Wednesday, May 13, 2026

Father Seraphim the Philosopher: Teacher of Ancient Piety

Reposed August 20 (+1982)

By Fr. Damascene [Christensen]

Source: Vita Patrum: The Life of the Fathers by St. Gregory of Tours, translated from the Latin and French by Fr. Seraphim Rose and Paul Bartlett, St. Herman of Alaska Brotherhood, Platina, CA, 1988, pp. 319-327.

 

 

In His love for mankind, God has placed in every person an innate longing for His Divine Truth. In order for the fullness of Truth to be revealed, however, one must first renounce the opinions of this world and inwardly die to it. This renunciation occurs through suffering, in which man’s spirit is torn, like the curtain of the temple, away from his fallen, carnal self and is led to seek enlightenment from above. It is then that our gracious Lord, if He finds a loving heart that may serve as a sure receptacle of His Truth, imparts a higher understanding to the devout seeker.

Few in our days have sought the Truth with such singleness of purpose as did the righteous Fr. Seraphim. He was a philosopher according to the original meaning of the word: a “lover of wisdom.” Just as Solomon once found favor in God’s sight by desiring wisdom above all else, so did Fr. Seraphim become chosen to be God’s servant through his earnest, painful longing to acquire the Truth at all costs. Having at last discovered it, he became free of the bonds of earth and ripe for eternity, as say the Scriptures: “You shall know the Truth, and the Truth shall make you free” (John 8:32).

1. Fr. Seraphim was born outside the saving enclosure of the Church, in order that, through his spiritual quest, conversion and subsequent missionary work, he might lead other searching souls into the Body of Christ. His quest for Truth became apparent at an early age. His mother, noticing how much her son was studying for school, once said to him, “You will be a smart man someday.”

“I don’t want to be smart,” the boy replied, “I want to be wise.” The older he grew, the more intense became his inquiry into the nature of his existence. His studies led him through the literature and traditional philosophies of many different cultures, and especially to the wisdom of the ancient Orient, for the acquisition of which he spent many years studying the languages of ancient China. But his hungry soul remained unfed, and he existed on the edge of despair, isolated and alone. For hours he would walk along deserted beaches at night, thinking that, without the Truth he sought, life was devoid of meaning, wondering if perhaps the oblivion of death was preferable to having such a burning yet unfulfilled desire. Little did he know then that his silent longings had not gone unnoticed, for God, in His limitless mercy, was soon to open to him another world.

God’s providence worked through one of Fr. Seraphim’s friends, who once recommended that he visit an Orthodox Christian Church. Heeding this advice, he walked into an Orthodox cathedral and witnessed a solemn and beautiful service, handed down from the times of the early Christians. Feeling as though he had stepped into the ranks of angels in Heaven, he joyfully said within himself, “I’ve come home.” His philosophic quest thus brought him at last into the presence of Christ, Whose true image he had not been able to find until he had made personal contact with the ancient Christian experience of the Orthodox Church. In this way he discovered that the Truth he had been seeking resided not in a single philosophy, but rather in the Divine Person of our Lord Jesus Christ, Who has said, “I am the Way, and the Truth, and the Life” (John 14:6).

Not many years later, when he received Holy Communion for the first time, Fr. Seraphim felt a Divine taste in his mouth which lasted for several weeks. Being humble before God, he thought that all newly-baptized Christians had the same experience; and it was only later that he learned that he had indeed received a special gift of grace.

2. This rare man, Fr. Seraphim, not satisfied merely with being externally a member of the Church, begged God that He would bring him into the very heart of the Truth, wherein all the saints and righteous ones have found the means for their salvation. His newfound “pearl of great price” — the true Gospel of Christ — was so precious to him that he wanted to dedicate his entire life to serving it. He wanted to do something with what he had received, not just bury his talent in the ground.

While this yearning still burned within Fr. Seraphim, he fell ill with a serious ailment, which grew worse and worse until he feared that he would die from it. How great was his anguish when he thought that he would be taken away so soon, before he had even begun to serve God! In such a state, he went one day to a small store that sold, among other things, icon cards. He looked entreatingly at one of the icons, an image of the Mother of God, and spontaneously said within himself, from the depths of his troubled soul, “Most Holy Mother of God, please hear me! Before I die, let me do something to serve your Son!” The Holy Virgin did not withhold Her mercy from the needy supplicant; and thus it happened that shortly after this incident, Fr. Seraphim, already recovering from his illness, heard a knock at his door. When he opened it, he found a young seminarian, a man with ideals similar to his own, wanting to serve Christ but not yet knowing exactly how to do it. They later decided to open an Orthodox Christian bookstore, so that other seekers like themselves could be provided with soul-profiting reading. In this way was granted Fr. Seraphim’s wish to work for God. His other need, that of entering into the fullness of the Church, was fulfilled at about the same time through a righteous man who arrived in the city in which Fr. Seraphim was living, San Francisco. This man was Blessed Archbishop John Maximovitch, a wonderworker sent by God to Fr. Seraphim as a living vessel of Divine Truth, which Truth he did not hesitate to impart through his holy example and words of instruction. Fr. Seraphim deeply loved his spiritual teacher, and Archbishop John in turn did all he could to help his disciple.

With the blessing and encouragement of Archbishop John, Fr. Seraphim and his seminarian friend became co-laborers in a missionary brotherhood dedicated to St. Herman of Alaska. In addition to working at the bookstore, they began to publish a periodical, “The Orthodox Word,” for the mission of true Christianity. And here is where God, wanting to make use of His willing servant, provided Fr. Seraphim with the opportunity to exercise all his talents — his penetrating mind and his writing ability — for the spreading of the Gospel. Fr. Seraphim devoted all his energy to his God-pleasing literary work so that, at the time of final reckoning, he would be found not empty handed, but with his talents increased a hundredfold.

3. Ever since his conversion, Fr. Seraphim did much reading of the Holy Fathers of the Church, and he was especially drawn to the ancient desert-dwellers and ascetics. In these desert-dwellers, he found living illustrations of Christ’s otherworldly teaching: transfigured beings who disdained all attachment to things temporal and who sought only that which lies beyond this corruptible earth. So much was he inspired by their example that he longed to have a small taste of the life of silence and prayer, unhindered by the tumult of the world. For this reason, he and his partner decided to move their publishing work to the mountains. Soon they found some land suitable for their needs: a forested area high on the top of a ridge, miles away from the noise of cities. After they had lived there for a few years, they were tonsured monks, and thus their brotherhood became a monastic one. Their literary work continued, and expanded to include the printing of books.

Having been delivered from death and granted more years of life through the intercessions of the Mother of God, Fr. Seraphim cherished the time he was able to spend in his forest hermitage. His heart so overflowed with thanksgiving that he would be seen blessing and kissing the trees. Because he valued every moment of life as a gift from God, he was filled with a sense of urgency and repeatedly warned: “It is later than you think. Hasten, therefore, to do the work of God.”

Through daily Divine services, constant exposure to spiritual literature, and separation from the world, Fr. Seraphim’s experience of spiritual life deepened. He lived for another world, guarding himself against idle talk and soberly viewing ordinary events in the context of heavenly reality. His loving heart, warmed and softened by his early years of suffering and his profound conversion, combined with his brilliant mind, his noble, truth-loving character and his depth of spiritual experience, to make him a Christian teacher unparalleled in our days. Having steeped himself in the writings of the Holy Fathers, having come to them as a loving son and learned from them Divine wisdom, having lived like them and acquired their way of thinking and feeling, he became as one of them. He successfully transmitted the spirit of the Holy Fathers in his writings, thereby feeding the souls of thousands of readers and enabling them to attain oneness of soul with the Christians of past centuries.

4. When Fr. Seraphim was made a priest, his responsibilities increased even more. He was called upon to pastor a parish flock in a nearby town. For a man who longed for desert solitude, this was certainly a burden, and yet he bore it without a grudging word. “Whatever God sends us,” he would say, “we must accept and do our best with. Each day brings a new struggle, a new chance to increase our prayer and new ways in which to serve God.”

He was a loving pastor not only to those in the town parish, but also to the many brothers who came to the monastery. Late at night, he would be seen kneeling before the altar of the monastery church, praying fervently with tears for those souls which had been placed under his direction.

All of his pastoral work, as well as his literary work, he did solely for the glory of God and for the salvation of his neighbor. He shunned all ephemeral, earthly rewards which might be gained in this life, even those rewards which may be amassed through the institutional, purely human side of church life. And yet his holy life did not go unrewarded by God. Once, in the altar of the town parish, during the reading of the canons at Sunday Matins, one of the acolytes saw Fr. Seraphim surrounded by Divine, uncreated Light. From this it is known that during his life here on earth, Fr. Seraphim received a foretaste of the heavenly bliss prepared for him by Our Lord Jesus Christ.

Fr. Seraphim’s early mentor Archbishop John, although he had reposed many years before, did not cease to take care of his spiritual son. Once a certain Brother Gregory, having been entrusted by Fr. Seraphim with a large sum of money, went to buy food for the monastery. When the time came to make payment, he suddenly realized he did not have the money. Telephoning Fr. Seraphim in a state of great agitation, he was told to return to the church in which Fr. Seraphim was serving. As he approached the church, he was met by Fr. Seraphim. “You have it right there,” said Fr. Seraphim, pointing to the brother’s chest. “Archbishop John told me. You didn’t think of praying to him, did you?” The brother felt his chest and with simultaneous joy and shame he found the money in the pocket which he thought he had certainly searched. Fr. Seraphim then comforted him, explaining that after he had finished speaking on the telephone, he had gone to church and there, praying before a portrait of Archbishop John, had asked him to help find the money. Archbishop John mystically informed Fr. Seraphim that Brother Gregory had the money in his pocket. “Thus,” concluded this brother as he finished relating the tale, “a sure trial and temptation was transformed into a revelation of the mystery of holiness and grace.”

5. Fr. Seraphim was only forty-eight years old when Our Lord was pleased to take him into His kingdom. As it is written in the Wisdom of Solomon: “He, being made perfect in a short time, fulfilled a long time: for his soul pleased the Lord: therefore hasted He to take him away from among the wicked” (Wis. 4:13). When the course of his blessed life was drawing to an end, he was suddenly afflicted with acute pains in his stomach. Being of such a humble disposition, he never complained or tried to draw attention to his sickness, but only retired to his cell to pray. Soon, however, his brethren realized that his ailment was a serious one, and took him to a hospital for treatment. After the doctors had operated on him, they said that the disease would probably be fatal. The news spread, and people travelled from distant places to be at Fr. Seraphim’s bedside during his last hours. Day and night they stood near him, consoling him by singing the sacred hymns of the Church. How great was the lamentation, how fervent were the prayers of the faithful! So many people were about to be deprived of their beloved spiritual father and teacher. And yet there was joy mixed with the sorrow, for all were aware that, from among those assembled in that hospital room, one person was soon to step over the threshold of death and stand before the throne of Almighty God. It was as if the ceiling of the room had opened up, as if everyone was in the presence of the blessed world beyond death.

Here, during his last, painful days in the hospital, Fr. Seraphim finished the holy task he had begun when he first took on the yoke of Christ: he eradicated the vestiges of his selfish, human will so that he could belong wholly to God, with Whom he would spend eternity. Again it is written in Holy Wisdom: “And having been a little chastised, they shall be greatly rewarded: for God proved them, and found them worthy for Himself. As gold in the furnace hath He tried them, and received them as a burnt offering” (Wis. 3:4-5). In truth was the spiritual gold of Fr. Seraphim’s soul purified by suffering, for he was tied to the hospital bed as one crucified, his arms and legs shaking from the intense pain that ran through his body. He could not speak because of the air tubes which the doctors had placed in his mouth. All he could do was pray, gazing imploringly into heaven. As his co-laborer in the wilderness said, “Fr. Seraphim suffered as he did in order to receive the glory of Martyrs.”

A young catechumen was standing at his bedside when a priest came in the room to give Fr. Seraphim Holy Communion. Before administering the sacred Body and Blood of Christ, the priest read the Gospel and then, holding the book over Fr. Seraphim’s reclining body, began to bless him with it. Suddenly Fr. Seraphim, exerting every last bit of strength in his dying, convulsing frame, raised himself up to kiss that sublime and holy Book that had given him Life. There was not a face in the room that was not covered with tears. The catechumen standing there said later that this incident was so inspiring that it erased all thoughts of hesitation concerning his baptism.

6. Finally, when the soul of the blessed one was sufficiently purified, it departed unto the Lord. Fr. Seraphim’s body was brought to his monastery to be buried on his beloved mountain, and, for the three days following his repose, was kept in the monastery church. There, as Fr. Seraphim lay in his simple wooden coffin, his face became radiant and smiled with such a serene smile that all were moved by the sight.

During the funeral, the church was filled to overflowing with faithful pilgrims. All came up to his coffin to kiss the blessed hands which wrote so many soul-profiting books, articles and church services. When the coffin was about to be taken from the church and buried nearby, one of the pilgrims, a woman named Helen, was vouchsafed to see Fr. Seraphim shining with celestial light above the coffin, facing the altar and swinging a censer.

Forty days after Fr. Seraphim’s repose, a bishop named Nektary came to the monastery and led the singing of a Glorification hymn: “We glorify thee, our holy Father Seraphim, instructor of monks and converser with angels.” During his sermon, he called Fr. Seraphim “a righteous man, possibly a saint.” The verity of this appraisal is attested to by the numerous miracles which Fr. Seraphim has performed since his death. Here we will include a few of these, described by the priest Alexey Young on November 11, 1983:

“About two months after the repose of Fr. Seraphim it came to my attention that a cousin (non-Orthodox) of one of my spiritual children (Barbara M.) was in the hospital with a serious ailment. She asked to see me and asked that I pray for her. She was suffering from a constriction of vessels in the leg, causing shortage of circulation. The immediate crisis was a gangrenous big toe. I saw this toe myself: it was green and rotting — a terrible sight. The doctors were preparing to amputate the toe within a week or so, and said that it was likely she would lose the whole foot and possibly the limb from the knee down. I anointed her toe and leg with oil from Fr. Seraphim’s grave and asked his intercession on her behalf. Within a short period of time the gangrene had completely disappeared. The doctors decided it was not necessary to amputate the toe or anything else and announced that they were ‘amazed’ at what had happened. Today, more than a year later, she has had no re-occurrence of her affliction, to the continuing surprise of the doctors, who have no explanation for it. I’m convinced that this healing was worked through Fr. Seraphim. (By the way, I myself spoke to the doctor on more than one occasion, and so am able to personally verify the medical details as well as the initial prognosis.

“And now I have a second miracle to report: Two weeks ago today my brother-in-law, Stefan (whom I baptized last July and then married to my sister, Anna), was in a serious auto accident here in town. He broke both legs (compound fractures in the left leg) and also shattered the left ankle and the left big toe. He was immediately taken into surgery, where the doctors worked for 4½ hours to clean out the wounds (the bones had broken through the flesh in more than one place); road dirt had been ground into the flesh and bones and the danger of life-threatening infection was very great. I saw the photos of his left leg and foot just before they took him into surgery and it was an appalling sight: the left foot was just hanging; the ligaments and tendons had all been torn away, and the bones completely crushed.

“During that first operation we prayed in the waiting room. Remembering that Bishop Nektary had sung a Glorification to Fr. Seraphim, I served a Molieben to Fr. Seraphim on behalf of Stefan. Starting the next day, and every day thereafter, he was anointed with oil from Fr. Seraphim’s grave. Through the bandages we were even able to reach one of the mangled toes of the left foot.

“After the surgery the doctor told us there was a good chance that he would lose the foot. Also, there was a possibility that if infection set in it could become ‘life-threatening.’ But we had great confidence in the prayers of our Righteous One before the throne of God, and we waited, patiently.

“Six days later the surgeons operated again. This was a critical time, for based upon what they saw when they removed the bandages, they would have a good idea about whether or not the foot could be saved. Afterwards the surgeon himself said that it was a ‘miracle’! Not only was everything mending well, but there was no sign of infection — in itself a miracle.

“Of course Stefan now has three months in a wheel chair, and then he will have to learn to walk all over again. There are still many difficulties, and possibly more operations, in the near future. But I believe that in this, as in so many other things, Fr. Seraphim again heard our prayers, and turned on our behalf to God’s throne in order to give us help. Truly, God rests in His saints!

“Of both of the above miracles I am personally a witness. In addition, photographs exist of the second case which would quickly convince anyone — lay person or physician — that something of a truly extraordinary nature took place.”

Several other miraculous visitations did our Lord Jesus Christ work through His servant, Fr. Seraphim. To God, Who raised up such a man for our inspiration and enlightenment, may there be glory unto the ages of ages. Amen.

 

 

Indestructible Towers

Father George Poullas

 

It is not unusual to find in encyclopedic entries on the Orthodox Church, or even in some otherwise decent scholarly surveys of Orthodoxy, the hackneyed and ridiculous claim that a key feature of Eastern Christianity is caesaro-papism, or the constant submission of the Church to the state (the Empire). Notwithstanding the fact that there was never a Pope in the Orthodox Church—despite the trend towards a kind of neo-Papal Patriarchalism, in contemporary times, modelled on medieval Roman Catholicism, which was in fact more characteristically caesaro-papistic in polity than the Eastern Church—this myth persists. Father George presents us, here, with select evidence that Orthodox Bishops, in fact, called the Byzantine (Roman) Emperors to task, and even in matters related to their personal lives and comportment. His accounts are worthy of our careful attention, and especially since the courage of our Bishops through the centuries is sadly lacking today.

***

The Holy Fathers of our Holy Orthodox Church fought not only against heresies, but also against every kind of transgression. We will mention, here, a few heroic examples from the lives of these holy stragglers.

1. The Holy Patriarch Nicholas I Mystikos, who was “a model of Christian conscientiousness and courage,” according to the historian P. Paparregopoulos, did not hesitate to enter into conflict with Emperor Leo VI (the Wise) on account of his unlawful fourth marriage. He implored Leo not to persist in this iniquitous desire of his. The Emperor, however, paid no heed to him and went ahead with the marriage. Then the Saint, not reckoning with imperial authority, stopped the miscreant emperor on the threshold of Hagia Sophia, forbidding him to enter. Moreover, he deposed the Priest Thomas, who had celebrated this unlawful marriage. As a result of his valiant resistance, he was immediately exiled by the emperor. But not even did exile intimidate the Saint, who had no hesitation in writing a letter to the Bishop of Rome, to the effect that an emperor who gave orders to slander, to murder through treachery, to celebrate unlawful marriages, and to seize other people’s property, was not an emperor, but a brigand, a slanderer, an adulterer, and a thief (see “Epistle XXXII,” Patrologia Grceca, Vol. CXI, cols. 209-213).

2. About fifty years later, the Holy Patriarch Polyeuctos prevented Emperor Nikephoros Phokas from entering a Church and imposed a lengthy penance on him, because there was an impediment arising from spiritual kinship between him and his wife Theophano. But the strength of the Saint proved still more resplendent when John Tsimiskes murdered Nikephoros Phokas, with the cooperation of Theophano, in order to seize the throne. The Saint in that instance demanded that the murderers be punished and the Empress Theophano be exiled. This is, in fact, what happened.

3. Later on, the Holy Patriarch Leontios II of Jerusalem rebuked Emperor Andronicos I Comnenos for his unlawful marriage, and was, for this reason, persecuted and exiled.

4. Almost immediately after the Fall of Constantinople, Patriarch Joasaph I (1465-1466), together with Maximos, the Grand Ecclesiarch, who subsequently became Patriarch, opposed the evil desire of the ruler, Amiroutzes, a friend of the Sultan, to contract an illicit marriage. For this, the Patriarch was banished, while the Ecclesiarch had his nose split open. Let us see, therefore, with what great courage our Holy Fathers stood up to imperial transgressions, without fearing persecution, exile or death.

Today, on the other hand....

 

Source: Orthodox Tradition, Vol. XXVI (2009), No. 2, pp. 15-16.

Tuesday, May 12, 2026

1970 GOC / ROCOR Concelebration in Athens

 


From left: Bishops Akakios of Diavleia, Hilarion of Manhattan (ROCOR), Auxentios of Athens, Petros of Astoria, and Gerontios of Salamis.


Nikolaos Sotiropoulos (1934-2014): The 15th Canon of the First-Second Council combats schism and is worthy of praise.

“When a hierarch preaches heresy, then the priest has the right not to commemorate the name of that hierarch.”

 [Comment added May 13, 2026, below]


 

Nikolaos Sotiropoulos: You who are appointed unto eternal life. Brothers whom the Lord loved, for whom He became man and sacrificed Himself, and whom He ordained to obtain boundless eternity, to obtain His unshakable and indescribable Kingdom.

Your Church invited me to come and preach the word of God. I responded readily to your Church’s invitation. Your Church is accused of being schismatic. I came as an Orthodox theologian to refute this accusation. I came, as an Orthodox theologian, to defend the people of God who come to this church in order to worship the Lord of Glory. Your parish priest, the minister of the Most High, Father Alexander [Kavouros of Adelaide, Australia], has ordination from a canonical Bishop. He has canonical ordination, he has real priesthood, and he performs the Mysteries.

The congregation: Axios! Axios! Axios!

Nikolaos Sotiropoulos: The Patriarchate of Constantinople deposed Father Alexander, but it deposed him unjustly, incompetently; this Patriarchate did not have the competence to judge Father Alexander, and it did so without allowing him to defend himself, without summoning him to make a defense. For this reason, according to the Sacred Canons, his deposition is invalid, just as the notorious excommunication of the speaker is also invalid.

Those who govern the Church must learn justice; those who govern the Church must learn justice and respect the Sacred Canons, and not do arbitrary and dictatorial things within the Church of God.

What does the 15th Canon of the First-Second Council say, my brothers? When a hierarch preaches heresy, then the priest has the right not to commemorate the name of that hierarch, and to serve independently of that hierarch, and to commemorate—as I was moved when I heard earlier Father Alexander commemorating—“all Orthodox bishops who rightly divide the word of Truth.” Canon 15, I repeat, of the First-Second Council, concerning the priest who does not commemorate the heretical hierarch and serves independently of him, says that this priest does not cause schism, but combats schism, because he does not commemorate the heretical hierarch and because he serves independently of the heretical hierarch. I repeat: he does not create schism, but combats schism and is worthy of praise.

Congregation: Axios! Axios!

Nikolaos Sotiropoulos: Not of deposition. Even great Fathers and teachers of our Church were deposed, such as Athanasius, the pillar of Orthodoxy, and Chrysostom, the most universal Father and teacher of the Church. But the Fathers, although they were deposed by unjust fellow bishops, are the undeposed towers of the Church. We enjoy the Liturgy of sacred Chrysostom here on Sunday.

My brothers, your Church is not schismatic. It is canonical, Orthodox, and your parish priest is worthy of praise, because he declared: “I will serve independently of the Archdiocese of Australia, because the Archbishop preaches heresy!” Heresies. That is why I came here to speak; otherwise, I would not have come.

Do you know what another Canon says, the 31st Apostolic Canon? A priest may cease the commemoration of a hierarch and serve independently of the administration of the hierarch when the hierarch offends piety—that is, the Faith, and not only piety—and justice, when he does unjust things.

Do you know what another Canon says? If a hierarch does not combat the heresies, and all the more if the hierarch also preaches heresies, then another hierarch has the right, has the right to come and assume the pastoral care of his flock. Indeed! If there were heroic Bishops and heroic priests, they ought to have come here to Australia and assumed the pastoral care of the shepherdless flock of the Archdiocese of Australia.

Today we celebrate, the day before yesterday and today, Saint Paraskevi. After our Panagia, she is the most popular female saintly figure. Saint Paraskevi became holy, my brothers, because she had Faith. The first thing is Faith; all the other things come second. She believed, as the Apostle says today; she believed in Jesus as Lord, as God. She believed in the Lordship and the Divinity of the Author of our Faith, our Lord Jesus Christ. She also believed in the Resurrection of Christ, which the Apostle again speaks of. She believed in everything that the Church believes. She was a conscious member of the Church and struggled within the Church. And because the Church is a workshop of holiness, for this reason Saint Paraskevi, through her struggle and through the Grace of the Church, became a Saint and wonderworker.

On this occasion, my brothers, I shall briefly explain to your piety the article of the Symbol of Faith which refers to the Church, which brings forth Saints and wonderworkers and martyrs and great-martyrs. What did we say earlier, when reciting the Symbol of Faith? I believe in One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church. It is one. Christ is not in many churches. He founded one Church: the one that has the correct Faith. The others are heresies and schisms. Here you are the Church with the right Faith, the Orthodox Faith. You belong to the One Church of which Christ said: “I will build My Church upon the rock of Faith.” He said “the” Church, “One” Church. One is the correct Faith, one is the Church.

Again, Christ said to the Jews: I do not have only you Jews, Christ said; I also have other sheep: us Gentiles, the Greeks and others, who were idolaters. I am going to lead them also, and there shall be one flock under one shepherd. What is the one Flock? The One Church. And who is the one Shepherd? He who sacrificed Himself for the sheep, our Lord Jesus Christ.

The Ecumenists speak of many churches. They say, Council, World Council of Churches. Let there be a union of the churches. Wrong! The Church is one: the one that changed nothing from the Faith of the first eight centuries. Many times, I challenge the heterodox, the heretics, to indicate and prove that we changed even one small Truth of Faith. They cannot prove such a thing. We changed nothing from the Faith. The Church is One; the others, I repeat, which are called churches, whether Papism, or Protestant confessions, or Monophysites, are heresies and schisms.

The Church is Holy. I believe in One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church. Why is the Church Holy? Because her Founder is Holy; because the Spirit that gives her life is Holy, the Holy Spirit. Because the Gospel is Holy, the Scripture is Holy, her teaching is holy, her Tradition is holy. Because her Mysteries are Holy, because her purpose is holy. The Church is a workshop of holiness. Within the Church there is the Grace of God, which brings forth Saints, as it brought forth Saint Paraskevi. What am I saying? Millions of Saints and martyrs and great-martyrs and wonderworkers, whose holy relics also work miracles. The Church is Holy; she has produced millions of Saints. It does not matter that within the Church there are also impious and corrupt people. The impious and corrupt do not abolish the Saints and the holiness of the Church, the Church of God. The Church is not merely a human organism; she is a divine-human organism, and for this reason the enemies and betrayers of the Faith have not been able to tear her down.

The Church is Catholic. What does it mean that the Church is Catholic? The Papists call themselves the catholic church. Wrong; the Catholics are not a church, they are a Heresy. Their church, their so-called church, is not catholic. It is called catholic, but it is not; it has the name, but it does not have the Grace. Our Church is Catholic. Why? Catholic means that it has the whole Truth of the Faith. It has thrown away nothing from the truths of the Faith; it has distorted nothing from the truths of the Faith. Because our Church has the whole Truth of the Faith, which the Lord revealed for our salvation, for this reason our Church is called Catholic. The Papists, from the name “Catholic,” do not have the Grace. We Orthodox have both the name “Catholic” and the Grace.

The Church is Apostolic. What does this mean? God founded her through the Apostles. He chose twelve, thirteen simple, unlettered men; He sent them forth into the inhabited world; they preached the most beautiful words, words which the ages marvel at, incomparable words. The philosophers do not attain to the wisdom of the Apostles. And some years, and some decades, after the death and Resurrection of Christ, they founded in the inhabited world, among all states and above all states, the State of God, the Church. The Church has as her cornerstone, her very foundation stone, Christ Himself, and as secondary founders, the Apostles; and as stones of this edifice called the Church, the Church has all conscious Christians. We are living stones in the majestic edifice of Christ which is called the Church.

The Church, my brothers, is the ark of our salvation; it is the workshop of holiness; it is, to express myself differently, our mother, our sweet mother, who grants us hope and consolation and strength. Within the Church miracles take place; for this reason, the Church is not torn down. And what did one Father of the Church say? No one can have God as Father if he does not have the Church as mother. If he does not come every Sunday to this great family of Christ, to say, “Glory to Thee who hast shown us the light,” to say, “We hymn Thee, we bless Thee, we give thanks unto Thee, O Lord.”

My brothers, all things in the world are vain. The Church is not a vain thing. Let us remain faithful to the Faith, to Orthodoxy, to our sweet mother, the Church, until the end. And when we depart from this vain world, as children of the Church of Orthodoxy, we shall not go below, where the impious go. We shall go above, above the stars, above the galaxies, and we shall receive an unshakable, indescribable Kingdom, and we shall reign together with the King of kings, our Lord Jesus Christ, unto the boundless ages; and of our Kingdom there shall be no end. Amen!

 

Greek source: https://apotixisi.blogspot.com/2026/05/15_12.html

 

Comment by Dr. Dimitris Chatzinikolaou:

May 13, 2026, at 11:16 a.m.

Father Dimitrios, Christ is Risen!

Thank you for the information. I lived for five years, from 1994 to 1998, in Adelaide, and I know the matter very well. The reason for the walling off was not for the Faith, but for the property of the Community. The Greeks there had established schools, churches, nursing homes, houses which they rented very cheaply, at about one-tenth of the market rent, to poor fellow Greeks, etc. Long before the heresiarch Stylianos Harkianakis, the Archdiocese of Australia sought to appropriate all this property, which many of the Greek expatriates did not accept, and thus they separated. Since the Archdiocese of Australia belongs to the Patriarchate of Constantinople, if they had accepted, then the property would essentially have been transferred to a Turkish organization. The Greek Orthodox Community was considered schismatic by the circles of the Archdiocese, who insulted their churches as “chicken coops”! Many attempts at union have been made, but I do not know whether any of them has borne fruit.


California Son: On the Patron Saint of Lost Western People

Paul Kingsnorth | April 27, 2025

 

 

I haven’t been well these last few days, and have not been able to write my usual Sunday Pilgrimage instalment. I hope to be back on the road next week. Instead, I’m offering up this essay, which was recently ‘printed’ in the Free Press in the US. It’s about the life of a pioneering American Orthodox figure whose journey has both intrigued and inspired me.


Last year I was invited to give a talk about Christianity and nature at Canisius University in Buffalo, New York. After the talk, I took some questions from the audience. One of the questions, asked in sweet innocence, was a deadly honeytrap for a visiting Englishman:

“What do you think of America?”

I had just been talking about the dangers to the soul of the technological culture of Silicon Valley, and the impact of its machine-like ways of thinking on the world, so I said the first thing that came into my head. This is rarely a good idea, especially in public.

“America is Babylon,” I said. Then, remembering I was speaking to an audience of Americans, I quickly added a qualification.

“It’s Babylon,” I said, “but it might also be the place that counters Babylon. It’s as if one force somehow begets the other. After all, California is home to Silicon Valley, but it’s also home to the monastery of Seraphim Rose.”

Somebody else in the audience put their hand up.

“Who’s Seraphim Rose?” they asked.

It was a fair question. The strange name I had conjured is hardly widely known. It is the name of a man who in many ways embodied the twentieth-century West’s aching search for meaning. A man who pushed himself out of the desert of modern materialism, through a banquet of “alternative spiritualities,” and into an ascetic, monastic life in the oldest and most traditional stream of Christianity: the Eastern Orthodox Church. Seraphim Rose is the unofficial patron saint of lost Western people, and only America could have made him.

Today, with the Orthodox Church in the U.S. growing faster than it ever has, and with young people flooding many of its parishes, interest in his life and work has reached new heights. Sales of his books continue to grow, his grave has become a place of pilgrimage, and there are more and more persistent calls for him to be recognized as a saint of the Church. Slowly and quietly, he may be helping to remake America.


Eugene Rose was born into a middle-class family in San Diego in 1934. Shy, intense, and clever, he became disillusioned, as he grew, with both the materialism of consumer America, and with what he regarded as the shallow, worldly Christianity of his suburban upbringing that did nothing to challenge it. After graduating magna cum laude in Chinese philosophy from Pomona College in Southern California, Eugene went on to study for a master’s degree at Berkeley, where he wrote an acclaimed thesis on the Tao Te Ching. Fiercely intelligent, he consumed philosophy, history, and theology at a rate of knots, in search of both truth and meaning, but none of it seemed to answer his questions: What was truth? What was life for? And what should he do with his?

One thing Rose did become sure about as a young man was that religion was a lie. Baptized a Methodist, he had grown to reject the Christian faith as empty and meaningless. He had read Nietzsche, he had met Jack Kerouac, and by the time he was a student he was cursing God in drunken fits of rage for having created an empty and meaningless world. Later, Rose described such passionate atheism as a “spiritual state… a real attempt to grapple with the true God whose ways are so inexplicable even to the most believing of men.”

If there was no God, though, what was there? The blossoming counterculture of San Francisco offered different kinds of answers, and the young Eugene threw himself into it with gusto. For a while he studied under the “beatnik guru” Alan Watts, who he believed might have the answers to his growing spiritual questions. But Eugene became disillusioned with Watts, whose pseudo-Eastern combination of booze, acid, Zen, and yoga came to seem like yet another example of the consumerism that was devouring his country.

The ’50s and ’60s counterculture as a whole presented the same problem: However much music, drink, drugs, or sex Rose experimented with, the void inside him just kept growing. “Disease, suffering, death,” he wrote in a letter to a friend, “these are reminders, convenient reminders, that man most profoundly is not of this world… Whatever the ‘eat, drink, and be merry’ school says, self-conscious man must face this problem.”

In the mid-1950s, when he was in his early 20s, Rose met another young seeker, Jon Gregerson. Gregerson was a Finnish-born Russian Orthodox Christian; he was also to become Rose’s lover. As part of Eugene’s endless search for meaning, one day he went along with his partner to the Russian Orthodox Cathedral in San Francisco. It was an experience that would alter the course of his life.

It was Easter—Pascha, in Orthodox terminology—and the cathedral was holding a night service. The Orthodox liturgy is over a thousand years old, and the Paschal service is particularly deep and intense. Typically, it will last for several hours on either side of midnight, culminating in a priest emerging from the altar into a blacked-out church, holding a single candle and declaring “Christ is risen!” The overall effect, especially after the week of heavy fasting that the Orthodox Church prescribes, can be extremely powerful. Rose had never seen—or felt—anything like it. “Something happened to me,” he later wrote of his visit, “that I had not experienced in any Buddhist or other Eastern temple; something in my heart said that I was home; that my search was over.”

After years of exploring every idea he could find in search of truth, he had seen something he never expected: “That Truth was not just an abstract idea, sought and known by the mind, but was something personal—even a Person—sought and loved by the heart,” he wrote later. “And that is how I met Christ.”

Eugene threw himself into a new exploration of Orthodox Christianity with the same intensity he had applied to his searches through Zen, Taoism, and perennialism. Just as he had previously taught himself Chinese in order to study the Tao, now he taught himself the Slavic languages in order to understand the Russian Orthodox hymns. Attending the cathedral regularly, he met its archbishop, John, who had recently arrived in San Francisco from Shanghai, where he had lived after fleeing his Russian homeland during the Bolshevik revolution. In China, John served as bishop under the Japanese occupation, later working in a refugee camp after the communist revolution and then fleeing to Paris, before being appointed bishop of San Francisco in 1962. Throughout it all, he refused to sleep in a bed, ate just one meal a day, went barefoot, and gave all he had to the poor.

St. John of San Francisco—as he now is—was an entrancing figure for the young Eugene, like an ancient saint who had walked into the modern world. In Russian Orthodoxy, and especially in the figure of St. John, he had found what he was looking for: a faith that emphasized not self-indulgence but self-sacrifice. This was no new claim—it was, he came to understand, the very foundation of Christianity, but it had been lost in the modern, comfortable versions of the faith with which he had grown up.

“Let us not, who would be Christians, expect anything else from [life] but to be crucified,” he later wrote, “and we must be crucified outwardly, in the eyes of the world; for Christ’s kingdom is not of this world.”

If there is a secret to the growing significance, and the growing veneration, of Rose as a modern Christian figure, it is perhaps the insight that he gained from watching St. John at work—that suffering and struggle are the key to wisdom and truth.


When Eugene Rose was received into the Orthodox Church in 1962, it was both the end of a spiritual search and the beginning of a remarkable transformation. Eugene was a man who never did anything by halves, and now that he had discovered what he considered to be the true faith and the true church, he wanted to explore it in its fullness. Above all, he wanted to be transformed by it.

In the cathedral, he befriended another young Orthodox newcomer, Gleb Podmoshensky, and soon they were hatching plans. By 1964, they had opened a bookstore in San Francisco dedicated to selling Orthodox texts. A year later they purchased an antique, hand-operated printing press and set to work producing their own magazine, The Orthodox Word, featuring stories of ancient forest-dwelling saints, lessons from the Desert Fathers, and teachings from Christian texts.

Reading and writing about the lives of ancient saints who had fled to the Russian wilderness to live for God alone, Eugene and Gleb felt a pull to do the same. In 1967, they bought a parcel of land in the wilds of northern California near the small hamlet of Platina, and formed a Christian brotherhood named after St. Herman of Alaska, America’s first Orthodox saint. Soon, the brotherhood became a monastery. It was a simple, stark, and unworldly place. Most of it was built by hand by Eugene and Gleb, using wood from abandoned mining shacks. There was no running water, electricity, or telephone, but there were bears and rattlesnakes aplenty. Here, both men were tonsured as monks by St. John of San Francisco. Eugene took the name Seraphim, and Gleb became Herman. Father Seraphim Rose was born.

For the next 15 years, Seraphim Rose used his life at the monastery to effect his own personal transformation and that of the nascent Orthodox faith in the U.S. He lived a severe, ascetic life in a small wooden cabin he built himself, sleeping on boards, never cutting his hair or beard, fasting regularly, and dedicating himself to prayer. It was a harsh existence, but one that seemed to deeply energize him. He was beginning to experience the paradox of ascetic Christianity that the monks of the Egyptian desert had noticed and taught a thousand years before: that the more you sacrifice for God, and the simpler your life, the more freedom and joy is available to your soul. The less attached you are to the world, the closer you come to God.

This was, and remains, a message so alien to modern consumer cultures as to be almost incomprehensible to many. But not, it turned out, to all. Slowly, more young men came to the monastery, seeking a radical Christian life away from the outside world, many of them drawn in by reading The Orthodox Word, which the brotherhood continued to produce. Like Rose before them, they sought a meaning that their culture could not give them.

Working by candlelight in his often-freezing wooden cell, Rose began to translate and then write his own books: God’s Revelation to the Human Heart, Orthodoxy and the Religion of the Future, The Soul After Death, and other works poured out of him. During the 1970s, with Russian communism in full force, these titles were produced in samizdat translations in the USSR, where many remain bestsellers today. In the West, meanwhile, Rose’s teachings and writings are growing in popularity—and in some cases, relevance. Orthodoxy and the Religion of the Future, for example, is a blistering examination of the role that digital technology and fashionable occultism will play in the coming of the Antichrist. In the age of WitchTok, and a burgeoning neo-paganism among the young and very online, it’s hard not to read it and shiver.

Writings like this made Rose a controversial figure in some quarters. Some of the claims he made in his books are argued over by theologians, and in some circles he is seen as an extremist or even a fanatic, for the ascetic lifestyle he insisted on leading, for his particular interpretations of Orthodox theology, and for his radical condemnations of what he regarded as the corrupt nature of modern society. In many ways, the criticism is understandable: Rose was a man driven to seek the truth at almost any cost to himself, and he brooked no compromise with a rapidly secularising world which likes its Christianity to be cosy and unthreatening. In the eyes of that world, his life and work do indeed seem extreme or even inexplicable—but then, so did the life of Jesus, and all of his apostles.

As Father Seraphim, he took literally Christ’s call to leave the world and head for the kingdom instead. In this, he may have been closer to historical Christianity, with its litany of martyrs, saints, and ragged desert fathers and mothers, than many of his comfortable critics. As the Orthodox scholar David Bentley-Hart has put it, “one thing in remarkably short supply in the New Testament is common sense. The Gospels, the epistles, Acts, Revelation—all of them are relentless torrents of exorbitance and extremism.” It is, in fact, precisely this lack of sensible, worldly “moderation” that has made Seraphim Rose an increasingly significant spiritual figure in modern America more than forty years after his untimely death.

That death came unexpectedly in the early 1980s, when Rose was in many ways at the height of his powers. Working in his cell, he began to feel a series of excruciating pains in his abdomen. His fellow monks wanted him to see a doctor, but Rose refused for several days. Eventually, when the pains became unbearable, he was taken to hospital, where it was found that a blood clot had killed part of his intestines. It soon became clear that his illness was fatal. The monastic brotherhood gathered around him in his hospital bed, holding an all-night vigil and singing hymns as he slipped in and out of consciousness. He died in September 1982, aged 48.

The end of Rose’s life, though, was to be the beginning of his reputation, which continues to grow among many who see him as an inspiring and uncompromising example of a genuine, unworldly Christianity. Today, there is a growing thrum of support for the notion that Seraphim was, and is, a saint, and that the Orthodox church should recognize him as one. Whether or not that happens, his life and works seem more and more relevant by the year, as the culture war continues, the materialism of the West intensifies, and as young people in particular begin seeking older, deeper, and more serious forms of faith in order to fill the void of meaning that has opened up around them. The endless political arguments and cultural divisions of the modern West, which seem only to grow, can easily disguise what Rose saw beneath: a spiritual void. Without a wider and deeper meaning to life—which in Rose’s view meant without Christ—only nihilism beckons. More and more people, especially the young, seem to agree.

Eugene Rose, who became Father Seraphim, was in this sense an American spiritual pioneer. He was prepared to throw everything off—even his own life—to find the truth that he had always sought so passionately, regardless of what the world thought of him. “When I became a Christian,” he once said, “I voluntarily crucified my mind, and all the crosses that I bear have been only a source of joy for me, I have lost nothing, and gained everything.”

 

Source: https://paulkingsnorth.substack.com/p/california-son

Sunday, May 10, 2026

Prayer for Someone When Recovery is Hopeless

O God, look down with mercy and loving-kindness on our dear brother, afflicted with sickness unto death; give him perfect resignation to Thy divine will, and graciously enable him to suffer, without complaining, whatever Thou art pleased to appoint. O compassionate Lord Jesus Christ, support and comfort him. O Most Holy Theotokos, and all ye blessed saints, intercede for him, that he may acquire much virtue in passing through this time of trial and be purified thereby from the smallest stain, so that at the moment of his departure from this valley of tears, he may enter into the joys which God has prepared for those who love and serve Him, through our Lord and God and Savior, Jesus Christ, together with His unoriginate Father, and His Most Holy and good and life-creating Spirit, now and ever, and unto ages of ages. Amen.




The Rule of Prayer for Deliverance from Evil Thoughts


 

Through the prayers of the Holy Fathers, Lord Jesus Christ our God, have mercy on us and save us. Amen.

Glory to Thee, our God, glory to Thee.

Heavenly King, O Comforter, the Spirit of truth, Who art everywhere present and fillest all things, O Treasury of every good and Bestower of life: come and dwell in us, and cleanse us from every stain, and save our souls, O Good One.

Holy God, Holy Mighty, Holy Immortal, have mercy on us. (3x)

Glory to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Spirit; both now and ever, and unto the ages of ages. Amen.

All-holy Trinity, have mercy on us. Lord, be gracious unto our sins. Master, pardon our iniquities. Holy One, visit and heal our infirmities for Thy Name's sake.

Lord, have mercy. (3x)

Glory to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Spirit; both now and ever, and unto the ages of ages. Amen.

Our Father, Who art in the Heavens, hallowed be Thy name. Thy  kingdom come, Thy will be done, on earth as it is in Heaven. Give us this day, our daily bread. And forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors. And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from the evil one.

Through the prayers of the Holy Fathers, Lord Jesus Christ our God, have mercy on us and save us. Amen.

Lord, have mercy. (12x)

Glory to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Spirit; both now and ever, and unto the ages of ages. Amen.

O come, let us worship and fall down before our King and God.

O come, let us worship and fall down before Christ, our King and God.

O come, let us worship and fall down before Him, Christ the King and our God.

PSALM III

O Lord, why are they multiplied that afflict me? Many rise up against me. Many say unto my soul: There is no salvation for him in his God. But Thou, O Lord, art my helper, my glory, and the lifter up of my head. I cried unto the Lord with my voice, and He heard me out of His holy mountain. I laid me down and slept; I awoke, for the Lord will help me. I will not be afraid of ten thousands of people that set themselves against me round about. Arise, O Lord, save me, O my God, for Thou hast smitten all who without cause are mine enemies; the teeth of sinners hast Thou broken. Salvation is of the Lord, and Thy blessing is upon Thy people.

Glory to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Spirit; both now and ever, and unto the ages of ages. Amen.

Alleluia, alleluia, alleluia, Glory to Thee, O God. (3x)

Our Hope, O Lord, glory be to Thee.

PRAYER I

O Master, Lord my God, in Whose hands is my fate, help me according to Thy mercy, and forsake me not to perish in mine iniquities, neither be it Thy will that I should follow the desires of the flesh against the spirit. I am Thy creature, despite not the work of Thy hands, for I am feeble; for I am come seeking refuge in Thee, my God and Protector: heal my soul, for I have sinned against Thee. Save me for Thy mercy's sake, for I was cast on Thee from my youth: let them be put to shame that seek to turn me away from Thee, by impure deeds, by foolish thoughts, by unprofitable memories. Drive from me every impurity, the excess of malice; for Thou alone art holy, Thou alone art mighty, Thou alone art immortal, having in all things power beyond compare, and by Thee is the power to withstand the devil and his hosts granted unto all. For to Thee belongeth all glory, honor and worship, to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Spirit, now and ever, and unto the ages of ages. Amen.

PRAYER II

May thine ill return upon thine own head, and let thy slander come down upon thee, O crafty and wicked demon: for I worship the Lord my God, and never will I speak blasphemy against Him. For how is it possible for me to vex, or blaspheme Him Whose glory I proclaim day and night, and at every hour, with all my strength and mind? But my doxology is indeed thine abuse; thou shalt see wherein thou slanderest Him, and as an apostate thou speakest against God.

PRAYER III

The Lord Who came into the world by the Most Pure and Holy Virgin and truly the Theotokos, unto the salvation of the world for the sake of us sinners, forbideth thee, O most crafty spirit, the devil. Cursed art thou and all thy wicked thoughts, whether at night or in the day. I exorcize thee by the name of the Consubstantial and Undivided Trinity, the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit: depart from me, the servant of God [name], put not thine evil thoughts into my heart, but depart unto a deserted land, without water, that the Lord visiteth not. I exorcize thee, O impure and blasphemous spirit, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, neither to flatter nor to trouble me with abusive thoughts as I make my prayer unto the Lord my God, but let all thy slanderous thoughts be upon thy head in the day of judgment: for I serve the Lord my God, and to Him alone I send up my prayers in the day and the night, to Him that abolisheth thee, yet hath mercy on me, and strengtheneth me, and forgiveth me, in His great goodness and mercy, all my sins. Get thee behind me Satan, and be thou cursed, with all thy wickedness and opposing power, for blessed and glorified is the most honorable name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, now and ever, and unto the ages of ages. Amen. 

PRAYER IV, TO THE MOST HOLY THEOTOKOS

O my most holy Lady Theotokos, through thy holy and all-powerful prayers banish from me, thy lowly and wretched servant, despondency, forgetfulness, folly, carelessness, and all filthy, evil, and blasphemous thoughts from my wretched heart and my darkened mind. Quench the flame of my passions, for I am poor and wretched, and deliver me from many and cruel memories and deeds, and free me from all their evil effects. For blessed art thou by all generations, and glorified is thy most honorable name unto the ages of ages. Amen.

More honorable than the Cherubim, and beyond compare more glorious than the Seraphim, thee who without corruption gavest birth to God the Word, the very Theotokos, thee do we magnify.

Glory to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Spirit; both now and ever, and unto the ages of ages. Amen.

Lord, have mercy. (3x)

Through the prayers of the Holy Fathers, Lord Jesus Christ our God, have mercy on us and save us. Amen.

Various Prayers to the Theotokos


 

When offended

At all times try to silently endure reproaches… Pray:

"O Queen of Heaven, save us sinners, and suffer us not to fall into the abyss. I know, O Lady, that all these sorrows are profitable unto our soul. But, O Lady, Thou seest how feeble we are, and how greatly we have attached unto the life that is earthly. Grant unto us patience to bear our cross, and forsake us not, sinners, of Thy heavenly consolation."

And thus, if you act in this way throughout your entire temporal life on earth, the Lord will not forsake you together with His Mother, and at times will give you such inner consolations as no earthly pleasure or comfort can be compared with…

 

Prayer of Venerable Macarius of Optina, read during carnal warfare

O Mother of the Lord, my Creator! Thou art the root of virginity and the unfading flower of purity. O Bearer of God! Help me, who am weak from carnal passion and in affliction, for in Thee alone, and through Thee in Thy Son and God, I have protection. Amen.

 

Prayer for neighbors

Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, by prayers of the Theotokos and of all the saints, send peace, well-being, and blessings to Thy servants: [names].

 

Prayers to the Most Holy Theotokos for our neighbors or the people around us whom we wish to help

Some people of high spiritual life, when they wished to help a person met on their life’s path but, due to various circumstances, could not do so, prayed thus:

“Most Holy Lady our Theotokos, take Thou this soul (name or names), and do with it what Thou willest, what I would wish to do with it, but cannot. I entrust him (or them – names) to Thy maternal care and protection.”

Prayer 1

O Most Holy Lady Theotokos! Raise us, the servants of God (names), from the depths of sin and deliver us from sudden death and from every evil. Grant, O Lady, unto us peace and health, and enlighten our mind and the eyes of our heart unto salvation, and make us, Thy sinful servants, worthy of the Kingdom of Thy Son, Christ our God; for His dominion is blessed with the Father and His Most Holy Spirit.

Prayer 2

Most Holy Virgin, Mother of the Lord, show upon me, the poor one, and the servants of God (names) Thy former mercies: send down the spirit of understanding and piety, the spirit of mercy and meekness, the spirit of purity and righteousness. Yea, O Most Pure Lady! Be merciful to me here and at the Dread Judgment. For Thou art, O Lady, the glory of the heavenly and the hope of the earthly. Amen.

Prayer 3

O Most Holy Lady Theotokos! Look down from the height of Thy holiness upon us, the servants of God (names), and help us who are weak; calm our sorrows, guide us on the right path; heal our afflicted hearts, grant us to spend the remaining time of our life in peace and repentance; grant a Christian end, and at the Dread Judgment of Thy Son appear to us as an intercessor of mercy, that we may always glorify Thee with all who have pleased God unto the ages of ages.

 

 

Source: Сборник редких молитв ко Пресвятой Богородице [Collection of Rare Prayers to the Most Holy Theotokos], published by Holy Dormition Pochaev Lavra, 2013.

Online: https://azbyka.ru/otechnik/molitva/sbornik-redkih-molitv-ko-presvjatoj-bogoroditse/

 

Did Fr. Seraphim Cover Up Abuse?

On the truth about Fr. Seraphim and the alleged cover up of the sins of Herman Podmosenky.

Silouan Wright

 

 

With the prospect of his glorification, accusations have resurfaced that Fr. Seraphim Rose knowingly covered up the sexual misconduct of his co-founder, Gleb Podmoshensky (later "Fr. Herman"). Blog posts and Substack articles repeat the claims as settled fact.

Here are 12 points to consider.

1. The entire argument against Fr. Seraphim Rose relies on the testimony of Reader Daniel Everiss and Fr. Alexey Young. Both men explicitly exonerated Fr. Seraphim and remained devoted to him until the end. The accusers cannot make their case without contradicting their own witnesses.

2. Reader Daniel Everiss is the star witness against Fr. Herman. He maintained the blog (which is still online) that excoriated, criticized, and named those in ROCOR who protected and justified what Fr. Herman Podmoshensky did. Reader Daniel was among 4-6 accusers who gave sworn, signed testimonies kissing the Gospel and Cross before Archbishop Anthony, in the presence of two or three priests. [1] He was himself a personal victim of Podmoshensky:

"He [Fr. Herman] harmed many souls, myself included. He drove me away from his Platina Monastery. He drove only God knows, how many wounded souls, especially of young men, from the Church, even from God."

Fr. Herman Podmoshensky in response blacklisted him:

"'That scum Everiss!' — this he repeated over many years to many."

Reader Daniel endured forty years of isolation for telling the truth. He died in 2023, having never recanted a word.

3. Reader Daniel Everiss was extremely critical of almost everyone BUT Fr. Seraphim Rose. The entire argument against Fr. Seraphim requires using the very words of Reader Daniel while completely dismissing the same man's glowing endorsement of Fr. Seraphim. Reader Daniel wrote:

"I KNOW such was not the case! Fr. Seraphim and Herman Podmoshensky were/are two, VERY different people. Fr. Seraphim was the true self-abnegating ascetic, and poor Fr. Herman... just playing his own pompous deluded/in prelest, 'Holy Starets' role."

And again from Reader Daniel:

"Furthermore, I have hard evidence, gathered from different sources, that Fr. Seraphim was not guilty of the sins of his brother, as some foolish people who did not know him, have wrongly imagined. Fr. Seraphim was an angel in the flesh."

And again:

"I saw absolutely no signs at all, that he [Fr. Seraphim Rose] led any secret unspiritual life-style, though as it proved to be later on, Fr. Herman ...did."

All who continue to use the name and arguments of Reader Daniel have to explicitly contradict him.

4. Reader Daniel Everiss, who bluntly critiqued ROCOR for not acting, called Fr. Seraphim Rose "an angel in the flesh." How can one use Reader Daniel's testimony against Fr. Seraphim Rose and completely ignore whom Reader Daniel himself said was responsible and accountable for not acting? Credibility is not selective. Either a witness is credible or he is not. The Pokrov Truth Substack (which everyone is deferring to in the pursuit of slandering Fr. Seraphim Rose) itself calls Reader Daniel "a courageous truthspeaker" whose "validity and sincerity as a reliable source is unquestioned," and then it immediately uses his testimony to argue the exact opposite of what Daniel intended and believed.

5. The documentary record rules out a long-term coverup. Fr. Seraphim's last surviving letter (early June 1982, three months before his death) mentions Fr. Herman casually and collaboratively. [13] Across 617 pages of published letters spanning twenty years of correspondence, not a single letter hints at knowledge of misconduct. Fr. Alexey Young's Russian-language memoir places the moment Fr. Seraphim learned something alarming approximately six months before his death: a novice reported that Fr. Herman had approached him and said things "that cannot be repeated." [7] Fr. Alexey describes Fr. Seraphim as devastated by this news: "His illness probably opened up because of this terrible news. After all, this meant the end of the monastery. The monastery would simply be closed if such news had reached the bishop." [7] His language is that of a fresh wound, not of a man who has been managing a known secret for years. The "long-term coverup" narrative has no documentary support whatsoever.

6. Hieromonk Damascene's biography documents that "every evening after services, Fr. Seraphim remained in church to hear the brothers unburden their souls privately to him." [2] The brothers did revelation of thoughts with Fr. Seraphim four to five times weekly. Blessed Paisius Velichkovsky, whose rule governed this practice, explicitly called it "confession." [3] Thus: if Fr. Seraphim learned about the matter of Fr. Herman, it is very likely that he learned about it under the seal of confession. Those who demand he should have "spoken up" are demanding that he commit a canonical crime. The canons are explicit: a confessor may not divulge the sins confessed to him; if he does so and the penitent denies it, the confessor's testimony carries no weight; and a priest who breaks the seal faces suspension or outright deposition from the priesthood. [4]

St. Nikodemos the Hagiorite: "Nothing else remains after confession, Spiritual Father, except to keep the sins you hear a secret, and to never reveal them, either by word, or by letter, or by a bodily gesture, or by any other sign, even if you are in danger of death." [5] Saint Paisios the Athonite: "Is it ever permitted to reveal the confession of another? Absolutely not!" [6]

Fr. Seraphim could not reveal what was confessed to him, even if his very life was in danger. He did what he could within the bounds of the canons: Fr. Seraphim "forbade this novice to be alone with Fr. Herman." [7] according to Fr. Alexey Young. The accusers are asking us to condemn a man for obeying the Holy Canons.

7. What exactly do critics expect Fr. Seraphim to have done? Write a newspaper article? Publish it in a book? Fr. Herman was the abbot of the monastery, officially appointed as Superior by Archbishop Anthony himself in 1975. [2] In monastic life, nothing happens without the blessing of the superior. A monk cannot act independently against his own abbot; the only proper course of action was to bring the matter to the bishop above them both. And we already know what happened when Archbishop Anthony received exactly that kind of testimony from multiple sworn witnesses after Fr. Seraphim's death: he "did not want to believe them and did not press these particular charges." [8] Anthony showed the testimonies to Fr. Herman, who "swore on the Bible that it was untrue." Anthony believed him. He gave Fr. Herman more than two years before suspension while the Synod wanted him defrocked earlier. So even if Fr. Seraphim told Archbishop Anthony everything, the result would have been the same. The full answer to everything these critics demand is already in the historical record, and it indicts the hierarchy, not Fr. Seraphim.

Further, we must consider how many assumptions the accusation requires. We must assume Fr. Seraphim did not tell Archbishop Anthony. We must assume he did not direct those who confessed to him to approach the archbishop themselves. We must assume the two men never discussed the matter. We must assume the information came outside the seal of confession. Every one of these assumptions contradicts the available evidence or cannot be verified. And against all of them stands one documented fact: when Archbishop Anthony did receive sworn testimony from multiple witnesses after Fr. Seraphim's death, he still dragged his feet and believed Fr. Herman's denial. The accusation requires a tower of unproven assumptions; the defense rests on what actually happened.

8. The double standard among those who repeat these accusations is staggering. The ROCOR Ecclesiastical Court's own published decision praised Archbishop Anthony's delay as pastoral patience: "he did not rush to proceed with an Ecclesiastical Court, so as to give Fr. Herman time for repentance." [9] Anthony's obituary in Orthodox Life contained three eulogies praising his humility; the Podmoshensky affair was never mentioned. No ROCOR Synod resolution ever criticized Anthony for delay or leniency. The institution commended his inaction as virtue and eulogized him without qualification. Archbishop Anthony himself, on Forgiveness Sunday in the Novi Sobor in San Francisco, wept and bowed to the congregation, asking them to "forgive me for my not being a good or wise bishop" in regards to Herman and Platina. [1] Even the bishop admitted he failed. Worse: Reader Daniel reveals that Archbishop Anthony issued "an order of temporary silence" to the witnesses themselves. [11] The bishop received the sworn testimonies, acknowledged the problem, and then ordered the victims to stay quiet. And yet a dying hieromonk with no canonical authority, whose star witness calls him "an angel in the flesh," is the one these slanderers choose to put on trial and insult. The Pokrov Truth blog, at least, is consistent in critiquing ROCOR's institutional failures. But the vast majority of people sharing these accusations do not. They will not critique the bishop because critiquing a hierarch carries actual institutional consequences. They will critique a dead hieromonk because it costs them nothing, and because Fr. Seraphim spoke against them in his writings.

9. Fr. Seraphim Rose had absolutely no motive to protect Fr. Herman. About six months before his death, he said "he was never happier than when Fr. Herman was off on one of his many trips," for then, he said, "we have peace, quiet, and order at the Skete." [8] According to Reader Daniel, Fr. Seraphim said that if he survived another year, he would leave Fr. Herman. When Fr. Herman openly told a group at a St. Herman Summer Pilgrimage that homosexuality was "commonly accepted" in Orthodox village life, Fr. Seraphim left the lecture in obvious and open disgust. [1] Fr. Alexey Young, who knew both men personally, writes in his memoir: "He [Fr. Seraphim] touched other people only when he blessed, and never again. Father Herman, on the contrary, immediately tried to grab the interlocutor into his arms when they met." [7] These were two fundamentally different men. And this was a volatile situation: when the accusations finally came, Fr. Herman reportedly threatened to shoot Archbishop Anthony, a claim corroborated independently by the academic record. [14] This is the unstable man Fr. Seraphim was living under. These critics, from the safety of their keyboards, presume to judge a monk trapped in a remote monastery with a dangerous superior and a bishop who would later admit he failed.

Further, those who have read Fr. Seraphim Rose know that he was without fear. In his writings he criticizes GOARCH, ROCOR, the OCA, the Moscow Patriarchate, the Serbians, the Antiochians, the Old Calendarists, the Paris school, the World Council of Churches, and modernist Orthodox seminaries. He critiqued Patriarch Athenagoras, Archbishop Iakovos, Metropolitan Nikodim (Patriarch Kirill's own mentor), Fr. Alexander Schmemann, Fr. John Meyendorff, Fr. Panteleimon of Boston, and his own ROCOR bishops by name. He called institutional compliance "spiritually illegitimate" [10] and "slavery to men." [11] He even said of Archbishop Anthony himself: "a 'quencher of the spirit'... He is an excellent 'peacemaker,' but he crushes every good initiative." [12]

Therefore: a man planning to leave his own monastery, who called obedience to corrupt institutions slavery, who spoke critically of Fr. Herman and of his own bishop, who called out jurisdictions and notable persons, has zero motive to cover up anything for institutional self-preservation.

10. The circulating "full story" against Fr. Seraphim Rose links rely on the testimony of a schismatic Old Calendarist "archbishop" (Gregory Abu-Asaly of the self-created "Genuine Orthodox Church of America"). [15] Consider what this man actually says in the video that Pokrov Truth promotes as "a valid source to take into consideration":

He renders the deathbed words as "I curse you" (30:44), a version found in no written source. The documented words, per Fr. Alexey Young, are "I'm finished with you. Damn you!" [8] He repeats his version three times in the video. He then fabricates the entire deathbed scene: in his telling, Fr. Seraphim "comes out of a coma, sees Father Herman, says 'I curse you, get away from me,' fell back into a coma and died" (30:36-31:04). The documented reality, per both Hieromonk Damascene and Fr. Alexey Young, is a man with tubes passed into his mouth, arms spread apart and tied to the bed, needles of IV drips in his veins, unable to move or speak. [27]

He insinuates that Fr. Seraphim's fatal intestinal illness was caused by his pre-conversion homosexuality: "And is it because of his past incontinence, we don't know, but he had a pain there" (28:45-29:01). Fr. Seraphim came to the faith from a sinful past, as many of us have. He repented. He converted. Everyone who knew him, including Reader Daniel, the star witness against Fr. Herman, testifies that Fr. Seraphim became wholly ascetic, wholly dispassionate: "an angel in the flesh." The Orthodox Church has many saints who committed grave sins before their conversion. St. Mary of Egypt lived in sin for decades. Abu-Asaly is drawing a crude connection between the location of the illness and the nature of the pre-conversion sin. Imagine a female saint who lived in sin before her conversion and later died of cancer. Imagine a man going on camera and insinuating that the cancer was connected to the sins she used to commit. That is what this man is doing. He is not a clairvoyant. He has no medical knowledge. He has no spiritual authority. He sat in a room, thought about the past sexual sins of a dead man, formed a crude anatomical theory, and published it on the internet. The Holy Fathers condemn this as gossip, and anyone who repeats these insinuations shares in it.

This is the same man who declared Fr. Seraphim "in prelest" because he did not comb his beard. He is not insulting a layman. He is insulting a hieromonk of the canonical Church, a priest and monk who showed no signs of his former life after conversion, a man every witness calls completely dispassionate, and one who will soon (God willing) be glorified as a saint.

In the same video, he claims, without any source, that Fr. Herman intercepted letters from Fr. Seraphim's "former lover" and planned to publish them to expose him (39:48). He claims the teaching of the aerial toll houses is "Gnostic" and "condemned by the ecumenical councils" (23:50), a teaching attested by St. Athanasius the Great, St. John Chrysostom, St. Basil the Great, St. Cyril of Alexandria, St. Ephraim the Syrian, St. John Climacus, St. Mark of Ephesus, St. Ignatius (Brianchaninov), St. Theophan the Recluse, St. John of Shanghai, and many others, hymned in the liturgical texts of the Church, and given comprehensive treatment in St. Anthony's Greek Orthodox Monastery's volume The Departure of the Soul.

This is the man the accusers cite. Anyone who shares the opinions of this schismatic and treats him as a credible witness has no interest in truth, accountability, or Orthodoxy.

The author of the Pokrov Truth Substack writes under the pseudonym "The Grand Inquisitor." In his own post endorsing the video, he acknowledges that Abu-Asaly's "fundamentalist views about baptism, ecumenism and who is, and is not a heretic, are not in accordance with established, mainstream positions of the canonical Orthodox Churches." He writes this, and then in the very next sentence calls him "a valid source to take into consideration." He knowingly promoted the video of a schismatic who fabricates deathbed quotes, insinuates that a hieromonk's fatal illness was divine punishment for sins he repented of decades earlier, and contradicts the consensus of the Fathers.

11. So we must ask: why are these accusations coming forward? The evidence does not support the accusation. The star witness contradicts it. The canons explain the silence. The hierarchy bears the documented responsibility. When someone persists despite all of this, the question is no longer about evidence. It is about motivation. You can see it plainly: they quote nothing else Reader Daniel said. Not his decades of posts naming those who protected Fr. Herman. Not his indictment of Archbishop Anthony's foot-dragging. Not his account of being blacklisted, shunned, and driven into isolation for telling the truth. Not his explicit exoneration of Fr. Seraphim Rose. They extract one fragment and discard the rest. Reader Daniel himself saw it coming. He wrote that Fr. Herman "even has caused some to disparage Fr. Seraphim, who himself was a sincere true ascetic and priest." [1] The pattern speaks for itself: they do not want Fr. Seraphim Rose glorified. They do not care about Fr. Herman. They care about what Fr. Seraphim Rose himself stood for: uncompromising Orthodoxy that spared no institution, no hierarch, and no theological fashion from criticism. That is what they cannot tolerate, and Fr. Herman's sins are merely the instrument they have found to use against him.

12. The aftermath proves that Fr. Seraphim did not enable Fr. Herman; he restrained him. Reader Daniel, who was present at the all-night vigil over Fr. Seraphim's coffin, writes that Fr. Herman:

"was totally out of his mind with remorse and guilt and weeping and self-accusation, kneeling down many times at night, in front of the coffin and trying to tell Fr. Seraphim that he was sorry." [1]

That is the behavior of a man who knew his brother disapproved, who felt accountable to him, and who lost the one person keeping him in check. Within two years of Fr. Seraphim's death, Fr. Herman was suspended from the priesthood. Within six years, he was defrocked. He then fled to the jurisdiction of Metropolitan Pangratios Vrionis, a Greek priest defrocked by the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America in December 1970 after pleading guilty to sodomizing two 14-year-old boys; Pangratios was arrested again in April 2002 for the alleged 1999 sexual assault of another 14-year-old boy. [14] That is who Fr. Herman chose to align with once Fr. Seraphim's restraining influence was gone. Sixteen years of partnership produced a brotherhood; six years without Fr. Seraphim produced a defrocked priest sheltering under a convicted pedophile. The accusation that Fr. Seraphim enabled Fr. Herman has the evidence exactly backwards.

If these people cared about the victims, they would be talking about what the victims talked about. For them, the victims are simply tools to be used to achieve their aims of slandering a saint under the guise of "seeking accountability."

I would encourage the faithful, whenever they see these accusations repeated against Fr. Seraphim Rose, to share this post (you have permission) and to ask the accusers to address the evidence presented here. Let us not allow the memory of our saints and elders to be defamed without answer.

---

1. Reader Daniel Everiss. Sworn testimonies and personal account: blog post, December 7, 2012, https://readerdanielsharing.blogspot.com/.../not-of-this... "Angel in the flesh," "hard evidence," and "'That scum Everiss!'": blog post, July 1, 2014, https://readerdanielsharing.blogspot.com/.../death-of-fr.... "I KNOW such was not the case" and "I saw absolutely no signs at all": "In Fr. Seraphim's Defense," https://startingontheroyalpath.blogspot.com/.../in-fr...

2. Hieromonk Damascene, Father Seraphim Rose: His Life and Works, ch. 66, "Brothers."

3. Life of Blessed Paisius Velichkovsky, quoted in Damascene, p. 529.

4. Canon 132 (141 in the Pedalion) of Carthage; Canon 34 of St. Basil the Great; Canon 27 of St. Nikephoros the Confessor. Together they establish the principle that a confessor may not reveal what is confessed to him. The penalty of deposition is stated by St. Nikodemos the Hagiorite in his commentary on the practice (Exomologetarion, Ch. 12).

5. St. Nikodemos the Hagiorite, Exomologetarion, Ch. 12: "That the Spiritual Father Is Not to Reveal Sins," trans. George Dokos (Uncut Mountain Press, 2006), p. 107. The same chapter records the incident under Patriarch Nektarios of Constantinople (381-397), when a spiritual father revealed a woman's confession and the faithful were so scandalized they refused to confess at all. St. John Chrysostom personally witnessed the fallout and labored to convince the people to return to the sacrament.

6. Elder Paisios the Athonite, Spiritual Counsels, Vol. 3: Spiritual Struggle, p. 297.

7. Fr. Alexey Young, Russian-language memoir, recorded August 20-21, 1998, posted 2007. https://seraphim-rose.livejournal.com/7683.html

8. Fr. Alexey Young, review of Not of This World, Orthodox America, Vol. XIV, Issue 126-127. https://roca.org/.../from-the-bookshelf-not-of-this.../

9. Orthodox Life, Vol. 43, No. 5 (1993), Ecclesiastical Court excerpt, pp. 44-45; Orthodox Life, Vol. 50, No. 5 (2000), Archbishop Anthony obituary eulogies.

10. Letters of Fr. Seraphim Rose, p. 125.

11. Letters of Fr. Seraphim Rose, p. 322.

12. Letters of Fr. Seraphim Rose, p. 128.

13. Letters of Fr. Seraphim Rose, Letter #326, early June 1982 (the last surviving letter).

14. D. Oliver Herbel, Turning to Tradition: Converts and the Making of an American Orthodox Church (Oxford University Press, 2013), Chapter 3; Phillip Charles Lucas, "Enfants Terribles: The Challenge of Sectarian Converts to Ethnic Orthodox Churches in the United States," Nova Religio 7, no. 2 (November 2003), reposted by ROCOR Studies: https://www.rocorstudies.org/.../enfants-terribles-the.../. See also New York Post, April 19, 2002: https://www.culteducation.com/.../4691-bishops-unholy-act...

15. Gregory Abu-Asaly, "Father Seraphim Rose," YouTube (GOC America channel), August 5, 2025. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WpMb94cGW0w. Timestamps cited in text. Pokrov Truth endorsed this video on April 27, 2026: https://pokrovtruth.substack.com/.../video-fr-seraphim...

 

Source: posted and shared on the author’s Facebook account, May 9, 2026.


Father Seraphim the Philosopher: Teacher of Ancient Piety

Reposed August 20 (+1982) By Fr. Damascene [Christensen] Source: Vita Patrum: The Life of the Fathers by St. Gregory of Tours , translat...