Saturday, April 4, 2026

The Truth on the 2014 Union of the Church of the Genuine Orthodox Church of Greece and the Synod in Resistance

Transcribed excerpt from the presentation of Dr. Demetrios Alibertis at the 2024 G.O.C. Family and Youth Conference, "Genuine Orthodoxy - 100 Years Later,” which took place on October 11-14, 2024, at the historic Cathedral of St. Markella, Astoria, NY.

 



"In 2013, after years of discussions that were taking place between the Synod in Resistance and the synod of Archbishop Kallinikos, there was a joyful union. This event which should have been a source of great joy for the entire old calendar world, came to be the subject of harsh criticism from all of the old calendar vagante groups who made various preposterous claims concerning it. I will try to present some of the facts, in the hope that it will simultaneously address some of these accusations against us.

"First, when the dialogue ensued, the Holy Synod in Resistance did not approach the discussions with the understanding that they were separate synod but rather expressed the sentiments that they were a part of the GOC, and that all which had transpired back in 1983 was simply to save the old calendar movement. With regard to the ecclesiological position of Metropolitan Cyprian, the truth of the matter is that since 1935, the issue of grace in the new calendar churches has been an issue for the Church and it had to be discussed. While differing opinions were expressed from both sides, the talks allowed for an ecclesiological position to be stated that both sides could agree on.

"Certain terminologies and expressions used by Metropolitan Cyprian were removed since they were a source of confusion for some. The truth of the matter is, that the patristic approach to danger surrounding the faith requires a very deep knowledge of matters a level that the majority of laity and some priests do not have. As these terms and expressions were not helpful to the people, the synod decided let's remove it as it serves no purpose. The sixth section of the joint reconciliation document entitled ‘The True Orthodox Church and the Heresy of Ecumenism’ exposits on the sensitive topic of Grace in a manner identical to the position stated by St. Philaret of New York and Chrysostomos of Florina. ‘We know that our Church bears grace and mysteries and so we do not concern ourselves with what the outsiders do or do not have.’ The Church of the GOC can only provide assurance concerning the validity or concerning the soteriological efficacy of the mystery celebrated within her midst, but it will not provide such assurances for those who commune knowingly with syncretistic ecumenism. Furthermore, the subsequent section states that while synodal condemnations of ecumenism have been issued by local churches, ROCOR in 1983 and the GOC in 1998, the Church awaits the convocation of a major synod of the True Orthodox Church which with expanded authority will arrive at important decisions concerning the calendar innovation and ecumenism. This was the position of the great saints before us, and this is our position today."

(...)

"The Lamian Synod [of ‘Archbishop’ Makarios Kavakidis] has adopted the Holy Orthodox Church in North America’s (HOCNA) version of the events which makes the man of God [Metropolitan Vitaly] an ecumenist. The reason people have adopted the story is because of Metropolitan Vitaly's nativity encyclical of 1984 which stated that ROCOR's anathema against ecumenism was local, and did not affect other local Churches, meaning that the other local Churches had to adopt such resolutions on their own. I hate to break it to everyone, and I know there's some in here that will not agree with me, but he [Metropolitan Vitaly] was right. Our regional council was precisely that, a local regional council, it was not an ecumenical council. We have to be able to differentiate this as it was the position of St. Philaret, this was the position of that entire generation of ROCOR hierarchs including the then Archbishop Vitaly."


[Blog Administrator’s note: besides Saints Philaret and Chrysostomos, a similar theological understanding was also notably maintained by the founder of the Cathedral of Saint Markella, His Eminence, blessed Metropolitan Petros of Astoria.

See https://orthodoxmiscellany.blogspot.com/2024/09/bishop-petros-astyfides-on-grace.html ]

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Interreligious Ecumenism: Two Patriarchs compete over who will become more pleasing to the Muslims

Evangelia Zoulaki | April 4, 2026     “No concession is permitted in matters of the Faith” (Saint Mark Eugenikos) On March 10, the...