Monday, December 29, 2025

Questions of Hieromartyr Nikolai (Prozorov) and Answers by Hieromartyr Joseph (Petrovykh) of Petrograd in 1929


A painting of two men

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

 

Your Eminence,

Our Most Reverend and dear Hierarch!

With the blessing of His Eminence Vladyka Dimitry, I venture to ask you to give us an answer to the questions put forward by the pastors of the Penza diocese from the parishes that have joined us. These answers will serve as guidance for us also for the future:

1) The Orthodox parishes are now surrounded either by the Zhivtsy [“Living Church”] and the Renovationists, or by the Sergianists. But the population of neighboring parishes has mutual family ties, and therefore they often bring into Orthodox churches infants baptized by the Renovationists and the Sergianists. Is it necessary to anoint them with Holy Chrism, and how should one deal with those baptized by the Sergianists?

Answer: Those baptized by the Renovationists — yes, they should be anointed with Holy Chrism; but those of the Sergianists — not yet! For they — the Sergianists — are such due to a misunderstanding, and the resolution of this matter is still in progress.

2) Three months ago, a certain chanter Panov was ordained to the priesthood by Metropolitan Kirill of Penza, in the same parish where he had been a chanter. Now both the parish and he are considering joining us. What should be done with Panov? In what manner should he be received?

The zealous among the parishioners do not want to recognize his ordination. Our clergy there are confused and are inquiring of us. The question is serious, and therefore we are turning to Your Eminence for clarification.

Answer: He must be received after an explicit and public confession of the truth by the one joining. For the calming of the “zealous,” it can be recommended that the priest humbly accept a certain epitimia — in the form of temporary abstention from priestly ministry (2–3 weeks, up to a month).

With regard to ordination, one must be guided by the practice established under the Patriarch for the reception of those ordained by the Renovationists: those who received ordination from bishops of the old teaching (who had deviated into Renovationism) were received through repentance and epitimia (such as the one mentioned above). By the same procedure it was permitted to receive those who had received ordination even from new bishops, provided they had themselves received their consecration from the old ones and without violation of church rules (unmarried, etc.). Only those who received ordination from married bishops and with violation of church rules were completely rejected and regarded as unordained.

3) Civil marriages, that is, open fornication and vile blasphemy, are gaining ground in the provinces. The priests are asking for a blessing to deprive of Christian burial those who were in these sins and died without having cleansed themselves through repentance. Or should they be buried at home, and not in churches? These are the measures proposed by the pastors to combat depravity.

And you, dear Vladyka, what is your view?

Answer: That is correct, but in particular cases some condescension is possible. For example, someone among the unwed may have been constantly aware of his sin and did not manage to correct it properly or was unable to. Such persons, though at home, may fittingly be buried with a funeral service for the sake of lessening the sorrow of their relatives. To bury manifest and hardened blasphemers would be a scandal. Let them be buried in a godless manner. The same applies to those who were unwed out of malice and estrangement from the Holy Church, without any awareness of the sinfulness of their life.

I leave space here for a reply, so as not to burden you with unnecessary writing. In all other matters, we have peace and well-being. Only Your Holiness is lacking — will we see you? (Little hope. I am waiting for you here.)

May the Lord God preserve and strengthen you. For we live by you (and it is probably not easy, is it?). I ask for your prayers and your hierarchal blessing.

Your humble and devoted obedient servant,
the sinful priest Nikolai Prozorov

Dear Father!
Greetings and blessing. And thank you for helping the Vladyka. Take care of him!

9/22 February 1929

Original source:

http://www.eshatologia.org/273-voprosi-svyashenika-nikolaya-prozorova-i-otveti-na-nih-mitropolita-iosifa-petrogradskogo.html (deleted, unarchived)

 

Hieromartyr Nikolai (Nikolai Fyodorovich Prozorov) was born in the village of Pokrovskoye, Penza Governorate. At the age of 18, in 1915, he left the seminary and volunteered to defend the Fatherland on the German front after training at the Mikhailov Artillery School. At the front, he commanded a battalion. The Revolution found him as a second lieutenant. In 1918 — inspector of Vsevobuch.

After returning from the front to Penza in 1918, he was accused by the Chekists of an “officers’ conspiracy” and sentenced to execution. The young officer, full of life and courage, vowed to become a priest if the Lord would preserve his life. While among those condemned to death in a shared cell, he suggested reading aloud the akathist to St. Nicholas, the defender of the unjustly condemned. Some officers agreed and sang the akathist, while others refused. All who read the akathist were spared execution and received prison sentences, while their fellow inmates were executed. Once freed, Nikolai accepted the priesthood in 1919. He was ordained by Archbishop Ioann (Pommer).

From 1919 to 1927, he served in rural churches near Penza. He was arrested in 1924 and soon released. From the beginning of 1927, he lived in Leningrad, studied at the Theological-Pastoral School, and then at the Higher Theological Courses (until July 1928). He served in the church of the Lavra Kinovia. In 1928–1929, he was rector of the Church of St. Alexander of Oshevensk at Piskaryovka. A Josephite, he was secretary to Bishop Dimitry (Lyubimov).

On November 28, 1929, the priest was arrested along with a group of Josephite clergy who did not recognize Metropolitan Sergius’s “Declaration,” and by the decision of the OGPU dated August 3, 1930, he was sentenced to the highest measure of punishment. Bidding farewell to his cellmates, the priest joyfully said: “The Lord is calling me to Himself, and now I will be with Him!”

He was executed by shooting on August 21, 1930.

In 1981, Priest Nikolai Prozorov was glorified by the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia and numbered among the New Martyrs and Confessors of Russia. His commemoration is on August 6/19.

 

Russian source:

http://www.internetsobor.org/index.php/sobytiya/sergianstvo/svyashchennomuchenik-nikolaj-prozorov-i-ego-perepiska-s-mitropolitom-iosifom-petrovykh

 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Questions of Hieromartyr Nikolai (Prozorov) and Answers by Hieromartyr Joseph (Petrovykh) of Petrograd in 1929

  Your Eminence, Our Most Reverend and dear Hierarch! With the blessing of His Eminence Vladyka Dimitry, I venture to ask you to g...