struggle against the sinful sickness of depression in order to be cured. But to struggle with the power of his will to overcome depression is like trying to turn on his cell phone when its battery has gone dead, or trying to rise into the air by pulling on his shoestrings. The believer feels that he is being asked something that is impossible for him to accomplish. As a consequence of this, he feels an intensification of the negative sensations of guilt, shame, unworthiness, and fear that were already preexistent in him as symptoms of depression.

3. “Psychotherapy or pharmacological assistance is not necessary.”

The majority of spiritual Fathers, and especially those who enjoy only theological reading and do not have experience with, or have not studied, psychopathology, doubt the validity and the usefulness of psychiatry and psychotherapy. “So many have become psychiatric physicians, psychoanalysts, psychologists, and they treat patients.... What patients, indeed? Who are you to treat such patients?” [4] Yet, most scientific statistical studies show that anti-depressants and anxiety medications, in conjunction with psychotherapeutic support, offer crucial aid, in most instances, in confronting depression. In severe forms of depression, pharmaceutical treatment is absolutely necessary.

Psychotherapy helps the person undergoing therapy come to know himself, to recognize and to accept his weaknesses, and with a calm sense of humility to surrender them to the power and love of God. More specifically, psychotherapy can help a person who suffers from depression

• to recognize and rethink thoughts and behaviors that result in the creation of the feelings of despondency, culpability, and guilt that accompany and are found at the roots of depression;

• to know which of the problems that beset him can be resolved, and in what way, and which of them cannot be resolved, but with which it behooves him to co-exist harmoniously;

• to improve his relationship with loved ones;

• to reintroduce into his life pleasing activities that can reawaken within him the joy of life;

• to claim his rights and not retreat out of fear of the opinions of others;

• to base his choices on his own values and on his own desires;

• to gain control of his life;

• to develop his abilities, setting realistic goals for the future, and to assume the responsibility and the risk for these choices.

The disdain of a spiritual Father for psychiatry and psychotherapy turns the believer away from the possibility of accepting the counsel of science, so as to be helped.

4. “Depression is the result of sinful experiences. The accumulation of sin and misdeeds distances man from the salubrious path of God and leads him to depression… Illness, every form of illness, is a consequence of the fall of man. This means that sickness is tied to sin and to human nature. It is not ‘natural,’ therefore, for man to become sick, but unnatural (παρά φνσιν).” [5]

In actuality, depression is a psychopathological phenomenon that has as much connection to sin as a bone fracture or sugar diabetes. Despite this, most spiritual Fathers are certain that, since depression manifests itself in the sphere of behavior and psychology, confronting it, in terms of assessment and therapy, belongs to the jurisdiction of pastoral psychology. With the conviction that clinical depression is a spiritual disease, and as a consequence derives from a departure from God, selfishness, and egotism, the spiritual Father approaches the patient as a sinner.

Accordingly, the spiritual Father advises, admonishes, and urges the sufferer to change his way of life and to align his life with the Will of God. In this attempt, however, he usually fails to take into account the psychological dimension of depressive experiences. And when we are ignorant of the psychology of a patient, that is, the characteristics of his personality, his needs, his desires, his interpersonal relationships, his traumatic experiences, his fears, his insecurities, and his unrealistic aspirations, it is not possible to help him.

5. “Depression is the result of selfishness and unbridled egotism. ...The chief reason for depression and all that we call demonic, Satanic...is that you have within you an inflated ego.” [6]

The individual who is afflicted by depression presents with behaviors that can easily be construed as egotistical, such as grumbling, making demands on others, withdrawal from society, sleeping long hours, and a lack of desire to work or to interact with others. The experience of depression drains an individual of all of his energy to act and he becomes preoccupied with nothing other than his own problems.

The patient is bogged down by grief and is continually preoccupied with what he is thinking about and what he feels. This painful, overwhelming preoccupation of an individual with his own self is wrongly taken by some spiritual Fathers to be egocentrism: “The depressed individual experiences sadness, bitterness, and pain precisely because he will not bend, will not show humility, will not repent, but is [rather] overcome by wounded pride and the desire to please others.” [7]

In reality, a person who suffers from depression is not selfish, since he has no love for himself; he does not have inner balance and harmony, has excessive feelings of guilt and inadequacy for his faults and weaknesses—and especially for his depression; he is not happy, enjoys nothing, does not look after himself, and does not satisfy his basic needs. With depression, a person does not suffer from unbridled egotism, but from a pathological egocentrism, since his pain makes him attend constantly to his needs and focus insistently on his negative feelings and weaknesses.

6. “The cause of depression is a lack of faith, prayer, love, and trust in God. If you find a good Elder and partake of the Mysteries of the Church, you will overcome it. ...We greatly set upon the Will of God when, on account of the grievances and worries that come to us, we fall to gloom, murmuring, hopelessness, immeasurable sadness, and stern coldness.” [8]

Of course, the cultivation of spiritual virtues and participation in the Mysteries help one in facing grief, but the person who suffers from depression typically has not the slightest desire to be present at services or to engage in spiritual struggle. The believer who lives with the symptoms of pathological depression not only has no appetite or desire to respond to the guidance of his spiritual Father or the Church, but he is likewise not able to cope with his basic everyday obligations.

Because he finds it difficult to keep himself clean, to eat, or to sleep, it is only natural that he should find it even more difficult to pray, to participate in services, to fast, or to show love and provide comfort to those in his family environment. Depression, like other psychopathological disturbances, does not arise from, and is not reinforced by, a lack of faith, obedience, love, or trust in God.

On the contrary, depression impedes a conscious growth in faith, obedience, love, and trust in God. A person suffering from depression feels that his life is empty, without any meaning; as a result, it is very difficult for him to feel at a conscious level that he can trust in God. He feels that all of his powers are ineffective, and he is struck by panic in seeking any improvement in his condition. Anything outside his need to survive or to alleviate his grief he considers an unrealistic luxury.

Many Grace-endowed spiritual Fathers believe that prayer and the worship of God, with the help of Grace, transform depression into joy. “Prayer and the worship of God transform depression, little by little, and turn it into joy, because the Grace of God acts on it. Here one must have the strength to draw on the Grace of God, Who will help you to unite with Him.” [9]

They do not explain, however, by what means the debilitated sufferer, who lacks exactly strength and power, is able to draw on Grace. This is so only if by “power” we mean our delivery from our weakness and its placement in God’s hands: “Place the sickness of your nature in the hands of God, fully realizing your own weakness, and you will then receive the gift of wisdom, without even knowing it.” [10] In the pit of grief, God is present, and it is possible to have a relationship of silent prayer with Him there.

The wounded with the Wounded One, the crucified with the Crucified One, the one who is alone with the One Who alone is, in a mystical, personal relationship of communion.

7. “Depression is a demonic-Satanic condition. ...He (the Devil) succeeds in tapping our very energy and makes it into grief, depression, and whatever—I don’t know what the so-called psychiatrists may call it. We do not call it by the names they use. We call it satanic activity; we call it coldness; we call it evil thought; we call it the demon of coldness, the demon of immorality, the demon, the demon, the demon. There are different demons for every Satanic activity that is created in us. [11] ...That is, what had overtaken her [a depressed person—see endnote below] was a psychic force, and instead of becoming something good, the Devil made this psychic power into depression and tormented the person.” [12]

We cannot prove that depression results from satanic activity; nor can we prove the contrary. In most instances, however, the assumption of satanic intervention is not necessary, since the phenomenon of depression is more easily and more simply explained on the basis of the biochemistry of the brain, personal history, or the negative experiences, thoughts, and behaviors of the patient. In the past, in the realm of the Church all diseases were considered the results of satanic activity, and even bodily disease; indeed, we often hear our brothers and sisters reduce anything difficult or negative to demonic activity. The devil is made responsible for all of their errors, failures, and weaknesses.

I believe that if something negative can be simply and easily explained by simple and objective givens, there is no need to ascribe responsibility for it to evil spirits. Therefore, it is preferable to limit the attribution of the phenomenon of satanic influences to other unusual demonic disturbances, and not to instances of depression.

 

 

III. The Pastoral Aspect of Love

A. Grief and Depression as a Gift

Aside from his positive support in confronting the everyday problems that result from the associated effects of depression, a spiritual Father can help assist a patient with love, humility, and prayer. A spiritual Father’s love, in particular, is a necessary prerequisite for soteriologically fruitful pastoral activity. Depression is not simply a painful experience without significance or meaning. As the expression of human weakness par excellence, there is concealed within depression a therapeutic and soteriological power.

In the Church, grief is transformed into a gift; illness, by the Grace of God, mystically prepares the ground of the soul for the manifestation of God. At a spiritual level, a person becomes capable, to the extent that he recognizes his weakness, of surrendering himself to the love of God. The existential return to God, that is, repentance, is consummated to the extent that human weakness is baptized in the Grace of God.

The role of the Grace-endowed spiritual Father is to make the Grace of God visible to the believer through unconditional love; without this love, the spiritual Father cannot carry out his work. “The Grace-endowed spiritual Father loves and feels the pain of a soul.... A spiritual Father who is not resolved even to go into hell for the love of his spiritual children is not a spiritual Father.” [14]

In the following paragraphs we will focus especially on love, basing ourselves on the supposition that it is closely related to, and inseparable from, humility and prayer. First, however, we will make extensive reference to the therapeutic power of depression itself, since it is our belief that depression contains within it the possibility of becoming holy humility.

B. The Therapeutic Power of Weakness

In the Church, external circumstances of a disadvantageous kind, temptations, and illnesses are considered basic presuppositions for the salvation of man. “No one who has not experienced temptation can enter into the Kingdom of God, and no such one can be saved.” [15] Human weakness is made wholly visible in the experience of depression. The believer is called to hand himself over to the love of God, so as to become perfectly strong: “My strength is made perfect in weakness.” [16]

Even though in the state of depression a patient may find it difficult to pray for keenness of mind, to participate in the Church’s services, or to help himself in any way whatever, it is possible for his relationship to God to function at a deeper, internal level. For when a person is ill and cannot help himself, it is then that God activates the mystery of sadness in his heart, in order to save him. “The person takes part in his salvation by synergy, even if the possibility of synergy is a gift of Grace… Man is not a passive, but an active, recipient of Grace. It is simply that even this active reception is a Divine gift.” [17]

In the Church, illness is considered a precursor to spiritual health and power: “When I am ill, only then am I strong.” [18] The deadlock of sorrow in a person suffering from depression has existential and spiritual meaning; for God works in the heart of a person by means of illness and grief: “Their souls are guided, by visible instances of grief, to virtue.” [19] Depression can more greatly connect one to knowledge of God through repentance than visible and demonstrable ascetic practices. The crushing sadness of the soul brings into action the succor of Grace; pain comes to act as a therapeutic means of cleansing, that one might partake of the joy of the Holy Spirit.

“Since by this crushing sadness the soul is freed from anger and bitterness, its place is taken by spiritual Grace.” [20] The Providence of God renders worthy human errors and sadness, leading a well-intentioned individual to the blessed state of humble self-knowledge. In the Orthodox spiritual tradition, self-knowledge is humility and humility is self-knowledge. “He who truly knows himself possesses humility. And when a man is made humble, the Grace of God will certainly come upon him.” [21]

The intensity of despair increases the probability that the heart of the sufferer will be energized by the mystery of repentance. Nothingness lies on the border of the sensible perception of God; an existential void can potentially spark a change of course and the entrusting of one’s existence to God. “With my whole heart I cried unto the compassionate God, and He hearkened unto me from the lowest depth of Hades, and brought my life out of corruption.” [22] This shifting in the center of gravity from the impotent self to the omnipotence of God unlocks the possibility of salvation.

How this change of course and surrender to God vis-a-vis one’s existence can be brought to fruition is mysterious and something that cannot be explained [merely] by scrutinizing the factors that determine the life of an individual. “By the Grace of God I am what I am..., yet not I labored, but the Grace of God which was with me.” [23] The love of a genial spiritual Father works in synergy, in an essential way, with the functioning of the mystery of repentance, such that the depression of the impotent believer is turned over to the therapeutic omnipotence of God.

The therapeutic function of Divine love does not mean the inevitable relief of symptoms, but rather the enlightenment of the soul by the Grace of God. “For the Church, therapy is not a psychogonical and moral matter, but an ontological one. The aim of therapy is not to relieve the symptoms of a person’s illness, but to regenerate him.” [24] And when a person is united with God, the sadness of these symptoms subsides to the extent that they are endowed with eschatological significance in the Holy Spirit. It is then that these symptoms are experienced as the marks of crucifixion and take on a resurrectional significance.

C. Unconditional Love in Christ

The spiritual Father who is unable to understand the depth and the complex functionings of human existence rushes to offer the believer concrete counsel and guidance. He wants immediately to solve the problems of the sufferer and to place him on the right path. For this reason, he adopts a pastoral approach based on reason, words, and action, and does not appreciate the therapeutic functionality of unknowing, of silence, of humility, and of love. A spiritual Father is called to love, and is not called to focus on the existential and spiritual weaknesses of the believer or to counsel him in self-evident ethical matters. “Many times I see something in the agony of another, understanding or knowing what he has done, yet out of respect I do not say anything to him, if he does not tell me himself.... It does not help, indeed, to play the teacher to another and to examine him about his habits, if he does not grant you that right.” [25]

The Grace-endowed Elder, and especially in Confession, embraces with discretion a pastoral approach that is rooted in humility and unconditional love. He does not seek to aid the believer so much with his own knowledge and social skills, as to do so with the revelation of the love of God. “It is a great delusion for you to think that by your efforts you can change a man.... When someone prays for another person, this is fine; but when one tries to change him, it is not. That is solely in the Hands of God.” [26]

Instead of insisting, propose solutions with correct religious counsel, it being preferable to respect the existential reality of the believer and to embrace with maternal affection his sadness, his weaknesses, and his freedom. In this way, the encounter of the spiritual Father and the believer is elevated to the experience of peaceful Grace, which is inspired by the therapeutic energy of Divine love. The love of the spiritual Father for the believer is the catalyst, so that sadness and depression might operate in a sanctifying manner.

In pastoral communication, the spiritual Father who loves, being filled with the love of God, communicates with the believer, having emptied out himself. He adopts the way of seeing and living of the believer, without being tied to his personal theoretical schemata about the world and his individual systems of belief. Within the boundaries of charismatic, unconditional, distinctive love, a believer can be absolutely and freely himself, without feelings that his spiritual Father is judging him, confining him, or failing to understand him.

D. The Cognizance of God

Love is the cognizance of God. The spiritual Father vividly manifests this love to the degree that he participates in it. Sweet, prayerful, humble love is therapeutic. “If you wish to correct someone’s errors, do not think that you can correct him by your own power. Pray to God, Who ‘searches the heart and the reins,’ with your whole soul, that the Same may enlighten the heart of the person.” [27] In our daily communication, let us affirm that the condition in which life experiences place one person affects the condition in which another’s life experiences place him; common sentiments, such as joy, sadness, anxiety, fear or enthusiasm, are passed from one to another, like liquid elements flowing from one container to another.

This communion in life experiences, and specifically the influence which the love of the spiritual Father exercises over the believer, we can better understand with the following example: If we place two guitars opposite one another and stroke a string on the first guitar, we will observe that a corresponding string on the other guitar will begin to vibrate. In the same way, in the relationship of a spiritual Father and believer, when the spiritual Father feels sweet love in his heart, this love awakens the Divine therapeutic power which is hidden in the heart of the believer. “One soul communicates with another and the one soul senses the other.” [28]

A Grace-filled spiritual Father sees in the face of the believer a potential Saint; he sees Christ Himself. With the spiritual sensory organs of love and humility, he feels that the believer is one with him within the Body of Christ, the Church.

 

Endnotes and References

1. Nikitas Kafkios (2009), “The acceptance without limits of the existential presuppositions of the person in pastoral practice.” See www.psyche.gr/poimantiki3.htm. (Emphasis added.)

2. A psychologist uses the term “άσθενής” (a patient or ill individual) in accordance with the etymological meaning of the term: “ασθενής” or one who is without “σθένος,” or strength. As well, this term underscores the fact that a person who suffers from depression bears no fault on account of what is happening to him, and cannot be cured simply by the power of his will.

3. Metropolitan Nicholas (Chatzenikolaou) of Mesogaia and Lavreotike (2010), from an interview in the newspaper Makedonia. [One might rightly note, of course, that His Eminence is not necessarily addressing, in his comments, the issue of clinical depression or pathological behavior, but certain personality traits that individuals sometimes adopt in social interaction. At the same time, the line that separates personality traits from personality disorders of a pathological kind is a thin one, and we must therefore take the author’s comments quite seriously.]

4. Constantine Giannitsiotes, Near to Elder Porphyries. Athens: Ekdosis Hierou Hesychasteriou “He Metamorphosis tou Soteros,” 2006, p. 199.

5. Metropolitan John (Zezioulas) of Pergamon, “Theology and Psychiatry in Dialogue,” in Conference Proceedings. Athens: Ekdoseis “Apostolike Diakonia,” 1999, pp. 141-156.

6. Elder Porphyrios, Hieromonk, A Conversation on Depression. Melesi (Greece): Ekdosis Hierou Gynaikeiou Hesychasteriou “He Metamorphosis tou Soteros,” n.d., p. 12.

7. Elder Paisios the Hagiorite, “Discourse V,” in Passions and Virtues. Sourote (Thessalonike): Ekdosis Hierou Hesychasteriou “Evangelistes Ioannes ho Theologos,” 2006, p. 139.

8. Staretz Zacharias, Apophthegmata From Russian Saints and Elders. See http://users.uoa.gr/~nektar/orthodoxy/gerontikon/gerontikon5_russians.htm.

9. Constantine C. Karakoles, The Gift of Discernment (Elder Porphyrios). Melesi (Greece): Ekdosis Hierou Gynaikeiou Hesychasteriou “He Metamorphosis tou Soteros,” 2011, p. 352.

10. St. John the Sinaite, The Ladder, “On Chastity II,” Step XV.

11. Elder Porphyrios, op. cit., p. 10.

12. Elder Porphyrios is referring to a discussion of his with a certain female professor.

13. St. Nicodemos the Hagiorite, The Book of Barsanouphios and John. Ekdoseis Soteriou Schoina, 1960, pp. 82-83 (Reply 110).

14. Elder Paisios the Hagiorite, Spiritual Struggle, “Discourse III.” Sourote (Thessalonike): Ekdosis Hierou Hesychasteriou “Evangelistes Ioannes ho Theologos,” 2007.

15. St. Anthony the Great, Patrologia Grceca LXV, col. 77A.

16. II Corinthians 12:9-10.

17. Nikitas Kafkios (2010), “Freedom and Divine Grace: The Role of Human Effort in The Work of Salvation.” See www.psyche.gr./graceandworks.htm.

18. II Corinthians 12:10.

19. St. Isaac the Syrian, Ascetical Homilies, “Discourse XXV.” Thessalonike: Ekdoseis Basileiou Regopoulos, 1997, p. 28.

20. St. Gregory Palamas, ‘To the Nun Xene,” in The Philokalia. Ekdoseos “To Periboli tes Panagias,” Vol. IV, p. 98.

21. Elder Paisios, op. cit.

22. St. Andrew of Crete, “The Great Canon,” Ode VI.

23.1 Corinthians 15:10.

24. Metropolitan John (Zezioulas) of Pergamon, op. cit.

25. Elder Paisios the Hagiorite, op. cit.

26. Nun Gabrielia, The Eldress Gabrielia. Athens: Ekdoseis “Eptalophos,” 1996, p. 181.

27. St. John of Kronstadt, My Life in Christ. Athens: Ekdoseis “Aster,” 1974, p. 25.

28. Elder Porphyrios Kavsokalybites, Life and Writings. Chrysopege, Chania (Crete): Ekdosis Hieras Mones Zoodochou Peges, 2003, p. 273.

 

Source: Orthodox Tradition, Vol. XXXII (2015), No. 1, pp. 4-18.


Saint Justin Popović (1894–1979): Theological Confession and Anti-Ecumenist Discourse in the Serbian Orthodox Church of the Twentieth Century

(Presentation of a profoundly moving confessional text)

Protopresbyter Dimitrios Athanasiou | July 20, 2026

 

 

Introduction

The text that we present in summarized sections, on account of its great length, was written by Archimandrite Justin Popović (1894–1979) on January 14, 1971, the feast day of Saint Sabbas the Sanctified, in his Cell at Ćelije Monastery. Fr. Justin had already been marginalized since 1948, following his unjust removal from the University of Belgrade because of his refusal to compromise with the communist regime. The occasion for its composition was an anonymous letter addressed to German, Patriarch of Serbia, in which it was implied that his marginalization was due to his opposition to German’s election.

By an act dated October 16, 1970, the Holy Synod asked Fr. Justin to state whether he desired an ecclesiastical appointment in Belgrade.

His response went beyond the personal issue and constituted a systematic theological-ecclesiological confession. The text sets forth the crucial problems of the Orthodox Church in the twentieth century, denounces Ecumenism as a heresy and a threat to the unity of the Church, invokes the Patristic tradition as the sole criterion of Orthodoxy, and highlights the principle “We ought to obey God rather than men” as the foundation of ecclesiastical life. It thus takes its place among the great Orthodox confessions, from the Epistle of the Eastern Patriarchs of 1848 to the contemporary anti-Ecumenist confessions.

The principal theological issues that it addresses are four.

First, the ecclesiology of Ecumenism: Fr. Justin denounces the accession of the Patriarchate of Belgrade to the World Council of Churches, which he characterizes as a “heretical union” of 233 heresies, and extends his criticism to the Patriarchate of Constantinople, Moscow, and other Orthodox Churches.

Second, he denounces common prayers, the recognition of the Mysteries of heretics, and the reception of “blessings” from heretics, invoking Apostolic Canons 45 and 64 and Canons 32–37 of Laodicea.

Third, the inaction of the Bishops in the face of heresy is characterized as “betrayal of God,” with reference to Saint Gregory the Theologian: “By silence one betrays God.”

The text concludes with an invocation of the Synodikon of Orthodoxy and an appeal for a return to the “Theanthropic path of the Holy Apostles and Holy Fathers.”

The author’s method is confessional, not polemical. He systematically invokes the Holy Fathers (Basil, Chrysostom, Maximus, Damascene, Symeon, Gregory Palamas), provides precise Patristic references, and employs the language of the Ecumenical Councils. He does not attack persons, but defends the Truth. Just as Saint Maximus the Confessor refused to enter into communion with the heretical Patriarch Pyrrhus without proclaiming a schism, so too Justin refuses to concelebrate with those who have betrayed Orthodoxy, without separating himself from the Church.

More than fifty years after it was written, the text remains timely. The issues it addresses—the relationship between Orthodoxy and Ecumenism, ecclesiastical consciousness, obedience to Tradition, and the stance toward heresy—continue to concern the Orthodox Church. The “Great and Holy Council” of Crete (2016), relations with the Vatican, intercommunion with heretics, and the crisis of Orthodox identity render Justin’s discourse prophetic and necessary.

The text comes from a manuscript of Saint Justin, typewritten on seventeen pages, bearing his own signature and date (“On the day of Saint Sabbas, 1971, at the guesthouse of the Cell”), and is preserved in the archives of the Holy Monastery of Ćelije.

“Our first and final need today is this: to return to the Orthodox path of the Holy Fathers... This alone, and this alone, can save us, wretched and miserable as we are.”

The complete [Serbian] text may be found at the following web address:

https://svetosavlje.org/odgovor-na-anonimnu-dopisnicu-o-clanstvu-u-ekumenskom-savetu-crkava/

* * *

RESPONSE TO ANONYMOUS CORRESPONDENCE

INTRODUCTION: THE OCCASION

A. The Anonymous Letter to the Patriarch (October 1970)

In October 1970, German, Patriarch of Serbia, received an anonymous letter, which stated the following:

“Your Holiness,

I consider it necessary to inform you that there has lately been much discussion among the people about Fr. Justin, and that he has been languishing at Ćelije for a long time solely because you desire it, because he opposed your election as patriarch.

Fr. Justin is regarded as the most learned man in Orthodoxy, and some even call him a martyr of the red patriarch. If he has offended you in any way, you should forgive him and bring him to Belgrade for some duty, and in this way the various stories would be brought to an end.

Respectfully,

An Orthodox Christian”

B. The Decision of the Holy Synod (October 16, 1970)

In presenting the letter, Patriarch German stated that he was deeply convinced that Archimandrite Justin had nothing whatsoever to do with its contents, but considered it necessary that the Holy Synod be informed of the “street versions” that were circulating. The Synod decided:

“Through His Grace Bishop Jovan of Šabac-Valjevo, the competent diocesan bishop, a copy of the aforementioned letter is to be delivered to the Very Reverend Archimandrite Fr. Justin, and he is to be asked to state whether he would wish and be able to accept some ecclesiastical appointment in Belgrade, and what kind.”

C. Fr. Justin’s Response

Fr. Justin replies to Bishop Jovan with the following introductory declaration:

“Having awakened all the eyes of my conscience and having examined my entire Orthodox consciousness from top to bottom, throughout all its divine infinitude, by means of the Holy Apostolic and Patristic Tradition, I resolved to respond to the aforementioned act. But our most inescapable and dreadful reality compels me to set forth in my response that which is ‘the one thing needful’ (Luke 10:42), and which is more important than the most important matter in our Serbian Orthodox Church today.”

Fr. Justin dismisses the personal issue as secondary and proceeds to a forceful denunciation of the crucial problems confronting the Church.

SECTION I

ORTHODOX ECCLESIOLOGY AGAINST ECUMENISM

1. The Uniqueness of the Orthodox Church

Fr. Justin begins with the fundamental ecclesiological principle:

“The One and Only Holy Ecumenical (Catholic) and Apostolic Church of Christ in heaven and on earth, the one heavenly and earthly Theanthropic Body, is the Orthodox Church of Christ. Thus have we been infallibly taught, and thus has it been universally handed down to us by all the Holy Apostles, the Holy Fathers, the Holy Martyrs, the Holy Confessors, the Holy New Martyrs, and all the Holy Ecumenical and Local Councils.”

He refers to the Council of Žiča and to the discourse of Saint Sava, who handed down to his successors the Orthodox Faith, the Church, Tradition, the Dogmas, and the Canons. Saint Sava characterized this Faith as a “spiritual teaching” that “is neither a game nor the madness of human thoughts,” but “the Holy Faith that he preached, upon which all the holy truths concerning Christ Jesus our Lord were founded.”

2. The Betrayal of Orthodoxy

Fr. Justin denounces the fact that this Holy Orthodox Faith has begun to be betrayed by many Orthodox Patriarchs, Bishops, and Pastors. The successors of Saint Sava, instead of defending Orthodoxy, “collaborate in, support, and participate in” the destruction of the Church.

He poses the burning question:

“Why did the Patriarchate of Belgrade (I shall never say: the Serbian Orthodox Church), under Patriarch German, join the heretical union called the ‘World Council of Churches,’ which consists of approximately 233 heresies? And also: Why did the Patriarch of the Orthodox Serbian Church accept the presidency over those 233 heresies?”

The Orthodox conscience, “astonished, wounded, struck to the heart,” cries out: “O horror of horrors! O shame of every shame!”

3. The Stance toward the Patriarchate of Constantinople

Fr. Justin denounces the “neo-papal conduct” of Patriarch Athenagoras, who:

• Denies the unique and all-saving truth of the Orthodox Church

• Recognizes the Roman and other heresies as equal to the Truth

• Recognizes the Roman Pontiff with “demonically anti-ecclesiastical pride”

Prepares a “Great Pan-Orthodox Council” with a “scholastic-Protestant agenda”

4. The Silence of the Hierarchy

Fr. Justin denounces the silence of the Serbian Hierarchy concerning:

• The decision of the Moscow Patriarchate (December 16/29, 1969) regarding communion with Roman Catholics

• The recognition of the Mystery of Matrimony celebrated by a Roman Catholic priest

• Common prayers with heretical dignitaries

• The preaching of the “Ecumenism” of Protestant syncretism by theologians and professors

He refers to the words of Saint Gregory the Theologian: “By silence one betrays God” (PG 35, 1112).

5. True Love versus False Love

Fr. Justin rejects the “sentimental and empty phrases” concerning the “dialogue of love” and the “spirit of Ecumenism.” These phrases are “superficial, untruthful, ignorant, and false,” because, instead of the “love of the Truth” (2 Thess. 2:10) and “truth in love” (Eph. 4:15), they lead to the “dead sea of superficial European man-worship.”

He quotes the words of Saint Maximus the Confessor (PG 91, 465):

“I do not desire that heretics suffer, nor do I rejoice in their evils—God forbid!—but rather I rejoice in their conversion... I desire and counsel only that heretics not be assisted, as heretics, in supporting their foolish belief, but rather that one be stern and uncompromising.”

6. The Rule of Saint Gregory Palamas

Fr. Justin invokes the rule of Saint Gregory Palamas (1345):

“Those who are of the Church of Christ are also of the Truth; and those who are not of the Truth do not belong to the Church of Christ... For we have learned to measure Christianity not by persons, but by the truth and exactitude of the Faith.”

SECTION II

THE SCHISM IN THE SERBIAN CHURCH

Fr. Justin points out that never in its history has the Serbian Church known so dreadful a tragedy: “with two soul-destroying schisms, created during the patriarchate and episcopacy of our present hierarchy.”

Instead of ecclesiastical reconciliation and canonical therapeutic sanctions, the Hierarchy has resorted to “self-justification and the shifting of responsibility onto others.” The result is a “dreadful slaughter of Serbian souls.”

He refers to the words of Saint John Chrysostom:

“Nothing so provokes God’s wrath as the division of the Church... Not even the blood of Martyrdom can atone for such a sin” (PG 62, 85).

SECTION III

“WE OUGHT TO OBEY GOD RATHER THAN MEN”

1. The Pan-Gospel of the Orthodox Church

Fr. Justin presents Acts 5:29 as the “soul and heart of the Orthodox Church,” as her “Pan-Gospel”:

“We ought to obey God rather than men.”

This is “the principle above all principles, the holy of holies above all holy things, the standard above all standards.” It is the essence of all the Holy Dogmas and Canons.

2. The Nature and Value of Authority

Authority comes from God (Rom. 13:1–6), but the authorities are to be obeyed only insofar as they reflect the divine order. When the authorities “become a terror to good works” and persecute the Supreme Good—the Lord Christ—then the Church is obliged to defend the Theanthropos “by sacred evangelical means.”

3. The Evangelical Coexistence of Church and State

The passage “Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s; and unto God the things that are God’s” (Matt. 22:21) establishes the immutable principle: “God is always in the first place, and man in the second.” Everything essential in man—soul and body—belongs to God.

4. Patristic Testimonies

Fr. Justin cites a series of Patristic testimonies:

Saint Basil the Great (before Modestus):

“You cannot confiscate the possessions of one who has nothing... I do not fear exile, for the whole earth is the Lord’s... I do not fear tortures, for death will only bring me closer to God... In all other matters we conduct ourselves humbly and meekly, but when someone seeks to take God and His righteousness away from us, then we regard no one.”

Saint John Chrysostom (before Eudoxia):

“Let the empress rage as much as she wishes, but I shall not cease to speak the truth. For it is better for me to anger men than God; and if I pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ” (Gal. 1:10).

Saint Maximus the Confessor:

“I cannot grieve God by remaining silent concerning those things which God has commanded me to speak and confess... I willingly consent to everything the emperor commands me, provided that it is not contrary to God” (PG 90, 124 and 161).

Saint John Damascene:

“It is not the task of emperors to enact laws for the Church... Emperors are responsible for civil matters, while ecclesiastical affairs belong to the Pastors and Teachers. We shall not remove the eternal boundaries established by our Fathers” (PG 94, 1297).

Saint Symeon the New Theologian (before the Patriarch of Constantinople):

“If you consent to teach us according to the Holy Scriptures, following the Holy Fathers who came before you, we shall receive you as equal to the Apostles... But if you do not wish to teach us in this manner... we can say nothing other than what the disciples of Christ said: We ought to obey God rather than men” (Acts 5:29).

SECTION IV

APOSTASY AND THE NEED TO RETURN TO THE PATRISTIC PATH

1. The Scourge of Apostasy

Fr. Justin observes that “the people of God of Saint Sava are being burned to ashes in the fire of our apostasy.” Hundreds of thousands are “unbaptized, unmarried, and without Communion.” The Serbian Church “has never been more gravely ill than it is today: a sick woman upon her deathbed, in agony.”

2. Ignorance of the Orthodox Faith

Fr. Justin points out that theologians and professors do not know the Patristic path in any field: Dogmatics, Ethics, Ecclesiology, Liturgics, or spiritual life. “And how could these poor children know this Orthodox, Apostolic-Patristic path when we, the pastors of the Church, do not follow it?”

3. The Only Path of Salvation

“Our first and final need today is this: to return to the Orthodox path of the Holy Fathers in every respect and in every sphere of ecclesiastical life and work.”

Only a “pure return to the Theanthropic path of the Holy Apostles and Holy Fathers” can save the Church from the “dead sea of European cultural idolatry.”

4. The Synodikon of Orthodoxy

Fr. Justin concludes by invoking the Synodikon of Orthodoxy:

“Our Holy Fathers, fulfilling the divine commandment... did not conceal the lamp of divine knowledge... What those Holy Fathers rejected, we also reject; and what they cursed and anathematized, we also anathematize... Thus, therefore: as the Prophets beheld, as the Apostles taught, as the Church received, as the Teachers proclaimed, as the universe agreed, as Grace shone forth, as the Truth was demonstrated, as falsehood was banished, as Wisdom spoke boldly, as Christ confirmed—so we think, so we speak, so we preach Christ our True God... This is the Apostolic Faith, this is the Faith of the Fathers, this is the Orthodox Faith! This Faith establishes the universe.”

COMMENTARY ON FR. JUSTIN’S STANCE TOWARD THE HOLY SYNOD

In the relevant letter, the Holy Synod asks Archimandrite Justin to state “whether he would wish and be able to accept some ecclesiastical appointment in Belgrade, and what kind.”

In his response, Justin avoids giving a direct, one-word answer (“yes” or “no”). Instead, he passes over the personal issue and shifts the discussion to the crucial dogmatic problems of the Church. Specifically, he states:

“I do not wish to concern myself with the details of my ‘situation’ and other personal problems. Especially today, when the dreadful, fiery problems of our truly apocalyptic age consume us all... we cannot and must not remain silent.”

His stance, however, remains clear and unequivocal: he indirectly but plainly refuses to concelebrate with a Hierarchy that he considers to have betrayed the Orthodox Faith. His refusal is not stated explicitly in the phrase “I do not concelebrate,” but is inferred from his discourse as a whole.

The Arguments for His Refusal

Accession to the World Council of Churches (WCC): Justin denounces the fact that the Patriarchate of Belgrade “joined the heretical union called the World Council of Churches, which consists of approximately 233 heresies,” and that Patriarch German “accepted the presidency over those 233 heresies.” For him, this development renders all liturgical communion impossible.

Communion and common prayer with heretics: He condemns the decision of the Moscow Patriarchate (1969) “to commune in the Holy Mysteries with public heretics.” At the same time, he points out that the Serbian Hierarchy also “prayed together with heretical dignitaries,” an act entirely contrary to the explicit Apostolic Canons and the Canons of the Council of Laodicea.

The Profanation of the Truth: He characteristically writes that the Bishops “participate... in the profanation of the Truth and in the selling of the sacred things of the Church of God to heretics.”

The principle “We ought to obey God rather than men”: Section III develops the argument that when human ecclesiastical authorities turn against God, the Church is obliged to stand by the truth of God. Justin invokes a series of Patristic testimonies—Saint Basil the Great, Saint John Chrysostom, Saint Maximus the Confessor, Saint John Damascene, and Saint Symeon the New Theologian—who refused to submit to ecclesiastical authorities that had altered the Faith.

The rule of Saint Gregory Palamas: He invokes the Saint’s theological position: “Those who are of the Church of Christ are also of the Truth; and those who are not of the Truth do not belong to the Church of Christ.”

Conclusion

Justin does not choose the words “I do not concelebrate,” since such a formulation would mean that he recognizes the Synod’s question as legitimate. Instead, he rejects the very premise of the question.

His silence concerning the personal issue and his immediate shift to the dogmatic problems constitute his substantive answer: there can be no “ecclesiastical ministry” with one who has joined a union of hundreds of heresies. Just as Saint Maximus the Confessor refused to enter into communion with Pyrrhus, the Monothelite Patriarch of Constantinople, so too Justin refuses all liturgical communion with Patriarch German—not out of personal animosity, but as an act of confession of the Orthodox Faith.

 

Greek source: https://fdathanasiou-parakatathiki.blogspot.com/2026/07/18941979-20.html

 

Sunday, July 19, 2026

A Necessary Distinction between Personal Grace and the Grace of the Priesthood

Andrei Mitocaru

 

 

In these times of spiritual confusion, one of the greatest temptations is to judge the validity of the Holy Mysteries through the prism of the morality of the one who performs them. Often, through a lack of theological discernment, a grave confusion is made between the personal grace of the man who wears the cassock and the objective grace of the priesthood received at the moment of ordination. In this regard, some time ago I posted an article in which Saint Nectarios of Aegina explains very precisely that the validity of the Mysteries does not depend upon the moral state of the minister.

There are voices that maintain that a dogmatic error or a heresy preached by a cleric would instantly affect the validity of the Holy Mysteries, even before he has been judged. From a canonical standpoint, however, heresy—although it is the gravest sin against the truth—does not automatically and mechanically annul the operation of the grace received at ordination. The Church does not act impulsively, but according to order and discernment. Until the minister has been heard, questioned, and officially condemned by an ecclesiastical tribunal, in accordance with all the strict procedures prescribed by the Apostolic and Ecumenical Canons, the Mysteries celebrated by him remain valid for the faithful.

In order to understand these complex procedures correctly, we need discernment acquired through a profound study of the Church’s juridical tradition. Just as, when you undergo medical tests, you need a specialist physician who knows how to interpret them correctly—because an erroneous diagnosis based on personal intuitions can be fatal—so it is also in the ecclesial sphere. In the Church, personal opinions or well-intentioned impulses of the moment do not automatically become dogma or canonical norm. Not everyone has the right to interpret the canons according to his own pleasure or his own sense of justice.

In order not to fall into the error of judging matters according to our own impulses, it is salutary to heed the voice of the great canonists of the Orthodox Church. One of the most distinguished authorities in this regard is Bishop Nikodim Milaš, universally recognized as one of the foremost specialists in ecclesiastical law. In his writings, he addresses with surgical precision this very fundamental distinction: the radical difference between the unworthiness or personal sins of the minister and the objective, indelible character of the grace received at ordination. His clear and illuminating words, which we reproduce in conclusion, put an end to all speculation and show us how the Church truly thinks [1]:

Irrespective of these rules, this is also demonstrated by the relationship between ordination and spiritual authority.

According to the canonical teaching of the Orthodox Church concerning the Mystery of the Priesthood, just as important as its spiritual aspect—that is, the communication of divine grace to a particular person—is its juridical aspect, namely, the spiritual authority through which this grace is communicated. This authority is a public right, and when it is transferred to a person, the transfer is effected through a solemn act of public law.

So long as a particular person possesses this authority, he may exercise it fully, and everything he does by virtue of that authority has legal effect, irrespective of the fact that he himself may be corrupt and unworthy of it. The latter circumstance does not deprive him of his authority, but may merely serve as grounds for that authority to be taken away from him. Again, this authority can be removed only through a solemn act of public law, by virtue of which it ceases, together with all its legal prerogatives; and, above all, any act performed by him thereafter is devoid of efficacy and of any legal significance.

By virtue of this, if a bishop were to preach heresy or organize a schismatic body, he would not thereby be deprived of the right to ordain; but if such a bishop were condemned by a council for that same offense or for any other grave offense and were ultimately deposed from his office, he would lose all his hierarchical rights, because he would lose the grace of the priesthood and the right to be the mediator of that grace to others—that is, he would no longer be able to ordain anyone. For deposition, that is, definitive expulsion (παντελής αφορισμός), is the canonical act by which a person loses the priestly authority that had belonged to him until then and is reduced to the state of a layman, as he was before ordination.

The words of the great canonist Nikodim Milaš put an end to every misunderstanding: the validity of the Holy Mysteries does not rest upon the human virtue of the priest, but upon the inviolate power of Christ, Who acts through the visible institution of the Church. Just as we cannot diagnose ourselves by reading medical test results according to our own intuition, so too we have no right to make ourselves judges of grace and to declare the Mysteries invalid on the basis of our own indignation or private interpretations of the canons.

Let us therefore retain this salutary distinction: personal sin and even dogmatic error gravely affect the soul and the personal grace of the minister; nevertheless, the grace of his priesthood remains operative for the faithful until the moment when the Church officially and synodally decides upon his removal. Until then, Christ remains the One Who baptizes, the One Who absolves, and the One Who offers Himself in sacrifice upon the Holy Table, protecting His flock from the errors of His ministers.

 

1. In The Canons of the Orthodox Church, the 1934 Romanian edition, I did not find this commentary. It is, however, available in Russian on the website below. I have no explanation as to why the commentary is more extensive in the Russian version.

https://azbyka.ru/otechnik/Nikodim_Milash/pravila-pomestnyh-soborov-s-tolkovanijami/#0_65

 

Romanian source: https://rezistentaortodoxa.org/2026/06/25/har-personal-preoti/

 

Blessed Elder Philotheos Zervakos: Humanity Pays the Price for Sin

 

 

Precisely today, humanity, and Europe in particular, is paying the price of sin, of disobedience toward God, of the transgression and contempt of the Divine commandments—and Greece even more so.

God gave laws, commandments, and rules through His Holy Apostles that Christians should fast on Wednesdays, Fridays, and during the Forty-day fasts. Men, however, having disregarded God and treated His commandments with contempt, ate without conscience and without discrimination; and some who were utterly impious did so even during Holy Week—not only laymen, but also certain clergymen. Now God has become angry with us, and we fast against our will, not only from meat, fish, cheese, milk, and oil, but also from bread, legumes, and fruit. Yet it is not only fasting that men have treated with contempt; with few exceptions, they have generally become contemners of all the commandments of God. Impiety, unbelief, blasphemy, avarice, injustice, hypocrisy, deceit, falsehood, slander, and especially licentiousness have multiplied exceedingly and abounded beyond measure.

For all these sins, the all-good and greatly compassionate God bore with us for a long time, giving men time for repentance; but men disregarded the riches of the Lord’s goodness, forbearance, and longsuffering, supposing that the Lord was asleep or that He did not see, while some, utterly foolish, imagined that God did not exist and turned aside from the straight path. But God is everywhere present; He sees all things, knows all things, even the hidden things of the heart, and chastens those who sin and transgress His Divine commandments. Many times He is slow to punish, but He never forgets…

All the afflictions, distresses, privations, and fears that humanity experiences are the wages of sin. And if there were not also a few righteous and elect persons, perhaps God would cast down fire, as upon Sodom and Gomorrah, and burn up the world. I hope that sufferings will become lessons, that humanity will come to its senses and repent; and then the wrath of the Lord will cease, peace, tranquillity, and happiness will prevail throughout the whole world, and there will be one flock and one shepherd. May we be deemed worthy for this to happen in our days…

 

Greek source: Πνευματικές Συμβουλές και Υποθήκες, Elder Philotheos Zervakos, Vol. 1, Orthodox Kypseli, Thessaloniki, 1997, pp. 39-41.


How Can We Be Saved?

Archpriest Gregory Dyachenko (+1903)

 

 

Many people sometimes say: “How can we be saved? We are worldly people, sinners; all our lives we bustle about and sin: cares and concerns have overwhelmed us.” It is sad, brethren, to hear such words from an Orthodox Christian. Pagans who lived before the coming of Jesus Christ into the world, who did not know His teaching, had not been baptized into the Orthodox faith, and had not partaken of the Holy Mysteries, might have spoken in this way. But we, the beloved children of Christ, ought neither to think nor to speak thus, for the path to salvation has been shown to us. It is spoken of, for example, in the Gospel that you heard today during the Liturgy. Let us read it once more and reflect upon what we have read:

“Therefore whoever confesses Me before men, him I also will confess before My Father who is in heaven; but whoever denies Me before men, him I also will deny before My Father who is in heaven” (Matt. 10:32–33).

Do you hear? The Lord requires of the one who seeks salvation that he be His confessor before men. But what does this mean? To understand this, listen to how the Holy Apostle Paul speaks of the same thing: “If you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you shall be saved” (Rom. 10:9). This, first of all, is what it means to be a confessor of Christ: not only to believe in Him in your soul, but also openly to declare with your lips that you believe in Him; not to conceal your faith from others, not to be ashamed of it, but boldly and openly to show yourself to be a Christian. We speak plainly and fearlessly that our earthly fatherland is Orthodox Russia. In the same plain and fearless manner, confess that you believe also in another Fatherland—the Heavenly One—and that you walk under the protection of the Lord who is in heaven. Yet this alone is not enough to be a true confessor of Jesus Christ. He Himself said elsewhere: “Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ shall enter the Kingdom of Heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven” (Matt. 7:21). Therefore verbal confession alone is not enough for the Lord—He also expects from us confession in deed, so that all our actions may accord with His will, and so that we may likewise openly and boldly show ourselves everywhere and always to be Christians by our deeds. Judge for yourselves: if one of you had a son who praised his father with words but offended him by his actions, would not his father say to him, “My son, your affectionate words are not enough for me; prove by your deeds that you love me”? So too we say: “We are an Orthodox people; we are not Jews or Tatars,” but we must demonstrate by our deeds that we are an Orthodox people, enlightened by the light of Christ’s gospel. A living example for us in this regard is the holy confessors of Christ. They lived long ago, in those centuries when the Church of Christ was still persecuted by pagan emperors. These pagan emperors searched everywhere for Christians and brought them before their tribunals. “Who are you?” they asked the Christian. “What is your name?” “I am a Christian,” the holy champion of the faith of Christ courageously replied, and fearlessly went to the most cruel tortures and to death itself for his Orthodox faith. This is what it means to be a confessor of Christ.

“I also will confess him before My Father who is in heaven.” Such is the reward that the Lord promises to His confessors. He Himself will bear witness before His Heavenly Father to the love of His confessors for Him. For love He promises love; for our earthly confession, His heavenly confession. If in earthly life you sometimes say, “You may ask anyone about me; everyone will tell you that I am an honest man”; if a servant proudly displays a written commendation given to him by his master, should we not all the more seek and desire heavenly testimony concerning ourselves—the testimony of Jesus Christ regarding our virtues before His Father who is in heaven? And if we believe human promises, can we doubt the promise of the Lord? “Where I am,” He said, “there My servant will be also” (cf. John 14:3); “I go to prepare a place for you” (cf. John 14:2). That is why we should never lose heart if good is repaid with evil, truth with falsehood, or love with malice. Only remember always that we have in heaven a true Witness of our good, who sees everything and hears everything, and who has prepared blessed dwellings for those who love Him. The holy martyrs who shed their blood in His name placed their hope in Him, and He wondrously helped them during their sufferings. Recall the sufferings of the Holy Great Martyr Panteleimon. He was thrown to wild beasts, but they fell at his feet; he was cast into the sea, yet he walked upon it as upon dry land. The Holy Martyr Boniface had molten tin poured down his throat by his tormentors, yet he remained unharmed; he was thrown into a cauldron of boiling pitch, yet he emerged from it safe and sound. Thus even on earth the Lord glorifies His confessors. What joy, then, awaits them in the Kingdom of Heaven!

But just as one may confess the Lord by word and deed, so one may deny Him by word and deed. If a man does not live according to the commandments; if foul language never leaves his lips; if he indulges excessively in wine; if he sows discord within his family; if he drives the poor away from his windows; if he oppresses orphans—then all such people deny Christ, and He will deny them before His Heavenly Father. But consider what could be more grievous than this. If it is bitter for a man, even a criminal, when all people reject him and send him away in chains to Siberia and beyond, how much more bitter will it be for us when the Lord Jesus Christ renounces us? What shall we feel when we hear His terrible voice: “Depart from Me, you cursed, into the everlasting fire” (Matt. 25:41)? We shall stand before the Lord and Judge, tormented by conscience, with all the evil we have done set before our eyes, down to the smallest detail. A fire caused by arson will reveal who the arsonist was; a theft in a church will reveal the thief; if someone accepted a false oath for money, to the ruin of an innocent person, that too will be revealed. Every evil deed will be exposed before the whole world to our shame. Then the gates of Paradise will be closed to us, and the torments of hell will receive us. Let us therefore strive to amend our lives while the sentence has not yet been pronounced and the eternal gates have not yet been closed behind us.

“He who loves father or mother more than Me is not worthy of Me; and he who loves son or daughter more than Me is not worthy of Me” (Matt. 10:37).

Here is yet another commandment that the Lord gives. For us He must be dearer than what is dearest to our hearts: children, wives, and parents. Love Him more than you love your family; think of Him more than of your family; submit to His laws more than you submit to the feelings of parental and family affection. Listen to how holy people fulfilled this commandment.

You have probably heard that the relics of Saint Theodosius the Abbot repose in the Kiev Lavra. When this Saint was still a youth, he already loved God more than anything in the world. His mother loved him dearly, made beautiful clothes for him, and tried to feed him the finest foods. But, to his mother's sorrow, he gave his clothes to the poor, fasted, and wore chains. In vain she urged him to associate and play with children his own age—he knew only the road to the church. Several times, to his mother's alarm, he disappeared from home, departing with pilgrims for monasteries. But his mother would find him and bring him back. At last he received the monastic tonsure in the Kiev Caves Monastery. There too his mother found him and long implored him to return home, but the Saint refused even to see her, having loved Christ more than her.

You may think: “But a saint could overcome himself in this way; how can we possibly stand as firmly?” Yet the saints were people just like us. They had the same weak bodies, endured greater temptations from Satan than we do, and at times even fell into sins, just as we sinners do. For example, the Venerable Erasmus, another Saint of God from Kiev, had formerly been a merchant. Later he entered a monastery and devoted all his wealth to the adornment of the monastery church. But the devil began to suggest to him that he had wasted his riches to no purpose, that it would have been better to distribute them to the poor. Erasmus fell into despondency and even became seriously ill. But the Lord had mercy on him: in a dream the Venerable Anthony and Theodosius appeared to him, together with the Most Holy Theotokos, and assured him that he had not used his wealth in vain, but for the benefit of his soul. So you see that the saints also fell, just as we do; only they wept over their sins and did not remain indifferent as we do. And God, seeing their sorrow and repentance, manifested His power in them. Therefore we should not say: “Those were holy people; we can never attain to them.” Such despondency is inspired by the devil. No, with God's help we too can accomplish much.

Do not allow your heart to grow cold. Struggle against the temptations of the devil, call upon the Lord for help, cleanse yourself more often from sins through confession, and nourish your soul with the Body and Blood of Christ—and then you will become an imitator of the saints.

The Venerable Theodosius placed his love for Christ above his love for his mother. In our own lives there are often occasions when we too should follow his example. Let me point out first an ordinary situation that may seem hardly worth mentioning. Your children, while playing outside, quarrel with the children of your neighbor. Has it never happened that you, as a father, or you, as a mother, without first looking into the matter, immediately rush upon the neighbor's children, scold them in anger, and perhaps even rebuke their parents: “Just look at the rascals they are raising,” and so forth? What can come of this? A quarrel between you, the parents. But if you wish to act as a Christian, then calmly reconcile the children, examine their dispute, and if your own children are at fault, instruct them, require them to ask forgiveness from those they have wronged, and correct them. This will not be a humiliation either for you or for them; it will simply be justice, the fulfillment of God's law, and in accordance with Christ's commandment you will have preferred love for Him above love for your children. Perhaps you think this is a small matter, unworthy of attention, but consider that always indulging children means corrupting them; secondly, disputes such as these often give rise to quarrels among parents; and thirdly, it is from such small things that our entire life is formed.

I think you have seen how beads are strung on a thread: one small bead after another is threaded onto it, and in the end a large necklace is formed. So it is with our lives: day after day passes through countless little incidents, and blessed is the one who watches over his soul in all these small things.

Yet there are also not infrequently more serious situations in which love for God must be placed above family affection. Your father, your brother, or another close relative has fallen, through human weakness, into wrongdoing and asks you to testify that he is innocent; or he is selling some object to an inexperienced person and asks you to praise it; and how many similar situations arise in life! Do not become accomplices of sin and deceit. Remember that the Son of God loved us to such an extent that He did not spare Himself for our salvation; and therefore He requires from us a love that is whole and undivided—with all our soul and with all our mind.

“And he who does not take up his cross and follow Me is not worthy of Me” (Matt. 10:38).

To be a confessor of Christ means to show oneself everywhere by word and deed to be a keeper of His law; it means to love Him above everything in the world. But this is often difficult and painful. These very sorrows, which are always inseparable from a virtuous life, are what the Lord compares to the cross that a man bears upon himself. In the time of Jesus Christ, criminals were crucified upon crosses. Christ Himself was crucified among criminals. The cross was then an instrument of shame, and carrying it was both humiliating and burdensome, since crosses were made very heavy. For the follower of Jesus Christ, it is necessary to overcome love of self; sometimes even love for family, parents, and children. It is not uncommon for a Christian to incur the hostility of neighbors or even of an entire community; or to forgo an obvious advantage, even great wealth that could easily have been acquired by dishonest means. Mockery, reproaches, persecutions—all these must be endured. One must carry upon his shoulders this sorrowful cross in order to remain a confessor of Christ.

But as the Teacher is, so also should His disciples be. Jesus Christ, though guilty of no sin, endured for our sake spitting, beatings, blows, and crucifixion upon the Cross. We, His followers, must likewise courageously endure temporal afflictions for His name's sake. “Through many tribulations we must enter the Kingdom of God” (Acts 14:22). But will we have the strength to bear these sorrows? you may ask. Brothers, the Lord sends every trial according to our strength, for He is longsuffering and abundant in mercy. He does not desire that the affliction He sends should crush a person’s strength as a hammer shatters glass, but rather that, by enduring sorrows, a person may grow stronger in love for God, just as iron is strengthened when it is forged. And by overcoming temptations and courageously bearing afflictions, we shall find them increasingly light, thus proving true in ourselves the words of the Lord: “My yoke is easy, and My burden is light” (Matt. 11:30). Remember the story of the righteous Job. At first the Lord struck him by taking away part of his possessions: raiders carried off his oxen and donkeys. Job endured this loss courageously. Then further losses followed: his sheep and camels perished, and Job endured this as well. Then his children died, yet even then Job did not murmur against God. Finally, a terrible disease afflicted his body, and at the same time his companion in life, his wife, lost heart, leaving him alone in his struggle with grief. Yet Job remained steadfast in his love for God. The same happens in our lives. Misfortune may come upon a person: a fire, a failed harvest, theft, or some other calamity. But do not lose heart—this is the hand of God. God sees that you are able to bear all these things; otherwise the righteous Lord would not have tested you in this way, but would have sent a trial suited to your strength.

Then Peter answered and said to Him, “See, we have left all and followed You. Therefore what shall we have?” Jesus said to them, “Assuredly I say to you, that in the regeneration, when the Son of Man sits on the throne of His glory, you who have followed Me will also sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel” (Matt. 19:27–28).

Up to this point we have spoken about what the Lord requires of us; now He points to the reward we shall receive if we are His confessors. It was the Apostle Peter who asked Him about this reward, and therefore the Lord first speaks of the reward of the apostles. He promises them great glory and honor: when He comes to judge the world, they too will judge the universe together with Him. Great is the reward, but great also were the labors borne by the holy apostles! When the Lord called them, He promised them no earthly joy—neither wealth, nor human honor, nor rest—but rather labor, afflictions, persecutions, sufferings, and death. “In the world you will have tribulation” (John 16:33), He told them; “If they persecuted Me, they will also persecute you” (John 15:20). “The time is coming that whoever kills you will think that he offers God service” (John 16:2). Yet the apostles were not afraid of the world. They left everything behind, because they loved Christ more than their wives and children. They followed Him and courageously endured every sorrow and persecution for His name's sake. As with them, so with us: a great reward awaits us in heaven if we walk in their footsteps. Listen to what the Lord says next.

“And everyone who has left houses or brothers or sisters or father or mother or wife or children or lands, for My name's sake, shall receive a hundredfold, and inherit eternal life” (Matt. 19:29).

Perhaps you may think that, according to these words of the Lord, one can be saved only by entering a monastery and renouncing everything—family, possessions, acquaintances, and the like. But this is not how we should understand them. The path to the Kingdom of Heaven is one, yet each person walks it in his own way. These words of the Lord can be fulfilled while living in the world, within a family, and possessing property. Each of us undertakes only the work that he is capable of performing. So it is in the spiritual life: take upon yourself only those labors and vows that are within your strength. The Lord Himself teaches this: “Not all can receive this saying, but only those to whom it has been given... He who is able to receive it, let him receive it” (Matt. 19:12). That is, whoever recognizes himself to be strong enough in spirit to bear all the labors of the celibate life may take such a vow upon himself; but from one who is unable to do so, it will not be required. Live in the world, live in a family, acquire possessions—but do not imitate those people who forget God because of these things. There are people who know neither fasts nor feast days; there are those who, when the church bell rings for the Divine Liturgy, set out for work instead. But you must place God's law above everything else. Do not concern yourself with excessive gain—the Lord feeds even the birds. Love God, as we have already said, more than wife and children. Visit God's house more frequently, read the Holy Gospel more often, do not begrudge alms to the poor. By purifying your soul through repentance and nourishing it with the Body and Blood of Christ, you will fulfill the Lord's words by preferring love for Him above love for the world.

One can be saved everywhere, and one can perish everywhere. David was saved while seated upon a royal throne; Judas was an apostle, and he perished. The Great Martyr George the Trophy-Bearer and the Martyr John the Soldier were soldiers; Saints Vladimir, Boris, and Gleb were princes; the Righteous Philaret the Merciful was a farmer—all of them were laypeople, and they were saved. Saint Macarius of Egypt was a great desert ascetic and a saint of God, yet once the Lord revealed to him that two women living in the world surpassed him in virtue. Macarius went to them in order to learn from them. Having found them, he asked what good works they performed that had so pleased God. They answered that they were sisters-in-law who had desired to enter a monastery, but their husbands would not allow it; therefore they had resolved to serve their husbands until death, and they never quarreled or engaged in idle talk. Thus, even while living in the world, one can become a great ascetic.

“But many who are first will be last, and the last first” (Matt. 19:30).

We shall receive a hundredfold in heaven for what we endure on earth, and this reward will be given without distinction to all who fulfill the law of Christ. On earth there are rich and poor, noble and common, educated and uneducated. But beyond the grave there are only the righteous and sinners. There the rich man, to whom everyone flattered on earth, goes to hell, while the beggar despised on earth rejoices in the Kingdom of Heaven. Truly, we shall take nothing there with us except the good and evil we have done.

This is the path that leads to the Kingdom of Heaven. Be everywhere and always a Christian not merely in name but in deed, and you will be saved. The true Christian loves God above all things in the world and gladly bears the Cross of Christ. Rank does not save; only a virtuous life saves, and such a life will be rewarded a hundredfold in heaven for all the righteous without distinction. May God grant that the doors of His glorious Kingdom may not be shut against us.

Parental Love for Their Children Through Love for God

“He who loves son or daughter more than Me is not worthy of Me” (Matt. 10:37). Parental love for children often, without any intention on the part of father and mother and unnoticed even by themselves, loses its Christian character. While exercising the rights of lawful love for their children, it can at the same time become hostility toward God and His holy law, making Christian parents with such feelings toward their children unworthy and deceitful servants of our Lord Jesus Christ. To love a son merely out of natural affection, without paying attention to who is growing up and maturing under the shelter of parental love—whether an honorable man or a libertine, a faithful servant of his country or a rebellious agitator and enemy of all order, a true Christian or a man without faith and good convictions, a defender of the gospel and truth or a betrayer of the faith and a traitor to the truth—is such love worthy of a Christian father? Is it the kind of love that the duty of a Christian father and the clear law of the gospel require of him? No. This is to love only the flesh and blood of one's son, while failing to love his soul and rational life. It is an animal love, not a human one, and still less a Christian love, which acts according to the spirit of Christ's love and the law of the gospel. Such love is contrary to love for the Lord and to the demands of His holy law; such love is enmity against God. Amid examples of this kind of paternal affection, it is refreshing, for its rebuke and correction, to encounter in the history of the ancient Christians examples of true parental love—parents who selflessly sacrificed every natural attachment to their children for the sake of love for the Lord and His holy faith whenever the former became sinful in relation to the obligations of the latter.

Here is one such example. The apostasy of the Roman Emperor Julian found many followers among Christians who were weak in faith and fainthearted. One such follower of the apostate was a young man, the son of a noble citizen of the city of Beroea, a high-ranking state official who was pious and devoted to the Christian faith. When the son revealed to him his unbelief and his fall, the pious father, for the sake of Jesus Christ, spared neither his son's honor nor his name nor even his own affection for him: he deprived him of all rights of inheritance and publicly disowned him.

The ambitious young man went to the apostate emperor seeking his protection, defense against his father, and rewards and honors for renouncing Christianity in order to please the emperor, an enemy and persecutor of the name of Christ. Julian, who dreamed of converting the whole world back to the ancient pagan idolatry that was then in decline, was greatly pleased by every example of apostasy and spared no rewards or favors to increase the number of people like himself. He welcomed the young man, reassured him, and promised through his own mediation to restore his father's favor and his inheritance rights.

Upon arriving in Beroea, Julian invited many of the city's distinguished citizens to dine with him, including the pious father and his apostate son. During the meal Julian addressed the father of the rejected son with these words: “It seems to me unjust to use force against people who think differently and to compel someone against his will to adopt another's opinions. Therefore, do not force your son to follow your teaching when he does not wish to do so. After all, I do not compel you to follow mine, though it would be very easy for me to do so!” “Are you speaking, O Emperor, about that lawless man who preferred falsehood to truth?” the pious father replied, filled with indignation against his apostate son.

There was such unconquerable zeal in the Christian father's defense of the holy faith of Christ, and at the same time such fearless indignation at his son's apostasy, even though the son stood under the protection of the emperor himself, that the traitor to faith and conscience could find no boldness within himself to defend falsehood against truth. Realizing his own helplessness before the holy zeal of Christianity's defender, Julian assumed an appearance of feigned gentleness and, turning the matter into a joke, said to the young man: “I myself will take care of you, since I could not persuade your father to do so.”

Indeed, the father of the young apostate did not abandon his righteous anger toward his lawless son. Neither the flatteries nor the threats of the wicked emperor had any effect upon him. For him there was nothing more fearful than the judgment of the Lord Jesus: “He who loves son or daughter more than Me is not worthy of Me.”

One Can Please God in Every Calling

Many people, especially among the common folk, complain that with their occupations it is impossible to please God. Such a complaint is unjustified. The Lord God, in His boundless mercy, calls everyone to salvation, provided only that there is a desire for it on our part. The lives of the saints contain many examples of this.

Many are probably familiar with the Holy Unmercenary Martyrs Florus and Laurus, who lived in the fourth century. They were simple stonemasons, yet their profession did not prevent them from living pious lives and benefiting others. The Lord rewarded these laboring brothers with the gift of working miracles. In a neighboring province, it was decided to build a magnificent pagan temple, and the governor sent Saints Florus and Laurus there because they were known to all as the finest craftsmen in their trade. While they were cutting and shaping stone, the son of the chief pagan priest approached them. Suddenly, a fragment of stone flew into his eye. The injury was so severe that it threatened to cost the boy his sight. When the father angrily cried out and reproached them, the Saints calmly replied that they would heal the innocent child’s eye if his father would allow the boy to stay with them for a time. With the father's consent, they took the boy to their humble hut, prayed for him throughout the night, and instructed him in the Christian faith. In the morning they made the sign of the Cross over him. Immediately the child's eye was restored, and he could see as before. This miracle affected the priest so deeply that he and all his household believed in the One True God and joined the Orthodox Church. For their miracles and virtuous lives, the holy unmercenary physicians Florus and Laurus were granted the crown of martyrdom—they were thrown into a dry well and buried alive under earth. Many years later, the bodies of the Holy Martyrs were found incorrupt and were transferred to Constantinople. The Lord granted their relics the power of healing.

Here is another remarkable man—Saint Mark of the Caves. The most astonishing thing about him was the simplicity of his ascetic struggle. He did not lead a lofty contemplative life. His occupation was very ordinary: he dug the earth. Living in a cave, Mark dug out many caves with his own hands and carried away the soil on his shoulders, laboring day and night for the Lord. He dug many graves for the burial of the brethren and accepted no payment for it, except what someone might voluntarily offer, and even that he distributed to the poor. Through such labor Mark attained a high degree of spiritual perfection, one achieved by only a few. He is the most convincing example of how, in the midst of physical labor, the soul can advance spiritually when the spirit labors for the Lord, drives away all impurity from the soul, fills it with holy thoughts and sighs, and carefully guards it through humility and meekness.

One Saint, in order more surely to attain the Kingdom of Heaven, became a stonemason. This is what we know about him from the life of Saint Ephraim, governor of the city of Antioch. Ephraim had been entrusted with rebuilding the city after an earthquake. Many laborers were hired, and the work proceeded energetically, but among all the day laborers one man stood out: his clothing was worn and tattered, his face gaunt, and he worked more diligently than anyone else. One day Saint Ephraim saw a vision in which a pillar of fire rose above this laborer while he slept. Astonished by the vision, the blessed Ephraim asked the remarkable worker who he was, from what city he came, and what his name was. The man replied, “I am a poor resident of Antioch and support myself by daily labor.” Not believing him, Saint Ephraim urged him to reveal the truth. “Believe me,” said the governor, “I will not let you go until you tell me the whole truth.” Unable to conceal himself any longer, the supposed laborer replied: “I was a bishop, but for the Lord's sake I left my episcopate and came here to a foreign land, where I work and earn my daily bread through my labor.”

These examples clearly show that no occupation—provided it is honorable—prevents a person from pleasing God. Therefore, it is a poor excuse to say that one cannot please God while engaged in difficult labor. On the contrary, in such labors it is easier to be saved than to perish. Labor is a great and good thing; labor is a blessing, while idleness is a misfortune for man. “There is nothing,” says Saint John Chrysostom, “truly nothing in human affairs that idleness does not ruin. Water, if it stands still, becomes corrupted; but if it flows, it retains its nature. Iron, if left unused, becomes covered with rust; but when it is forged into something useful, it benefits others and shines like silver.” It is not without reason that people say, “God loves labor.” Why does God love labor? Because labor leads to goodness and happiness, whereas idleness—the mother of all vices—destroys a person and makes him miserable. The Apostle Paul says that “if anyone is not willing to work, neither shall he eat” (2 Thess. 3:10). Yet while you labor, ask God to bless your undertaking, and when it is completed, give thanks again to God the Creator and Benefactor, for every perfect gift and every good gift comes from Him. When you are free from work—on a Sunday or feast day, for example—go to the church of God. There you will receive both sanctification and enlightenment for your soul. And when you return home, do not give yourself over to revelry, drunkenness, quarrels, or, even worse, fighting. If you fear being bored, read some spiritually beneficial book. If you spend your time in this way, you will rise the next day with renewed strength and easily return to your ordinary labor. Is it not possible to please God while living in such a manner? Of course it is. Our righteous saints are living proof of this.

Therefore, no occupation, however humble it may seem, can prevent us from pleasing God if there is a sincere desire for it in our souls. Follow the command of Christ's Apostle: “Let each one remain in the calling in which God has assigned him, and in which the Lord has called him” (cf. 1 Cor. 7:17).

All Christians Are Called to Holiness

If a citizen or a peasant were told: “Do this and that; become a close servant of the king, who grants you the right to this privilege and calls you to it,” with what eagerness and zeal would he undertake the tasks required of him, even if the undertaking were difficult and the labor prolonged! But now the herald of the will of the Heavenly King says to us, who are unworthy even in the smallest degree of citizenship in that Kingdom: “Be holy”—be morally holy, and afterward you shall be blessed; live piously and virtuously, and you shall become close to the Heavenly King, who permits you not only to draw near to Him but even to abide in Him, and who Himself desires not only to draw near to you but to dwell within you. What then? How is this calling received? Do all—or at least many—follow it with readiness, fervent zeal, unflagging devotion, and complete self-surrender? Do we not more often think and say: “How can we be saints? We are sinful people; it is enough if somehow we are saved through repentance.”

“How can we be saints?” But have we considered what we shall be and what will become of us if we do not strive to become holy? There are higher degrees of holiness in which especially chosen and grace-filled souls shine brightly, but holiness in general is not merely a special distinction among Christians, commendable for some to possess while others can easily do without it. According to the apostolic teaching, everyone called by the Holy God into the Kingdom of God—that is, every Christian—must find in this very calling and in the thought of the God who called him both a law, a duty, and a motive compelling him to be, or to become, holy. “As He who called you is holy, you also be holy in all your conduct, because it is written: ‘Be holy, for I am holy’” (1 Pet. 1:15–16). If, however, you live without striving and without hope of becoming holy, then you do not live in accordance with the Holy One who called you, nor do you correspond to the dignity of those called by God and made sons of His covenant—you are Christians in name only. Where such a life leads can be seen from another apostolic saying: “Pursue peace with all men, and holiness, without which no one will see the Lord” (Heb. 12:14). More plainly: have peace with all, possess holiness; for without peace and without holiness no one will see the Lord, that is, no one will attain eternal blessedness.

Therefore, if we carelessly and thoughtlessly assume that we are not meant to be saints, we are in effect writing our own sentence—that we shall not see the Lord and shall remain strangers to eternal blessedness.

“We are sinful people,” some say. This seems undeniable. For, on the contrary, “If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us” (1 John 1:8). But if we call ourselves sinners without contrition of heart, without hatred of sin, with indifference, slyly implying that everyone else must admit the same thing and therefore there is no shame in confessing it and no danger in remaining after the confession exactly what we were before it, then such an acknowledgment of sinfulness will certainly not lead to holiness. In that case, even while speaking the truth that we are sinners, we deceive ourselves, because there is no truth in our hearts and in our lives, though our lips may confess our sinfulness. “This is a faithful saying and worthy of all acceptance, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners” (1 Tim. 1:15). But we deceive ourselves if we imagine that we shall be saved while remaining the same kind of sinners. Christ saves sinners by giving them the means to become holy.

“We shall somehow be saved through repentance,” people say. Yes, repentance belongs among the means of salvation that Christ gives to sinners when He proclaims: “Repent and believe in the gospel” (Mark 1:15). But if we think we can somehow repent and somehow be saved, then we judge too lightly a matter of the highest importance. Would a servant please his master if he performed his work carelessly rather than as well as possible? Certainly not. How much less will a person please God if he performs the work of God—which is our salvation—in a careless manner. Moreover, the perfect teacher of repentance, John the Baptist, says that true repentance requires something further. “Bear fruits worthy of repentance” (Matt. 3:8), he says. Repentance clears the soil of the heart of thorns, cultivates it, and softens it; faith sows within it the heavenly seed; the growth of this new plant is the keeping of the commandments and the doing of good works; its blossom is spiritual inner illumination; and its ripe, perfect fruit is holiness. Wheat must reach maturity before it can be gathered into the granary. A person must attain holiness before he can be brought into the Kingdom of Heaven.

Indeed, if we were required to attain holiness by merely human and natural powers, it would be reasonable to say that it lies beyond our ability. But when we possess the grace of God, which goes before us, enlightens us, strengthens us, assists us, and guards us, no one should lose hope of attaining that for which “the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ... chose us in Him before the foundation of the world.” And He chose us “that we should be holy and blameless before Him in love” (Eph. 1:3–4).

Examples of the Intercession of the Saints

Who among you, Orthodox Christians, doubts that the saints of God can obtain from God this or that gift for us sinners? Here is the teaching of the Eastern Church: “We invoke the saints as mediators between God and ourselves, that they may pray to Him for us. We do not invoke them as gods, but as His servants, who glorify, praise, and worship Him. We seek their help not because they can aid us by their own power, but because through their intercession they obtain for us grace from God... Although the saints do not of themselves know or understand our prayers, they know and hear them through divine revelation... Therefore we rightly honor them and seek through them help from God... We do not render to them divine worship, but entreat them as our brethren and fellow servants, that they may obtain help for us from God and intercede for us before Him.” Nor are our prayers to the saints of God sometimes offered in vain. Here are examples.

In the Life of the Holy Apostle Bartholomew it is related that Saint Joseph the Hymnographer held the memory of the Apostle Bartholomew in special honor. He obtained a portion of the Apostle’s relics, built a church in his monastery in honor of the Apostle, and placed the relics in the newly constructed temple. He was often granted the grace of seeing the Apostle in dreams. Saint Joseph desired to adorn the feast of the Apostle with special hymns, but he did not know whether this would be pleasing to Saint Bartholomew. Therefore he began to pray fervently to God and to the Apostle that he might receive an answer concerning it. Forty days of earnest and tearful prayer passed, and on the eve of the feast of Saint Bartholomew, Joseph saw him in the altar clothed in white garments. The Apostle drew back the altar curtain and called Joseph to him. When he approached, Saint Bartholomew took the Gospel from the Holy Table, placed it upon Joseph’s breast, and said: “May the right hand of the Almighty God bless you, and may the waters of heavenly wisdom flow upon your tongue. May your heart become the dwelling place of the Holy Spirit, and may your hymns delight the whole world.” Having said this, the Apostle disappeared. Filled with inexpressible joy, Saint Joseph began composing church hymns and canons. He composed not only canons in honor of the Holy Apostle Bartholomew, but also in honor of the Mother of God, Saint Nicholas, and other saints, for which he received the title “the Hymnographer.”

Here is another example from the life of Saint Theodore of Sykeon. Once this Saint fell gravely ill and despaired of life itself. He already saw the holy angels who had come for his soul, and therefore he wept and lamented, considering himself unprepared for death. Above his head hung an icon of the Holy Unmercenaries Kosmas and Damian. They appeared to him in a dream and, feeling his pulse, conversed for a long time with one another, as though uncertain of the outcome of his illness. Then the holy physicians asked him: “Brother, why do you weep and grieve?” “Because,” answered the Saint, “I have not sufficiently repented before God, nor have I properly ordered my flock.” Then the Holy Unmercenaries asked him: “Would you like us to entreat God to prolong your life?” The sick man replied: “If you do this, you will become the cause of much good and will receive a reward for my repentance.” Turning to the angels, the Saints asked them to wait a little while as they went to the King and God to plead on Theodore’s behalf. The angels agreed to wait, and Saints Kosmas and Damian went to Christ God, the Almighty King, and obtained from Him an extension of years for Saint Theodore. Soon they returned, bringing with them a youth who resembled the angels but was far more radiant than they. This youth said to the angels: “Leave Theodore alive. The Lord and King of Glory, Master of all, has been entreated concerning him.” Immediately the holy angels and the radiant youth departed into heaven, while Saints Kosmas and Damian said to Theodore: “Rise, brother, and attend to yourself and to your flock, for our good and merciful Master has accepted our prayers for you.” Theodore arose from his bed, and the Holy Unmercenaries disappeared.

Finally, who among us does not know and honor Saint Nicholas the Wonderworker, our fervent intercessor and mighty helper in every affliction? How many times has he appeared to those who sought his help, sometimes in dreams and sometimes openly? One such instance concerns a Greek military commander named Peter, who was once captured by the Saracens and imprisoned. There he lamented not so much his bitter fate as his own conduct. “A similar thing happened to me before,” he said, “and I prayed to Saint Nicholas to deliver me from my enemies, promising to receive the monastic habit in Rome. He fulfilled my request and freed me from captivity, but I, ungrateful man that I am, forgot my promise. For this I now suffer here. O Saint of Christ, save me, and I will certainly fulfill my vow!” Saint Nicholas appeared to him in a dream and said: “I have heard your prayer, but God has not yet appointed the time for your deliverance. Nevertheless, do not lose heart and do not cease praying. ‘Knock, and it shall be opened unto you’ (Matt. 7:7).”

After some time, the Saint of God appeared to him again and said: “I have prayed to God for you, but I do not know how He will dispose of the matter. However, I shall point you to a most worthy intercessor—Saint Symeon the God-Receiver. Pray to him continually. He is powerful before God and, together with the Most Holy Theotokos and Saint John the Baptist, stands nearest of all to the Throne of God.”

At last Saint Nicholas appeared to him openly, together with the righteous Symeon, and both said: “Take courage, Peter, and call upon the Lord in your affliction.” Then they made him swear that he would fulfill his promise. Afterward, righteous Symeon touched his chains with his staff, and they fell apart. He led Peter out of the prison, and Peter received complete freedom. At that same time Saint Nicholas appeared to the Bishop of Rome, holding Peter by the hand. He recounted Peter’s story, instructed the bishop to tonsure him a monk, and then disappeared. When Peter arrived before the Bishop of Rome, the latter immediately recognized him and related what Saint Nicholas himself had told him. Having received the monastic habit, Peter spent the remainder of his life on Mount Athos in great ascetic labors.

Another account is told concerning Saint Bassian. Into the city of Ravenna, where the man of God lived, there came an imperial order commanding the execution of an official named Vithimnius, who had been falsely accused. He was immediately seized, bound in chains, and brought to the place of execution. Knowing himself to be innocent, Vithimnius remembered the holy servant of God, Bassian, and, bowing his head beneath the executioner’s axe, prayed: “Saint of God, by the grace given to you by God, be my helper this day.” And what happened? The moment the executioner raised his axe, it slipped from his hands and fell to the ground. Taking hold of the deadly weapon again, he attempted to strike, but the axe fell from his hands a second time. The same thing occurred a third time. The governor, suspecting deliberate negligence on the executioner’s part, summoned another man to carry out the sentence. Yet the axe likewise slipped from his hands three times. The people, witnessing so extraordinary an event, recognized in it the invisible protection of God and demanded the prisoner’s release. When the emperor was informed of what had happened, he ordered a thorough investigation into Vithimnius’ case. It was discovered that he had indeed been the victim of slander. The emperor commanded that he be freed and restored to all his offices and honors. Vithimnius publicly glorified the servant of God, Bassian, through whose prayers he had been delivered from an unjust death.

Therefore, as we listen with living and heartfelt faith to these ecclesiastical accounts of the heavenly intercession of the saints of God on our behalf—saints who are always ready to help and console us in the sorrows and trials of life—let us give thanks to the all-merciful God, who grants to us earthly creatures, through the mediation of the saints, greater boldness and strength in prayer.

"O Lord! If we did not have Your saints as intercessors and Your goodness showing mercy toward us, how would we dare, O Savior, to sing unto You, whom the angels glorify unceasingly?"

Because of the multitude of our sins, both our body and our soul are weakened. As grievous offenders, we would not dare lift our eyes to the throne of God the Judge were we not encouraged by faith in the intercession of the saints, who, being near to God as His friends and initiates of His grace, possess great power before the Heavenly King. At the same time, they can fully sympathize with our infirmities, since they were human beings like ourselves and experienced the whole burden of life in its struggle against sin.

Let us therefore not grow cold in our prayers to the saints of God, especially to those whose names we bear and to whom the churches in our own communities are dedicated. “The fervent prayer of a righteous man avails much” (James 5:16).

 

Russian source: https://azbyka.ru/otechnik/Grigorij_Djachenko/prostoe-evangelskoe-slovo/9

English source: https://www.mystagogyresourcecenter.com/2026/06/first-sunday-after-pentecost-sunday-of.html

 

An Edifying and Moving Story from the Holy Mountain

  There was once a monk on Mt. Athos who dwelled in Karyes. [1] He drank every day to the point of inebriation and came to be a source...