Saturday, April 4, 2026

Interreligious Ecumenism: Two Patriarchs compete over who will become more pleasing to the Muslims

Evangelia Zoulaki | April 4, 2026

 

 

“No concession is permitted in matters of the Faith” (Saint Mark Eugenikos)

On March 10, the president of Turkey, Tayyip Erdoğan, hosted at the Presidential Palace a (pan-religious) Iftar dinner, which is offered during the period of Ramadan after the end of the Muslims’ daily fast. A multitude of the country’s religious leaders were present, among them the Patriarch of Constantinople Bartholomew, whom Metropolitan Emmanuel of Chalcedon accompanied. [1]

A related video reveals that during the Iftar a recitation of the Koran was given by Egzon Ibrahimi.

https://youtu.be/26YKP_nsvKI?si=3twPSXnxIbw2PEt6&t=8

According to the announcement of the Ecumenical Patriarchate, Patriarch Bartholomew “expressed his wishes for Ramadan to the Turkish president and through him to all Muslims.”

A similar official dinner was hosted in Ankara by the Foreign Affairs Committee of the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP). The Patriarch of Constantinople, who is invited every year, was represented by Metropolitan Joachim of Prousa.

Likewise, on March 16, the Ecumenical Patriarch attended another Iftar dinner hosted by the historic Greek community educational institution, the Zographeion Lyceum. [2]

Parallel actions were also undertaken by Patriarch Theodoros of Alexandria. [3]

More specifically, on March 10, he himself hosted an Iftar dinner in honor of the engineers, architects, and workers who are laboring for the restoration of the historic Holy Church of the Annunciation of the Theotokos in Alexandria, expressing through this initiative his satisfaction toward all the workers.

We read in the announcement of the Patriarchate of Alexandria: “The Iftar took place in the courtyard of the Patriarchate in Alexandria, in the presence of His Excellency the Consul General of Greece in Alexandria, Mr. Ioannis Pyrgakis, the President of the Greek Community of Alexandria, Mr. Andreas Vafeiadis, the Most Learned representative of the Grand Sheikh of Al-Azhar in Alexandria, Dr. Ibrahim Al-Jamal, His God-beloved Bishop Damaskinos of Mareotis, Patriarchal Vicar of Alexandria, as well as the persons in charge of the construction company Rowad, which has undertaken the execution of the restoration project of the Holy Church.”

 

 

It is noteworthy that the announcement of the Patriarchate of Alexandria characterizes the month of Ramadan as “holy,” and this indeed during the period of the truly holy fast of Great Lent:

“[Patriarch Theodoros of Alexandria] referred in particular to the period of the holy month of Ramadan, during which, despite the strict fast, the workers continue with the same dedication and industriousness the restoration works.”

It is recalled that on October 29, 2009, Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople, while in Atlanta, America, offered as a gift a Koran to the president of Coca-Cola, which he in fact called the “Holy Koran” and the “sacred book of our Muslim brethren.”

https://katanixi.gr/synaxis-orthodoxon-klirikon-kai-monachon-oikoymeniston-lechthenta-kai-prachthenta-a%CE%84-meros-4on/

In his speech he had said: “I have a small keepsake. Small and important. A keepsake for Daphne and Mukhtar. This is the Holy Koran, the sacred book of our Muslim brethren.”

https://youtu.be/fIwdL2IZ3cY?si=pq6zqBQbQHhV0sI7&t=232

It has now become a common phenomenon for certain contemporary ecumenist Orthodox hierarchs to distribute the Koran, calling it a sacred book, or to participate in Iftar dinners, characterizing the fast of Ramadan as holy.

This is not the first time in history that Orthodox Christians and Muslims have coexisted in one place.

During the long historical coexistence of Orthodox Christians and Muslims, the Church engaged in dialogue genuinely and authentically through her Saints, who authentically lived the mystery of the Church and for this reason understood in depth the dogma and ethos of Islam.

The Saints did not make the slightest concession in the dogmas of the Orthodox Faith.

We read concerning this in a study by a Monk of the Holy Monastery of Gregoriou on Mount Athos, which was written under the supervision of the Monastery’s abbot, the blessed Archimandrite Georgios Kapsanis [4]:

During the long historical coexistence of the Orthodox Christian and Muslim peoples, our Orthodox Church was in a continual Orthodox-Muslim ‘dialogue.’ The Church engaged in dialogue genuinely and authentically through her Saints, who authentically lived the mystery of the Church and for this reason understood in depth the dogma and ethos of Islam.

Representative examples of this ‘dialogue’ in different periods of Islamic-Christian contact are the dialogues carried out by Saint John of Damascus (8th century), Saint Gregory Palamas (14th century), the holy Gennadios Scholarios (15th century), and Saint Nikodemos the Hagiorite (18th–19th centuries). The remarkable theological uniformity of these dialogues proves the single spirit under which the Saints engage in dialogue, regardless of the historical period through which Islam is passing and regardless of the political and social condition of the Orthodox peoples.

These dialogues can safely be regarded also as the authentic expression of the dialogue of Orthodox peoples with Islam.

[...]

Yet the Saints dialogued with Islam in an entirely different way [in relation to the contemporary Hierarchs]. They confessed the Orthodox Faith precisely, indeed in periods when the Orthodox would have had reasons to secure more favorable treatment on the part of their Muslim rulers by downplaying the dogma of the Holy Trinity. Nevertheless, they did not make even the slightest concession in the dogmas of the Orthodox Faith, something which many times cost them even their very life.

The holy New Martyrs are shining examples. Saint Nikodemos the Hagiorite summarizes the stance of the holy New Martyrs as follows: ‘Did those men (the ancient martyrs) suffer martyrdom for the faith of the Holy Trinity? These likewise did so. Did those men shed their blood for the name and the Divinity of our Lord Jesus Christ? These likewise did so. Not to say that these have something more than those, in that those indeed struggled against polytheism and idolatry, which is an obvious impiety, where it is difficult to deceive a rational mind, whereas these struggled against the one-person monotheism of the heterodox, which is a hidden impiety, and which can easily deceive the mind.’”

The same excellent study points out the erroneous assumption that the Orthodox faith and Islam believe in the same God, whereas in reality Islam constitutes a denial of the true God:

“Interreligious syncretism

[…] the erroneous assumption that Christianity and Islam believe in the same God of the Bible, whereas in reality Islam constitutes a denial of the true God, because it denies the tri-hypostatic being of God and the divinity of the Lord Jesus Christ.

[…] Anthropocentric approach.

Islam draws its teaching concerning Jesus Christ from anti-Christian Jewish and heretical Christian (Arian-Neo-Nestorian) literature. It accepts Him as a great prophet, as the seal of holiness, as the one who is going to judge the world at the Second Coming. It also regards Him as the Word and Spirit of God, born of the Virgin Mary (not the Lady Theotokos, but the sister of Moses), a teacher of monotheism, and finally as having been taken up into the heavens until his second mission for the judgment.

It denies the divinity of Christ, His death on the Cross, and the Resurrection, because it considers these unfitting and blasphemous for a prophet of God. For this reason, it also abhors the Precious Cross. In order to support all this teaching concerning Jesus Christ, Islam maintains that the Christians distorted the original Gospel preached by Jesus by additions, subtractions, and falsifications.”

The Pan-Heresy of interreligious Ecumenism is taking on flesh and bones, with the Hierarchs and their followers setting aside the Holy Canons of our Faith.

The position and stance of the Holy Fathers constitute the sharpest rebuke of the interreligious syncretistic words and deeds of the contemporary Hierarchs.

 

[1] https://ec-patr.org/10/03/22/29/o-oikoymenikos-patriarchis-stin-agkyr-12/

[2] https://ec-patr.org/17/03/11/13/o-panagiotatos-paresti-sto-deipno-ift/

[3] https://www.patriarchateofalexandria.com/iftar-toy-patriarcheioy-alexandreias-pros-timin-ton-ergazomenon-tis-anastilosis-toy-ieroy-naoy-toy-eyaggelismoy-alexandreias/

[4] https://www.impantokratoros.gr/E43ED69B.el.aspx

 

Greek source: https://katanixi.gr/diathriskeiakos-oikoymenismos-dyo-patriarches-antagonizontai-gia-to-poios-tha-ginei-pio-arestos-stoys-moysoylmanoys/

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Interreligious Ecumenism: Two Patriarchs compete over who will become more pleasing to the Muslims

Evangelia Zoulaki | April 4, 2026     “No concession is permitted in matters of the Faith” (Saint Mark Eugenikos) On March 10, the...