Tuesday, September 15, 2026

St. Basil the Great: Homily on Thanksgiving




1. You have heard the words of the Apostle, in which he addresses the Thessalonians, prescribing rules of conduct for every kind of person. His teaching, to be sure, was directed towards particular audiences; but the benefit to be derived therefrom is relevant to every generation of mankind. Rejoice evermore, he says; Pray without ceasing. In everything give thanks (I Thessalonians 5:16-18). Now, we shall explain a little later on, as far as we are able, what it means to rejoice, what benefit we receive from it, and how it is possible to achieve unceasing prayer and give thanks to God in all things.

However, it is necessary to anticipate the objections that we encounter from our adversaries, who criticize the Apostles injunctions as unattainable. For what is the virtue, they say, in passing one’s life in gladness of soul, in joy and good cheer night and day? And how is it possible to achieve this, when we are beset by countless unexpected evils, which create unavoidable dejection in the soul, on account of which it is no more feasible for us to rejoice and be of good cheer than for one who is being roasted on a gridiron not to feel agony or for one who is being goaded not to suffer pain?

And perhaps there is someone among those who are standing among us here who is ailing with this sickness of the mind and makes excuses in sins (Psalm 140:4, Septuaginta), and who, through his own negligence in observing the commandments, attempts to transfer the blame to the law-giver for laying down things that are unattainable. How is it possible for me always to rejoice, he may ask, when I have no grounds for being joyous? For the factors that cause rejoicing are external and do not reside within us: the arrival of a friend, long-term contact with parents, finding money, honors bestowed on us by other people, restoration to health after a serious illness, and everything else that makes for a prosperous life: a house replete with goods of all kinds, an abundant table, close friends to share ones gladness, pleasant sounds and sights, the good health of our nearest and dearest, and whatever else gives them happiness in life. For it is not only the pains that befall us which cause us distress, but also those that afflict our friends and relatives. It is from all of these sources, therefore, that we must garner joy and cheerfulness of soul.

In addition to these things, when we have occasion to see the downfall of our enemies, wounds inflicted on those who plot against us, recompense for our benefactors, and, in general, if no unpleasant circumstance whatsoever that would disturb our life is either at hand or expected, only then is it possible for joy to exist in our souls. How is it, therefore, that a commandment has been given to us that cannot be accomplished by our own choice, but depends on other antecedent factors? How am I to pray without ceasing, when the needs of the body necessarily attract the attention of the soul to themselves, given that the mind cannot attend to two concerns at the same time?

2. And yet, I have been commanded to give thanks in everything. Am I to give thanks when I am strapped to a rack, tortured, stretched out on a wheel, and having my eyes gouged out? Am I to give thanks when I am beaten with humiliating blows by one who hates me? When I am stiff from the cold, perishing from hunger, tied to a tree, suddenly bereft of my children, or deprived even of my very wife? If I lose my wealth as a result of a sudden shipwreck? If I run into pirates on the sea, or brigands on the mainland? If I am wounded, slandered, wander around, or dwell in a dungeon?

Raising these objections, and more besides, our adversaries find fault with the lawgiver, thinking that, by slandering the precepts that we have been given as impossible to fulfill, they furnish themselves with a defense for their own sins. What, therefore, shall we say in response to them?

That, while the Apostle is looking elsewhere and attempting to elevate our souls from the earth to the heights and to transport us to a heavenly way of life, they, unable to attain to the loftiness of the lawgivers mind, and preoccupied with the earth and the flesh, crawl around in the passions of the body like worms in a swamp and demand that the Apostle issue precepts which are capable of being fulfilled. For his part, the Apostle summons not just anyone, but one who is as he was to rejoice always, no longer living in the flesh, but having Christ living in himself, since union with the highest good does not in any way allow sympathy for the demands of the flesh (cf. Galatians 2:20). And even if an incision is made in the flesh, the disintegration occasioned by its continued presence remains in the part of the body that suffers it, since the pain is unable to spread to the noetic part of the soul. For, if, in accordance with the Apostles precept, we have mortified our members which are upon the earth (Colossians 3:5) and we bear in the body the dying of the Lord Jesus (II Corinthians 4:10), necessarily the injury suffered by the mortified body will not reach the soul which has been freed from contact with the body. Dishonor, losses, and deaths of our nearest and dearest will not rise up to the mind, nor will they incline the sublimity of the mind to sympathy with things below. For, if those who fall into difficulties have the same attitude as the virtuous man, they will not cause annoyance to anyone, seeing that not even they themselves endure sorrowfully what befalls them; but if they live according to the flesh (Romans 8:13), not even in this way will they annoy anyone, but will be reckoned pitiable, not so much because of their circumstances, as because they do not choose to react properly.

In short, a soul which has once and for all been held fast by the desire for its Creator and is accustomed to delighting in the beauties of the heavenly realm will not alter its great joy and cheerfulness under the influence of carnal feelings, which are varying and unstable; but things which distress other people it will regard as increasing its own gladness. Such was the Apostle, who took pleasure in infirmities, in afflictions, in persecutions, and in necessities, counting his needs an occasion for glorying (II Corinthians 12:9-10); in hunger and thirst, in cold and nakedness, in persecutions and distresses (II Corinthians 12:10; 11:27), conditions in which others endure only with difficulty, bidding farewell to life: in these he rejoiced. Therefore, those who are ignorant of what the Apostle has in mind, and do not understand that he is calling us to the evangelical way of life, dare to accuse St. Paul of laying down things that are impossible for us. Well then, let them learn how many legitimate occasions for rejoicing are made available to us through Gods munificence. We were brought from non-being into being; we were made in the image of the Creator (Genesis 1:27); we have the mind and reason to perfect our nature, and through them we have knowledge of God. And perceiving the beauties of nature carefully, we thereby recognize, as if through letters, Gods great providence and wisdom concerning all things. We are capable of discerning good and evil; we are taught by nature itself to choose what is beneficial and to avoid what is harmful. Having been estranged from God through sin, we have been called back to kinship with Him, being released from ignominious slavery by the blood of His Only-begotten Son. We have the hope of resurrection, the enjoyment of Angelic goods, the Kingdom of Heaven, and promised goods, which transcend the grasp of mind and reason.

3. How is it not proper to think that these things are sufficient reasons for unending joy and unceasing gladness? How is it proper to suppose that one who is a glutton, who delights in hearing flute-playing, and who lies on a soft bed and snores, is living a life worthy of joy? I would say that such people are worthy of lamentation on the part of those who are endowed with intelligence, whereas we should call blessed those who endure the present life in the hope of the age to come and who exchange present joys for eternal joys. Whether they stand amid flames, as did the three Youths in Babylon, who were united with God (Daniel 3:21), or are shut up with lions (Daniel 6:16-23), or swallowed by a whale (Jonah 2:1), we should call them blessed, and they should pass their lives in joy, not being distressed over present sufferings, but rejoicing in the hope of what is in store for us in the next life. For, in my opinion, a good athlete, once he has stripped down for the arena of piety, should valiantly endure the blows of his adversaries in hope of the glory that comes from crowns of victory. Indeed, in gymnastic contests, those who have become inured to pain in wrestling schools are not depressed at the prospect of suffering pain from blows, but advance to close quarters with their foes, disdaining momentary pains in their desire to be publicly proclaimed victors. Thus, even if some misfortune befalls a virtuous man, it will not cast a shadow over his joy. For tribulation worketh patience, and patience, experience, and experience, hope; and hope maketh not ashamed (Romans 5:3-5). Hence, in another place, Saint Paul enjoins us to be patient in tribulation and to rejoice in hope (Romans 12:12). It is hope, therefore, that makes joy to dwell within the soul of a virtuous man. But the same Apostle bids us weep with those who weep (Romans 12:15); and, writing to the Galatians, he wept over the enemies of the Cross of Christ (Philippians 3:18). And what need have I to speak of the tears of Jeremiah (Lamentations), of Ezekiel writing lamentations over the rulers of Israel, at Gods command (Ezekiel 2:9), or of many other Saints who mourned? Alas, my mother, that thou hast borne me (Jeremiah 15:10); Woe is me, for the godly man hath perished from the earth, and there is none among men that ordereth his way aright (Micah 7:2); Woe is me, for I am become as one gathering straw in the harvest (Micah 7:1).

So, in a word, scrutinize the sayings of the righteous, and when anywhere you find one of them emitting a rather doleful expression, you will be convinced that all who are of this world bemoan the misery of the life that is led therein. Woe is me, for my sojourning is prolonged (Psalm 119:5, Septuaginta). For the Apostle has a desire to depart, and to be with Christ (Philippians 1:23). He is, therefore, vexed at the prolongation of this earthly sojourn as an impediment to his joy. David, too, bequeathed to us a lamentation in song for his friend Jonathan, in which he also mourned for his enemy: I am grieved for thee, my brother Jonathan (II Kings 1:26); and: O daughters of Israel, weep for Saul (II Kings 1:24). He mourns for Saul, as one who died in sin, but for Jonathan, as one who shared his life in every respect. Why should I speak of the other examples? And yet, the Lord wept over Lazarus (St. John 11:35) and He wept over Jerusalem (St. Luke 19:41), and He calls blessed those who mourn (St. Matthew 5:4) and likewise those who weep (St. Luke 6:21).

4. But how, you say, are these things to be reconciled with the words: Rejoice always? For weeping and joy do not derive from the same source. Weeping, for example, is naturally engendered as a result of some blow, in which the involuntary impact strikes and constricts the soul, while the spirit surrounding the heart is depressed; but joy is like a leap of the soul, as it were, which rejoices at things that are under its control. Hence, the physical symptoms are different. For, in the case of those who are distressed, their bodies are sallow, livid, and cold, whereas in the case of those who feel joyous, the condition of their bodies is efflorescent and reddish, while their souls all but leap outwards, propelled by delight.

To this we will say that the Saints lamented and wept on account of their love for God. And so, ever beholding Him Whom they loved and increasing the gladness that they themselves derived from Him, they provided for the needs of their fellow-servants, mourning for those who sinned and correcting them through their tears. Just as people who stand on the shore and feel sympathy for those who are drowning in the sea do not jettison their own security in their concern for those in peril, so also, those who are distressed at the sins of their neighbors do not efface their own gladness; on the contrary, they increase it, being vouchsafed the joy of the Lord by virtue of the tears that they shed for their brothers. This is why those who weep and those who mourn are blessed, for they themselves will be comforted and they themselves will laugh. By laughter, one means not the sound which is emitted through the cheeks when the blood boils, but the cheerfulness which is pure and unmixed with any sadness. Therefore, the Apostle allows us to weep with those who weep, because tears of this kind are like the seed and pledge of eternal joy. Ascend with me in mind, please, and behold the Angelic estate and consider whether any other condition befits them than that of rejoicing and gladness; for they are vouchsafed to stand before God and enjoy the ineffable beauty of the glory of Him Who created us. And so, it is to that life that the Apostle urges us on, bidding us always to rejoice.

5. Now, as for the fact that the Lord wept over Lazarus and the city, we have this to say: He ate and drank, not because He needed these things Himself, but so as to leave you with measures and limits by which to control the unavoidable emotions of the soul. Thus, He wept in order to correct the propensity to excessive emotion and dejection among those given to mourning and lamentation. For if there is anything that needs to be moderated by reason, it is weeping: that is, over what things, to what extent, when, and how it is proper to weep. For that the Lord’s weeping was not emotional, but didactic, is clear from this verse: Our friend Lazarus sleepeth; but I go, that I may awake him out of sleep (St. John 11:11). Who among us mourns for a sleeping friend, whom he expects to awake after a short while? Lazarus, come forth (St. John 11:43). And the dead man was brought back to life; he who was bound walked. This is a miracle within a miracle: that his feet were bound with grave-clothes and yet were not prevented from moving. That which strengthened him was greater than that which impeded him.

Why, therefore, did the Lord, Who was about to accomplish such things, judge the incident worthy of tears? Is it not clear that, disregarding our infirmity in every way, He contained the necessary emotions within certain measures and limits, avoiding a lack of sympathy, on the one hand, as something appropriate to wild beasts, and, on the other hand, refusing to give way to excessive grief and lamentation as something ignoble? Hence, in weeping over His friend, He both displayed that He Himself shared in our human nature, and freed us from either kind of extreme, allowing us neither to indulge our emotions nor to be unfeeling in the face of sorrows.

Therefore, just as the Lord accepted hunger, after digesting solid food, submitted to thirst, after the moisture in His body was consumed, and felt weary, when His muscles and nerves were strained from travelling–although it was not that His Divinity succumbed to weariness, but that His body accepted its natural attributes; so also, He accepted weeping, permitting a natural property of the flesh to supervene. This occurs when the hollow parts of the brain, filled with vapors arising from grief, discharge the burden of moisture through the opening of the eyes as through some kind of duct. Hence, one experiences a certain ringing in the ears, dizziness, and darkening of the eyes when he hears about unexpected sorrows, and one’s head is set in a whirl by vapors which are emitted by compressed heat deep inside him. Then, in my opinion, just as a cloud dissolves into raindrops, so also the thickness of vapors dissolves into tears. Hence, those who grieve feel a certain pleasure when they lament, because the burden that weighs on them is secretly evacuated through weeping. Experience of events proves the truth of this account. For we know many people who, in desperate straits, forcibly restrain themselves from weeping; then, in some cases, they fall into incurable sufferings, either apoplexy or paralysis, while in other cases, they completely faint, their strength having been broken down, like a weak support, by the weight of sorrow. For, what is observable in the case of fire, that it is stifled by its own smoke if it does not escape, but rolls around it–this, it is said, occurs also in the case of the faculty that governs a living creature; that is, it wastes away and is extinguished if there is no way for it to exhale.

6. Therefore, let those who are given to mourning not adduce the Lords tears in support of their own weakness. For, just as the food which the Lord ate is not an occasion of pleasure for us, but, on the contrary, the highest criterion of restraint and sufficiency, so also, His weeping is not an ordinance prescribing lamentation, but is a most fitting measure and an exact standard whereby we may, with proper dignity and decorum, endure sorrows while remaining within the limits of our nature. Thus, neither women nor men are permitted to indulge in mourning and excessive weeping, but only to the extent that it is fitting to grieve over sorrows; they are permitted to shed a few tears, but this must be done calmly, without bellowing or wailing, without rending one’s tunic or sprinkling oneself with dust, or committing any of the other improprieties that are typical of those who are ignorant of heavenly things. For one who has been purified by Divine doctrine must be fenced around by right reason, as by a strong wall, and must manfully and strenuously ward off the onslaughts of such emotions; he must not accept any crowd of emotions that flows in, as it were, to some low-lying place, with a submissive and compliant soul.

It is the mark of a craven soul, and one that is lacking in the vigor that comes from hope in God, that it utterly collapses and succumbs to adversities. For, just as worms are particularly inclined to breed on more tender pieces of wood, so also sorrows grow in men of lesser moral fiber. Was not Job adamantine in heart? Were his inward parts not made of stone? His ten children fell dead in one brief moment of time, overwhelmed by a calamity in the house of their gladness at a time of enjoyment, when the Devil brought down their dwelling upon them. He saw the table drenched with blood; he saw his children, who had been born at different times, but who had ended their lives together. He did not wail aloud; he did not pluck his hair out; he did not let out a degenerate cry; but he uttered that thanksgiving which is renowned and acclaimed by all: the Lord gave, the Lord hath taken away; as it seemed good to the Lord, so hath it come to pass; blessed be the name of the Lord (Job 1:21). Was this man not lacking in sympathy? How could this be so? For about himself, at any rate, he says: I wept over every man who was afflicted (Job 30:25). But was he not lying when he said this? But here, too, the truth bears witness to him that, in addition to his other virtues, he was also truthful: ...That man was blameless, righteous, godly, and truthful (Job 1:1).

Yet many of you keep on wailing in dirges that are designed to express dejection, and you deliberately waste away your soul with mournful melodies; and, just like the make-believe and paraphernalia with which they adorn theatres to typify tragedies, so, also, you suppose that the proper outfit for a mourner consists of black clothing, squalid hair, dirt, and dust, complete with a darkened house and lugubrious chanting, which preserves the wound of grief ever fresh in the soul. Let those who have no hope do these things. You, however, have been taught, concerning those who repose in Christ, that it [the body] is sown in corruption; it is raised in incorruption; it is sown in dishonor; it is raised in glory; it is sown in weakness; it is raised in power; it is sown a natural body; it is raised a spiritual body (I Corinthians 15:42-44). Why, then, do you weep for one who has gone to change his vesture? Neither mourn for yourself, as one who has been deprived of a helper in this life; for it is better to trust in the Lord than to trust in man (Psalm 117:8-9, Septuaginta). Nor lament for this helper, as one who has suffered a terrible calamity. For, a little later, the trumpet sounding from Heaven will awaken him, and you will see him standing before the judgment-seat of Christ. So, dismiss these dejected and ignorant cries: Alas, these unexpected woes! Who would have thought that this would happen? Could I have ever anticipated that I would cover this dearest friend of mine with earth? If we should hear someone else saying such things, it behooves us to blush, since we have been taught from both past memories and present experience that these natural occurrences are inevitable.

7. Therefore, neither untimely deaths nor other misfortunes that unexpectedly befall us will ever cause consternation in us who have been educated by the doctrine of piety. For example, let us say that I had a son who was a young man–the sole heir of my estate, the comfort of my old age, the adornment of his family, the flower of his peers, the support of his household, and at that time of life which is most charming–, this lad having been carried off by death, he becoming earth and dust who, a short while ago, uttered sweet sounds and was a most pleasing sight in the eyes of his father. What, then, am I to do? Shall I rend my clothing? Shall I consent to roll around on the ground, scream in vexation, and act in front of those present like a child crying out in pain and having convulsions? Rather, paying heed to the inevitability of events, that the law of death is inexorable and affects every age-group alike, dissolving all compound things in order, surely I should not be surprised at what has happened. Surely I should not be upset in my mind, as if I had been devastated by some unexpected blow, since I have been taught beforehand that, being mortal, I had a mortal son, that there is no constancy in human affairs, and that nothing wholly abides for those who possess it.

Why, even great cities, which were renowned for the elegance of their buildings and the abilities of their inhabitants, and conspicuous for their prosperity both in the countryside and in the marketplace, now display tokens of their erstwhile dignity only in ruins. A ship which has frequently been preserved from the sea, and which has made countless speedy voyages and conveyed innumerable amounts of merchandise for traders, vanishes with a single gust of wind. Armies which have many times defeated their foes in battle have, on suffering a reversal of fortune, become a pitiful sight and one pitiful to relate. Entire nations and islands, which have attained great power, and have raised many trophies both by land and by sea, and have gathered much wealth from booty, have either been consumed by the passage of time or been taken captive and exchanged their liberty for enslavement. Indeed, in short, whatever great and unbearable evil you care to mention, life already has prior examples of it.

Therefore, just as we determine weights by a turn of the scale and assay gold by rubbing it with a touchstone, so also, if we were to remember the limits revealed to us by the Lord, we would never exceed the bounds of prudence. Whenever, therefore, any involuntary adversity befalls you, by virtue of being mentally prepared, you will avoid confusion, and you will make light of present afflictions by your hope for the future. For, just as those whose eyes are weak divert their gaze from things that are excessively bright and give them rest by looking at flowers and grass, so, also, the soul must not constantly behold that which causes grief or be fixated on present sorrows, but must direct its gaze towards what is truly good. In this way will it be feasible for you always to rejoice, if your life always looks towards God and if hope of recompense alleviates life’s dolors.

Have you been dishonored? Then have regard for the glory which is laid up in Heaven through patient endurance. Have you suffered a loss? Then contemplate the heavenly wealth and treasure which you have laid up for yourself through your good deeds. Have you been expelled from your homeland? Then you have Jerusalem as your heavenly homeland. Have you lost a child? Then you have Angels, with whom you will dance around the Throne of God, rejoicing eternally. By thus opposing anticipated good things to present sorrows, you will keep your soul in the cheerfulness and tranquillity to which the Apostles precept summons us. Neither let the joys of human affairs create immoderate and excessive gladness in your soul, nor let sorrows diminish its exultation and sublimity by feelings of dejection and abasement. Unless you have previously trained yourself in this way regarding the eventualities of life, you will never have a calm and tranquil life. But you will easily achieve this if you have dwelling within you the commandment which advises you always to rejoice, dismissing the vexations of the flesh and gathering that which gladdens the soul, transcending the sensation of present realities and extending your mind to the hope of eternal realities, the mere thought of which is sufficient to fill the soul with rejoicing and to make Angelic exultation reside in our hearts; in Christ Jesus our Lord, to Whom be the glory and the dominion, unto the ages. Amen.

 

Translated for the first time from the Greek original by Hieromonk Patapios. The Greek text of this homily is found in the Patrologia Græca, Vol. XXXI, cols. 217B-237A. From Orthodox Tradition, Vol. XVII (2000), No. 4, pp. 22-29.

The Historicity of Heretics Occupying Episcopal Thrones for Generations

A brief excerpt from the Greek work, “Treatise on the Validity of the Ordination of Clergy Ordained by a Deposed and Schismatic Bishop,” by Archbishop Basil (Asteriou) of Anchialos (later Metropolitan of Smyrna), written in 1874 on account of the so-called “Bulgarian Schism” and at the request of Patriarch Joachim II of Constantinople.

 

 

…Deposition from the episcopal rank was not something unknown to the holy Fathers; indeed, it was quite common. For whenever a bishop was proved guilty either of an offense incompatible with the priesthood or of heresy, he was deposed from the episcopate as unworthy to shepherd the Lord’s people and minister to Him: in the former case, because he had fallen into one of those sins on account of which he would not have been ordained in the first place, and from which he ought also to have safeguarded his flock through his teaching, so as to present it pure before the Lord together with himself; in the latter, because through his false doctrine he distorted the truth of the evangelical doctrines of the faith, of which he had been appointed guardian and teacher.

Whenever, however, the Orthodox bishops lacked the strength to depose and remove from their sees those bishops who had proved to be heretics, because these had the multitude following them or enjoyed imperial protection, such heretics naturally remained in possession of the episcopal sees, exercising episcopal oversight over those who followed their error and heresy and performing priestly functions, as is implied by Canon 5 of the Third Ecumenical Council. Ecclesiastical history abounds in such examples extending continuously over many centuries: for instance, the bishops of the Arians, who still survived even at the time of the Sixth Ecumenical Council (in 680), and those of the Iconoclasts, who occupied even the throne of Constantinople itself.

Nestorius, upon becoming Bishop of Constantinople, said to Emperor Theodosius when preaching for the first time in church: “Give me, O Emperor, the earth cleansed of heretics, and I will give you heaven in return. Help me overthrow the heretics, and I will help you overthrow the Persians.” Basil the Great also relates that the Arian-minded Eustathios, Bishop of Sebasteia, and others with him, though condemned by five hundred bishops, did not relinquish the administration of their churches, “not even deigning,” he says, “to withdraw from the administration of the churches, although so many bishops had agreed upon the sentence of their deposition.” …

 

Metropolitan Basil of Smyrna: A Zealot Hierarch (+1910)

Nikolaos Mannis | December 22, 2016

 

 

Dedicated to those who were persecuted,
to those who are being persecuted,
and to those who will be persecuted,
by false bishops
(cf. Canon 15 of the First-Second Council of Constantinople).

 

Having been studying the late Metropolitan Basil of Smyrna (+1910) these days, I considered it necessary to present certain details of his life and work, so that a comparison might be made between a truly Orthodox Bishop and today’s so-called “Orthodox” bishops, who, although they are supposed to have received, through successive generations, not only Apostolic Succession but also the same Faith and the same Zeal as the Apostles and the Holy Fathers, instead of bearing the Apostolic and Patristic spirit, become persecutors of those who bear it! [1]

The late Metropolitan Basil Asteriou of Smyrna [2] studied at the Theological School of Halki [3] and, under the guidance of two great figures of the School, Metropolitan Constantine Typaldos of Stavroupolis and the Teacher of the Nation Elias Tantalidis, [4] men devoted to tradition and zealous for the Orthodox Faith, distinguished himself, later also serving as its Rector.

In 1865 he was elected Metropolitan of Anchialos in Eastern Rumelia. In 1871, following the repose of Paisios of Caesarea, he was proposed as his successor, but Basil refused, because he opposed the transfer of bishops from one see to another.

In 1875, as an early opponent of ecumenism, he combated the views of Professor John Anastasiadis, who, after participating that year in the Old Catholic Conference in Bonn, portrayed the Old Catholics as being in complete agreement with the Orthodox Church. [5]

He wrote many noteworthy books, including an excellent study of Saint Gregory the Theologian and two treatises, one on the validity of Mysteries performed by deposed clergy or schismatics,* and the other on excommunication. His discourses were also renowned and were published in two volumes in Smyrna, where he was reinstated as Metropolitan in 1884, following his expulsion from Anchialos because of the Bulgarian Question. [6]

(Two representative excerpts from the late Basil of Smyrna’s study on the work of Saint Gregory the Theologian in Constantinople, below)

It seems by no means unlikely that even the few faithful who awaited the arrival of Saint Gregory with heartfelt longing were dismayed by these appearances and doubted whether he would succeed, especially when they saw the great contrast between his illustrious reputation and his manifestly humble appearance, which his extraordinary modesty and simplicity accentuated still further. The Arians, possessing such abundant resources of worldly power and grandeur and asserting their dominance through the weight of their political influence, immediately grew insolent and mocked the newly arrived hierarch, perceiving that they had before them a man of the countryside and the desert, wholly unversed in urban manners and devoid of all the splendor and prestige conferred by the world and its goods.

And yet, with such an appearance and such resources, he undertakes undaunted the immense task entrusted to him and, surrounded by those few faithful strugglers, wavering though they are, prepares for the formidable struggle destined to determine the fortunes of Orthodoxy. As though the obstacles arising from his own circumstances to the accomplishment of such a task were not enough, his external resources, too, prove exceedingly meagre and weak. For the faithful are both few and unorganized, having no ecclesiastical organization, and not a single church belongs to them, all having been occupied by their adversaries. It was therefore necessary, before anything else, to establish an ecclesiastical center suited to the purpose and the circumstances, where worship could be conducted unhindered and the word of God preached with complete boldness. Since the house in which he was staying belonged to generous, devout and God-loving relatives of his, and its layout was suitable for serving as a temporary gathering place for the faithful, Gregory first gathers them there, preaching, admonishing and encouraging them all. Meanwhile, fierce opposition immediately arises from the Arians under the leadership of their bishop Demophilos, noisy and turbulent as a torrent, as they utter every kind of threat. Yet these threats and attempts at intimidation do not daunt this most holy man: his divinely inspired spirit rises, the zeal of the devout is vigorously kindled, and a spark lying hidden in the hearts of many who are timid, doubtful and lukewarm transforms them into fervent adherents of Orthodoxy. From the very outset, victory appears to incline towards the great teacher of piety, chiefly for two reasons: because he was fighting for the truth, and because the weapons for close combat supplied by his extensive learning were invincible. Then all, having taken courage and been inspired with enthusiasm by their most wise shepherd, and hanging entirely upon his gracious words, readily heed his exhortations and proceed with zeal to erect a proper church within the grounds of that blessed house of his relatives, which had first received the great teacher and his word.

This church was built modest and small in comparison with the other churches of the Queen of Cities, towards the southwestern side of the Hippodrome, “in the porticoes of Domninos,” that is, beside a certain broad thoroughfare bearing this name, according to the testimony of Kedrenos and the compiler of the Synaxarion. Saint Gregory named it Anastasia so that its name might symbolically signify the resurrection and revival within it of Orthodoxy, which until then had been dead in Constantinople.

* * *

It is indeed worthy of the greatest attention and admiration that, while occupied with such intricate and weighty studies, this holy man neglected nothing that would contribute to the complete success of his work. With what speed and indomitable zeal he organized and completed everything necessary to establish a fully constituted Orthodox Church in Constantinople! It appears that, amid this feverish activity, intensified by the raging fury of the heretics, he sought the requisite assistance and cooperation from many quarters. At that time, quite a few zealous clergy and laymen hastened to the battlefield to join in so sacred a struggle and, though already well educated, to become disciples of the great teacher, such as the previously mentioned Ieronymos and Evagrios of Pontus, whom he also appointed archdeacon. They come to know this great churchman personally, to marvel at his extraordinary breadth of learning in theology and other fields, to learn something useful and beneficial from him, but above all to be filled with zeal and to share in glorious struggles, in which essentially one man alone contends against so many formidable adversaries who dominate the Queen of Cities. Thus, while the widespread struggle continues outside, the Church is meanwhile being organized, and before long we find bishops, priests, deacons, monks, readers, chanters and the Church’s full complement of clergy performing their duties. Since the preaching of the great teacher attracts pagans, Jews, schismatics and heretics, particularly Arians, Semi-Arians and Pneumatomachians, and many of them are captivated by the charm and power of his words, a group of catechumens also takes shape and prepares for baptism. So eager is the teacher to bring as many as possible into his newly established Church that he also publicly expounds the mystery of baptism and urges that it should not be postponed, but that even infants should be sanctified through timely baptism. To understand more fully the magnitude of Saint Gregory’s indomitable courage, we should observe that all his activities took place amid savage persecutions, insults, disturbances, expressions of contempt, stonings, denunciations, death threats, assassination attempts and every other violent and insolent action on the part of the Arians. Indeed, considering the raging savagery and bloodthirsty brutality of the Arians of Constantinople under such a leader as Demophilos, his work there appears far more difficult and dangerous than preaching the Gospel among pagans and unbelievers. For the fury of the Arians, who had rested secure in their successes thus far and in the favor of the civil authorities, had turned, in the face of impending great danger and irreparable loss, into a terrible frenzy that dared stop at nothing. Yet Saint Gregory’s zeal and strength grow all the more, and amid manifold cares he invigorates and heartens everyone through both his words and his example. He who until then had loved tranquility and solitude is utterly transformed and emerges as a most courageous and invincible fighter, retreating before no one until he successfully completes the work which God blessed and the Orthodox Church entrusted to him.

Metropolitan Basil also participated in drafting the Patriarchal Encyclical of 1895 against Papism, a monumental Orthodox text. [7]

One of the principal characteristics of his personality was the impartiality of his judgement, regardless of friendship or enmity, which earned him considerable animosity, especially in Phanar circles, to whose behind-the-scenes dealings he was a stranger. [8]

Although in 1886, through his pamphlet “An Appeal to the Piety of the Orthodox Faithful of Smyrna,” he asked his flock to support the Metropolis financially, he demonstrated his freedom from the love of money not only by abolishing the passing of collection plates in churches, but also by putting his flock’s modest contributions towards works worthy of a true Bishop, such as expanding the Greek Hospital of Smyrna, establishing schools in Smyrna’s neighborhoods, founding the Smyrna Foundling Home (1902), and founding the Ecclesiastical Music Society (1903).

We read in Wikipedia [9] that “Metropolitan Basil of Smyrna was greatly loved by the people of Smyrna because of his piety, as well as his ascetic character and freedom from the love of money,” and that “he had the disposition of a bishop of the early years of Christianity […] To the people of Smyrna, Basil was a saint.” The ever-memorable Fr Chrysanthos Vrettaros [10] confirms this, adding that “because of his boldness before the All-Good God, the Turks would bring all their sick to Metropolitan Basil of Smyrna, and they would recover!” [11]

Fr Chrysanthos himself also recounts the following incident, which took place in Smyrna and reveals the holy zeal of the late Metropolitan:

“The followers of Luther and Calvin, known to the common people as Evangelicals, established a hall and secretly preached their heresies. One day they grew bold and wrote outside the hall: ‘Greek Evangelical Church.’ When Basil of Smyrna read this, he went one Sunday, when the Evangelicals were gathered, and taught them the truth of the faith and the errors of Luther and Calvin. They, however, were not persuaded, and a few days later he asked for a ladder, climbed up, erased ‘Greek Evangelical Church,’ and wrote: ‘Lutheran-Calvinist Church, which is a church of the devil and not of Christ.’ Such was his zeal for the Orthodox faith that he often longed, if it were possible, to suffer martyrdom, just as many martyrs before him had suffered for Christ.” [12]

The late Metropolitan Basil of Smyrna reposed on 23 January 1910.

May his memory be eternal!

 

[* https://drive.google.com/file/d/17l86MwoulRuzBSKYLBm8c4mUmRavkSfO/view?usp=sharing]

 

FOOTNOTES

1. The latest example is the planned persecution of Fr Theodoros Zisis and those with him, at the orders of the ecumenist Patriarch Bartholomew and the ecumenist Metropolitan Anthimos of Thessaloniki.

2. Also found as Asteriadis.

3. Into which the spirit of Ecumenism had not yet penetrated, as Fr George Metallinos observes in his article here.

4. Author, among other works, of the renowned two-volume work “Refutations of Papism.”

5. Although the Old Catholics at that time signed the Orthodox positions (on the Filioque and Primacy) in their dialogue with the Orthodox, in dialogue with the Anglicans they agreed in favor of the ordination of women to the priesthood (see also here).

6. Information here and here.

7. The text of the Encyclical was written by the eminent Germanos Karavangelis, while Philotheos of Nicomedia and Basil of Smyrna made revisions and improvements. It is available here.

8. How many bishops today behave cowardly by condemning the heresy of Ecumenism, yet not daring to rebuke their ecumenist fellow bishops lest they “spoil their friendly relations.” Thus, today we witness various scenes from the theatre of the absurd when, for example, we hear bishops one Sunday hurling anathemas and vehement denunciations against the pan-heresy, and the next Sunday festively concelebrating with its proponents!

9. Basil of Smyrna

10. On the late Elder Chrysanthos, see here.

11. Hieromonk Chrysanthos of Saint Anne’s, Recollections and Narratives of an Elder, vol. I, published by the Holy Monastery of Panagia Hodegetria in Molos, p. 137.

12. Ibid.

SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY

1. Vasileios Stavridis, The Holy Theological School of Halki, vol. I, Athens, 1970.

2. Hieromonk Chrysanthos of Saint Anne’s, Recollections and Narratives of an Elder, vol. I, published by the Holy Monastery of Panagia Hodegetria in Molos.

 

Greek source: https://krufo-sxoleio.blogspot.com/2016/12/1910.html

Monday, September 14, 2026

The Temptation of St. Justina and the Repentance of St. Cyprian

The Feast and commemoration of Sts. Cyprian and Justina bring to mind some important truths deriving from the experience of the Orthodox Church. The holy members of the Church have always been subject to temptations, in accordance with the wise Providence of God, but have always been victorious. They have, thus, become the cause of the conversion of others—until then enslaved to the darkness of the Devil—to the light of Christ’s Truth.

 

 

St. Justina was a model of love and virginal dedication to Christ, just like the Holy Protomartyr Thekla, the Equal-to-the-Apostles. Her pure heart, ablaze with Divine love, prompted her to frequent God's Church, fashioned by human hands; the Grace of the Holy Spirit made her heart an altar, not fashioned by human hands: a "temple of the living God." [1]

When Cyprian the sorcerer sent evil spirits to vex her and induce carnal desire in her, so as to befuddle her and make her a plaything in the hands of a licentious youth, Justina resisted valiantly and resolutely.

Demonic assaults and the temptations which they provoke are not without limits or checks: "The demons...cannot fulfill their own evil will to cause the destruction and perdition of another when God, Who governs all things, does not so will; but even when He does so will, He sets limits as to how much harm they should do." [2]

In this way, while a person's freedom is tested, his will is not forcibly dominated by Satan. The Devil acts through the passions and stimulates us with feelings of pleasure. And when, because a person is vigilant, he cannot act through the mind, he stimulates the body, in order to arouse it and thereby seize the mind. [3]

But constant vigilance on the part of a person, wakefulness, and prayerful alertness render him a vessel of Divine Grace, and thereby the attacks of the Evil One are repulsed. The dew-laden Grace of the Holy Spirit quenches his fiery arrows. When the sign of the Cross is not made merely perfunctorily and externally, but reflects an inner disposition of crucifying one's carnal desires, the invincible power of the Precious Cross banishes the Devil and puts an end to his unclean machinations. Unceasing invocation, in a spirit of repentance, of the Divine Name of Jesus, the Crucified and Risen Son of God—Who annihilated the Devil—and union in the Eucharist with the Lord of Glory, our God and King, truly crush and overwhelm Satan.

So also in the case of St. Justina: a powerful nocturnal temptation at the hour when she awoke for prayer prompted her to oppose it at once with her spiritual weapons and to make the enemy disappear through the sign of the Cross: "I saw a sign of some kind and I trembled!'’ admitted the Devil.

However, until he was finally destroyed, the enemy did not cease to war against what is good. He also appeared to the Saint physically, in the form of a maiden, in order to deceive her. And he has this property. "The grosser demons fight against a man's body." [4] In their endeavor to destroy a man, demons can approach him in two ways: "either through a dense material substance, or through a very refined immaterial substance"; [5] that is, either visibly and corporeally, which happens rarely and only according by God's Providence, or invisibly and incorporeally, as usually occurs.

The enemy, therefore, attempted to inject his poison and corrupt the Saint's thoughts, "as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtility," [6] and he brought upon her, albeit for a moment, perplexity, turmoil, and mental confusion; for, the Saint saw one who was supposedly a virgin and fellow-straggler, but heard words that emanated from a profligate antagonist! But once again, the sign of the Precious Cross, made with faith and prayer, drove the tempter away in shame.

The consequences of this victory of the virgin Justina were incalculable. A new triumph of the Faith was beginning.

The admission of the demons to their devotee, Cyprian the sorcerer, that they were powerless and had failed in their mission, initiated the reversal of his situation. The son of darkness became a son of Light through repentance, renunciation of the Devil, and recourse to the Church of Christ.

Justina was the instrument used by Grace to bring about St. Cyprian's repentance. Cyprian himself recognized this immediately: "I must grasp the feet of Justina, so that she might bring about my salvation." When the evil spirits attacked him fiercely, he cried out: "O God of Justina, help me!" On hearing this, the demons vanished. They did not, however, abandon their efforts, but returned, using thoughts of despair to impede Cyprian's repentance. They maliciously assured him that he would once again come under their power, since God would surely reject him as someone abominable and impious.

In truth, Cyprian appeared for a moment to be overwhelmed and, under the weight of his sins, to doubt God's inexhaustible goodness and the possibility of his complete conversion and sincere repentance. Could he return to Him Who is Life?

With the aid of certain pious people, the Lord of life encouraged him at this critical juncture in his journey towards the healing of his diseased nature; Satan's malevolent activity was exorcised, Cyprian's thoughts of despair were banished, and his return to God was accomplished. The presence of God is the advent of His Kingdom, which is manifested through a life of repentance. There is no other way in which a man can be restored and saved.

"Repentance is a return from the unnatural to the natural state, from the Devil to God, through asceticism and toil." [7] Repentance, the "door of Grace" is the first step on the path towards knowledge of God; it is also a condition that persists throughout the course of our ascent to God, an ascent which involves both cleansing and perfection. Repentance is not simply remorse for certain deeds and sins, but rather, a struggle to "encounter’ God and achieve union with Him. This union is attained through labors and tears over one's past and present loss of God. Only thus is a man's nature transformed, and only thus is he preserved from the spiritual delusion of self-justification, complacency, and acquiescence. "For this reason, repentance is demanded of all people and at all times, and there is no limit to the perfection of repentance; for, even the perfection of the perfect is incomplete, and hence, until the hour of our death, repentance is not confined to particular times or particular deeds." [8]

To give up repentance is to give up making any spiritual ascent and is a symptom of spiritual death, whereas unceasing repentance and its blessed fruit—that is, the gift of a contrite and humbled heart and the repetition of the prayer of the Publican, "O God, be gracious to me, a sinner," until we reach the very door of the Kingdom—constitute a sure sign that our hearts are possessed by Divine love.

The purification of human nature through repentance and tears is ultimately perfected by the Grace of the Holy Spirit, which penetrates a man's heart and transforms it.

This was the Grace that delivered the maiden Justina from her temptation, converted Cyprian the sorcerer from the captivity of darkness, sanctified both of them, transformed them into vessels of Divine glory, and, after crowning them with the wreaths of martyrdom, finally entrusted them to the Church as protectors of the Faithful and expellers of unclean spirits.

NOTES

1. II Corinthians 6:16.

2. St. Isaac the Syrian, Homily 3.

3. St. Maximos the Confessor.

4. St. Diadochos of Photiki, Ascetical Discourse, §81.

5. St. Isaac the Syrian, Homily 84.

6. II Corinthians 11:3.

7. St. John of Damascus, Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith, Book II, eh. 30.

8. St. Isaac the Syrian, Homily 55.

 

Greek source: Άγιος Κυπριανός, No. 310 (September-October 2002), pp. 161-163.

English source: Orthodox Tradition, Vol. XX (2003), No. 3, pp. 26-28.

The Indelibility of the Priesthood

Nikolaos Mannis, Educator | September 11, 2020

 

 

Recently, the well-known speaker Fr. Andreas Konanos decided to resign from the Priesthood. Although I am not among his admirers, because his words, in my personal opinion of course, are far from the genuine patristic spirit, I consider that for this particular act of his he was criticized very harshly, and unfortunately by a multitude of people, even though the reason for which he proceeded to this has not even been made known. Let us consider the possibility that this man had impediments to the Priesthood and came to understand that these (despite the justifications of contemporary Bishops and Spiritual Fathers) admit of no Economy, for they bring damnation both to the one ordained and to the one who ordained him, and great harm to the Church. Then, for this act of his, he would not only not be blameworthy, but on the contrary, worthy of praise. And indeed, great praise, for we live in an age in which, due to the general disregard of the impediments to Priesthood, we are experiencing many afflictions, concerning which the Saints have warned us.

However, on the occasion of this recent self-defrocking of Fr. Andreas, a position was expressed by His Eminence Metropolitan Seraphim of Piraeus, which I consider to be contrary to the Orthodox view, as the latter arises from the word and the practice of the Church.

Specifically, the position of His Eminence Seraphim, Metropolitan of Piraeus, is the following:

“The view, therefore, that the Priesthood is indelible or that it becomes inactive is a heresy, which originates from Roman Catholicism and was introduced into our Theology by theologians who studied in the West and by their disciples. A proof of this fact is the 62nd Canon of the Holy Apostles, which commands the following: ‘If any clergyman, out of fear of man, whether of a Jew or a Greek or a heretic, denies—if it be the name of Christ, let him be cast out; but if it be the name of the clergyman, let him be deposed; but if he repents, let him be received as a layman.’

This canon has been definitively ratified by the Second Canon of the Holy Quinisext Ecumenical Council.

To the question of why clerics who are subjected to the penalty of deposition are not ‘re-ordained’ after grace has been bestowed upon them, the answer is that the mystery is the Church, which judges, and thus the repetition of the sacramental act is not required.” [1]

And while it is true that Papism (or "Roman Catholicism," if you prefer) has distorted, also in this domain, Orthodox teaching with its scholasticism, the view that the Priesthood is indelible and that it cannot be removed from the Clergyman, but only suspended (that is, rendered inactive), is not supported only by theologians who studied in the West [2] (after all, most of those who oppose the indelibility of the Priesthood—whether theologians, such as the well-known ecumenist Amilkas Alivizatos, Panteleimon Rodopoulos of Tyroloa, etc., or [the main proponents of it] jurists, such as the famous freemason Christos Sgouritsas, Panagiotis Poulitsas, Konstantinos Tsatsos, Georgios Rammos, Spyros Troianos, etc.—also studied in the West!).

The indelibility of the Priesthood (without, of course, the papal misinterpretations and scholastic minutiae concerning it) is supported also by earlier distinguished Teachers of the Church, such as (among others):

a) Dositheos of Jerusalem (+1707):

“Baptism indeed imparts an indelible character, just as also does the Priesthood… it is impossible for the same person to receive the same priesthood twice.” [3]

b) Chrysanthos of Jerusalem (+1731):

“This (the Priesthood), in those upon whom it is impressed, remains indelible and invincible, secure and exceedingly radiant, perpetually enduring.” [4]

c) Eugenios Voulgaris (+1806):

“For deposition is a kind of removal from sacred service, and this only means perpetual inactivity, without end, differing from simple suspension in that the latter is imposed for a set time after which there is restoration, whereas the former extends throughout life, bearing no hope of restoration. But there is no total erasure of the Priesthood itself—God forbid!—since it remains indelible, and the character is not removable… The Priesthood, being indelible, is not annulled through deposition. For if it were annulled, neither would there be any hope of restoration, which indeed exists in some cases, as we are taught by the canon of Antioch: ‘A Bishop,’ it says, ‘deposed by a synod, or a presbyter, or a deacon, or a subdeacon by his own bishop—if he dares to perform anything of the Liturgy, let him no longer have even the hope of restoration.’” [5]

d) St. Nikodemos the Hagiorite (+1809):

“Priests who have fallen from the Priesthood are not ordained a second time, because they typify the first and great High Priest, Who entered once for all into the Holy of Holies, having found eternal redemption, according to Paul, and remains perpetually, having an unchangeable Priesthood; this, in my opinion, is the reason why the priest is not reordained. For in Christ, the Priesthood is unchangeable.” [6]

e) Vasileios of Smyrna (+1910):

“Through deposition, the grace of the Priesthood is not removed or annulled, whose efficient cause is chiefly the All-Holy Spirit, but its operation is suspended and hindered.” [7]

The indelibility of the Priesthood is also supported by the practice of the Church, which has always considered valid the Mysteries performed by deposed (it is understood, deposed Orthodox, and not deposed heretics who have been placed outside the Church through the great anathema) clergymen, and indeed not only when the depositions were unjust, [8] but even when they were just.

The 28th Apostolic Canon (“If any bishop, or presbyter, or deacon, who has been justly deposed for manifest crimes, should dare to touch the ministry once entrusted to him, let him be wholly cut off from the Church”)—while it threatens the deposed cleric who dares to celebrate a Mystery with complete severance from the Church (great anathema)—does not state that the Mystery celebrated by him is non-existent, that is, as if performed by a layman.

Eugenios Voulgaris writes on the matter that if the deposed one “should perform sacred rites, he indeed brings upon himself a heavier condemnation, but the gifts offered are sanctified by the descent of the Spirit Who presides over the Mysteries.” [9]

This is also confirmed by a Synod in Constantinople in 1143 under Patriarch Michael Kourkouas, which condemned Bishop Leontios of Balbissa “for baptizing a second time the one who had been baptized by a priest deposed for manifest crimes, because he believed that the baptism performed by the deposed was not valid.” [10]

The invocation of the 62nd Canon of the Holy Apostles—or, more accurately, its literal (and detached from the other related Canons) sterile interpretation—leads to erroneous legalistic conclusions. The correct interpretation is not that deposed Clerics lose the Priesthood and are, as if by magic, turned back into Laymen, but rather that, as a punishment, they are “cast into the place of the Laity.” [11] And if the crime for which the Cleric was deposed is the denial of Christ or of his own Priesthood (62nd Apostolic Canon), then even if he repents, he remains for life “as a layman, that is, let him pray together with the faithful” [12]; but if his crime is canonical (e.g., fornication, adultery, etc.), then if he repents, the right is granted to him to once again wear the form of the Cleric, according to the 21st Canon of the Quinisext Ecumenical Council (“Those who have been found guilty of canonical crimes, and for this reason are subjected to complete and permanent deposition, and are thrust into the place of the laity: if, seeing their return, they willingly renounce the sin through which they have fallen from grace, and make themselves utterly alien to it, let them receive the form of the clergy; but if they do not choose this voluntarily, let them grow their hair like the laity, as having preferred the worldly way of life over the heavenly”)—but not the permission to perform sacred rites (according to the aforementioned 28th Apostolic Canon).

In summary, and referring specifically to Fr. Andreas, at this moment he still has (due to the fact that he has not been deposed) active Priesthood, [13] even if he does not exercise it (in the case of impediments, as we said, he does well not to, so as not to be condemned). After his deposition, however, he will not be permitted—under penalty of excommunication—to activate it, despite the fact that he will bear the indelible Priesthood and will be judged before God as a Priest.

I conclude with a terrifying incident, which proves the indelibility of the Priesthood, and if necessary, I will return to the topic with many more pieces of evidence which I omitted for the sake of brevity.

Around the year 1660 (during the period of Turkish rule), Bishop of Ophiounta in Pontus was Alexandros Potouras, “who, breathing threats against the Metropolitan of Trebizond, out of revenge, persuaded and urged those present to apostatize, setting the example himself... After his apostasy, he was named Iskender Pasha... Having become a mufti (Islamic judge) of the Turks in Trebizond, after some years he repented due to the following incident, and returned to the Christian faith. That is, from among his relatives who had remained in the Christian faith, the incorrupt body of one long deceased was discovered; his relatives, having carefully placed it in a coffin (case), secretly transported it one night to Trebizond to his house and begged him to pray and read according to the Christian rite, so that some means might be found to dissolve the anathematized incorrupt body. He, though a mufti, after removing his Islamic garments and donning his episcopal vestments, knelt down and prayed, reading and calling upon divine forgiveness over the body of the deceased in the presence of the relatives who had brought it. It is said—and tradition emphasizes this with conviction—that by divine intervention, a miracle occurred so that the body of the dead man immediately decomposed, and only his bones remained. Then Alexandros, having repented of his apostasy, said: ‘This is the only true religion, that of Christ. We thought it gold, that which is but copper.’ And thus, when he went to the mosque as usual to perform his prayer, he confessed from the pulpit his return to Christ. Whereupon the Turks seized him and, after torturing him in various ways, finally killed him and left his body unburied. The Christians gathered his body and buried it in a certain church in Trebizond.” [14]

 

NOTES

1. Holy Metropolis of Piraeus: Concerning Archimandrite Andreas Konanos

(https://www.romfea.gr/ieres-mitropoleis/39280-im-peiraios-peri-tou-arxim-andrea-konanou)

2. I do not know whether His Eminence Seraphim is alluding to the eminent theologians and defenders of the indelibility of the Priesthood, Panagiotis Trembelas and Christos Androutsos, whom several modern theologians (mainly “Romanidian” ones) reject with unwarranted disdain as being influenced by the West.

3. Ioannis Karmiris, The Dogmatic and Symbolic Monuments, Austria, 1968, p. 760.

4. Syntagmation, Târgoviște, 1715, p. 22.

5. Critical Observations, Vienna, 1806, pp. 277–278, 280.

6. Pedalion, Footnote to the 68th Apostolic Canon.

7. Treatise on the Validity of the Ordination of Clergy Ordained by a Deposed and Schismatic Bishop, Smyrna, 1887, p. 18.

8. Such as, for example, in the case of the “deposition” of Saint John Chrysostom by the Synod of the Oak, which the Saint very rightly ignored and continued to perform priestly functions.

9. Critical Observations, ibid., p. 278.

10. St. Nikodemos, Pedalion, Second Footnote to the 28th Apostolic Canon.

11. Ibid., Footnote to the 21st Canon of the Quinisext Council.

12. Ibid., Interpretation of the 62nd Apostolic Canon.

13. “For those deposed are not without effect; those under deposition retain an active power of the Priesthood equal to the innocent,” according to St. Athanasios of Paros (Epitome, Leipzig, 1806, p. 378).

14. St. Kokkinidis, The Apostate Bishop (Pontiaki Estia, Issue 9, September 1950, pp. 514–515).

 

Greek source: https://www.romfea.gr/katigories/10-apopseis/39359-to-anejaleipto-tis-ierosunis

Sunday, September 13, 2026

GOC History: Patriarch Diodoros I of Jerusalem and the Holy Synod in Resistance

In a moment of historical significance for the Holy Synod in Resistance of the Orthodox Church of Greece, His Beatitude, Diodoros I, Patriarch of Jerusalem from 1981 until his death in 2000, visited the Holy Monastery of Sts. Cyprian and Justina, in Phyle, Greece (headquarters of the Holy Synod in Resistance), where he addressed a large crowd of faithful on the afternoon of the monastery’s Feast Day, October 15,1989 (New Style). In the course of his comments, Patriarch Diodoros praised the work of the Holy Synod and of our Metropolitan. We reproduce, here, his words of endorsement for the edification of our faithful and as an item of historical interest.

 

 

 

Most Reverend Metropolitan Cyprian, Right Reverend Hierarchs of the Church, beloved children in Christ:

It is with special joy and emotion that I find myself in this holy place, on the occasion of the celebration of the Feast Day of Saints Cyprian and Justina. My joy and emotion are especially great because I am in the midst of Bishops and Priests who, in the course of the last decade, have spread the light of Orthodoxy to nearly every continent: to Europe, Africa, America, and wherever there exists an opportunity to proclaim the Orthodox Church. Thanks to the labors of the Most Reverend Metropolitan Cyprian and his Bishops, the voice of Orthodoxy has reached the most distant corners of the world.

My dear Christians, I arrived here in our beloved homeland a few days ago for personal reasons and because of certain concerns of the Patriarchate. I considered it my duty, therefore, to come today to celebrate with you and to congratulate Metropolitan Cyprian on his Name Day.

Certainly you know the situation in Jerusalem today. Jerusalem is struggling. Jerusalem is the Church from which the Holy Apostles were sent to preach the Gospel of our Lord to all the world. She is the mother of the Churches, having as her sacred duty the maintenance of Orthodox teaching, which she received from the Lord, in pure and unadulterated form. As you know, she is the only Church which can boast in the Lord of having been established by the Founder of our religion. He celebrated the first Liturgy in Jerusalem at the Mystical Supper. He sanctified its land by His presence; through His teaching in its abodes, He saved the human race, cleansing mankind from the sin of Adam through His death on the Cross. Yet the Holy Land is always in the midst of persecutions. For almost two thousand years, the Church of Jerusalem has been struggling to keep pure the teachings and Traditions of Orthodoxy, to hold to the Canons of the Church, and to preserve the teachings which we received from Christ and the Apostles.

The ecumenical movement, with its dialogues—the only aim of which is to eat away at our Church—, today seeks to subjugate Orthodoxy to the commands of Papism and ecumenism. It has for many years been working to destroy Orthodoxy in the Holy Land. But the Holy Sepulchre and God—Who has protected the Church of Jerusalem for so many centuries in the face of so many perils—have always saved Orthodoxy from every danger. Never, during its two thousand years of Christian history, has Jerusalem known a permanent ruler or conqueror. There have passed satraps, kings, and governors. But all of these have gone, and there remain but the one hundred Greek Orthodox monks who act as vigilant guardians of our holy heritage.

It is regrettable that, for decades now, nominally in order not to disturb the unity of the Orthodox Church, Jerusalem has followed the other Churches by participating in ecumenical dialogues, though without, of course, having been influenced or dominated in any way. Nonetheless, her presence in these dialogues provided certain parties with an opportunity to stress that the Patriarchate of Jerusalem was also a participant. What we have observed with sadness is the fearful exploitation of these dialogues by heretics. They exploit our faithful, trying by every means to convert them. They produce photographs showing the Pope with our Patriarchs and Bishops, claiming that union has already been achieved: “Do not listen to your' Bishops. The union has already been accomplished and the Orthodox Church has joined the Roman Catholic Church”—union, perhaps, in the sense that the ecumenists understand it: as subjugation.

We have thus pondered our· responsibilities toward God, toward the Church, toward Orthodoxy, toward history itself, and toward our traditional right to the Holy Land. And with enlightenment from God, we have decided to cease every dialogue between the Patriarchate and the heterodox churches, since no positive result has emerged from so many years of contact. We have announced this decision to our Sister Churches. And we are obliged and committed to hold to this decision and to continue, as far as possible, until the other Orthodox Churches acknowledge, before God, their responsibilities to Orthodoxy and to history and cease every contact with the heterodox. As you know, the Patriarchate of Jerusalem follows the traditional Old Calendar. It has never changed, and will never change, in the slightest the teachings, Canons, and doctrines of our Church. It will preserve them at any price. We will labor, even with sacrifice, to maintain them. The threats which are every day directed against us and the actions of our opponents do not frighten us. We shall remain unshaken guardians, faithful to the doctrines of the Church.

I thank the Most Reverend Metropolitan and I pray that God, through the intercessions of St. Cyprian, will grant him strength, health, and patience in carrying his Cross for the glory of Orthodoxy. I bring to all of you the blessing of the Holy Sepulchre, Golgotha, and the Sacred Cave, and I pray that God may always strengthen, protect, and establish you in the Faith of our Fathers. Many Years!

 

Source: Orthodox Tradition, Vol. XXV (2008), No. 3, pp. 28-29.

Saint John (Maximovitch) of Tobolsk (+1715): On how we may discern the will of the Lord in all matters and occurrences


 

Authorities differ according to various institutions: in a school — by the assembled pupils; in a household — consisting of family and servants; in a monastery — of the brethren; in a military camp — assembled from separate regiments, battalions, and other distinct units. Yet in each of the aforementioned institutions and those like them, there exists one and the same principle for attaining order and well-being: this is the obedience of subordinates to their elders, instructors, and commanders — an obedience that brings the various individual wills of subordinates into unity, into harmony, which is expressed through authority, organizing the separate wills into concordant action. A commander will govern poorly if he does not know how to direct and wisely restrain his subordinates in unquestioning obedience to the law and in the fulfillment of orders or instructions. On the contrary, everything proceeds successfully and reaches its intended goal where, for example, in a house — the steward, in monasteries — the guide of the brethren, in schools — the teacher, in regiments — the military commander, leads all those entrusted to him through prudent instruction, by example, by word, or even by a mere motion of the hand, toward the attainment of a good end according to his discernment.

As a soldier is obliged in all things to be obedient to his commander, to follow his example, and to be ready to fulfill every order, so must every true Christian live as though under the hand and the word of God. Whatever God may will to do with us, to what He appoints us, what He commands — in all this we must unquestioningly submit to His most holy will. Let there be for all of us, Christians, a single response to the call addressed to us by God in the Holy Scriptures: Lo, I come; in the volume of the book it is written of me (this is said of Christ the Savior): I delight to do Thy will, O my God; yea, Thy law is within my bowels (Psalm 39:8–9) — that is, in my memory, in my understanding, in my will (let each of us say after the example of our Savior): Thy will, O God, is for me better than all commands; the fulfillment of it is for me the greatest good.

With Saul, after he had fallen to the ground, struck by an extraordinary heavenly light, and heard the voice: Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou Me? — his first question was: Lord, what wilt Thou have me to do? (Acts 9:4–6). This question let us repeat daily in every moment of uncertainty, when we do not know how to act in this or that circumstance: “Lord! What wilt Thou have me to do? What is Thy will in this matter, all-good Jesus? Reveal it to me by whatever sign Thou wilt, that I may understand it — whether by a good word, counsel, or some other kind of revelation. Willingly will I follow Thy gracious will, prayerfully inspired in me by Thee.”

To the question of how we may discern the will of God in all matters, let us respond by pointing to certain ordinances or principles through which the will of God is clearly revealed; let us call them, for brevity's sake, commandments.

The first commandment, or Principle, aiding in the knowledge of the will of God

All that draws us away from God is contrary to the will of God; whereas all that brings us closer to God is in agreement with the will of God. For the will of God is your sanctification, that you should abstain from fornication (1 Thess. 4:3), not only from carnal fornication but from every form of delusion, and all the more from what is unlawful. Whoever senses such a delusion within himself should say to himself: this undertaking of mine, this friendship, this acquisition, this manner of life will not make me morally better, for it draws me away from God; at the very least, this is not God's Divine good pleasure concerning me.

The Second Commandment

The will of God is explained to us clearly and intelligibly through the law of God and the ordinances of the Church. Therefore, in every doubt, we must inquire: what do the commandments of God and the Traditions of the Church require of us? And not only what they require, but also consider what is in accordance with them (even if not explicitly defined) and what is in harmony with their spirit. Once, Christ pointed to the commandments of God to the rich young man who asked Him: What shall I do to inherit eternal life?Thou knowest the commandments (Mark 10:17; 10:25) — and He pointed out those among them which prescribe our duties toward our neighbor. Truly, there is nothing better than the fear of the Lord, and nothing sweeter than to heed the commandments of the Lord (Sirach 23:36). Abraham, speaking to the rich man who had rejoiced every day and afterward ended up in hell, presented as a witness the Divine will revealed through Moses and the other prophets, saying of the rich man’s brothers who were still alive: They have Moses and the prophets; let them hear them (Luke 16:29). And the divine Apostle Paul says: Be not conformed to this world, but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect will of God (Romans 12:2). The good (i.e., righteous) will of God is contained in the Ten Commandments of God; the acceptable (God-pleasing) will — in the Gospel counsels; the perfect will — that which demands that all commanded by God be fulfilled by us on earth just as it is fulfilled by the Angels in heaven.

The Third Commandment

This commandment is prescribed by the Apostle Paul in the First Epistle to the Thessalonians (1 Thess. 5:18): In every thing give thanks: for this is the will of God in Christ Jesus concerning you. First of all, it is worthy of note that our giving thanks to God for everything that may happen to us is greatly beneficial for us in times of anxiety and sorrow—how much more so when we receive something good. Saint John Chrysostom beautifully expressed this: “Have you suffered something evil? If you do not wish it to be evil for you, give thanks to God, and behold, this evil has already been turned into good. In this lies great wisdom.” The ancients taught their children a good custom, which consisted in this: if a child burned its finger, it was taught to immediately turn to God with the words, ‘Thanks be to God!’—a short, yet most beneficial commandment. For everything endured, let the Christian, burdened with misfortunes and sorrows, exclaim: ‘Thanks be to God!’ Let him proclaim it a hundredfold, a thousandfold, unceasingly: ‘Thanks be to God!’ To this, Saint Paul adds: Quench not the Spirit — make room within yourself for the Holy Spirit; for often God reveals His will through hidden, mysterious signs, which one must be guided by and believe in only when the deed they point to results in the glory of the One God. Further, Saint Paul says: Despise not prophesyings — that is, the interpretations of Divine Scripture and the teachings offered in churches, as well as the prophetic admonitions of wise and pious men, must never be despised by anyone who wishes to align his will with the Divine will. But whoever does not wish to heed all the above clearly does not wish to understand the will of God. Again, Saint Paul teaches: Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. Abstain from all appearance of evil (1 Thess. 5:21). Just as coin testers examine every coin by various known signs—by the sound of the metal, by the inscriptions—and thus distinguish the genuine coin from the counterfeit, accepting the former and rejecting the latter, so also must we act in discerning the will of God in every matter: that which truly conforms to it we must hold fast to; and all that bears even the slightest trace of falsehood or sin we must hate and cast away as being contrary to the will of God.

The Fourth Commandment

For the understanding of the will of God in some doubtful case, there are also other sources; beyond the aforementioned commandments of God and Church ordinances, there belong here the lawfully chosen interpreters of the will of God in our uncertainties—those who truly live in a Christian manner (for example, spiritual fathers, pastors). These are the spiritual and secular judges of our conscience. Among the laity, this includes parents, schoolteachers, instructors, and all lawfully appointed, true rulers of human societies. We bring forth historical examples for illustration:

When Saul, having wholly surrendered himself to the will of God, asked, Lord, what wilt Thou have me to do? — the Lord did not burden him with immediate commands in every detail, nor did He at once send him the Spirit of wisdom, but, as a disciple, He sent him to Ananias, saying: Arise, and go into the city, and it shall be told thee what thou must do (Acts 9:6). Ananias became the sure interpreter of the will of God to Paul, just as Saint Peter was to Cornelius the centurion (cf. Acts 10). From this, we see God’s good pleasure to reveal His will to a person through another person. Therefore, we must not neglect the good counsel of others: Ask counsel of every wise man, and despise not any useful advice (Tobit 4:18); following this, you will not regret it. The soul of a righteous man sometimes declares more than seven watchmen that sit aloft to watch — yet in all this, pray to the Most High that He may direct thy way in truth (Sirach 37:18–19). Dwell in friendship with a man who is truthful and possesses the fear of God: his soul shall be as thine own soul, and he will grieve with thee if thou fallest. Along with this, hold fast the counsel of thine own heart, for there is none more faithful to thee than it (Sirach 37:16–17). To resolve doubts about how to act according to the will of God in any matter, ask for counsel and guidance from your spiritual fathers and superiors, to whom we have entrusted our conscience and the moral conduct of our life. In general, address your uncertainties to all those in authority, whose will—excluding anything sinful—is the will of God. Whatever they advise, apart from sin, we must receive as if given through them by God Himself, and we must carry it out. Saint Paul the Apostle serves as an example for us in this. Describing to the Galatians his actions after his conversion to Christianity, he says among other things: Then fourteen years after I went up again to Jerusalem with Barnabas (by revelation) (Gal. 2:1). Why, then, did Paul delay his journey to Jerusalem for such a long time? The reason, he answers, was that I communicated unto them that gospel which I preach among the Gentiles, but privately to them which were of reputation, lest by any means I should run, or had run, in vain (Gal. 2:2). Behold the universal preacher, who had been preaching the Gospel to the Gentiles for fourteen years as though he were the least of the apostles, offering his teaching to the foremost apostles, inviting them to be judges or censors of his preaching, so that in his teaching all that the elder apostles might approve would be received by common counsel, and being harmonized with their own preaching, they might add to it or take something away—and all of this he himself would then believe and teach the Gentiles. What is most astonishing is that Paul says of himself, I went up by revelation. If it was by revelation that he went to Jerusalem, then by revelation he could also have been given all that the Apostolic Council resolved. But such a further revelation was not given, precisely to show that God wills to instruct us not only through revelations, but also that man be instructed through man. Moreover, Paul’s submission of his teaching to apostolic judgment was not done because he doubted the orthodoxy of his teaching; rather, the synodal confirmation was more necessary for others—both believers and, even more so, those who doubted. Thus did all who wished and strove to unfailingly follow the will of God resolve their uncertainties: they questioned their elders, accepted their good and beneficial counsel. Stand ye in the ways — that is, pay full attention to your deeds, says the Lord through the Prophet Jeremiah — and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest and comfort for your souls (Jer. 6:16).

The Fifth Commandment

If time or place do not permit one to seek counsel, a person must judge for himself in his uncertainty regarding the understanding of the Divine will—how he should act in accordance with it in the matter before him—and God will not abandon his prayerful desire to fulfill the will of God in all things, but will unexpectedly resolve his doubt. In such a case, the one in doubt must carefully examine the matter before him and consider both or all sides of it that raise the question. In choosing one of them, he should take into account which is more favorable to the will of God, and which is closer to our carnal desire or attachment. Having considered all this impartially, each person is obligated to do that which is more pleasing to God, even if it is undesirable to our own will and wholly disagreeable to the inclinations of the flesh, bringing neither pleasure nor delight, but only labor and weariness. Despite this, we must follow the will of God, do what is pleasing to Him, and not what pleases our self-love and indulgence of the flesh. Egoism, pride, and carnal desires are always shameful and lead us close to a fall; to resist them in every case is safe. If thou turn away thy foot from doing thy pleasure on My holy day, says the Prophet Isaiah, then shalt thou delight thyself in the Lord; and I will cause thee to ride upon the high places of the earth, saith the Lord (Isaiah 58:13–14). Let us offer some practical advice for further clarity. For a person suffering from stomach illness, the best advice is not to eat what he greatly desires—such food will bring him no benefit and more likely will harm him. For example: fresh watermelons, melons, cucumbers, mushrooms, strong undiluted drinks, cold water, young vegetables, and unripe garden fruits—these things stimulate excessive eating and thereby burden digestion, causing harm not only to the sick, but sometimes even to the healthy, although indulging in them may seem pleasant.

The same—or something similar—occurs in our moral actions: more often than not, we are drawn to that which pleasantly gratifies our outward senses, by which we may appear impressive, by which we may boast before others—in a word, all that is worldly and temporal is desirable to the flesh but harmful to our inner man. Whatever excessively draws our will toward the material and fleeting, that very thing diverts our spirit from the Divine and eternal; therefore, it is contrary to God, estranges us from Him, and casts us into the abyss of evil. Mortify therefore your members which are upon the earth (restrain their inclinations toward godless deeds and passionate desires): fornication, uncleanness, inordinate affection, evil concupiscence, and covetousness, which is idolatry; for which things' sake the wrath of God cometh on the children of disobedience (Col. 3:5–6). Go not after thy lusts, but refrain thyself from thine appetites, advises the son of Sirach (Sirach 18:30). In your uncertainties, turn to God in prayer, that He may instruct you concerning His holy will in your actions.

If you encounter, dear reader, something neutral—for example, you are walking and come across two people begging alms, both equally destitute, and for some reason you cannot give alms to both equally—then give, even if unequally: to one more, to the other less, according to your desire; you will not sin against the will of God in this inequality of giving. But if the matter is complex and requires special study and consideration, then seek counsel from knowledgeable people, and ask prayerfully from God His blessing upon the good deed. If it is a question of choosing one of several such deeds and it is entirely unknown which of them is pleasing to God—that this or that should be carried out—then in such a case, wait; do not carry out either of them until you come to know, in one way or another, even approximately, that your action and choice are not contrary to the will of God. In all doubtful judgments, two counselors are especially beneficial: reason and conscience. If both diligently apply themselves to the examination of the uncertain matter, they will, without hindrance, find the true resolution as to how best to proceed and how to carry out the intended deed in accordance with the will of God.

It happens, however, that even people with a pure conscience may go astray in the labyrinth of the manifold conflicts between spirit and flesh, wherein the spirit sometimes finds itself in such confusion that it does not know what it ought to choose and do, so as not to act against the will of God. This occurs not infrequently even with church preachers. Let the following instructive example serve them for consolation and benefit.

A preacher sets forth and explains the word of God to his listeners and notices that the majority of them have dozed off, while only a few listen attentively; this troubles the preacher. Yet he thinks: “Still, it is better that they have dozed than if they were engaged in idle talk. And if even two or three are not asleep, that is enough to encourage me in my labor: one is as good as a thousand!” Let each person, similarly, reason in moments of uncertainty concerning his own affairs: it is enough for me if two eyes remain watchful within me—reason and conscience; if only they preserve the will of God, then they will direct my own will toward the will of God. As for the rest, I will not be disturbed; and if in anything, through my weakness, I fail to fully meet the good pleasure of God, I will nevertheless strive to be well-pleasing to Him!

The Sixth Commandment

Much contributes to the knowledge of the Divine will the prayerful appeal of Saint Paul to God: Lord, what wilt Thou have me to do? (Acts 9:6). We, following the example of Saint Paul, often have the need to repeat this prayerful request: Lord, what wilt Thou have me to do? It became customary among the holy servants of God. In matters doubtful and extraordinary, they always resorted to prayer for God’s help, that He might reveal to them His holy will: Lord, what wilt Thou have me to do? Thus Moses and Aaron in their time would approach the Ark of the Covenant (the Lord’s ark) with prayerful inquiry of the Lord. Likewise, our elders did and still do the same: if the sky is suddenly covered with thick clouds, thunder strikes like cannon fire, and lightning flashes continuously, then the bells are rung to disperse the storm clouds and at the same time to call everyone to fervent prayer to God for mercy upon us sinners and for His help unto deliverance. In like manner must we act when we perceive that the righteous sun of God’s will is withdrawing from us and we know not at all what we are to do. It is necessary and greatly beneficial for us to lift our eyes to heaven and with fervent prayers knock upon it, saying: Lord, what wilt Thou have me to do? So acted the Apostle Paul, when suddenly in the field a light unbearable to the eyes shone upon him and he fell to the ground and heard a voice: Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou Me? In fear and trembling, he asked: Lord, what wilt Thou have me to do? (Acts 9:3–6). It is profitable to repeat this prayer often. But the most pleasing time for its frequent deepening is when we, with fear and trembling, approach the reception of the Divine and Most Pure Mysteries of the Body and Blood of Christ. Fully aware of our unworthiness to receive them, we must with all our soul and heart implore our Redeemer: Lord, what wilt Thou have me to do? God-inspired men advise us to hold unceasingly in our mind and to express in words: Lord, I am unworthy; but I acknowledge in my heart: that which is pleasing to Thee, let it also be pleasing to me; what I have promised, I will keep and fulfill.

The daily entrusting of oneself to the will of God is the most perfect and most beneficial preparation for the unknown to us, yet inevitable hour of our passage from this present life into the life to come, the life beyond the grave, where we shall receive that which we have merited here by our good or evil deeds.

Note: If someone, having long prayed to God for the fulfillment of some request, does not receive what he asks, let him know that the Merciful Heavenly Father delays in granting the request either because what is asked would not be to the benefit of the petitioner, or else He postpones its fulfillment in order to cause the petitioner to pray more often and to train him in patience—for the sake of a greater reward.

There is not the slightest doubt that often even the best father does not hasten to give his son or daughter what they ask, in order to test their affection for him and to teach them the useful virtue of patience, which merits a greater reward than impatience and resentment after the very first refusal. All the more is it fitting for the All-knowing Heavenly Father to act thus with us. We would cease to pray to God altogether, or would pray only very rarely and out of necessity, and it is unlikely that we would possess any measure of patience, if God were to grant us immediately everything we might desire from Him.

It is far more beneficial for us to obtain even small gifts from God through prolonged and frequent prayers than to receive a quick answer to our prayer; for unceasing prayer in itself is already the greatest gift of God, and in addition, it makes the one who prays worthy of even greater mercy—consolation and peace of soul. Such a repeatedly offered, yet seemingly unheard, petition has granted many righteous ones the greatest stillness and tranquility in the heart.

The King of Judah, David, when the prophet Nathan reproached him for his sin and declared the will of God concerning the death of the child conceived in sin by him, prayed long and fasted, shed tears, casting himself upon the ground before God, beseeching Him for the life of his newborn son. But when he heard that his son had died, he immediately found peace: he changed his garments of mourning for festive attire, went into the house of God, and worshipped the Lord (cf. 2 Samuel 12:14–23). Christ, the God-man, having completed for the third time His prayer in the Garden of Gethsemane for the removal of the cup of death from Him, fully surrendered Himself to the will of the Heavenly Father and calmly said to His disciples, who were heavy with sleep: Rise, let us be going: behold, he is at hand that doth betray Me (Matt. 26:46). Thus, it often happens that an unanswered prayer brings peace to the mind and heart, and from this we may come to know the will of God—that His good pleasure is not in the fulfillment of what we ask, but in the complete surrender of ourselves to the will of God concerning the thing requested.

Eli, the Jewish priest, when Samuel told him what punishment God had decreed for the house of Eli and his sons, humbly said: He is the Lord; let Him do what seemeth Him good (1 Samuel 3:18); as if to say: “Thy declaration of God’s judgment is grievous to me, O Samuel, but since I know that this is the will of God, I willingly accept thy words and recognize in them the will of God: I and my sons receive punishment according to our deeds, by the sentence of God’s judgment, to which no one has the right to resist; let the Lord do all that is pleasing to His most holy will: we are servants, He is the Lord; we are guilty in many things; it is His work to correct our falls through righteous chastisement.” When the Apostle Paul was on his way to Jerusalem and passed through Caesarea, and the Christians there, knowing through prophecies that many troubles and sorrows awaited him from the Jews in Jerusalem, sought to dissuade him from continuing his journey, Paul answered their tearful pleading: What do ye, weeping and breaking mine heart? for I am ready not to be bound only, but also to die at Jerusalem for the name of the Lord Jesus. And when we (the Christians of Caesarea) could not persuade him, we were silent, saying: The will of the Lord be done (Acts 21:13–14). This is the only true consolation of the soul when our prayer is not heard, when our petitions are not granted—to pray for one thing: The will of the Lord be done.

The Seventh Commandment

No one among the living can more truly know the will of God concerning the actions he intends to undertake than he who sincerely and wholeheartedly desires in all things to act according to the will of God. Such a desire will truly serve as a guiding thread for him in the labyrinth, helping to remove the difficulties and errors that may arise in understanding the will of God in the matter at hand. He who is filled with such fervent desire to act according to the will of God, or to choose that which is pleasing to God from among two possible actions, and who is in doubt as to which undertaking is in accordance with the Divine will, let him prayerfully turn to God, saying with all his soul and heart: “Lord! If I knew with certainty what is pleasing to Thee, I would surely do that very thing—and thus I believe that Thou, though unseen, wilt implant in my heart the thought that is pleasing to Thee.”

Having poured out his heart before the All-seeing One, he may then act according to what seems best to him, choosing one course or another, laying aside all doubt; he will not anger God thereby, for the most loving Father does not allow such a loving son to fall into delusion. If there is no person capable of giving edification, God sends a good Angel, just as He sent an Angel in a dream to Joseph, when the latter was pondering and uncertain as to how to act concerning the Virgin betrothed to him in a matter of great importance. In like manner, an Angel was sent to the three eastern kings who were journeying to worship the Child lying in the manger in Bethlehem, to instruct them not to follow the flattering counsel of King Herod and to return to their country by another way. To Abraham, to the bondwoman Hagar, and to many others, Angels were sent for aid and to turn them away from various errors—or, in place of Angels, faithful people were sent for their instruction.

In the year 324, Emperor Constantine the Great, having departed from Rome, began to build a new capital in Heli; but this undertaking was not pleasing to the Providence of God, and in order to change his intent and indicate the proper place for the construction of the new capital, God wondrously arranged that the building tools and materials for the city's construction were, in a single night, by an invisible power, transferred from the Asiatic shore of the strait to the European side—in Thrace, as related by Bede and Glycas. Zonaras further adds that an eagle, seizing in its beak the plan of the city prepared by the architect, flew with it across the strait and dropped it near Byzantium.

Thus, God never refuses to reveal His will—by one means or another—to those who sincerely desire to know and fulfill it; for the Holy Spirit of Wisdom, being full of love for mankind, withdraws from deceitfulness, as the true beholder of our heart, and being all-encompassing, knows every word of ours—whether it is true—and abundantly grants Himself to all who call upon Him (cf. Wisdom 1:5–7). The Lord is near to all who truly seek Him and reveals to them His will through wondrous and most sweet instruction: He will fulfill the desire of them that fear Him, and He also will hear their cry, and will save them (Psalm 144:19)—that is, from every delusion, error, and danger.

 

Russian source: Илиотропион, или сообразование человеческой воли с Божественной волей, by Saint John (Maximovitch) of Tobolsk; introduction and notes by Priest Alexander Gumerov, Third Edition, Sretensky Monastery Publishing, Moscow, 2014, chapter 4.

Russian source online: https://azbyka.ru/otechnik/Ioann_Tobolskij/iliotropion/1_4

St. Basil the Great: Homily on Thanksgiving

1. You have heard the words of the Apostle, in which he addresses the Thessalonians, prescribing rules of conduct for every kind of pe...