Monday, June 8, 2026

A Rare Virtue: On Why Many of Us Show No Gratitude

Priest Dimitry Vydumkin

 

 

“Everybody receives abundant blessings from God, but only a few give thanks to Him.”

About two centuries ago, Saint Ignatius (Brianchaninov) spoke of a very deplorable moral constant which was revealed to him by his spiritual experience, “Gratitude is a rare virtue among people.” It is enough to look closely at the state of morals in the society we live in to understand that it is a constant and not a variable quantity. We can’t look into someone’s inner world and measure with a ruler his ability to thank, and we don’t need to. Some indirect indicators are sufficient to conclude that a considerable part (if not the best part) of our society has been infected with pathological ingratitude. I am first of all speaking of banal callousness in its ever more terrifying manifestations, people’s ever-increasing dissatisfaction with their lives and an ever more intensive desire to “roll themselves up into balls” like prickly hedgehogs. “What has this to do with ingratitude?” you may ask. The fact is that the soul’s ability to be grateful is an effective antidote for such diseases. Someone with a grateful heart, receiving never-ceasing favours from God and his neighbours, naturally shows favour to others; such people are more than happy with their lives and won’t be preoccupied with their own problems. In contrast with this, the ungrateful heart will make someone view everything from a very different perspective.

The Apostle Paul in his Epistle to Timothy warns us: This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be proud…, unthankful… (2 Tim. 3:1-2). Pathological ingratitude, which can be found everywhere and in some cases (careerism) is becoming a norm, is a clear sign of the end times. Perhaps the most hideous manifestation of ingratitude, when someone cruelly pays for a benefaction he has received with evil, was widespread even 200 years ago, as Saint Ignatius wrote: “Those who receive great favours often begin to feel something, frenzied hatred for their benefactors. This unnatural oddity occurs so often that a popular proverb appeared: ‘You will not make an enemy before feeding him and giving him to drink.’” What can we say about our time? What about children who send their parents to old age homes or simply turn them out into the street like lumber? Take frequent cases when others make use of your gullibility and unselfishness to get you into trouble “as a token of their gratitude.” And take the numerous cases when someone who has got used to your benefaction begins to demand favours from you frantically, and if you can’t show him favours anymore, you become an “offender” in his eyes.

Why do such things happen and how can we interpret extreme ingratitude? Ingratitude is a defect of self-understanding, and by the virtue of this defect someone has a distorted view of the world around him. An ungrateful person is like someone who sits in a room that has windows smeared with dirt. This person can’t see or feel the sunshine; he only feels that it’s dark and cold. What can he be grateful for? The reason for this spiritual state when someone’s heart is not even warned up by the generous “sunshine” is explained by his view of himself. Pride, the root of all spiritual diseases, smears the human heart with the dirt of an exaggerated high opinion of themselves. Pride tells him that not only is he worthy of everything he receives from God and other people, he is also worthy of many other and better things; so he feels disappointed and thinks that it is unjust that he hasn’t yet received these “best things.” Hence his inability to give thanks, for he is “worthy” of everything he enjoys; hence his discontent with all he has, for he is “worthy of better”! Indeed, “the share of a madman is small in his eyes.” Meanwhile, life shows that by thinking in this way he deceives himself. Thus, entrapped by self-delusion, the one who is incapable of thanking hides himself from the “sunshine” of Divine grace and loses what is really best. As opposed to this, a grateful person always receives beyond expectation, for a thankful heart is a receptacle of Divine gifts. This is what the Gospel story of the healing of ten lepers by the Lord is about (cf. Lk.17:12–19).

This episode is one of the few places in the Holy Scriptures which speaks about the need for the ability to be grateful. More than that, the Lord shows here that gratitude to God is a demonstration of someone’s true faith in God, the faith that saves and attracts God’s mercy to him.

One day, as Christ was entering a village, ten lepers were near His way. They were standing at a distance and dared not approach Him, since lepers were not allowed to be in contact with other people and were treated as social pariahs. Having heard about Christ’s arrival, they shouted loudly from a distance, “Jesus, Teacher, have mercy on us!” But the Lord didn’t heal the lepers in public: He sent them to their priests so that they could confirm their cure as true. Indeed they were cleansed on their way, but only one of them returned to Christ and, falling at His feet, gave praise to God. This man turned out to be a Samaritan, a member of the “unfaithful” and “alien” ethnic group whom the Jews shunned and weren’t on speaking terms with. The Lord said in reply: Were there not ten cleansed? but where are the nine? There are not found that returned to give glory to God... Arise, go thy way: thy faith hath made thee whole (Lk.17:17-19).

There are no coincidences in this episode, every detail is filled with deep meaning. Let us examine at least some of them.

On the importance of gratitude

Let us start with the action related to our subject. Soon after Christ had sent the ten lepers away, all of them saw they were healed. Did they go to the priests as Jesus had told them? They probably did because they couldn’t re-enter society unless they first went to the priest to be checked. But did they return to Christ to thank Him for this great miracle? Alas, only one of them came. According to the Holy Fathers, thus the Lord showed us the proportion of the grateful to the ungrateful among people. This is what Saint Theophan the Recluse wrote about this: “Ten lepers were healed, but only one came to thank the Lord. Isn’t there generally a similar proportion of people who are grateful after gaining benefactions from the Lord? Who has not received good things; or, rather, what do we have in us, or whatever happens to us that is not good for us? Even so, is everyone grateful to God, and does everyone give thanks for everything?” Agreeing with Saint Theophan that not many of us show gratitude and not for everything, let us ask another question: Why is the ability to show gratitude so important? Who needs our gratitude? God? He certainly doesn’t need it because He is all-good and all-sufficient. People? But people who strive for goodness and sincerely do charitable acts without mercenary motives don’t need gratitude either. Who needs it then? Of course, it is we who need it; for only a grateful heart can respond to the good it receives properly, which guarantees future blessings. Only a grateful heart is the receptacle of multifarious gifts from God, and the Creator awaits our gratitude only in order to give us more blessings. Saint Ignatius writes: “The gratitude of the receiver of gifts encourages the giver to give more gifts which are greater than the previous ones. The gifts are not multiplied only when there is no gratitude for them.” There is a famous saying of Saint Nicodemus the Hagiorite, “God does not need your gratitude, but you desperately need His blessings. Your grateful heart receives and preserves these benefactions.” Only a grateful heart can pray for future blessings with boldness, “for how should he ask for future things, who is not thankful for the past?” (St John Chrysostom).

In other words, the ability to show gratitude is a generator of God’s blessings in our lives. Apart from this, this ability can serve as a strong weapon in our spiritual warfare. Specifically, against the sin of envy, as Saint John Chrysostom wrote: “Let us be thankful for the benefactions that have been granted not only to us but also to others; thus we will be able to both destroy envy and strengthen love, making it most sincere. You will no longer be able to envy those for whom you thank the Lord…Such gratitude releases us from earth, resettles us in heaven and makes us angels.”

How should we show gratitude?

True, the overwhelming majority of us understand that we should show gratitude to God and people for the benefactions we receive. But how are we supposed to express gratitude? Are simple words of appreciation and a smile on our faces sufficient? Perhaps a grateful heart won’t be satisfied with this and will try to repay good with good. A believer will at least pray for his benefactor. But any benefactor is just an instrument in the hands of God; so the following question inevitably arises: How can we show gratitude to God Who is Himself the source of all good things and doesn’t need anything?

Sacrifices were the original form of gratitude to God. Beginning from the first human beings and later throughout the history of the Chosen People we see the faithful offer blood sacrifices. Thus, Abel brought of the firstlings of his flock (Gen. 4:4). Noah offered burnt offerings on the altar. And the Lord smelled a sweet savour…(Gen.8:20-21). Sacrifices were performed in the Temple of Solomon and continued in the time of the Saviour. However, the Old Testament sacrifices had a prefigurative meaning. In addition to the expression of gratitude they reflected the faith in the coming of the Saviour, the True Sacrifice for the world. After the coming of the Messiah, blood sacrificial offerings lost their purpose, including that of gratitude. Long before the incarnation of Christ, King David prophetically pointed to the form of gratitude which can replace all blood sacrifices and would always be pleasing to God: A sacrifice to God is a broken spirit: a heart that is broken and humbled God will not despise (Ps. 50:19). Repentance for our sins and a remorseful heart are the required form of gratitude, along with praise of God for the benefactions we receive. As Saint John Chrysostom wrote: “Do you want to know how you should show gratitude? To confess your sins means to give thanks to God; he who confesses his sins shows that he is guilty of innumerable sins but has not yet received the punishment he deserves. He thanks God more than everybody else.” Do you want to understand how it works in life? Look how the Patriarch Jacob pours out his gratitude to God in prayer: God of my father Abraham, and God of my father Isaac, the Lord which saidst unto me, Return unto thy country, and to thy kindred, and I will deal well with thee: I am not worthy of the least of all the mercies, and of all the truth, which Thou hast shewed unto Thy servant; for with my staff I passed over this Jordan; and now I am become two bands (Gen. 32:9-10). Consequently, when we happen to taste and see that the Lord is good (cf. Ps. 33:8), then, having glorified the Creator for His countless blessings to us, it wouldn’t be bad to proclaim together with the Patriarch Jacob: I am not worthy of the least of all the mercies, and of all the truth, which Thou hast shewed unto Thy servant.

Why should I be thankful for sorrows?

Everybody understands why we must be grateful to God for joys, but the fact that we must give thanks for sorrows and diseases is not clear to everyone. We read in one of Saint Paul’s epistles, In everything give thanks (1 Thess. 5:18). But we are seething inside when something happens and we are harmed. At such times, especially if we suffer serious losses, we ask perplexedly: “Why should I be grateful for this if I feel so terrible?”

But even in unenviable situations we shouldn’t forget popular wisdom based on the Holy Scriptures and experience: “Whatever God wills is for the best.” This truth is confirmed by the New Testament teaching concerning God, which is our most authoritative source. God is love (1Jn.4:16), we read in the Holy Scriptures. God treats us with love. However, while some need joy or consolation, others need sorrows or illnesses for their salvation. This can be compared to a situation when a doctor sends one patient to a health resort and sends another patient to the operating room, “to go under the knife.” This surgeon’s knife is often the only possible way of saving someone’s life. God does the same by sending people sorrows and infirmities for the restoration of their spiritual health. Though people often doubt this in moments of trouble, later the good outcomes of trials give them important experience. There is an interesting parable on how this can work in our lives.

One eminent and wealthy dignitary invited a tutor who was famous for his wisdom to educate his child. When his son grew up enough and acquired riding skills, they went horseback riding together. But during the ride the boy fell and the horse accidentally crushed his arm. The tutor hurried to support the adolescent morally with the words: “Don’t worry! Take heart! Glory be to God!” Writhing in pain, the latter replied angrily: “What have you given thanks to God for?! I am now an invalid!” And soon by his father’s orders the tutor was sent to prison.

Some time passed. One day the same young man, accompanied by a new tutor, undertook a faraway voyage during which they were captured by a native tribe that practiced human sacrifice. They quickly lit fires, and the tutor was the first to fall victim to the barbarous rite. Now it was the young man’s turn. Dozens of hands lifted him over their heads and carried him to the fire. But an unforeseen thing happened: at the moment they were about to sacrifice him, the high priest noticed that his arm was injured. Since their pagan gods demanded sacrifices without defects, the tribe with disgust rejected the young man and drove him away. So he trudged back to his native shores.

This parable reflects an important spiritual truth: Divine providence often allows adversity in our lives, foreseeing the greatest good that will result from it, just as a pure baby is born through severe pain.

God doesn’t want us to live in clover our entire lives; He wants to prevent us from ruining our souls for eternity. We should make efforts and realise that it is not possible to reach Paradise by flying there business class, that affliction and maladies are often needed to reach it. Our failure to understand this truth not only removes gratitude from our hearts but also gives rise to the opposite, namely grumbling and indignation. When Saint Theophan the Recluse encountered this attitude towards sorrows, he would exhort: “There are even those who permit themselves to ask, ‘Why did God give us existence? It would be better for us not to exist.’ God gave you existence so that you would be in eternal bliss; He gave you existence as a gift, as a gift He has furnished you with every means for attaining eternal bliss. The job depends on you: you need only to labour a while for this. You say, ‘But I have only sorrows, poverty, diseases, misfortunes.’ Well, these are also some of the ways to attain eternal bliss. Be patient. Your entire life is less than a moment compared with eternity. Even if you had to suffer unceasingly your entire life, compared to eternity it is nothing; and you still have moments of consolation. Do not look at the present, but at what is prepared for you in the future, and concern yourself with making yourself worthy of that; then you will not notice the sorrows. They will all be swallowed up by unquestioning hope in eternal consolations, and your lips will never cease to utter thanks.”

Thus, beyond all doubt, our sorrows and diseases are gifts from God intended to help us attain the heavenly abodes. As with all gifts, they should be followed by thanksgiving. And the Holy Fathers see the proof of our true Christian disposition in gratitude. “If sorrows for Christ are gifts from God made by God to genuine Christians, then they must show their Christianity in practice by gratitude for sorrows, confess and accept the gift of God by showing gratitude for the gift.”

So gratitude to God for sorrows is a duty of Christians and an indicator of their progress in spiritual life. But not only that. The words of thanksgiving and glorification of God contain an effective remedy for sorrow. This is what Saint Ignatius writes about the power of the influence on us of such simple and familiar words as, “Glory to God!” “Glory to God!” These are powerful words! In sorrowful circumstances, when your heart is beset with thoughts of doubt, faint-heartedness, discontent, and murmuring, force yourself to repeat the words ‘Glory to God!’ frequently, unhurriedly and attentively. Those who take this advice with simple hearts and put it into practice when the need arises will experience the wonderful power of glorifying God; they will rejoice at gaining this useful new knowledge and acquiring a weapon against the enemies of souls, such a strong and handy one.”

But that is not all. The Lord said to the thankful Samaritan, Arise, go thy way: thy faith hath made thee whole (Lk. 17:19). Why does the Saviour equate thankfulness with faith? Because there is a direct link between these two virtues, and Saint Ignatius points to it: “Thanksgiving to God has its particular attribute: it gives rise to and strengthens faith and brings us closer to God.” In contrast to this, “ingratitude and disregard of God destroy faith and move us away from God.” The faith of the Samaritan appeared and became stronger in living gratitude to Christ. He saw and felt the things that we so often forget. He learned that this perfect gift, the deliverance from an incurable disease, can come from God alone, and he bowed before God in the person of Christ.

“If something good happens, glorify God, and the good will remain; if something bad happens, glorify God, and the bad will disappear,” Saint John Chrysostom used to say. And for him it was not just a beautiful phrase. He would begin every speech by hitting his index finger to his palm and saying: “Glory to God for all things.” He did it all his life, and before his last sigh he uttered the same words, pointing out the undying value of gratitude to God: “On account of the substantial benefit the soul receives through thanking God, He commanded us to practice showing gratitude to Him diligently and cultivating a sense of gratitude to God.”

We must thank God both for joys and sorrows, for such is the will of God for us, and His will is holy to us. Divine providence and God’s care of human beings boil down to us reaching the haven of the Heavenly Kingdom. It is not bad if we have to face storms and hidden rocks on the way sometimes: the main goal is to reach the haven. However, not many can understand this; alas, the ungrateful are a majority, and they won’t hear these most important words from Christ: Thy faith hath made thee whole.

 

Source: The Shepherd: An Orthodox Christian Pastoral Magazine, Vol. XLV, No. 6, February 2025, pp. 3-12.

The Moral Degradation of Western Christianity and Its Alignment with Modern Apostasy

 Western “churches” ask forgiveness for their opposition until now to homosexuality

Office of Heresies and Religious Cults of the Metropolis of Piraeus [of the Official Greek Church]

Piraeus | June 8, 2026

 

 

We have emphasized many times in our announcements that falling away from the saving faith and the revealed truth of our Church leads at the same time also to a decline in ethos. And this is because the removal from the salvific embrace of the Church, where the uncreated grace of God is diffused, and the adoption of heretical opinions, takes away divine grace, which sanctifies man and makes him authentic, a complete being of soul and body.

This is evident in the heresies, where immorality abounds. The most representative example is Western Christianity, which, after it was cut off from the one and indivisible body of the Church, goes from fall to fall and from moral decline to moral collapse. Its history constitutes an undeniable witness to a tragic course, which clearly reveals its departure from the authenticity of Christianity. In the name of Christ the most heinous crimes against humanity were committed: crusades, holy wars, the Holy Inquisition, genocides, murders; but also incredible moral deviations: fornications, incests, rapes, pederasties, unspeakable sexual perversions, etc., not so much by the simple people as by its “ecclesiastical” leaders, and chiefly by the “Popes,” who, in their overwhelming majority, were among the most corrupt religious leaders in history. It is historically confirmed that many “Popes” died during orgies, in the arms of mistresses and prostitutes, for example John XII, 955–964 A.D., Alexander VI, 1492–1503 A.D., and others, while several of them had illegitimate children, whom they subsequently promoted to higher ecclesiastical offices, for example Pius II, 1458–1464, Innocent VIII, 1484–1492, Julius II, 1503–1513, Paul III, 1534–1549, and others. We refer summarily to the medieval decline of Papism, to the dramatic period, 9th–15th century, in which the moral, spiritual, and political authority of the “Popes” collapsed. It was marked by extreme corruption, the rise of secular power over religious authority, and led directly to the questioning of Papism as a “church.”

Also noteworthy is the contemporary moral degradation of the papal “clergy,” with the thousands of cases of sexual abuse of innocent children by corrupt pederast Frankish priests. It is an ongoing scandal that has afflicted the papal “church” for years, exposes it in the eyes of the contemporary world, and empties its “sacred” coffers because of the compensations paid to the victims.

The papal “church” is followed closely also by the numerous Protestant “churches” and confessions in moral decay. Reports about immorality are continual and reveal the magnitude of the problem also in these papal divisions. And we say “papal divisions,” because in essence wider Protestantism does not differ substantially from Papism either in its false doctrines or in its moral degradation.

It is worth mentioning parenthetically that both Papism and Protestantism constitute an enduring disgrace to Christianity. The enemies of Christianity present the perennial moral deviations of Papo-Protestantism as “weak points” of Christianity.

The present situation in heretical Western Christianity is at the worst point of its decline, because of its alignment with the so-called Woke Agenda, which it regards as “progress” and which promotes the liberation of all human instincts and passions, and along with this the exculpation of every form of sinfulness, culminating in homosexuality.

Western Christianity, in order to appear “synchronized” with the moral downfall of the contemporary apostate world, has to a great extent ceased to regard homosexuality as a sexual perversion and, worse, as a sin, despite the fact that the whole of Divine Revelation, the Old and New Testaments, condemns it as an abomination before the Creator, as an overturning of human physiology and ontology.

The occasion for our present announcement was a publication according to which the “church” of Norway “asked forgiveness” for decades of discrimination against homosexuality. [1]

According to it: “The Church of Norway issued a historic apology to the LGBTQI+ community for decades of discrimination. Bishop Olav Fykse Tveit acknowledged that the Church ‘caused pain and shame’ and committed itself to a new era of acceptance and inclusion.”

In other words, the heretical Norwegian “bishop” clearly considers that it is not only his “church” which, according to him, “caused pain and shame,” but also Divine Revelation, the Holy Scriptures, and God Himself, Who condemns with absolute clarity homosexuality as a deviation from human ontology. And not only this, but he also “proclaimed” a “new era of acceptance and inclusion” of those who persist in this deviation!

And the publication continues: “A moment of historic significance unfolded recently in Oslo, when the Church of Norway officially apologized for decades of discrimination and marginalization of LGBTQI+ persons. The ceremony took place at the London Pub, a symbolic place of the Norwegian LGBTQI+ community, where in 2022 a terrorist attack occurred with two dead and nine wounded.”

The alignment of the “church” of Norway with sodomism is now clear. The heretical Norwegian “bishop,” instead of denouncing the sinful passion of homosexuality and calling homosexuals to repentance, placed his “church” in a position of apology for its until-recently adherence to Christian morality, which regards homosexuality as a mortal sin and a source of many evils, with ramifications both for personal health and for society as a whole. He even reached the point of glorifying this passion and asking forgiveness for the observance of Christian morality up to now.

Behold how the “church” of Norway came to ask forgiveness from the sodomites: “For decades, the Church of Norway regarded homosexuality as a ‘social danger’ and forbade LGBTQI+ persons to be ordained or to perform a marriage within a church. The change began to take place gradually from the 2000s, in parallel with the liberalization of Norwegian society. In 2007, the Church ordained the first homosexual pastor, while in 2017 it performed the first same-sex ‘marriage.’ In 2023, Bishop Tveit himself participated for the first time in the Oslo Pride parade, an event that was regarded as a historic turning point.”

This proves that the heretical “bishop” recognized Christian teaching as a “mistake” and aligned himself with homosexuality. He did not simply “open himself” toward persons who choose to live as homosexuals, but toward the sinful passion itself as such, rewarding it with the “ordination” of a homosexual pastor, the performance of “marriages” of same-sex “couples,” and his participation in public “pride” parades, through which the so-called “rights” of homosexuals are claimed. By his presence at these, he himself also aligns himself with their demands.

And not only this, but his “apology” to the unrepentant sodomites “was accompanied by emotion and applause, while many faithful attended the service that followed in Oslo Cathedral.” His decision to ask forgiveness was sealed by a “service” in Oslo Cathedral. To such a point did his impiety and hubris reach!

His statements can also be considered blasphemous: “The Church in Norway caused shame, great harm, and pain to LGBTQI+ people. This should never have happened. […] Discrimination and unequal treatment caused many to lose faith.” For the heretical “bishop,” the “loss of faith” seems to have greater importance than the purity of the faith.

The “apology” of the heretical “bishop” Olav Fykse Tveit provoked various reactions. “Hanne Marie Pedersen-Eriksen, a homosexual pastor and head of the network of Christian lesbians, characterized the apology as an ‘important act of reparation,’ which ‘marks the end of a dark chapter.’ Others, however, consider that the apology came too late. ‘For those who died of AIDS feeling that God was punishing them, this apology brings no consolation,’ stated Stephen Antom from the Norwegian Association for Gender and Sexual Diversity.”

The “apology” of the “church” of Norway to the “wronged” sodomites, lesbians, trans people, etc., does not constitute an isolated phenomenon, but one now common in apostate Western Christianity. According to the aforementioned publication, it “is part of a global wave of self-criticism by religious organizations. In 2023, the Church of England and the Methodist Church in Ireland issued public apologies for their stance toward LGBTQI+ persons, while the United Church of Canada spoke of a ‘commitment to full inclusion and radical hospitality.’ The apology in Oslo was not simply a ceremony; it was a symbolic but also substantive act — an acknowledgment that faith and love have no room for discrimination.”

In Finland, the former “archbishop” of the Lutheran “church,” Kari Mäkinen, openly welcomed the enactment of same-sex “marriage” by the State, while the current “archbishop,” Tapio Luoma, also expressed his joy over the development, adding that “as far as I too am concerned, I consider that the Church must reexamine its position on the concept of marriage.” He further stated that “same-sex couples are welcome in all the activities of the church.” Indeed, the “Synod of Bishops” has approved a proposal for the “addition of a parallel model of marriage,” which would allow “priests” to perform “marriages” of homosexual “couples.” [2]

As was natural and expected, neither did the papal “church” remain outside this “climate.” According to another recent publication, [3] “Papal bishops at vigils for the ‘combating of homo-transphobia.’ The downfall of papism seems to have no end. From a weapon against sin, the vigil, which aims at repentance, became a means of propaganda for homosexuality.”

And it points out that: “A significant increase is recorded in 2026 in the participation of Papal bishops in Italy in vigils and prayer events related to issues of homosexuality and gender identity. According to Italian publications, at least twelve bishops are expected to preside over or attend services and vigils organized with the aim, as stated, of ‘overcoming homo-transphobia.’ These events have spread to more than twenty dioceses throughout the country. In several cases, the vigils are held inside Catholic churches, with the support of local bishops or ecclesiastical organizations. Some of these initiatives are part of broader pastoral programs related to the inclusion and support of LGBTQI persons.” “At the same time, these developments are connected with the continuing discussion within the Papal ‘church’ about synodality and the pastoral approach to issues of sexuality and gender identity. The relevant framework has been strengthened after recent synodal texts and discussions at the national and global level. Ecclesiastical circles maintain that these vigils constitute an expression of pastoral care and an effort to overcome discrimination, in the spirit of contemporary ecclesiastical dialogue.”

Cardinal Reinhard Marx, “archbishop” of Munich and Freising in Germany, openly supports the inclusion of homosexual couples in the “Church,” having even permitted the performance of blessing ceremonies for same-sex couples in his “archdiocese.” More specifically, following the instructions of the “German Synod,” “Archbishop” Marx announced that the blessing of couples of every sexual orientation who cannot or do not wish to perform a religious marriage is permitted. He has publicly stated that homosexuality is not a sin and that homosexuals constitute part of God’s creation!

The above data concerning the downfall of heretical Western Christianity are entirely indicative. In reality, the problem is generalized and moral decay is eating away at its innards. For this reason, its decomposition is rapid, as we have often revealed in our announcements. A characteristic example is the departure of thousands of Finns from the Lutheran “church,” after the statements of the former and current “archbishops,” Kari Mäkinen and Tapio Luoma, concerning homosexuality. “From that moment until today, 13,000 people left the Church — therefore they also stopped paying the church tax. Archbishop Kari Mäkinen knew that his words would enrage and alienate a portion of the faithful. But it seems that his principles and his personal code of values compelled him to align himself with the supporters of individual freedoms.” [4]

We conclude our announcement by expressing our sorrow for the wretched state of heretical Western Christianity, which abandoned the principles of genuine Christian faith and life and aligned itself with the fallen world. Undoubtedly, the most striking proof of this identification is the acceptance of the mortal sin of homosexuality as a supposedly “natural choice,” despite the fact that it diverts man into the misuse of his bodily organs, altering human physiology and ontology.

Thus, Christian anthropology concerning male and female is despised in the most impious manner, and a multitude of fictitious “genders” is introduced, according to the sinful passions: sodomism, lesbianism, trans, queer, bisexuality, etc., with incalculable consequences both on a personal and on a social level. Also overlooked is the multitude of biblical references to the issue of homosexuality and God’s categorical aversion toward this passion.

Our sorrow is intensified when we observe that many clergy and theologians on the Orthodox side regard with sympathy the alignment of the western “churches” with the spirit of the world and, in the present case, with homosexuality. To this day we have seen no official protest or position on the matter, so that the Orthodox fullness may be informed that this is a serious deviation and may not be led astray by the propaganda that supposedly there is no opposition between the Christian faith and homosexuality. Those who do not possess sufficient knowledge of the abyssal differences between our Church and the heretical western “churches” are led astray, regarding these anti-Christian choices as supposedly “progress.”

 

 

Even more, we are sorrowful and troubled because many of them develop relations with these “churches,” naming them as supposedly true, overlooking the chaotic dogmatic differences that separate them from the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church of Christ, our Holy Orthodoxy, and at the same time they triumphantly refute themselves, because they do not proceed to intercommunion with them, which proves the unity of the Church, since they know that at once they will lose not only their Archpriesthood, but also their Orthodox identity.

By their “warm” relations with them, their compliments, and, worst of all, by such forms of secularization as the exculpation of homosexuality, extremely erroneous messages are being sent both to the heretics — that supposedly “they are acting rightly” — and to the Orthodox fullness, whose Orthodox sensibility is gradually dulled.

 

[1] https://www.lifo.gr/now/world/zitoyme-syggnomi-apo-ta-loatki-atoma-i-ekklisia-tis-norbigias-paradehetai-dekaeties

[2] https://www.efsyn.gr/stiles/triti-matia/6325_o-finlandos-arhiepiskopos-kai-oi-gay/

[3] https://orthodoxostypos.gr/%cf%80%ce%b1%cf%80%ce%b9%ce%ba%ce%bf%e1%bd%b6-%e1%bc%90%cf%80%ce%af%cf%83%ce%ba%ce%bf%cf%80%ce%bf%ce%b9-%ce%b5%e1%bc%b0%cf%82-%e1%bc%80%ce%b3%cf%81%cf%85%cf%80%ce%bd%ce%af%ce%b1%cf%82-%e1%bd%91%cf%80/

[4] https://www.efsyn.gr/stiles/triti-matia/6325_o-finlandos-arhiepiskopos-kai-oi-gay/

 

Greek source:

https://imp.gr/%ce%b7-%ce%b7%ce%b8%ce%b9%ce%ba%ce%b7-%ce%ba%ce%b1%cf%84%ce%b1%cf%80%cf%84%cf%89%cf%83%ce%b7-%cf%84%ce%bf%cf%85-%ce%b4%cf%85%cf%84%ce%b9%ce%ba%ce%bf%cf%85-%cf%87%cf%81%ce%b9%cf%83%cf%84%ce%b9%ce%b1/

Sunday, June 7, 2026

Papism and Judaism

by Archimandrite Sergius (Aleksiev)

 

 

One of the most sinister symptoms of our apocalyptic age is the systematic and ever-increasing rapprochement between Papism and Judaism. In essence a monstrous perversion of Christianity, Papism is an anachronistic return from the New Testament to the Old, whereby the meaning of the Old Testament is understood in a perverted way, according to its interpretation by the scribes and Pharisees of the time of Christ (cf. St. Matthew 15:6) and according to the spirit of contemporary Judaism.

The very idea of Papism, with its earthly centralization of the Church and its desire for supremacy over the whole Christian world, brings to mind Judaism, with its globalist tendencies. The establishment in the Old Testament of a single Temple, headed by one High Priest after the order of Aaron (Hebrews 7:11) is to some extent a "personification" of the idea of earthly centralization. During the period of the Old Testament, this personification was merely a foreshadowing of Christ, the only High Priest of the New Testament after the order of Melchizedek (Hebrews 5:10; Psalm 109:4), "Who hath passed through the Heavens" (Hebrews 4:14). Through this act, our Lord Jesus Christ, "the Apostle and High Priest of our confession" (Hebrews 3:1), "a High Priest of the good things to come" (Hebrews 9:11), "a High Priest over the house of God" (Hebrews 10:21), that is, over the Church (I Timothy 3:15), by assuming Her together with Himself into the Heavens, abolished forever the earthly centralization of the Church. Thus, the Church of Christ has, here on earth, no abiding city, but seeks the City which is to come (Hebrews 13:14). Thus, it is evident that the idea of some "Vicar" of Christ on earth is unacceptable.

The Christian, that is, Orthodox Bishops here on earth are only multiple reflections, each in his own diocese, of the one and only High Priest and Head of the Church, our Lord Jesus Christ, "Who ascended far above all the heavens, that He might fill all things" (Ephesians 4:10). St. Ignatios the God-Bearer writes in precisely this sense in his Epistle to the Trallians (Chapter III): "Let us all reverence the Bishop as Jesus Christ, Who is the Son of God the Father!"

Papism, however, reverts to the earthly centralization of the Old Testament, for it is personified by a single High Priest, who claims to be the "Vicar of Christ," as if he were the sole reflection of Christ here on earth, a deus in terra ("God on earth"), such that the rest of the bishops are regarded as mere vicars or deputies of the Roman Pontiff. Under the pretense of being the "Vicar" of Christ, the Pope aspires to the gradual displacement of the only High Priest of the New Testament, the sole Head of the Church (i.e., Christ). In this way, Papism, as a legacy of Judaism, paves the way for the Antichrist, who will put himself in the place of Christ, since he is incompatible with Christ (I John 4:3).

This gradual process of replacing Christ with one earthly "head" of the Church started as early as the eleventh century, when Papism fell away from the Church of Christ, and has continued without interruption up to the present day, when the anti-Christian essence of Papism is being palpably revealed in its rapprochement with Judaism. Already on September 6,1938, the then Pope Pius XI, himself an Italian Jew, expressed on Vatican Radio the bizarre thought that all Christians are "spiritual Semites"! A rather strange racial assimilation, this assertion, through which the spiritual essence of the Christian Faith is sacrilegiously made materialistic!

A month prior to that event, the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad, meeting in council in Belgrade, rang the alarm concerning a "Judaeo-Catholic Rapprochement," as is stated in the title of a report about the council made by M. Stepanov.

Subsequently, this rapprochement progressed steadily, until it reached a new phase at the Second Vatican Council (1962-1965). The latter, through its Declaration "Nostra aetate" (October 28,1965), proclaimed, in Article IV, that "Judaism, despite its non-recognition of Jesus Christ as the Messiah, is still dear to the Lord," and also that "the Church is fed from the root of the olive tree, on which the branches of the wild olive were grafted" (cf. Romans 11:17-24)! In order to refute this absurd interpretation of the Holy Apostle Paul's words, it is sufficient to quote what he says about the Jews: although broken off from the olive tree, "God is able to graft them in again," as long as "they abide not still in unbelief [concerning Jesus Christ]" (Romans 11:23). However, Judaism is opposed precisely to this essential condition!

Renewing this Declaration of the Second Vatican Council eight years later, the French episcopate published in April, 1973, on the occasion of the Jewish Passover, a special Declaration consisting of "Pastoral Directions Concerning the Position of Christians in Relation to Judaism." Affirming "The Permanent Call of the Jewish Nation" (the title of the third article), despite its disbelief in Jesus Christ, this Declaration by the French episcopate asserts that "it is not possible to conclude, on the basis of the New Testament, that the Jewish nation is deprived of its elect status" (Article IV). However, at the end of His parable about the wicked husbandmen, the Lord makes the following inference, directed at the chief priests and the Pharisees: "Therefore I say unto you, The Kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof" (St. Matthew 21:43).

The French bishops dare to state, as well, that "the first Testament...was not abolished by the New" (Article V), despite St. Paul’s clear interpretation of Jeremiah's prophecy regarding the New Covenant [Testament] (Jeremiah 38:31-34), which he forcefully concludes with these words: "In that He saith, A new covenant, He hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away" (Hebrews 8:13).

Declaration of the French episcopate finishes with a false intimation concerning both Christians and Jews in the form of a rhetorical question: "Does not their common concern relate to the Messianic times?" (Article VII). In other words, the French bishops imply that the "messianic" expectation of the Jews encompasses the true Messianism of the Christians! This calls to mind the sacrilegious innuendo made by Cardinal Etchegaray, at that time Archbishop of Marseilles and one of the authors of the Declaration, as a member of the French episcopal committee for relations with Judaism. In an interview with the magazine La Documentation Catholique, under the heading "The Double Mission of the Church Towards the Jews," Etchegaray posits a rather strange "rivalry" between "one who expects a Messiah who is to come and another who expects his return." Thus, through an absurd mixing of concepts, the true Messiah, Who has come—our Lord Jesus Christ—, is united in His Second Coming with a false messiah, whose advent is being prepared by the Jews.

Meanwhile, in the newly published Catechism of the Catholic Church (French version), in Section 840, under the heading "The Church's Attitude Towards the Jewish Nation," we read that "insofar as the future is concerned, the people of God from the Old Testament and the new People of God aspire towards similar goals: the expectation of the advent (or return) of the Messiah."

The Great Rabbinate of France, however, understood very clearly the treacherous character of the Declaration of the French episcopate. That is why, a laudatory commentary following directly after the Declaration, hastens to stress that "the 'Pastoral Direchons' of the French episcopate coincide with the teaching of the most prominent Jewish theologians, according to whom the religions which came from Judaism have as their mission preparation for the advent of the Messianic age [sic] indicated in the Bible"!

After such a consummate betrayal by the French bishops, which is equivalent to denying Christ in favor of the Antichrist, we should not be amazed that these "bishops" subsequently received a primate worthy of them in the person of the Polish Jew Jean-Marie Lustiger, who was appointed Archbishop of Paris in 1981, and later promoted to Cardinal in 1983. Radio Israel made the following comment on his unexpected appointment: "The new Archbishop of Paris, who does not conceal his Jewish origins, is a Judaizer who will fulfill Judaism in Christianity!" This is why the French believers distrust such a "Cardinal Archbishop" and make a parody of his name: "Lustiger-Lucifer!"

In spite of all this, the Masons have put forth every effort to bend public opinion in favor of their candidate, so as to have him elected Pope. Several years ago, we heard on Radio Paris the following discussion about the ethnicity of the Popes: "If it is not written in stone that the next Pope should be Italian—since the present Pope is a Pole—, what would preclude the next Pope from being...a Jew?" In fact, a eulogizing article, "The Future of Mgr. Lustiger," was printed in the magazine Paris Match. The article contains a photograph of Pope John Paul II exchanging a kiss with Cardinal Lustiger. There follows an enumeration of the political "merits" of Lustiger, who had recently been appointed Minister of European Affairs for the Vatican. The piece ends with a readers' survey: "Do you think that one day Mgr. Lustiger can become Pope?" Such a survey, conducted while the present Pope is still alive, is unheard of! Incidentally, Pope John Paul II, himself, is responsible for Lustiger's appointment!

Indeed, this is not odd, since the present Pope is himself a Mason. In October, 1983, the Italian magazine Oggi published in one of its issues, which was to have been confiscated, a scandalous photograph showing Pope John Paul II clothed in black, in accordance with the strict rule of the Masonic lodges, and participating in a Masonic banquet with his arms folded in the "chain of brothers" made by the guest Masons around the table. A blackboard with a crowned monster depicted on it is visible behind him—obviously the Devil presiding over the meeting! A bit further down in the "chain of brothers," we see the Vicar of Rome, Ugo Cardinal Poletti, a famous Mason from the Vatican.

It is not by accident that Poletti was the one who accompanied the Pope in his official visit to the Chief Synagogue in Rome on April 13, 1986, when the Pope addressed the Jewish rabbis with the friendly words: "You are our elder brothers!" In a recent interview given to the American magazine Parade, the Pope emphatically states that "the attitude of the Church towards the people of God's Old Testament—the Jews—can only be that they are our elder brothers in the Faith." "In what Faith?" we ask.

So the Pope, who claims to be the head of all Christians, suddenly humbles himself in an unusual way; but before whom? Before the rabbis, who do not acknowledge the Lord Jesus Christ as the Messiah, but await their own “messiah," the “Antichrist," which means "to be in the place of Christ," or rather, "to replace" Christ!

Several months later, on November 6, 1986, the Pope delivered a speech before the participants in the Second International Judaeo-Christian Dialogue on "The Importance of Salvation and Redemption in the Jewish and Christian Traditions." Avoiding the principal issue of "the Messiah," which separates the Jews from the Christians, the Pope speaks about "the mutual connection between our respective heritages of faith" and about "the bonds that connect us in our understanding of salvation." Afterwards, commemorating the twentieth anniversary of the Declaration "Nostra aetate," the Pope quotes this phrase from Article IV concerning "the spiritual connection between the people of the New Testament and the seed of Abraham," and continues: "We have here a connection which, despite our differences, makes us brethren." Thus, the profound incompatibility between the true Messiah of Christians, Who has already come, and the false messiah, expected by the Jews to come in the future, is reduced by the Pope to certain "differences," which do not preclude the brotherhood of the former and the latter in Abraham.

St. John the Baptist, however, disdaining the self-conceit of the Jews, who bragged that they had Abraham for their father (cf. St. John 8:39), contrasts such conceit to the power of God, Who "is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham" (St. Matthew 3:9). The Holy Apostle Paul, as he speaks of "Abraham our father according to the flesh" (Romans 4:1), emphasizes that he has become "the father of us all" (Romans 4:16), namely of Christians, because of his prophetic faith in Christ. This is exactly Abraham's faith, as Christ points out when He tells the Jews: "Your father Abraham rejoiced to see My day; and he saw it and was glad" (St. John 8:56).

In violation of this unbroken link of Abraham to Christ, Pope John Paul II, during his visit to Mainz, Germany, in November, 1980, invited the local chief rabbi to the cathedral and greeted him in Hebrew with the words: "May the Jewish people be blessed by our common father Abraham"—without even the slightest mention of Christ!

During his fourth visit to Poland in June, 1991, the Pope had "a cordial meeting" with the rabbis of Warsaw, as can be seen from the photograph on the front cover of La Documentation Catholique. At the very beginning of his speech before the Jewish rabbis, the Pope himself points out that: "The meetings with representatives of the Jewish communities are a constant element cf my Apostolic journeys. This fact speaks for itself and emphasizes in its own way the unique confession of the faith which unifies the sons of Abraham, who confess the religion of Moses and the Prophets, with those who in an identical way [!] confess Abraham as their 'father in the faith' (St. John 8:39)."

Thus, without explicitly mentioning Christians, and without counting himself among them, the Pope ascribes to them "the same" confession of the faith as the Jews and calls Abraham their "father in the faith." Furthermore, the Pope quotes the Gospel text from St. John (8:39), which, however, as we have demonstrated above, concerns those Jews who boasted, "Abraham is our father." The ascription of these words to Christians is a malicious falsification on the part of the "infallible" Pope in favor of the Jews, especially because the expression cited by the Pope in single quotation marks is not contained in the actual text of the Gospel (St. John 8:39)!

Closing this brief review of the relationship between Papism and Judaism, we should emphasize its apocalyptic significance, as it is expressed by the Greek Orthodox Archimandrite Arsenios Kompougias in his article, "The Relationship of the Pope to the Antichrist." The author comments on the recent book by an American Jew, Benjamin Creme, The New Apparition of Christ and the Teachers of Wisdom. According to this book, published by the clergy of the future "messiah," namely the Antichrist, he will soon appear as head of a world government. Among the plans he is to put into effect, there is the abolition of the Christian religion and the establishment of a new universal religion through the mediation of the Masonic lodges. The author stresses the decisive role to be played by the present Pope's successor in the betrayal of Christianity, whereas the mission of the present Pope himself is to level off the ground among religions by "uniting all Christians."

Now it is clear why this present Pope appealed to the Jews, the Moslems, and the Christians in March, 1986, to unite under one "god," and why, on October 27 of the same year, he invited one hundred fifty representatives of different religions, including Orthodox, under his Papal aegis in Assisi. This is why the Pope has been accused of creating a new religion, whose head he proclaims himself to be!

In the light of all that we have said, we understand the analogy invoked by the ever-memorable Metropolitan Philaret of Moscow, who has already been proclaimed a Saint: "Papism resembles a fruit, whose peel of Christian ecclesiality, inherited from the past, cracks up more and more in order to reveal its anti-Christian core."

Similar to the "small horn" mentioned by the Holy Prophet Daniel (Daniel 7:8), the Vatican plays a predominant role among the European countries, anticipating a Common Europe, the "chief architect" (a Masonic term!) of which is supposedly the Pope! The Vatican also resembles the second apocalyptic beast, with two horns like a lamb, but which speaks like a "dragon" and "makes the earth and its inhabitants worship the first beast" (Revelation 13:11-12).

Without anticipating the course of events, we can nevertheless ask ourselves: "Will not the Pope be the forerunner of the coming Antichrist?"

APPENDIX

The concerns and suppositions expressed above are to some extent confirmed in the Accord signed on December 30, 1993, between the Vatican and the State of Israel. The Preamble to this accord follows:

"The Holy See and the State of Israel, aware of the unique character and the universal significance of the Holy Land, conscious of the unique nature and the improving relations between the Catholic Church and the Jewish people; of the historical process of increasing reconciliation and understanding; of the growing mutual friendship between the Catholics and the Jews [emphasis ours], as they decided on July 29, 1992, to establish one working bilateral commission in order to examine and to define together the questions of common interest, and in order to normalize their relations, by acknowledging that the fruit of the work of this commission suffices to conclude a primary fundamental accord, by realizing that such an accord will be a solid and durable base for the continuous development of their present and future relations [emphasis ours] and for the progress of the work of the commission, agree to the following...."

The subsequent fifteen Articles of the Accord, by establishing the mutual obligations between the Vatican and Israel, emphasize that “the Church'' and “the State'' will consult one another and cooperate as circumstances dictate (Article V). In Article XIII, the terms utilized by both parties are specified: in section (a) “the Catholic Church'' is identified with “the Church'' in general; and in section (c), “the State of Israel" is identified with “the State" in general. This terminology implies that in the future, the two negotiating parties will turn into two absolute super-powers of a universal character!

 

About the author: The Very Reverend Sergius, a former assistant professor at the Theological Academy in Sofia, Bulgaria, is the spiritual Father of the Russian Convent of the Holy Protection in Sofia, which is under the omophorion of Bishop Photii of Triaditza. He was dismissed from his academic position when he refused to adopt the revised New, or Papal, Calendar, at its introduction into the Bulgarian Orthodox Church, and is considered a confessor of the Faith by the Bulgarian traditionalists. His important book, Orthodoxy and Ecumenism, co-authored with the late Archimandrite Dr. Seraphim, his longtime colleague, has recently appeared in Bulgarian and Russian editions.

 

Source: Orthodox Tradition, Vol. XII (1995), No. 3, pp. 11-18.

Faithfulness to Christ Will Save Us From the Mark of the Beast

From an Extemporaneous Sermon by Bishop Photii of Triaditza

 

 

Burdened with cares, immersed in the daily course of monotonous routines, exhausted from the rapid pace of the passing years, we rarely contemplate the Judgment Day of God, which we will all, without exception, face. Even the realization of our impending deaths and appearance before God for His judgment is vague and weak, struggling to find deep expression in our hearts. Living by the rhythm of this frenetic, transient world, we seldom understand that every passing moment shapes our eternal state. At the same time, many Christians are anxiously preoccupied, even to the point of unhealthy feverishness, with these questions: “When will this take place? When will Christ’s words be realized? When will God’s awesome and fearsome Day of Judgment come about? When is the Lord’s Second Coming?” Sadly, these concerns and questions seldom come forth from hearts standing in awe before Christ. So it is that we unfortunately become schizophrenic; we are of two minds. We live our lives according to the beat of the present world, constantly under the sway of its logic, and this even when contemplating things spiritual. We remain half-Christian and half-heathen in our hearts, involved in the world, yet eagerly inquiring and desiring to know when God’s words regarding the end of the world will come to fruition.

Our Lord Jesus Christ responded to this particular question, when it was posed to Him by His Apostles: “Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of Thy coming, and of the end of the world?” (St. Matthew 24:3). The Lord left the Apostles and us with but a hint and a single sign of His glorious Second Coming: the Cross. All human beings on earth will observe the Cross in the heavens—shining even brighter than the sun—at the Lord Jesus Christ’s Second Coming in all His Divine Glory, together with a countless multitude of bright Angels, so as to carry out His Judgment. Alarmed, we still ask ourselves: “When is its arrival, when will this happen?”

All of us are aware that the Saviour’s Second Coming will also be preceded by that of the Antichrist. Much is said, in this regard, about the Mark of the Beast (Antichrist), and there are countless theories concerning the secret meaning of the number “666.” But few are they who approach these issues with humility, profundity of thought and, indeed, spiritually! One who understands that the mark of the beast is, alas, inscribed on our hearts will not worry and be disquieted, waiting anxiously for its appearance, for example, in some new change in the official documents and passports that a government may issue. Instead, he will concentrate all of his attention on identifying this mark in the heart, where it is evilly inscribed.

Few Orthodox faithful, I suspect, realize that their feverish concerns and questions—“What will the mark look like? Will it not likely be the latest thing in technology, some sort of electronic microchip?”—have their provenance in Protestant texts and Protestant fundamentalistic theology. This kind of speculation cannot be found at the core of the Orthodox Church, and particularly in the theological consensus of the Holy Fathers. Indeed, the truth is that we do not know what form the Mark of the Beast will take. Will it perhaps be a technical process—or perhaps one of the rituals of the false religions of the future world? Perhaps a rite that will blasphemously imitate the Christian rite of Chrismation? We simply do not know. That of which we should be aware is one thing: no outward action and no outward safeguard can guarantee and ensure that we will remain faithful to our Lord. The effectiveness of this mark will be thwarted only by our conscience and by our will. It will be powerless to the extent that we are willing to live in a constant state of spiritual effort of conscience and indefatigable struggle against sin, continuously exercising our willpower in standing up for and maintaining our uninterrupted fidelity to Christ—even after falling over and over, or by betraying Him through our feelings, thoughts, words, and deeds.

No amount of protestation, no organizations and earthly resources directed against passports and the symbol “666”—which is purported, for example, to appear on Russian passports—will save us from the proliferation of this Mark of the Beast. Our sole aim should be the preservation of our fidelity to the Patristic spirit and to Orthodoxy’s Tradition. As I said, not one of the Holy Fathers ever provided a detailed assessment or some rash interpretation of the meaning of the symbol “666.” It is only that disturbed part of humanity, those who have distanced themselves in their hearts from Christ, that has succumbed to hysteria and made such determinations. To some, it is an avocation, while to others it is a burning issue, while to yet others it is a manifestation of their spiritual illness.

The most difficult thing for a person to achieve is the maintenance of spiritual stability. And the Evil One is fully aware of this. That is why he employs innumerable methods in his attempt to separate us from Christ, carefully attacking our inner fidelity to Christ, which fidelity we defile on a daily basis. If we are not able to serve our neighbor quietly and lovingly, if we are incapable of feeding the hungry, visiting the sick, quenching the thirst of those without drink, and comforting the imprisoned, then we are in no condition to serve Christ. If we lack love for our neighbor, we simply do not have Christ in us. It is on such concerns that we must focus our attention. Fidelity is a genuine, profound faithfulness to Orthodox Tradition, in all of its fullness, in word, spirit, life, and actions; in other words, fidelity to, and love for, Christ by fulfilling His commandments and acquiring the Holy Gospel’s appointed virtues in loving our fellow man. One should not have doubt or fear about the Antichrist, for those things that will remain firm on Christ’s Judgment Day are humility, truth, repentance and love. They will save us.

O Lord, rid us of everything that separates us from Thee! Amen.

 

Source: Orthodox Tradition, Vol. XXVII (2010), No. 1, pp. 11-13.

The Mystery of Confession: A Second Baptism

by Father Seraphim Johnson (+2009)

 

 

We all know that in Baptism God graciously forgives all the sins we have ever committed up until that time. But what happens when we sin again after Baptism? We cannot, in fact, be baptized again, so are we condemned to stay in our sin forever? Or has the Lord made some provision for us to renew our Baptism and to cleanse ourselves anew from our sins? When our Lord Jesus Christ washed His disciples’ feet at the Last Supper, He showed us that there is a way to be cleansed from our sins after Baptism. Let us review this event from the Gospel of Saint John:

Jesus knew that the Father had put all things under His power, and that He had come from God and was returning to God; so He got up from the meal, took off His outer clothing, and wrapped a towel around His waist. After that, He poured water into a basin and began to wash His disciples’ feet, drying them with the towel that was wrapped around Him.

He came to Simon Peter, who said to Him, “Lord, art Thou going to wash my feet?”

Jesus replied, “Thou dost not realize now what I am doing, but later thou wilt understand.”

"No,” said Peter, “Thou shalt never wash my feet.”

Jesus answered, “Unless I wash thee, thou hast no part with Me.”

“Then, Lord,” Simon Peter replied, “not just my feet but my hands and my head as well!”

Jesus answered, “A person who has had a bath needs only to wash his feet; his whole body is clean. And you are clean, though not every one of you.” For He knew who was going to betray Him, and that was why He said not every one was clean.

(John 13:3-11)

Now, let us notice several things in this passage. First, this event took place right before the disciples received Holy Communion for the first time. They were purified by this washing before they received the Holy Mysteries of the Body and Blood of the Lord. When Saint Peter objected to the Lord’s washing his feet, the Lord said that if He did not wash Saint Peter’s feet, then Saint Peter would have no part in Him and His kingdom. That is, Saint Peter would not be able to receive the Lord’s Body and Blood and share in the new life. When Saint Peter heard this, he impulsively asked the Lord to wash all of him, not just his feet. But the Lord reminded him that he had already been washed—he had received Holy Baptism, which had cleansed his whole body. What Saint Peter needed now was to have his feet washed.

The feet are the part of the body which comes into contact with the world: as you walk around, especially if you are barefoot or in sandals, as the Lord and the disciples were, your feet get very dirty. The rest of you might stay clean after a bath, but you couldn’t walk anywhere without getting your feet all dusty and grimy. And that is how it is for us too: after being washed clean in Baptism, we still have to walk around in this fallen world, and when we do so, our spiritual feet get dirty. We cannot be baptized again, but before we can come to Holy Communion and share in the Lord’s Body and Blood, we need to be cleaned again. The means by which we are cleaned is Confession of our sins, which spiritually corresponds to the Washing of the Feet in this Gospel. In his commentary on this passage Blessed Theophylact says, “Thus through confession we can wash ourselves to commune worthily of the supper, and not eat and drink condemnation to ourselves.” [1]

Saint Cosmas of Aitolia, the great missionary of Greece and Albania in the eighteenth century, explains Confession quite clearly when he says: “We too should keep our Baptism as pure and immaculate as possible. If by chance we err, as human beings, may the gracious God be glorified, He Who has granted us a second Baptism, holy Confession, because it is impossible for a person to be saved who hasn’t been baptized and one who is unconfessed.” [2] Saint Cosmas also tells us: “The man who is unconfessed is similar to one who is unbaptized and is unable to be saved… If he has not confessed, let him commune as many times as he will, it does not help at all, but rather causes harm, since he communes unworthily, and woe to him… First we should wash and cleanse our vessel, and then place the most precious Thing inside.” [3]

The Origin of Confession

When the Lord appeared to His Apostles after His resurrection from the dead, He established the Mystery of Holy Confession. He breathed on them and said, “Receive the Holy Spirit. If you forgive anyone his sins, they are forgiven; if you do not forgive them, they are not forgiven” (John 20:22-23). In these words He granted His Apostles the power, through the working of the Holy Spirit, to release men from their sins, and also to bind them in their sins. The Church has used this power ever since. Initially, the bishops, as the direct successors of the Apostles, were the only ones to exercise it, but by the second century they allowed priests to act as their representatives in forgiving sins. The Mystery has two parts: the person who is repenting confesses his sins orally to a priest or bishop, and then, if he seems to have a true desire to stop sinning, the clergyman reads a prayer for God to forgive the sins confessed. After this prayer, the sins are forgiven, as if they had never been committed.

In the second and third centuries, the confession of sins was often done publicly, in front of the whole congregation, at least when major sins were being confessed—apostasy, betrayal of fellow Christians, heresy, and sins which were already public knowledge, like adultery. For such sins, a long period of special discipline and testing was necessary before a person could be readmitted to Holy Communion. In many ways this period paralleled the preparation for Baptism, and the person who had confessed a major sin was treated much like one coming for Baptism. He had to pass through a series of stages, including: (1) mourner—he stood outside the church and asked the forgiveness and prayers of the Christians going inside; (2) listener—he stood with the catechumens in the narthex of the church and listened to the first part of the Liturgy, through the Scriptures and sermon, but left before the Eucharist itself; (3) kneeler—he stood in the back of the church, knelt for special prayers and a blessing from the bishop, but left before Holy Communion; (4) stander—he stood with the faithful, but was not admitted to Holy Communion. During all this time, the penitent was given a special rule of extra prayer and fasting; and if he was willing to fast even more, the time he was excluded from Holy Communion might be reduced. In the case of particularly serious sins, the person might be cut off from Holy Communion for many years, or even until he was dying.

Public confession and the long periods of special discipline and testing began to be relaxed in the third century, starting in Africa, and gradually the Mystery of Confession became more as we know it today. [4] When we look at our own sins, we need to remember how seriously they were treated in the early Church, and we should think about how long we would have been cut off from Holy Communion had we lived then as we do now.

Who Needs Confession?

There is no one alive who does not sin. Saint Paul says, “All have sinned and come short of the glory of God” (Rom. 3:23). The Holy Apostle Saint John reminds us: “If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness. If we claim we have not sinned, we make Him out to be a liar and His word has no place in our lives” (I John 1:8-10). In fact, everyone sins “continually,” as Saint Symeon of Thessalonica says, and therefore everyone must repent: laymen, monks, priests, bishops—everyone. [5] Our Lord Jesus Christ Himself tells us, “Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand” (Matt. 4:17).

Sometimes we think that we don’t have many sins, so we must be making real progress in the spiritual life. People might even say that they don’t need to confess, since they have not done anything wrong. But, unfortunately, this does not mean that they are already saints; on the contrary, it is a bad sign, since the saints are more aware of their sins than most of us are. Abba Poemen, the Desert Father, once told a story about Abba Dioscoros: One day Abba Dioscoros’s disciple was in his own cell when he heard the abba weeping. So the disciple went and asked Abba Dioscoros what was wrong. “I am weeping over my sins,” the elder answered. “But you do not have sins, Father,” the disciple replied. And the elder said, “Truly, if I were allowed to see my sins, three or four men would not be enough to weep for them.” [6] The closer we grow to God, the brighter His light shines in our souls, and the more clearly we see our sins and shortcomings. So if we are growing in love for God, we should also have a constantly growing awareness of our own sinfulness and unworthiness.

If we don’t confess to God, we make the Devil happy, and our spiritual state grows worse and worse. Abba John the Dwarf says, “The enemy rejoices over nothing so much as over those who do not confess their thoughts.” [7] And Saint Symeon the New Theologian explains how the Lord gave Adam a chance to confess after he disobeyed in the Garden of Eden. When the Lord came in the evening and found Adam hiding, He asked him, “Where are you?” “Who told you you are naked?”—hoping that Adam would confess his sin and ask for forgiveness. But, as we know, Adam did not confess. Instead, as the saying goes, “he took it like a man—he blamed his wife,” and by implication he also blamed God, saying that it was the woman God gave him who caused him to sin. Then the Lord turned to Eve to see if perhaps she would confess. But she blamed the serpent. Since neither one was willing to say, “I have sinned, forgive me,” they were cast out of Eden. [8] How different our lives would be if only our first parents had confessed their sin, instead of hiding it and blaming each other for it! When we come to the Last Judgment, we also will have to choose between two answers to the Lord for all the sins we have committed in our lives. We can either say, “Lord, have mercy on me a sinner,” or we can make excuses and blame others for our sins. What we must remember is that the Lord accepts those who confess their sins, as He accepted the publican, the prodigal son, the harlot, Zacchaeus, and the thief on the cross. But He rejects those, like the Pharisee, who deny their sins or blame others for them.

How Often Should We Confess?

The simplest answer is: as often as possible. Saint Cosmas advises us to confess every day if possible, but if not, then weekly or monthly, but at least four times a year. [9] You see, at the moment we sin, we open the way for Satan to enter into us and start crowding God out of our lives. The longer we wait to turn back to God and confess, the more deeply and firmly Satan digs in and takes over, and the stronger sin’s grip becomes on us. Abba Poemen declared, “At the moment when a man goes astray, if he says, I have sinned, immediately the sin ceases.” [10] Once a monk asked his elder why the people in the world live such bad lives, but have so few strong temptations, while the monks try so hard and have a great many temptations. It seemed unfair, he thought. The elder answered that when worldly people fall, they don’t confess and get back up again, so they can’t fall again, since they are already flat on the ground. The Devil does not waste his temptations on them anymore, since he already has them anyway. But when a monk falls, he immediately confesses his sin and gets up. Now he is standing up again, so he can also fall again. Sometimes the monk wins in his battle with Satan, and sometimes he loses, but he keeps on trying until finally he comes to peace with God. [11] Similarly, when one of the brothers fell, he asked Abba Sisoes what to do. “Get up again,” he answered. “I did, but I fell again,” the monk said. “Get up again and again.” “How many times?” the monk asked. “Until you are taken up either in virtue or in sin,” the abba told him. [12] So we see that we should confess every time we sin. And then, after confessing, we must fill our minds with thoughts of God so that the temptations and sins do not return and fill us again with their filth.

One way everyone can use to get rid of sin as soon as possible is to confess daily. Saint Isaiah the Solitary taught: “Examine yourself daily in the sight of God, and discover which of the passions is in your heart. Cast it out, and so escape His judgment.” [13] Now, obviously, you cannot go to a priest daily and tell him your temptations and sins, but you can go before God every night in your prayers and examine your life during the day which has just passed. Saint Maximos the Confessor teaches us that our daily confession should have two parts: first, we should thank God for all the blessings we have received from Him, especially the ones of that day; then we should bring to light and examine our sins, again especially the ones of that day. These two acts produce humility, says the Saint, since in our thanksgiving we see how unworthy we are of God’s goodness and blessings to us, while in our confession of sins we see how badly we have repaid Him for His love toward us and we ask for His forgiveness. [14] If we follow this rule, we never let the sun go down on our sins and do not give them a chance to put out deep roots in our souls.

How To Confess

You do not, perhaps, need any special instructions to make your daily confession as part of your prayers; but special preparation is needed for the Mystery of Confession. Saint Cosmas of Aitolia lived in a time of great spiritual decline, when the Moslem Ottoman Empire was oppressing Christians and when most priests were so poorly trained that they were not allowed to hear confessions. Wherever Saint Cosmas went, he preached to the people about the Faith and about repentance, and then he heard as many confessions as he could. But since there were always too many people, he told them he would take all their sins on his own shoulders if they would agree to take four hairs from his beard. These four hairs are the four steps to a good confession: (1) forgive your enemies; (2) find a good confessor and tell him all your sins; (3) accuse only yourself, no one else; and (4) leave confession firmly resolved that it is better to die than to sin again. [15] Let us look at each of these steps in detail.

Forgive Your Enemies

Our Lord Jesus Christ taught: “And when you stand praying, if you hold anything against anyone, forgive him, so that your Father in heaven may forgive you your sins” (Matt. 11:15). He also said, “If you are offering your gift at the altar and there remember that your brother has something against you, leave your gift there in front of the altar. First go and be reconciled to your brother: then come and offer your gift” (Matt. 5:23-24). Before you can do anything acceptable to God, you must forgive your neighbors, and above all, your enemies. The Apostle John says that, “anyone who claims to be in the light but hates his brother is still in the darkness. Anyone who hates his brother is a murderer, and you know that no murderer has eternal life in him” (I John 2:9; 3:15).

Saint Cosmas told a story about two men who came to confession. One of them, Peter, had many good deeds and few sins, but he would not forgive men for their offenses against himself. The other, Paul, had many sins but he always forgave others. Because of this, Peter was sent to Hell, while Paul, because he forgave others, was granted Holy Communion. Saint Cosmas says that Peter was like 100 pounds of flour, and his hatred and refusal to forgive others was the yeast which changed it all into the devil’s poison. Paul, on the other hand, was like a pile of kindling, and his forgiving of others was the spark which ignited the whole pile and made it burn brightly for God. [15] So before you do anything else, think about those who have offended you, and then forgive them from the bottom of your heart. In the words of Abba Zeno, “If a man wants God to hear his prayer quickly, then before he prays for anything else, even his own soul, when he stands and stretches out his hands towards God, he must pray with all his heart for his enemies. Through this action, God will hear everything that he asks.” [17]

Actually, this is something you should do every day as part of your daily confession. Saint Epiphanius once met with Abba Hilarion and served him a fowl to eat. Abba Hilarion said, “Forgive me, but since I received the [monastic] habit, I have not eaten meat which has been killed.” Saint Epiphanius answered, “Since I took the [monastic] habit, I have not allowed anyone to go to sleep with a complaint against me, and I have not gone to rest with a complaint against anyone.” Abba Hilarion admitted that Saint Epiphanius’s way of life was better than his. [18] Let us follow Saint Epiphanius’s good example, and never go to bed in a state of enmity with anyone; rather, let us forgive everyone every night in our evening prayers.

Find a Good Confessor and Tell Him All Your Sins

Saint Symeon of Thessalonica says that you must confess all your sins with simplicity and sorrow, and you must promise to correct any injustices and from now on to behave in a godly way. [19] In order to confess all your sins you must review your life since your last confession and see what sorts of falls you have had. Daily confession will make this much easier, since you will remember far more and be aware of more of your sins if you consider them each day.

Your spiritual father may also help you to review your thoughts and actions and to examine yourself by asking you some questions. There are also various other aids that you can use in considering your sins. One approach is to go over the Ten Commandments and the Beatitudes to see how your life compares to their demands; you can also find lists of questions based on them to help in this examination. Another method is to consider the three parts of the soul and see what sorts of sins are characteristic of each: the intelligent part is prone to errors in faith, such as heresy or blasphemy; the incensive part often leads to anger and cursing of others; and the appetitive part produces greed, love of money, envy, jealousy, impurity. [20] There is, however, one special caution which must be observed when you examine yourself to see what your sins are. Saint Mark the Ascetic warns that you should be careful not to go over your sins in too much detail, either in preparing for confession or when confessing them, since dwelling on them too much may rekindle some of the old passions and cause you to fall again. [21] In any case, pray to God to enlighten you and show you your sins as far as you are able to bear this knowledge.

People sometimes get nervous when they hear they must confess all their sins. They think, “What if I forget something? Will God condemn me even more?” Once in a while, you really do forget a sin, and quite often you are ignorant of your real sins because of your spiritual immaturity, but do not let this frighten you. When the priest prays for your forgiveness in the prayer of absolution, he prays that you will also be forgiven for any sins you have not confessed, either because of ignorance or forgetfulness. Of course, if you later remember a sin you forgot to confess, or if you become aware that some past act was sinful, you should tell this to your spiritual father at your next confession.

After reviewing your life and determining your sins, you and your spiritual father should sit down together in a quiet place and talk over your sins. During this conversation, you should not just tell him about the actual sins you have committed, but also about ideas and temptations which have troubled you or about which you are in doubt. Unfortunately, it is not always possible to do this, especially if you come to confession only before Liturgy on Sunday morning. If this is your normal practice, you might try to find a time occasionally when you can have a longer conversation with your spiritual father.

Mention of your spiritual father brings us to the other part of this step. You should try to find an experienced spiritual father, and one for whom you feel trust. Abba Poemen warns us, “Do not lay open your conscience to anyone whom you do not trust in your heart.” [22] There was once a monk who was very tempted. He went to an elder and confessed his sinful thoughts. Before the elder had even heard of the monk’s sinful deeds, he said, “You have lost your soul.” So the monk decided that in that case, there was no point in his staying in the monastery and living such a difficult life. As he was leaving to go back to the world, however, he met Abba Silouan, who was spiritually very experienced and perceptive. He asked the monk what was wrong, so the monk confessed his sinful thoughts again. But Abba Silouan told him the Scriptures do not condemn a person only for thoughts. That encouraged the monk enough that he then told the abba about his sinful deeds. Abba Silouan taught the monk about repentance, and the monk went back to the monastery and became a lamp of virtue. [23] As you can see, that inexperienced elder nearly cost the monk his soul. By the way, being spiritually experienced is not the same thing as being well educated or old. It is possible for a young person to be more spiritually experienced than an old one, and it is actually somewhat more likely that a less highly educated confessor will be humbler and more experienced spiritually. Further, there are laymen who are far more experienced in things of the Spirit than are many priests. At times you will find that people confess their sins to a layman for advice and guidance, and then go to a priest for absolution.

Some cautious priests, knowing their own lack of spiritual experience, will hear confessions and read the prayer of absolution, but will not give any beyond the most general advice, lest they cause harm to the person confessing. If a spiritual father has some experience, however, he should try to help those who confess to him by advising them on how best to deal with their temptations and conquer their passions. In fact, receiving such advice is one of the advantages of confessing to a spiritual father.

You must be careful of a particular temptation which the evil one will often use against you. As Saint Theodorus puts it, “Do not judge the actions of your spiritual father, but obey his commands. For the demons are in the habit of showing you his defects, so that your ears may be deaf to what he tells you.” [24] Your spiritual father is also a human being, with his own sins and weaknesses. Even so, he may be able to see things—or God may show them to him—which will help you if you listen to him. Do not be critical of him or be put off by something he says or does, so that you refuse to listen to his good advice to you.

A spiritual father does not normally give actual “commands” or “obediences” to his spiritual children, but he can help them with advice if they ask for it. Saint Peter of Damascus teaches that “we can trust only him who has received from God the grace of discrimination and who, as Saint Maximos says, has acquired through great humility and long practice of the virtues an intellect blessed with spiritual insight. Such a man is in a position to advise, not everyone, but at least those who seek him out voluntarily and who question him by their own choice… It is because of his humility, and because his questioners seek him out voluntarily, that what he says is stamped on the soul of his listeners.” [25] Sadly enough, Saint Peter remarks that even in his day there was no one who had this discrimination, since no one had the humility that leads to it. [26] How much less likely that you will find such humility and true discrimination today! But do not despair. Rather, discuss your spiritual state with your spiritual father. He cannot and must not dictate to you, but it is very important to be open to his advice. The combination of his advice and your humility in receiving it is often the key to victory over your sins. Once two brothers went to confess to Abba Zeno. One of them had many tears and a great desire for instruction, while the other was indifferent and had no interest in anything the abba had to teach him. Later, when the two monks compared notes, the one who wanted guidance was healed of his sins, but the other was not. [27]

When you come to confession, be careful to avoid another temptation. It is easy to start talking about all sorts of exalted spiritual questions, the meaning of the Scriptures, and so forth, while you somehow neglect to mention your own sins. Once an elder who had heard about Abba Poemen made a long trip to see him. When he was admitted to the abba’s cell, the visitor began talking about all sorts of exalted spiritual matters; but Abba Poemen did not say a word to him. Finally, the visiting elder left and, in great disappointment, told Abba Poemen’s disciple that the abba had not spoken to him at all. When the disciple asked Abba Poemen why he had not talked with the visitor, the abba answered that the visitor knew about sublime spiritual topics, of which he was ignorant, so he had nothing to say. He only knew about the passions and how to struggle with them. The disciple advised the visitor to go again to see Abba Poemen and to ask him about the passions of the soul. When he did so, Abba Poemen replied that now this was something he knew about, and they then had a long talk which was very profitable for the visitor. [28] So when you come to confession, leave theology behind and stick to your passions.

Remember that when you come to confession, you are actually confessing to God; you should approach Him with reverence and godly fear, knowing how holy He is. So often today people are casual and unconcerned in their approach to anyone in authority, and this attitude sometimes carries over into their approach to God. But, when you come to Confession or Holy Communion, think how you would feel if you could actually see the Lord Jesus Christ standing there before you. Then remind yourself that He is in truth there, and approach Him with awe. In the Order of Confession, the priest is told to remind the person confessing, “Brother, inasmuch as thou hast come to me and to God, be not ashamed; for thou speakest not unto me, but unto God, before Whom thou standest.” [29] Now, some people may ask, “Why, then, do I need to have the priest there at all? Can’t I just confess to God?” But the Apostle James instructs us: “Therefore confess your sins to each other and pray for each other so that you may be healed” (James 5:16). Your spiritual father is present in Confession as a witness so that you really will examine yourself, to give you advice, and also because your sins are also offenses against mankind, of which he is a representative. One of the important products of a full confession to another person is that it leads to humility, which is absolutely essential for any progress at all in the spiritual life. Always remember that your spiritual father has his own sins and trials. He will not judge and condemn you if you open your heart to him. You must not, then, be ashamed to open your life up to him and confess all your sins. The time to be ashamed is when you commit the sin, not when you come to confess it. Often it is the very act of humbling yourself and acknowledging your sin that leads to your triumph over it. There was once a father who had a terrible warfare with temptation for three years, but he was unable to confess it. In his pride and shame he said to himself, “Why reveal my secrets, when I already know what to do?” So, although he often visited his elder and talked to him about other things, he never mentioned this warfare. But since the warfare kept getting worse, he finally decided he had to go and confess it. On the way, he wavered, and he decided, “If no one is there, I will confess, but not otherwise.” When he arrived, the elder was alone, but still he did not confess. Finally, as he was about to leave again without confessing, the elder stopped him and encouraged him to confess. The elder could see he was in difficulty, so he told him, “I am a man of like passions to you. Tell me what is wrong.” At last, the monk confessed his sin, and immediately his heart was lightened and he was freed from that passion. [30]

Saint John Cassian likewise tells of a monk who was a great ascetic, but would not reveal his thoughts to anyone. He was troubled for a long time by dreams which showed him that Judaism was better than Christianity, but he told no one about the dreams, nor did he ask for advice. In the end, he abandoned Christ and became a Jew himself, having been led astray by his pride. True discernment comes only from true humility, which you show by being willing to reveal your thoughts and actions to your spiritual father, rather than trusting in your own wisdom. The very act of revealing them weakens and withers evil thoughts. [31]

Accuse Only Yourself, No One Else

Actually, there are two reasons why you should accuse only yourself at confession. In the first place, when you come to confession, you must not follow the bad example of Adam and Eve and try to blame someone else for your sins; rather, you must take responsibility yourself for your own weakness. Abba Or taught his disciples: “In all temptations, do not complain about anyone else, but say about yourself, ‘These things happen to me because of my sins.’” [32] Abba Moses likewise taught that if a person does not think in his own heart that he is a sinner, then God will not hear him. He said, “When someone is occupied with his own faults, he does not see those of his neighbor.” [33] As long as you are trying to blame someone else for your sins, you are not truly sorry for them—you have not yet acknowledged that you are responsible for them—so God cannot give you the strength to overcome them. It is only when you turn to God, admit your own weakness and sinfulness, and ask for His help, that you will begin to make progress against your sins.

The second reason for accusing only yourself during confession is that you must never reveal another person’s sins. Abba Poemen warns that if you reveal another person’s sins, God will reveal yours. [34] Many people know that a priest is not allowed to tell anyone what he has heard in confession, even at the threat of death. But many do not know that this same rule applies to everyone. If you happen to overhear what someone says in confession, you must never reveal that to anyone. You are bound just as much as the priest is to keep it secret. When Christians learn of someone else’s sins, they should pray for that person; but to reveal the sins and talk about them destroys your own soul. To keep silent about someone else’s sins is all part of not judging others. Saint Isaac the Theban once saw a brother sinning and condemned him in his heart. When the Saint got home, he found an angel blocking the door to his cell. The angel said, “God sent me to ask you where you want to throw the guilty brother you have condemned.” Saint Isaac repented, and the angel told him that he should not judge before God has done so. [35] Another time a group of monks was discussing the sins of one of the brothers. Abba Pior came with a big bag of sand on his back and a small bag of sand hanging down in front. The fathers asked the meaning of this, and he told them that we put our sins—the big bag—behind us so that we will not be troubled by them, and we put the little bag of our brother’s sins in front of us so we will be able to see and judge his sins. This is backwards. [36] Always remember that you are coming to confess your own sins, not to judge your brother. If you do reveal someone else’s sins during confession, you are actually committing another sin in the midst of confession, so how can you hope to be forgiven?

Leave Confession with a Firm Resolution that it is Better to Die than to Sin Again

It is easy to fall into the habit of going to confession without really thinking about what repentance means, but this makes confession worse than meaningless. Repentance is a firm desire and intention not to commit that sin again. Saint Symeon of Thessalonica even declares that if a priest is aware that someone is not really repentant when he comes to confession, he must send that person away without absolution. Otherwise, the priest himself shares in that person’s sin. [37]

“He who conceals his sins does not prosper,” say the Holy Scriptures, “but whoever confesses and renounces them finds mercy” (Prov. 28:13). Abba Poemen says that God will forgive one who converts from sin. [38] If you have really decided to turn away from your sins and commit them no more, then when the priest reads the prayer of absolution over you, God forgives all your sins and wipes out the very memory of them.

What we find so often is that, while we don’t really like our sins, we do love the things which lead to sin. We want to stop judging other people, but we still enjoy talking about them and hearing about things they do. As Saint Isaac the Syrian teaches, we become enslaved to our passions because we are attached to the causes of our sins. You cannot stop sinning, the Saint explains, unless you hate your sins, and you cannot be forgiven unless you confess them. [39] So you go to confession with a real desire to stop sinning, but you don’t want to give up the things which lead to the sins. A monk once came to his elder and asked for help against lustful thoughts. The monk was sincere in wanting the thoughts to stop, but they did not. When the elder then prayed for enlightenment, he was shown that an angel was waiting to help the monk, but the monk did not ask for help. On the contrary, when the thoughts came he welcomed them and enjoyed them. [40] This monk wanted his sin to go away, but he did not hate it. In fact, he enjoyed the sinful thoughts when they came, even though they were drawing him away from God. In such a case, confession is worthless, since there is no desire to stop sinning. In another case, a monk confessed his helplessness against impure thoughts and asked his elder to pray for his victory over them. After the elder had prayed for him for seven days, the monk said the thoughts were worse than ever. The elder was puzzled, so he prayed to God for an explanation. Satan appeared to him and said that from the first day of the elder’s prayers he had stopped tempting the monk, but the monk had then created his own temptation by eating and drinking too much. [41] If you come to confession and do not really intend to stop sinning, then you would do better to stay away. You are not receiving the forgiveness of your sins at all, but are just mocking God and making your state worse than before.

Now, do not misunderstand this. Sometimes people say, “But, I always have the same sins. Does that mean I should not come to confession?” It can be discouraging to find that you have the same sins each time you come to confession, but, as one priest says, “What do you want—new sins?” No matter how weak you are and no matter how many times you fall into the same sins, if you want help in overcoming your sins, then come and confess them, asking for this help. But be ready to work to overcome them. Do not just think that they will go away on their own while you continue to feed them and to enjoy the things that cause them. If, on the other hand, you have no desire to struggle and to avoid the situations, people, and things that have led you to sin in the past, then you might better stay away from confession, because in this case confession only adds more sins to your burden. For confession to produce forgiveness, you must hate your sin and want to conquer it by all the means at your disposal.

What To Do When You Have No Spiritual Father

For many Orthodox Christians, what they have read so far may be more frustrating than helpful. In our current circumstances many Orthodox Christians live far away from a church and may not see a priest more than once or twice a year. In other cases, while they may have a priest at hand, they may not feel able to approach him as a spiritual guide, or he himself may not be willing to provide such advice and direction. In the modern world there is a fearful shortage of priests with the experience and the discrimination to be spiritual fathers. Sometimes this problem can be solved by occasionally telephoning a spiritual father or writing to him, but that is frequently unsatisfactory too. This same situation has often arisen in the past, since there have never been enough discriminating spiritual fathers. Many centuries ago there was an ascetic who served as spiritual father to some monks; as a result of hearing one monk’s confession, he fell into sin himself. Where he was living, there was no one to whom he could open his thoughts, so he decided to go where he could find someone to whom he could confess, although that would leave no one to hear the thoughts of the monks where he was then living. As he was starting to leave, God sent him a vision in the form of a young virgin who advised him to stay where he was, to live with God’s grace, and to learn the truth from it. This is what he did, and he was healed from his sin. [42]

From this example, we learn that when you have no one to advise you, you can call on God to send you His grace to help you. Of course, you must be careful not to fall into the error of ignoring a guide when you have one available and saying that you will have only God for your director. God will not help in this special way when there is a guide at hand whom you choose to disregard. There is a story of a man who was trapped on the roof of his house in a flood. A boat came to rescue him, but he refused, saying that he was waiting for God to save him from the flood. Later a helicopter came, but he turned it down also, waiting for God to save him. Then the flood waters came up higher, and the man drowned. When he came to judgment, he asked the Lord why He had not saved him from the flood. The Lord replied, “Who do you think sent the boat and the helicopter?” If He gives you a guide, He expects you to listen to him. But if He does not give you one, then He will graciously be your guide if you approach Him in sincerity and humility.

Similarly, Saint Peter of Damascus says that if you have no advisor, you should take Christ as your counsellor. Ask Him with humility and heartfelt prayer about your every thought and action. If you are sincere and have as your only purpose the doing of God’s will, then God Himself will teach you what to do. He may do this in different ways: directly, through inspiration; by means of some person (sometimes this may be the priest to whom you go to confession); by circumstances; or by the Holy Scriptures. [43] As an example of how God can send you guidance, remember the Ethiopian eunuch who was riding in his chariot and reading the Prophet Isaiah. The Holy Spirit sent Saint Philip the Apostle to him to ask if he understood what he was reading. The eunuch said he did not, so Saint Philip explained to him how the Prophet was speaking about our Lord Jesus Christ. After this explanation, the eunuch asked to be baptized (Acts 8:26-39). In another instance, from the nineteenth century, a young man came to confess to the Russian Elder Amvrosy of Optina. While he was waiting, he was very upset and confused about how to confess his sin. Fr. Joseph, the elder’s cell attendant, gave him a book of essays, saying, “Here, this is a good book to read before confession.” The young man opened the book to a passage which was exactly what he needed, and he finished it just as he was called for confession. [44] When you ask the Lord Jesus Christ in this way for guidance, you must give up your own will and live in God. You must hope in faith for an answer from Him, and you must be patient for that answer to come. Do not assume that you are immediately going to receive a revelation in answer to your request. Saint Peter of Damascus says that it may take years for the answer to come, but it will come. In the meantime, be humble enough to admit that you do not know about the matter, so that you do not fall into either of the possible temptations: disbelieving an angel who is bringing you the answer, or trusting a devil who is trying to mislead you. [45] In words of great comfort, Saint Peter says that if you have no guide, but do try to act with dispassion, even things you may do that are not so good will be counted to your credit for two reasons: because you are perplexed about how best to follow God, and because you have God in mind and have the intention to follow Him to the best of your ability. [46]

If you have the sincere desire to conquer your sins, God is always ready and waiting to help you. If possible, take all four hairs from Saint Cosmas’s beard: forgive your enemies, confess all your sins to an experienced spiritual father, accuse no one but yourself for your falls, and have the firm intention to die rather than to sin again. But if you cannot grasp the second hair in full because you have no spiritual father, at least take the other three hairs and make a full confession of your sins to God Himself, asking Him to provide you with the guidance you need in the absence of a human spiritual father. In either case, God will see your humility and your sorrow for your sins and will grant you forgiveness and guidance in living with, in, and for Him in the future.

 

FOOTNOTES

1. Blessed Theophylact, Blagovestnik [in Russian], S. Pctersburg, p. 679.

2. Vaporis, N. M., Father Kosmas, The Apostle of the Poor, Brookline, Massachusctts, 1977, p. 111.

3. Menounou, I. V., Kosma tou Aitolou Didakhes [in Greek], Athens, 1979, p. 163.

4. Tal'berg, N., Istoriya Khristianskoy Tserkvi [in Russian], Jordanville, New York, 1964, pp. 98-99 gives a brief history of this period.

5. Saint Symeon of Thessalonica, Ta Apanta [in Greek], Thessalonica, 1882, pp. 205-206.

6. Ward, B., The Sayings of the Desert Fathers, London, 1975, p. 46.

7. Ibid., p. 152.

8. Symeon the New Theologian, The Discourses, New York, 1980, pp. 95-97.

9. Vaporis, op. cit., p. 66.

10. Ward, op. cit., p. 152.

11. Euergetinos [in Greek], Athens, 1983, Vol. I, pp. 428-429.

12. Ward, op. cit., p. 184.

13. Philokalia, London, 1979, 1981, 1984, Vol. I, p. 26.

14. Philokalia, Vol. 11, p. 226.

15. Menounou, op. cit., p. 229; Vaporis, op. cit., pp. 64-66.

16. Vaporis, op. cit., pp. 66-67.

17 Ward, op. cit., p. 57.

18. Ibid., p. 49.

19. Op. cit., p. 210.

20. Saint Symeon of Thessalonica, op. cit., p. 211.

21. Philokalia, Vol. I, p. 138.

22. Ward, op. cit., p. 163.

23. Euergetinos, Vol. 1, pp. 286-287.

24. Philokalia, Vol TI, p. 21.

25. Philokalia, Vol. III, p. 183.

26. Philokalia, Vol. III, p. 185.

27. Euergetinos, Vol. I, pp. 285-286.

28. Ward, op. cit., pp. 140-141.

29. Manual of Eastern Orthodox Prayers, London, 1945, p. 55.

30. Khampake, Th., Gerontikon [in Greek], Athens, 1962, pp. 343-344.

31. Philokalia, Vol. I, pp. 102-104.

32. Ward, op. cit., p. 207.

33. Ibid., p. 120.

34. Ibid., p. 147.

35. Ibid., p. 93.

36. Ibid., p. 168.

37. Op. cit., p. 209.

38. Ward, op. cit., p. 150.

39. The Ascetical Homilies of Saint Isaac the Syrian, Boston, 1984, p. 152.

40. Euergetinos, Vol. I, p. 309.

41. Ibid., pp. 309-310.

42. Euergetinos, Vol. 1, p. 310.

43. Philokalia, Vol. III, p. 149.

44. The Elder Joseph of Optina, Boston, 1984, p. 65.

45. Philokalia, Vol. III, pp. 269-270.

46. Ibid., p. 243.

 

Source: The True Vine, Number 1, Spring 1989, pp. 30-50. Footnote numbering adjusted.

A Rare Virtue: On Why Many of Us Show No Gratitude

Priest Dimitry Vydumkin     “Everybody receives abundant blessings from God, but only a few give thanks to Him.” About two centuri...