Monday, February 23, 2026

The Who’s Who of the Great Canon of St. Andrew of Crete

Protodeacon James Hughes

 

 

As we approach Great Lent, the time given to us specifically for repentance, the Church gives us a whole host of images to help us. St. John of Kronstadt teaches that:

“Imagery or symbols are a necessity of human nature in our presently spiritually sensual condition; they explain [by the vision] many things belonging to the spiritual world which we could not know without images and symbols.”

We need pictures to help us think, to help us digest and understand the truths given to us. What St. Andrew of Crete does in the Great Canon written by him, is to being to remembrance many characters of the Old Testament and a few from the New Testament. In earlier times, people knew the scriptures much more than we do. Mention a name like Korah, Datham, Hophni or Phinehas and many people would be able to tell you all about them. When they heard these names in St. Andrew’s canon, they had the opportunity to be struck in the heart and brought to repentance. Unfortunately, we are not that scripturally literate so the names can just fly by and not mean anything to us. We could be virtually untouched by the canon. The reason for this talk is to at least start us on the way to knowing to whom St. Andrew is referring.

However, we need to do more than simply know who all those people are. We need to take the canon personally. Their sins and failings are our sins and failings. That St. Andrew expects us to approach the canon personally is clear from the way he writes it.

Adam and Eve

The first people mentioned are, understandably, Adam and Eve. In Canticle One we read:

“I have rivaled in transgression Adam the first-formed man, and I have found myself stripped naked of God, of the eternal kingdom and its joy, because of my sins.

And:

“Instead of the visible Eve, I have the Eve of the mind: the passionate thought in my flesh, showing me what seems sweet; yet whenever I taste from it, I find it bitter.”

It is interesting that St. Andrew refers to Eve as the mind. Last week, on March 16/29, in the For Consideration section of the Prologue, there is a quote from St. Hesychius which reads: “If you make yourself fulfill [God's commandments] in thought, you will rarely find it necessary to toil over the fulfilling of them in action.”

So in the beginning of the canon, St. Andrew, through mentioning Adam and Eve tells us of the results of sin (separation from eternal life) and the cause of sin (turning from God in our thinking). St. John of Kronstadt teaches that we do not actually think with our mind. The thoughts we have are generated in our hearts, or are the result of suggestions by the devil. One of the things which the elder Simeon told the Mother of God was that her child “shall be spoken against, that the thoughts of many hearts may be revealed.”

In the prayer read at Midnight office on Sunday morning, there is a phrase which reads something like “I have become a slave to pleasure through slothfulness of mind”. I have even seen a warning on a bumper sticker which read, “Don’t believe everything you think”. If we believe everything we think, and, in our laziness, do not weigh our thoughts against the commandments of Christ, we become enslaved. By being aware of our thoughts, we can come to know what lies in our heart. We may not like what we come to know, but such is the spiritual life.

Perhaps the rest of the Old Testament figures mentioned in the canon could be seen as symbolizing the various ways in which we sin against God, in thought word, and deed.

Cain

Cain was half-hearted in his devotions and sacrifice toward God. He didn’t give his best. He gave lip service, empty words, to God; he did not give his heart. He knew that the sacrifice he was making was only an outward show, but “killed” his conscience by not listening to it.

Next mentioned is Cain, the first son of Adam and Eve.

“By my own free choice I have incurred the guilt of Cain’s murder. I have killed my conscience, bringing the flesh to life and making war upon the soul by my wicked actions.”

However, God was not mocked; He saw the shallowness of Cain’s efforts and therefore did not accept the sacrifice and reward Cain.

Abel

Of course, Cain is mentioned in contrast to his brother Abel, who offered to God an unblemished lamb. St. Andrew writes:

O Jesus, I have not been like Abel in his righteousness. Never have I offered Thee acceptable gifts or godly actions, a pure sacrifice or a life unblemished.”

Some interpreters of the story of Cain and Abel see Cain’s sin as not offering the correct kind of sacrifice; he offered the fruits of his garden, not a lamb as did Abel. This is missing the point. God, of course wants our hearts. Our responsibility is to give our best in all we do.

Cain’s sin could more correctly be seen as jealously which led to murder. Jealousy comes when we are ungrateful and have not given with a sincere and humble heart. When we feel jealous, it is a sign that we got caught in our ingratitude and we don’t like it. We got caught trying to give our second best but still expecting to receive the best reward. We kill our conscience which tries to tell us that our disappointment is our own fault. Of course, our disappointment, our dissatisfaction, must be someone’s fault so we turn on our brother.

We probably do not murder outwardly as did Cain, but we all know the judgments and anger that accompany jealousy. Our Lord tells us in the sermon on the mount that, “Ye have heard that it was said of them of old time ‘Thou shalt not kill’… But I say unto you “Whosoever shall be angry with his brother shall be in danger of the judgment.”

Mention the school children. Cain and Abel mean “I can’t” and “I am able”. When one of them is not putting their heart in their works, we simply need to ask Cain? or Abel?

Canticle Two

Lamech (descendent of Cain)

In Canticle two, we hear of Lamech. There are a few Lamechs in the Old Testament. This one was a descendant of Cain. Cain had a son named Enoch, and, according to Genesis 4:17, built a city and named it after his son. Enoch had a son named Irad, Irad had a son named Mehujael. Mehujael had a son named Methusael (not to be confused with Methuselah). Finally, Methusael had a son named Lamech.

Lamech’s sin was, like Cain, murder. Whereas Cain killed one person, Lamech kills two people – an older man and a young man. The canon reads:

“To whom shall I liken thee, O soul of many sins? Alas! to Cain and to Lamech. For thou hast stoned thy body to death with thine evil deeds, and killed thy mind with thy disordered longings.

“Through sin, a man ends up destroying his own soul, (the man) and his mind (the young man).”

St. Andrew then mentions four righteous men.

“Call to mind, my soul, all who lived before the Law. Thou hast not been like Seth, or followed Enos or Enoch, who was translated to heaven, or Noah; but thou art found destitute, without a share in the life of the righteous.”

Seth was a son of Adam and Eve born after Abel had been murdered and Cain had been cast away. Seth had a son named Enos. The last verse of the fourth chapter of Genesis reads:

“And to Seth, to him also there was born a son; and he called his name Enos: then began men to call upon the name of the Lord.”

Enos had a son named Cainan. Cainan had a son named Mahalaleel. Mahalaleel had a son named Jared, in turn had a son named Enoch. This second Enoch did not die as men normally do. When he was three hundred five years old, he was “translated.”

I cannot tell you exactly what “translated” means, but Enoch was true to the meaning of his name “dedicated”. The scriptures say: “Enoch walked with God: and he was not, for God took him” (Genesis 5:24). Enoch had a very famous son, the oldest recorded person in history -Methuselah.

We have now been introduced to two people named Enoch. The first Enoch was Cain’s son. He was dedicated to this world, symbolized by his connection to a worldly city. The second Enoch was the one mentioned by St. Andrew, who was dedicated to God and was found worthy to enter the heavenly city.

Noah

The fourth righteous man mentioned in canticle two is Noah. We all know Noah. He was a righteous man in the midst of a very unrighteous society. Only Noah and his wife, his three sons and their wives survived the Great Flood.

Canticle Three

Lot

Canticle three begins with a reference to Lot, Abraham’s nephew and the son of Abraham’s brother, Haran. Apparently, Haran had died and Abraham was looking after Lot in Haran’s place.

The reference to Lot in the canon is:

“O my soul, flee like Lot to the mountains, and take refuge in Zoar before it is too late. Flee from the flames, my soul, flee from the burning heat of Sodom, flee from the destruction by the fire of God.”

This verse of the canon is in reference to the destruction of the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah. Three angels were sent by God to destroy these cities for their extreme wickedness. However, before destroying the cities, angels first went to visit Abraham who was living on the Plain of Mamre, not too far from Sodom and Gomorrah. Abraham offered them wonderful hospitality. It was during this visit that the angels told Abraham and Sarah (99 and 89 years old at the time) that Sarah would bear a son who would be called Isaac. This incident is the inspiration behind the icon we know of as “The Hospitality of Abraham.”

When the angels told Abraham that they were on their way to destroy Sodom and Gomorrah, Abraham realized that his nephew lived there and asked the angels if they would destroy the cities if they found fifty good people there. They said, “No.” Abraham kept questioning the angels, lowering the number of righteous people required to warrant a reprieve. The angels finally agreed that if ten righteous people were in the cities they would not destroy them.

As it turned out, only four good people were found – Lot and his wife and two daughters. The angels told them to flee to the mountains and not turn back. This is when Lot’s wife disobeyed and turned back. She turned into a pillar of salt. It is very possible that the site of Sodom and Gomorrah is now covered by the Dead Sea.

Toward the end of Canticle three there are more references to Lot. We are urged:

“Do not look back, my soul, and so be turned into a pillar of salt. Fear the example of the people of Sodom, and take refuge in Zoar. Flee, my soul, like, Lot, from the burning of sin; flee from Sodom and Gomorrah; flee from the flame of every brutish desire.”

Lot escaped destruction because he fled from temptation and did not look back. So often we entertain sinful thoughts, thinking we can then discard them at will. The Fathers of the Church urge us not to attempt to fight temptation by our own strength but to immediately flee to Christ.

The wickedness of Sodom and Gomorrah is generally considered to center around unrestrained sexual desire which leads to depravity. This is clear from the narrative as given in Genesis 19 and also from the reference made in the epistle of St. Jude.

Canticle three also refers to the three sons of Noah: Shem, Ham and Japheth.

“O my soul, thou hast followed Ham, who mocked his father. Thou hast not covered thy neighbor’s shame, walking backwards with averted face. O wretched soul, thou hast not inherited the blessing of Shem, nor hast thou received, like Japheth, a spacious domain in the land of forgiveness.”

These verses refer to an incident that happened some time after the ark had landed and Noah had planted a vineyard. He was affected by the fermented grape juice and was found in an embarrassing position. His son, Ham, saw him and made fun of his father in front of Shem and Japheth. Unlike Ham, Shem and Japheth did their best to shield their father and “cover his sin”. Ham’s sin was mocking the faults and weakness of others. In the Prayer of St. Ephraim the Syrian, which we say many times during Lent, we beg God to prevent us from committing this serious sin.

“Yea, O Lord, King, grant me to see my failing and not condemn my brother, for blessed art Thou unto the ages of ages.”

When Noah realized what had happened, he cursed the descendants of Ham and blessed the descendants of Shem and Japheth.

Abraham

Canticle three also refers to Abraham:

“O my soul, depart from sin, from the land of Haran, and come to the land that Abraham inherited, which flows with incorruption and eternal life.”

Abraham probably does not need too much of an introduction. Abraham was apparently born in Ur, a city in Mesopotamia. After the death of Haran, Abraham’s brother, his father Terah moved his family north to a city known as Haran (perhaps named after Terah’s son). This became their new home. When Abraham was seventy-five, God told him to, “Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father’s house, unto a land that I will show thee.”

So far, we have been presented with two righteous men who were told to leave the place they were living. This, of course, symbolizes the fact that we have ingrained ways of thinking and perceiving that need to be left behind. Prayer and the examination of our own thoughts and perceptions are required of us in the spiritual life. This is part of leaving the old man and allowing Christ to make us new. We venture beyond our own “self-image” into the spiritual unknown, relying on God.

Ishmael

“Thou hast heard, O my soul, be watchful! How Ishmael was driven out as the child of a bondwoman. Take heed, lest the same thing happen to thee because of thy lust. O my soul, thou hast become like Hagar, the Egyptian; thy free choice has been enslaved, and thou hast borne as thy child a new Ishmael, stubborn willfulness.”

Abraham was married to Sarah who was barren. At Sarah’s suggestion, Abraham had a son by Sarah’s maid, Hagar, and this son is Ishmael. Egypt is usually a symbol of evil, or of the passionate, unregenerate life. Thoughts and actions which arise from the passionate in us enslave us. This is a reoccurring theme in the canon.

Canticle Four

Jacob

“Thou knowest, my soul, the ladder that was shown to Jacob, reaching up from earth to heaven. Why hast thou not provided a firm foundation for it through thy godly actions.”

Leah and Rachel

“By the two wives, understand action and knowledge in contemplation. Leah is action, for she had many children; and Rachel is knowledge, for she endured great toil. And without toil, 0 my soul, neither action nor contemplation will succeed.”

Once again, we are enjoined to be watchful rather than slothful with our thoughts. If you remember, Jacob had to work for his uncle, Laban, for seven years in order to marry Rachel. He was given Leah instead, so he worked another seven years for Rachel.

Esau

“Thou hast rivaled Esau the hated, 0 my soul, and given the birthright of thy first beauty to the supplanter; thou hast lost thy father’s blessing and in thy wretchedness been twice supplanted, in action and in knowledge. Therefore now repent.”

Do you recall how Esau lost his birthright to Jacob? He came home from an unsuccessful hunting trip very hungry and asked Jacob for a bowl of lentil soup. Jacob said he would give Esau the soup if Esau, in turn, would give him the birthright. Esau, so unwilling to suffer a little, traded his birthright in order to appease his appetite. This is a good lesson for lent.

Canticle Five

Reuben

“In my misery I have followed Reuben’s example, and have devised a wicked and unlawful plan against the most high God, defiling my bed as he defiled his father’s.”

Joseph

“I confess to Thee, 0 Christ my King: I have sinned, I have sinned like the brethren of Joseph, who once sold the fruit of purity and chastity. As a figure of the Lord, 0 my soul, the righteous and gentle Joseph was sold into bondage by his brethren; but thou hast sold thyself entirely to sin.”

Moses

“O miserable soul, thou hast not struck and killed the Egyptian mind, as did Moses the great. Tell me, then, how wilt thou go to dwell through repentance in the wilderness empty of passions? Moses the great went to dwell in the desert. Come, seek to follow his way of life, my soul, that in contemplation thou mayest attain the vision of God in the bush.”

These passages, of course, refer to the time when while still a prominent man in Egypt, saw an Egyptian guard beating an Israelite. Moses killed the guard, thinking no one had seen him…. In this passage we see an example of Egypt, and Egyptians, as symbols of the old, unregenerated man.

Korah, Datham, Abiram, Aaron, Hophni and Phinehas

“Aaron offered to God fire that was blameless and undefiled, but Hophni and Phinehas brought to Him, as thou hast done, my soul, strange fire and a polluted life.” (Then in Canticle six) “Like Datham and Abiram, O my soul, thou hast become a stranger to Thy Lord; but with all thy heart cry out ‘spare me,’ that the earth may not open and swallow thee up.”

Korah, Datham and Abiram were the leaders of a revolt against Moses. When the Israelites were but a short distance from the Promised Land, Moses sent six pair of men, one man from each tribe, as “spies” into the Promised Land. They were to get a sense of the people who inhabited the land and of the land itself. Five pair, (ten men) returned with glowing reports of the land, but told Moses that the people were strong and fierce, with many chariots. It would be impossible to defeat them. Only one pair, Joshua and Caleb, said that although it was true that the people were great, the Israelites could conquer them with God’s help. When the Israelites shouted down Joshua and Caleb and despaired of entering into the new land, God told them that they would wander in the desert for 40 years, until they were all dead. Of the 600,000 people who initially left Egypt, only Joshua and Caleb actually entered the Promised Land.

God told Moses to lead the people south, away from the Promised Land. This is when Korah and his friends lead a revolt. God responded to their revolt by opening the earth which swallowed them. All their families were also killed. When the rest of the Israelites saw what had happened, they blamed Moses and spoke against him, God then sent a plague to kill the people. Aaron, however, took a censer and ran among the people, making atonement for them. The plague then stopped.

The reference to Hophni and Phinehas concerns the two sons of the priest, Eli. As sons of the priest, they had privileges and responsibilities in the temple. The sons greatly misused their position to steal from the people and do all kinds of immoral things. Eli knew what was happening but did nothing but verbally scold his sons. A prophet told Eli that his sons would be killed for their evil. When Eli was told his sons had been killed by the Philistines, he fell backwards and died also.

Although the reference to Eli is in the next canticle we will quote it here.

Eli, the Priest

“Thou hast drawn upon thyself, 0 my soul, the condemnation of Eli, the priest: thoughtlessly thou hast allowed the passions to work evil within thee, just as he permitted his children to commit transgressions.”

Canticle Six

Ephraim (raging as a maddened heifer)?

Joshua, the son of Nun

“Like Joshua, the son of Nun, search and spy out, my soul, the land of thine inheritance and take up thy dwelling within it, through obedience to the law. Rise up and make war against the passions of the flesh, as Joshua against Amalek, ever gaining the victory over the Gibeonites, thy deceitful thoughts.”

This is a reference to Joshua’s work as one of the twelve spies sent into the Promised Land. We are given a foretaste of heaven when we are faithful to God.

Joshua against the Amalekites (descendants of Esau) was the battle shortly before the Israelites reached Mount Sinai where Moses received the Ten Commandments.

The reference to the Gibeonites concerns something that happened after the Israelites had entered the Promised Land under the leadership of Joshua. The Israelites had conquered Jericho and the city of Ai and as a result, the surrounding peoples were very afraid of them. The people of Gibeon devised a plan to join forces with several other kingdoms in order to defeat the Israelites. Some of the men of Gibeon dressed themselves in rags, gathered some old dry bread and dried out wineskins and pretended to be emissaries from a distant country. The told a story about how they had heard of the wonders of the Israelites and were seeking to be their servants. The leaders of Israel, including Joshua, were deceived. The scriptures say that, “And the men took of their victuals (believed in the outer appearance), and asked not counsel at the mouth of the Lord.”

Joshua finally realized the plot, gathered his armies together and did battle with the opposing kingdoms. It was a very long and difficult battle, so long in fact that Joshua had to pray that the sun stop in the sky so he would have enough time to win.

Manoah

“O my soul, thou hast heard how Manoah of old beheld the Lord in a vision, and then received from his barren wife the fruit of God’s promise. Let us imitate him in his devotion.”

Manoah was the father of Samson.

Samson

“Emulating Samson’s slothfulness, O my soul, thou hast been shorn of the glory of thy works, and through love of pleasure thou hast betrayed thy life to the alien Philistines, surrendering thy chastity and blessedness.”

Once again we are given an example of the enslavement which follows slothfulness.

Barak and Jepthah with Deborah

“Barak and Jepthah the captains, with Deborah who had a man’s courage, were chosen as judges of Israel. Learn bravery from their mighty acts, O my soul, and be strong.”

Part of “see-saw days” after the death of Joshua. The Israelites did evil in the sight of the Lord and as a result they were conquered by another nation, this time by Jabin, King of the Canaanites. Deborah, a prophetess was the judge of Israel. She called together two good men Barak and Jepthat and they inspired the people to repent and regain their freedom.

Jael, who pierced Sisera

“O my soul, thou knowest the manly courage of Jael, who of old pierced Sisera through his temple and brought salvation to Israel with the nail of her tent. In this thou mayest see a prefiguring of the Cross.”

Sisera was the captain of the armies of Canaan. When the Israelites routed the armies of Canaan, this Sisera fled on foot. He went to the Kenites with whom the Canaanites were at peace and was invited into the house of a man named Heber. Heber’s wife, Jael, knew the whole situation and as Sisera was resting, she took a nail and hammered it into his head. This made the defeat of the Canaanites complete.

Gideon

“O my soul, consider the fleece of Gideon, and receive the dew from heaven; bend down like a hart and drink the water that flows from the Law, when its letter is wrung out for thee through study.”

Hannah and her son Samuel

“Hannah, who lovest self-restraint and chastity, when speaking to God moved her lips in praise, but her voice was not heard; and he who was barren bore a son worthy of her prayer.”

“Great Samuel, son of Hannah, was born at Ramah and brought up in the house of the Lord; and he was numbered among the judges of Israel. Eagerly follow his example, O my soul, and before thou judgest others, judge thine own works.”

Canticle Seven

Saul

“When Saul once lost his father’s asses, in searching for them he found himself proclaimed as king. But watch, my soul, lest unknown to thyself thou prefer thine animal appetites to the Kingdom of Christ.”

David

“David, the forefather of God, once sinned doubly, pierced with the arrow of adultery and the spear of murder. But thou, my soul, art more gravely sick than he. For worse than any acts are the impulses of thy will, David once joined sin to sin, adding murder to fornication; yet then he showed at once a twofold repentance. But thou, my soul, hast done worse things than he, yet thou hast not repented before God.”

Uzzah

“When the ark was being carried in a cart and the ox stumbled, Uzzah did no more than touch it, but the wrath of God smote him. O my soul, flee from his presumption and respect with reverence the things of God.”

While Saul was king and Eli was high priest, the Ark of the Covenant was stolen by the Philistines, the archenemy of the Israelites. When the Ark was brought into the Philistine’s temple where their idol was kept, the idol fell and was smashed. The Ark caused the Philistines all kinds of difficulties so they put it on a cart drawn by two oxen, and pointed the oxen toward Jerusalem. The oxen did not make it all the way to Jerusalem, but stopped about 7 miles short, at the house of a man named, Abinadab. There it stayed there until David was crowned king.

Shortly after being crowned king, David started making plans to return the Ark of the Covenant to Jerusalem. It was put in a cart drawn by two oxen. At one point the cart seemed to be tipping so Uzzah, one of the sons of Abinadab, stretched out his hand to steady the Ark. He was immediately killed.

Absalom and Ahitophel

“Thou hast heard of Absalom, and how he rebelled against nature; thou knowest of the unholy deeds by which he defiled his father David’s bed. Yet thou hast followed him in his passionate and sensual desires.

“Thy free dignity, O my soul, thou hast subjected to thy body; for thou hast found in the enemy another Ahitophel, and hast agreed to all his counsels. But Christ Himself has brought them to nothing and saved thee from them all.”

Absalom was one of the sons of David and was well respected. The Scriptures say of him: in all Israel there was none to be so much praised as Absalom for his beauty: from the sole of his foot to the crown of his head there was no blemish in him.” However, Absalom’s goodness and beauty were all on the outside. Inside he was full of pride, ambition and deceit. He rebelled and fought against his father.

Ahitophel was one of David’s counselors, and like Absalom, was highly respected. When Absalom decided to turn on his father and take over the throne, Ahitophel joined him. Together they forced David to leave Jerusalem. Ahitophel wanted to immediately pursue David before he (David) had time to gather those faithful to him. Through a series of events, Ahitophel was delayed and David rebuilt his forces. When Ahitophel saw that he was to be defeated, he set his house in order and hung himself.

We see here a foreshadowing of events which were to take place in the life of Christ almost a thousand years later. Judas betrayed Christ, just as Ahitophel betrayed David, the king. Both Judas and Ahitophel hung themselves. Psalm 54, which is read at Sixth Hour refers to these events:

“For if mine enemy had reviled me, I might have endured it. And if he that hateth me had spoken boastful words against me I might have hid myself from him. But thou it was, O man of like soul with me, me guide and my familiar friend, thou who together with me didst sweeten my repasts; in the house of God I walked with thee in oneness of mind.”

Solomon

“Solomon the wonderful, who was full of the grace of wisdom, once did evil in the sight of heaven and turned away from God. Thou hast become like him, my soul, through thy accursed life.”

Rehoboam

“O my soul, thou hast rivaled Rehoboam, who paid no attention to his father’s counselors, and Jeroboam, that evil servant and renegade of old. But flee from their example and cry to God: I have sinned, take pity on me.”

Rehoboam was a son of Solomon who became the King of Judah. Some representatives of the northern tribes came to him asking for lower taxes. Rehoboam told them that he would give his answer in three days. He spoke with his father’s counselors who advised him to be merciful. He then spoke with some men his own age who advised him to make the taxes even greater. He listened to the younger men, who suggested that he tell the people. “My father made your yoke heavy, but I will add to your yoke; my father chastised you with whips, but I will chastise you with scorpions”

Jeroboam was the first king of the northern kingdom, of the Kingdom of Israel. He gained his position through treason and encouraged the worship of idols.

Ahab, Jezebel and Eliiah and Zarephath

“Heaven is closed to thy, my soul, and a famine from God has seized thee; for thou hast been disobedient, as Ahab was to the words of Elijah the Tishbite. But imitate the widow Zarepheth and feed the prophet’s soul.”

Ahab was one of the kings of Israel. If you remember, after Solomon’s rule the kingdom was divided into the Kingdom of Israel in the north and the Kingdom of Judah in the south. Ahab and his wife, Jezebel encouraged the worship of many different idols. The prophet Elijah, who is also mentioned in the canon, was constantly in opposition to them. Elijah was so enraged by the blasphemers of Ahab that he prayed to God that it would not rain for three and a half years.

At one point Elijah fled because Ahab was going to kill him. God told Elijah to go to a certain widow, Zarephath. He met the widow gathering sticks in preparation for a last meal for her son and herself.

Christ referred to Elias and Zarephath, as recorded in Luke 4:25-26

Hezekiah and Manasseh (mentioned in other services)

“My days have vanished as the dream of one awaking; and so, like Hezekiah, I weep upon my bed, that years may be added to my life. But what Isaiah will come to thee, my soul, except the God of all?

“By deliberate choice, my soul, thou hast incurred the guilt of Manasseh, setting up the passions as idols and multiplying abominations. But with fervent heart emulate his repentance and acquire compunction.”

Hezekiah was one of the kings of Judah, whose capital was Jerusalem. Hezekiah was one of the good kings. He destroyed the idols that had been erected. However, at one point Jerusalem was being besieged by the Assyrians who were conquering all the surrounding area and Hezekiah was despairing. The servants of Hezekiah sought help from the prophet Isaiah. Isaiah prophesied that Jerusalem would be spared; that God would disburse the Assyrians. Hezekiah begged God for mercy and in the morning the citizens of Jerusalem looked over the city walls and saw 185,000 dead Assyrians.

Later when Hezekiah was very sick, Isaiah came to him and told him that he should set his house in order for he was indeed going to die. Hezekiah wept upon his bed and begged again God for mercy. The Lord heard him and granted him fifteen more years of life.

Manasseh was a son of Hezekiah, and therefore the next king of Judah. However, he restored the idols and was very wicked, building altars for idols in the temple itself. Once again God had to send punishment upon the people; the Assyrians captured Manasseh and took him to Babylon. There Manasseh humbled himself before God and repented. When Manasseh was released from Babylon, he tore down the idols he had previously erected and restored the temple to its proper use.

Canticle Eight

Gehazi

“O wretched soul, always thou hast imitated the polluted thoughts of Gehazi. Cast from thee, at least in thine old age, his love for money. Flee from the fire of hell, turn away from thy wickedness.”

Gehazi was the servant of the prophet Elisha. Elisha had healed a man named Naaman of leprosy. When Naaman wanted to give Elisha some money, the prophet refused. After Naaman left, Gehazi thought of a way to get some money for himself. He ran after Naaman and made up a story about Elisha having a few visitors and needing some money. Naaman gave two talents to Gehazi. Gehazi thought he had made some easy money, but when he returned to Elisha, the prophet knew what he had done and prophesied that the leprosy of Naaman would now come upon Gehazi.

Christ referred to this incident as recorded in Luke 4:27.

Uzziah

“Thou hast followed Uzziah, my soul, and hast his leprosy in double form; for thy thoughts are wicked, and thine acts unlawful. Leave what thou hast done, and hasten to repentance.”

Uzziah was one of the kings of Judah and reigned very well, conquering the pagan nations as God had directed and making many improvements in the kingdom. “But when he was strong, his heart was lifted up to his destruction” He decided one day that he could act as one of the priests and burn incense upon the altar of incense. The priests and several rulers confronted Uzziah but he rebuked them. As Uzziah continued to swing the censer in violation of the Law, his face was covered with leprosy. He died a leper.

Also mentioned are Jonah and the men of Nineveh who repented; Jeremiah, in the muddy pit; and Daniel with the three holy children in the furnace.

Sunday, February 22, 2026

Saint Philaret the New Confessor: On Humility and Repentance

Greek source: St. Philaret of the Russian Diaspora: A Contemporary Ascetic, Confessor, and Hierarch (1903-1985), by Bishop Klemes of Gardikion, Holy Monastery of Sts. Cyprian and Justina, 2015, pp. 97-99.

 

 

With his experience, the saintly Metropolitan Philaret was able to teach true humility and repentance with words that were flowing with life, expressing the Orthodox ethos in summary as follows:

“Sometimes people say about themselves, ‘Oh, I am very religious; I am deeply pious.’ And they say this with sincerity, thinking that they can actually say such about themselves with justification…

“We see from Church life that those who indeed have true faith think about themselves and about their faith in a very humble manner, and always think and have a sense about themselves as having little faith…

“He who indeed believes does not have confidence in his [personal] faith, but sees himself as having little faith. One who does not intrinsically have true faith thinks that he believes profoundly…

“We see the same anomaly in the moral and spiritual assessment of a person… Righteous men see themselves as sinners, while sinners see themselves as righteous.

“Within the soul of the sinner unenlightened by the Grace of God, who does not think about spiritual life, who does not think about his correction, who does not think how he will give an account before God, everything has been jumbled up, and he cannot do anything about it. Only God, Who sees all, knows the wretched condition of such a man’s soul, while the man himself does not feel or observe it, thinking that he is not so bad and that the parts of the Gospel that refer to great sinners do not pertain to him at all. Of course, he may not imagine himself a Saint, but nevertheless he supposes that he is not so pitiable…

“All those who are pleasing to God think about themselves in a completely different way, seeing themselves and their spiritual nature in a completely different light.

“There was an ascetic who mourned continually. His disciple asked him, ‘Father, why are you lamenting?’ ‘For my sins, my child,’ he answered. ‘But what sins do you have? And why do you grieve for them so much?’ ‘My child,’ answered the ascetic, ‘if I were to see my sins as they are, in all their ugliness, I would ask that you also weep for them, together with me’! This is exactly how these exceptional men spoke of themselves.

“We, however, who are ordinary people, do not see our sinfulness or feel its weight. For this reason there occurs what I have just said: for someone to go to Confession not knowing what to say! A certain woman who went to Confession said to her spiritual Father, ‘Father, I have forgotten everything!’

“But what do you think if some person has a pain in his hand, foot, or some internal organ and goes to a doctor—will he forget that he is in pain? So it is with the soul. If it is truly enflamed by the feeling of repentance, it will not forget its sins. Of course, nobody can recall all of his sins—to the very last one, without exception. But true repentance never fails to keep a man conscious of his sinfulness and feeling sincere remorse for it.

“During Great Lent, we pray to the Lord to grant us to see our transgressions—our own transgressions, and not those of other people. But we must pray for this, not only during Lent, but at all times. Let us pray that the Lord will teach us to see ourselves as we should and not to think about our supposed ‘righteousness.’

“Yet we must remember that it is only the mercy of God that can open the eyes of man with regard to his true spiritual state and, through this means, set him on the path of true repentance!”

 

English source: 

Orthodox Tradition, Vol. XXXIII (2016), No. 1, pp. 7-8. Translated by Schemamonk Chrysostomos Agiogregorites.

Saturday, February 21, 2026

On a Common Confession of Faith and Full Communion with the Monophysites

"Moving the Dialogue Forward": Conclusions from the conference on Eastern-Oriental Orthodox relations

[Archdeacon] Fr. John Chryssavgis | February 20, 2026

 

 

The dialogue between the Orthodox (Chalcedonian) and the Oriental Orthodox (non-Chalcedonian) churches began in its official capacity in 1989, and the official Joint Commission has continued to operate since then​ to address centuries-old divisions. Last November saw a landmark​ and groundbreaking​, albeit unofficial ​an academic conference organized by the Huffington Ecumenical Institute at Holy Cross School of Theology, seeking to support the two families of churches in their ongoing efforts to affirm and act upon their theological agreements over the last decades. 

At Holy Cross School of Theology, prominent hierarchs, scholars, and faithful from the Eastern and Oriental Churches gathered on November 5-6, 2025, for an international conference intended primarily as an opportunity for Eastern Orthodox to discuss response to the official dialogues, reception of our joint statements, and understanding of our historical divisions. But crucially, that reflection was done in the presence and with critical comment​s by members of the Oriental traditions: Coptic, Armenian, Syrian, Ethiopian, and Indian.​ Their participation ensured that the conversation was not one-sided, but instead reflected the voices and experiences of both church families.  

After the close of this gathering, the following statement was drafted by the conference organizers in order to summarize its findings and propose recommendations to our churches, parishes, and theological schools about ways in which the two families could act upon what they had already agreed to officially in the Chambésy Statement of 1990, but also upon many additional insights that have arisen ​in the decades since then, especially on the local level, ​such as the United States. 

+++

REPORT AND CONCLUSIONS

From the Conference on Eastern and Oriental Orthodox Relations

“MOVING THE DIALOGUE FORWARD”

Holy Cross School of Theology

November 4–6, 2025

1. From November 4–6, 2025 the Huffington Ecumenical Institute at Holy Cross School of Theology hosted a conference on Eastern and Oriental Orthodox Relations. This meeting gathered leading hierarchs, theologians, and scholars before an in-person and online audience comprising over 150 participants.

2. This conference, the first of its kind in the United States, had significant impact. With no intention of interfering with or bypassing the formal processes of the Joint Commission of the Theological Dialogue between the two church families, it sought rather to be of help in the reception of these official dialogues. More specifically the primary intention was to help Eastern Orthodox coordinate amongst themselves, though in the presence and with the response of Oriental Orthodox participants.

3. To that end, most sessions featured two Eastern Orthodox speakers and an Oriental Orthodox respondent. There was ample conversation after each session, and an entire session was devoted to listening to the voices of younger members of both families, from the Orthodox Christian Fellowship and from students at Holy Cross School of Theology.

4. The clearest message that emerged from this gathering was the participants’ sense of urgency for the dialogue on the one hand to be revived in substance. The Agreed Statements must be advanced to the point that they are received within all the local churches. These statements must either bring us to the point of visible unity and sacramental communion, or the churches must speak authoritatively as to why this could not be possible. Otherwise, our continued division is a repudiation of our own official agreements from more than three decades ago. 

5. Those present at this gathering were well aware that a potential restored unity between Eastern and Oriental Christians will require local adjustments and temporary arrangements in order to meet pastoral and liturgical considerations, and transcend psychological barriers built over centuries of separation and isolation. However, theological convergence was agreed more than thirty years ago by our discerning and qualified forebears. We owe it at once to their generation and to the present generation of our faithful to complete and consummate what they started and labored for over many years. A restored unity will be a test of humility as well as charity, but at the same time the proof of respect and honor for their commitment and conviction.

6. With all of our formal and informal dialogues, and on the heels of our own gathering in November 2025, we are also aware of the continued widespread ignorance of one another’s historical development and Christological thought. We further know that there are vocal opponents to our progress towards communion, from Mount Athos and within many sectors of Eastern Europe. In order to remedy persistent misconception and misinformation, and to build on our progress, our conference put forward the following as tangible and accessible recommendations. Some of these are simply more concrete iterations of pastoral recommendations made by the Joint Commission in the early 1990’s, while others are new.

7. That all theological colleges and seminaries provide informed education and course curricula, with inclusion and participation by representatives of one another’s communion, in the hope that this instruction would gradually influence and shape sermons and teaching in our respective parishes and communities.

8. That at the patriarchal and ecclesiastical level, mutual anathemas of saints in our respective communions should be lifted, on the basis of historical and theological findings of the past fifty years. The lifting of anathemas on each other’s saints would not require us to venerate previously anathematized persons as saints. But on the whole, it may be wiser and preferable to condemn theological positions (such as “Eutychianism” and “Nestorianism”), rather than individual names.

9. That on the local parish level, geographical proximity permitting, an exchange of visits on the occasion of one another’s patronal feasts, along with spiritual retreats, study days, and social events might be jointly organized for purposes of acquaintance and familiarity.

10. That on the practical level, the process of reception from one communion to the other should be standardized in the form of a confession of faith. Zealot voices on both sides should be highlighted, addressed, and/or censured in support of the overwhelming majority of faithful who endorse and need such reconciliation. In this regard, over the course of time, formal documents, especially in educational and academic contexts, should strictly avoid the old polemical and false terminology, such as “monophysite” (which refers now only to the heretical position denying Christ’s consubstantiality with us humans, a position held neither in Eastern nor Oriental churches).

11. Finally, on the level of sacramental union, the desired objective should be full communion. If our bilateral relations and agreed statements are considered with integrity and sincerity, we must confess that no other dialogue—whether that with the Roman Catholic Church, the Anglican Communion, or the Lutheran Federation—comes anywhere near as close as what has been achieved in recent times between our two family churches, whose separation dates much longer than an East-West or Protestant divide. On the way toward such full communion, it would be beneficial to establish intermediary steps, such as a broader—and more official—acceptance of communion among “inter-Orthodox” couples, as is already the practice in many parts of the world.

Find a PDF of the report here:

https://orthodoxobserver.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/EO-OO-Report-2025.pdf

 

 

For the Conference Organizing Committee:

EASTERN ORTHODOX

Fr. John Chryssavgis, co-chair

Huffington Ecumenical Institute at HCHC

Dr. Peter Bouteneff, co-chair

St. Vladimir’s Orthodox Theological Seminary

Archbishop Alexander Golitzin

Orthodox Church in America

Rev. Dr. Nicolas Kazarian

Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America

Rev. Dr. Philip Halikias

Holy Cross School of Theology

Rev. Dr. Gary Alexander

Holy Cross School of Theology

ORIENTAL ORTHODOX

Archbishop Vicken Aykazian

Armenian Apostolic Church

World Council of Churches

Bishop Kyrillos

Coptic Orthodox Diocese of Los Angeles

St. Athanasius and St. Cyril Theological School

Bishop Daniel Findikyan

Gevorgyan Theological Seminary

St. Nersess Armenian Seminary

Atsede Elegba

Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church

Dr. George Kiraz

Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton

Beth Mardutho: The Syriac Institute

Dr. Andrew Youssef

Trinity College, Toronto

 

Source: 

https://orthodoxobserver.org/moving-the-dialogue-forward-conclusions-from-the-conference-on-eastern-and-oriental-orthodox-relations/

 

On Self-Reliance

Source: Orthodox Life, Vol. 47, No. 5, September-October 1997, pp. 15-16.

 

 

The Apostles propagated the Faith everywhere, they organized and established church communities. However, in all of their great deeds, they did not credit anything to themselves, but in everything acknowledged the working of God's Grace. They would say it was not they who labored, but rather the Grace of God which was with them. Here is what Apostle Paul says about himself in the Epistle reading we heard: I laboured more abundantly than they all: yet not I, but the Grace of God which was with me (I Cor. 15:10).

Let us learn from their example, and in every good deed acknowledge God's power, and in no way depend upon ourselves.

It is not enough for a plant to be rooted in soil, but it also needs sunlight and to be irrigated by the rain; otherwise, it will not grow and will not bear fruit. Likewise, for the successful completion of our deeds, blessing from above is always needed. A person gathers all the resources for the success of his undertaking, so that by all accounts a good end seems imminent after such a good beginning. However, suddenly an unexpected change in circumstances ruins all hopes and wrenches success from his hands, as a sudden head of water ruins a strong bulwark, or as a powerful storm topples big trees.

The more God's help is needed, the more dangerous self-reliance becomes. Within our sinful nature hides the inclination to self-delusion, by which man considers some of his successfully accomplished deeds as great struggles, and considers his weak powers sufficient for truly difficult undertakings. One meets such proud hypocrites who think of themselves as saints, and are not ashamed to pose as great ascetics.

…Neither let the mighty man glory in his might (Jer. 9:23). The wealth of Grace which strengthens the soul is inexhaustible, the power of Jesus’s name is insurmountable, whereby we must be saved (Acts 4:12). Man is truly poor and unfortunate if he calls his poverty wealth. The enemy of mankind easily notices the isolation of the soul which is blinded by self-reliance and skillfully robs it of all that had been gained by the self-reliant person. This is why the Apostle warns: Wherefore let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall (I Cor. 10:12). Let him who has been able to do something for his soul, cover his virtues with humility and seek God’s protection to deflect the danger of falling. A blessed ascetic used to say: “The thief was on the cross, and with one word was justified. Judas was one of the apostles, and in one night destroyed all of his labor. Why should no one boast of success in good deeds? Because all those who have relied on themselves have fallen.”

Through bitter experiences man is convinced that self-reliance harms even his temporary well-being. As much as the Lord is well pleased in them that fear Him, and in them that hope in His mercy (Ps. 146:12), so, likewise, God removes His help from the haughty and self-confident. For this reason, that in which people place their hope for obtaining their goals often becomes harmful to them. Do they want to attain expensive belongings? They get eaten by moths and corrupt (cf. James 5:2). Do they put their hopes in the vastness of their fields planted with grain? The very first crop failure could reveal that neither is he that planteth any thing, neither he that watereth; but God that giveth the increase (I Cor. 3:7). Do they strive toward distant cities to trade and to make profit? Who is even sure that they will return alive? Does the scholar boast of his wisdom? [God] taketh the wise in their own craftiness (I Cor. 3:19). In general, should one depend on his own foresight to protect his well-being? Except the Lord guard the city, in vain doth he watch that guardeth her (Ps. 126:2).

Not only in ancient times, but also now and always The Lord is nigh unto all that…call on Him in truth (Ps. 144:19). Let us then begin every work of ours, asking God’s blessing, and reasoning with ourselves ahead of time as the Apostle James instructs us: If the Lord will, we shall live, and do this, or that (James 4:15).

 

- Translated from “A Collection of Short Homilies on All Sundays and Feast Days” (in Russian), Vol. 2, compiled by Priest Andrew S. Smirnoff. Moscow, 1899, pp. 142–143.

Fr. John Romanides on Ancestral Sin

Protopresbyter Dimitrios Athanasiou | February 21, 2026

 

 

[Protopresbyter] John Romanides formulated a radically different reading of ancestral [or original] sin, abandoning the Western moralistic approach in favor of a therapeutic and ontological consideration of the human condition. His basic position is summed up in a simple observation: man does not inherit guilt from Adam, but illness.

According to Romanides, Western theology transformed ancestral sin into a juridical problem. Adam transgressed a law, God became angry, and the punishment of death was imposed upon all humanity. Every man is therefore born guilty, charged with a sin he did not commit, and salvation consists in the remission of this guilt through the sacrifice of Christ. Romanides rejects this image as foreign to the patristic tradition. For the Orthodox Fathers, sin is not primarily a transgression of a moral rule, but an illness of existence, a darkening of the nous, a disturbance of the relationship with God. Adam, having withdrawn from living contact with God, became corrupted ontologically, and this corrupted nature—not the guilt—is transmitted to his descendants.

The difference is decisive. When Western theology speaks about ancestral sin, it means a hereditary guilt that renders every man justly condemned from birth. When the Orthodox Fathers speak about ancestral or forefathers’ sin, they mean the consequences of Adam’s act: death and corruption that entered into our nature. Death for Romanides is not a punishment imposed by God in order to satisfy His justice, but a natural result of separation from the source of life. It is the enemy of God, an instrument of Satan, which Christ came to destroy, not to fulfill. Man is therefore born not guilty, but sick—with a nature weak, mortal, attached to the passions, incapable of truly loving. Salvation is not forgiveness that cancels an imaginary penalty, but healing that restores the health of the soul, illumination of the nous, participation in the divine life.

Romanides used a simple example to make the difference perceptible. A father who drinks poison does not transmit to his children the guilt of his act, but the consequences—the children are born with a weak body, a predisposition to illnesses, perhaps even with poison in their blood. They are not punished, they are victims. Exactly so also with Adam: we are not punished for his own fault; we suffer from the consequences of his fall. This distinction radically changes the meaning of salvation. If the problem is guilt, then Christ is the judge who pays the fine in order to acquit us. If the problem is illness, then Christ is the physician who comes to heal us, to unite us again with God, to make us “gods by grace.”

Romanides’ critique of Western theology is strict. He considers that it misinterpreted the Apostle Paul, introducing a pseudo-moralistic philosophy influenced by Neoplatonism. It ignored the experience of the Fathers of the Church, who knew deification as an immediate reality, and developed a theology based on logical categories—essence, existence, justice—which led to a God-punisher and to a man-condemned. For Romanides, this turn distanced the West from the true Christian experience, transforming religion into moralism and salvation into a legal transaction.

Romanides’ theology restores the center of gravity to the medicinal dimension of salvation. Christianity is not a system of moral rules nor a theory about the remission of sins—it is the therapeutic science of souls. Baptism is not merely a symbolic act that erases guilt, but the putting to death of the old man and birth into new life. Holy Communion is not a reward for the good, but a medicine of immortality. The ascetic tradition of the Church—fasting, prayer, vigil—is not a means to appease an angry God, but therapeutic exercises that restore the health of the nous. The aim is not to avoid hell, but to be deified, to become bearers of the love of God in the world.

In summary, Romanides calls us to see man not as guilty who needs forgiveness, but as sick who needs healing. Ancestral sin is not a condemnation that we carry from Adam, but a weakness that we inherit and that we can overcome within the living relationship with God. Salvation is not a judicial decision in heaven, but a real transformation here and now—illumination, deification, eternal life which begins from the moment we are united with Christ.

 

Greek source: https://apotixisi.blogspot.com/2026/02/blog-post_86.html

 

Metropolitan Cyprian I of Oropos & Phyle: Homily on Cheesefare Sunday

Excerpt from a homily given in 1998 at the spiritual center “Annunciation of the Theotokos” in Kolonos.


 

With the help of God—for yet another year—we find ourselves on the eve of Holy and Great Lent. For those who love their salvation, for those who wish to struggle, this period is the most beautiful!

No virtue is accomplished without prayer and fasting. No passion is cast off, no weakness is cast off, without prayer and fasting.

Behind every passion, the Holy Fathers say, there is also hidden a demon. For this reason, our Christ says: “This kind (that is, of demons) does not go out except by prayer and fasting.”

And fasting—as I mentioned earlier this morning in our Monastery—is not what some unlearned and irreverent people say, that fasting is an invention of the priests, but it is a commandment of God, and this commandment has as much history as the existence of man itself!

It is the first commandment that God gave to the first-formed in Paradise, which for them was Paradise, and it was the only commandment He gave them: not to taste one of the fruits there, from a tree of Paradise.

And the consequence of this disobedience is known; you see it here. Here is hidden our great misfortune, and in the fact that we make bad use of free will. One of the greatest gifts that God has given to man is freedom, is free will!

Unfortunately, man makes bad use of this free will. By his will, therefore, man becomes a rebel against the commandments of God, opposes the will of God, and, sadly, becomes an enemy of God by his own choice.

For this reason, Saint John Chrysostom says: “He who created you without you cannot save you without you.” Out of inexpressible love, without your willing it, He made you a man! He cannot save you if you do not will it.

So greatly does He respect the freedom of man. Thus, we see our Christ Himself saying: “Whoever wills to come after Me”! Whoever wills!

Whoever does not wish may choose not to follow Him, but the one who wills “to come after Me,” “let him deny himself and take up his cross.”

For this reason, therefore, the Fathers, the Saints, have established that today the expulsion of the first-formed from Paradise be commemorated, so as to help us realize how much that transgression, that single transgression of the commandment, cost—not only the first-formed, but the entire human race…

Just as they went out, the Holy Fathers say, we shall not be able to enter Paradise without prayer and fasting.

Today’s Gospel reading, among the many divine teachings it contains, has three most important ones. And our Christ begins with forbearance!

Between avarice and rancor, He places fasting in the middle. For those who did not have time to hear the Gospel, you will allow me to repeat it.

The Lord said: ‘For if you forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you.” In another place of the Gospel, it adds: “even from the heart.”

If, it says, you do not forgive from the heart those who have embittered you, who have insulted you, who have wronged you—who, who, who… If therefore you do not forgive him from your heart, neither will God forgive your own sins…!

And most of us Christians are so foolish that, while we want God to forgive us and while we ask Him every morning to forgive us, and we draw the prayer rope (“God, be merciful to me the sinner,” “Lord Jesus Christ, have mercy on me the sinner”), nevertheless rancor does not depart from within our heart…

We do not have the strength to forgive our fellow man, whether he be a spouse, or a brother, or a child, or a friend, or a co-worker.

How many depart from this world confessed, communed, yet not speaking and with passion and malice toward their fellow men. And they even leave instructions many times to their children, to their wife: “Let him not come either to my grave or to my funeral. See that you do not let him come; I will rise and chase you”…!

I was saying also other things from this very place, when someone came from Phyle and begged me weeping, “What should I do?  He has left word to his wife and to his children that if I go to the house, to his funeral, they are to throw me out. And what should I do? I am afraid lest we be humiliated and become a spectacle.” And he was crying…

He had such longing to go and see his brother, who was dying, that he was afraid… He was dying; he wanted to go venerate his remains, and he was afraid…

And after he described the situation there to me, I feared lest some incident occur there and I told him: sit there opposite—they would bury him in Agioi Anargyroi—in some place where they will bring the body, go to his grave and when the others leave, weep and beseech God on your knees to forgive both him and you.

You see how terrible, how terrible! For this reason, what benefit will fasting bring? For this reason, our Christ tells us that, in order for it to benefit us, we must forgive from the heart. If we do not forgive, God will not forgive us.

“For if you forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you. But if you do not forgive men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses” (Matt. 6:14–15).

Many times, therefore, we see in Christian people a Phariseeism. They show that they are worn down, that they have weakness, in order to show that they are fasting…

It is something terrible for a man to be condemned because of a virtue… To be condemned for sins, I understand. To steal, to tell lies, to commit fornication, to commit adultery—I understand.

But to pray and be condemned, like the Pharisee?… To fast and be condemned?…

An ascetic once said, when they were going to Alexandria and two others were in front of them, and he says to his disciple: “Do you see that man, my child?” He says, “Yes, Elder.” “He is,” he says, “a very proud man.”

For this reason, our Christ here emphasizes to us to take good heed, so that we may not lose the reward of fasting, how we must fast. I repeat it therefore: “But when you fast, do not become like the hypocrites, gloomy; for they disfigure their faces so that they may appear to men to be fasting. Amen, I say to you, they have received their reward.”

Truly, truly I say to you, therefore, He says that these have no reward at all with this fasting.

“But you, when you fast, anoint your head and wash your face, so that you may not appear to men to be fasting, but to your Father who is in secret; and your Father who sees in secret will repay you openly.”

And He continues, therefore, with the third teaching: “Do not lay up for yourselves treasures on earth […] but lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust destroys, and where thieves do not break in nor steal; for where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.”

What will fasting profit you if you have the passion of avarice? The Apostle Paul calls it “the root of all evils.” And he adds: “equal to idolatry!” And it is not only those who have much money who are avaricious… There are also many poor who are avaricious! They become even poorer; they make their life more miserable… […]

 

Greek source: https://353agios.blogspot.com/2021/03/1997.html

 

Friday, February 20, 2026

Prayer for People Suffering from Mental and Spiritual Illness

Composed by Hieromonk Athanasios of Simonopetra Monastery

 



Lord our God, who out of love fashioned man from nothing, and breathed into him the spirit of life, and made him partake of it through the gift of an immortal and unique soul, thereby showing him to be, as it were, a small God through your great generosity, who granted him a peaceful life in the garden of delight, where by the envy of the devil he committed disobedience, through which every form of disorder was introduced into the world, and peace was lost; you, O Lord, who through your incarnation broke down the middle wall of partition and united what had been separated, who gave your all-holy and peacemaking Spirit to dwell in your bride the Church, look upon your servant [Name] in your loving-kindness with favor, and restore peace to him/her, establishing in his/her soul the Paraclete who grants peace.

Yea, Lord, you can do all things, and nothing is impossible for you; and as you said to your holy apostles, “I give you my peace,” say likewise to your child [Name] who is bowing down in reverence before you, “Peace be with you, go in peace, let it be according to your faith,” granting him/her the rich blessing of your peace and joy; and as you commanded the wind and the sea to cease from their turbulence and caused calm to prevail, likewise soothe the spiritual turmoil brought upon him/her by the father of evil, so that from this moment forward, abstaining from every evil deed that drives away peace, he/she may in every way glorify and worship your all-holy name to the ages of ages. Amen.


Quote from St. Chrysostomos the New (+1955) on the Old Calendar Movement


 

There was a time in the past when almost the entire body of the Hierarchy in the Byzantine State was lured into the heresy of the accursed Arius, along with the citizenry of Byzantium, at which time the Orthodox character of the official Church was represented by a small faction of Orthodox in Constantinople not tainted by the corruption of Arianism.

This faction remained under the pastorship of St. Gregory the Theologian, who, in the Chapel of St. Anastasia, through sermons redolent with the pleasing and divine aroma of Orthodoxy, hurled thunderbolts against the cacodox and soul-destroying heresy of Arianism. St. Gregory the Theologian and his party not only did not constitute their own Church in severing ecclesiastical communion with the Arianizing Hierarchy, but also served thenceforth as a pledge for the return of the whole Church to the realm of Orthodoxy through a rejection of the heresy and abominable cacodoxy of Arianism. Hence, given that the spirit of Orthodoxy, and not externals and numbers, forms the substance of the Church, it is self-evident that we constitute and represent the age-old and anti-innovationist Church of Greece, as continuators of her ancestral traditions and Orthodox ordinances, and not the innovating Hierarchs, whose focus is on externals and numbers.

Source: Orthodox Tradition, Vol. XXXIV (2017), No. 1.

 

 

 

The seeking of salvation is the principal task, even in the defense of the faith, without compromise, but also without losing oneself.

by Hieromonk Lavrentie | February 17, 2026

 

A holy elder, who lived a hundred years and died after the fall of communism, Antonie, left as a legacy very beneficial words, especially about the end times, which have already been present in the Romanian sphere for some time in the form of two visions. The center of his attention is the seeking of salvation, peace of spirit, lack of compromise, and not the sophisticated reading of the times and entry into endless discussions without a spirit rightly ordered. Below is a fragment of his wisdom (three small excerpts originating from the 1990s) on facing the challenges of apostasy without making concessions, but also without entering into unjustified disturbances and attitudes contrary to the saving and peace-giving truth of God, which can be understood only with a mind made tranquil by prayer.

***

Who still prays now? No, I am not speaking about the reading of prayers, but about prayer itself. If there were only a few such people who truly pray, those end-times would not even come. But, unfortunately, we only read our rule of prayer, we read our morning and evening prayers, yet we do not pray. Whereas our Lord Jesus Christ Himself showed us an example of prayer—unto sweat and blood. Who remembers this?

(…)

Exactly [as in the communist camps] it is happening in our days as well—the world has now directed all its powers toward the effort to distract people’s attention from the most important thing—salvation. But the most terrible thing is that, in order to achieve this objective, the powers of darkness make use of seemingly good aims and intentions. It would seem that, in essence, the unification of the Russian Orthodox Churches (the Patriarchate and the one in exile, ROCOR) could be a very good thing. But here too the enemy does not rest, but draws people into the “struggle for truth.” And that is it—from then on salvation no longer takes place! Everyone wants to prove something, to reinforce everything they say with quotations, to confirm their words by bringing as arguments certain similar cases from the history of Byzantium and of Russia… But where is salvation?! Where is the struggle with one’s own passions, with one’s own sin?!

Behold, there once came to me—and it was not the first time they had come—some people who said about themselves that they were my spiritual sons. These listened to my counsels, only they did not hear them and, therefore, did not fulfill them. Invoking their rights as spiritual sons, they entered my room, not giving heed to the people who had gathered at the door of my cell and to the fact that I was then confessing a widow, beside whom I was praying and weeping for her lost son. If you listen to them, you would say that they are confessors of the faith, shield and sword of the Church militant. But all this—done with passion, beside themselves, in a kind of frenzy.

I listened to them, seated them on chairs, and then began to receive my brothers who were humble, humbled by life and by the world. I prayed and wept together with them. I, the sinner, did not give them advice, but strove to make each one hear for himself the voice of his Lord. I bowed my head to the fulfillment of His holy will.

Thus several hours passed. The bewilderment of my “sons” was replaced by reflection. Then by prayer, after which tears also followed. In the end, they began to ask forgiveness and to thank me for the teaching! And what was that teaching: “Peace be to you!”—as the Savior said (Luke 24:36). Peace in the soul as the pledge of His salvation. If there is no peace, there is no salvation. And peace means the striving for salvation, the renunciation of everything that has no connection with it.

Here are your “whys.” Yes, such things exist, yes, they are very, very troubling. Even so, you do not spend whole days thinking about why there are clouds in the sky and how it is that the sun no longer shines. Is that not so, Father?

(…)

The scattering of the mind, I believe, is nevertheless the principal cause [of evil]. Everything in this world is now directed against the exhortation of the Savior: “Watch!” (Lk. 21:36). We pay attention neither to the words of Scripture nor to the counsels of the Holy Fathers. You know, Father, people bring me many, many books written by contemporary theologians. Or rather, by certain authors who approach Orthodox subjects. I will tell you plainly—most of them end up in the fire. I ask my spiritual sons to read to me now from one, now from another, yet I do not find salvation in them! They have now come to criticize everything—Protestantism, occultism, shamanism, as well as certain things still unintelligible. One struggles passionately to prove something, another to preach something, another to convince… But to what extent do all these things have any connection with salvation?! They have no connection at all; indeed, they are very far from it. So far that it is hard for them even to understand this. Yes, it is a difficult thing to understand, since nowadays all people, in one way or another, live in the modern world, full of diabolical laws. Or rather, they live according to these laws.


(Elder Antonie, Am văzut sfârșitul lumii. Mărturisirile unui stareț care a trăit o sută de ani, Vol. 2, Sophia Publishing House, Bucharest, 2025.)


Online source:

https://theodosie.ro/2026/02/17/cautarea-mantuirii-este-lucrul-de-capatai-chiar-si-in-apararea-credintei-fara-dompromis-dar-si-fara-iesire-din-sine/

The Who’s Who of the Great Canon of St. Andrew of Crete

Protodeacon James Hughes     As we approach Great Lent, the time given to us specifically for repentance, the Church gives us a whol...