Saturday, October 3, 2026

Miracles That Corroborate the Traditional Orthodox Faith

by Professor John Kallianiotis, University of Scranton

 

 

“Greeks regard foreign sights with greater wonder than sights at home.”

(Pausanias [2nd-century Greek geographer])

 

Prologue. Traditional Orthodoxy was established in the year 33 A.D. at Pentecost and subsequently reaffirmed by the Apostolic Synod of 49 A.D. The process of consolidation continued with the Edict of Milan, issued by St. Constantine the Great in 313 A.D., and the Orthodox Faith was reinforced by the First (Ecumenical Synod of 325 A.D., in Nicaea, Bithynia. This Synod of the 318 God-bearing Fathers also regulated the Orthodox Christian Festal Calendar in accordance with the Julian Calendar, which had been in effect since 46 B.C. [1] At the ensuing (Ecumenical and local Synods the Orthodox Church was further upheld and safeguarded by way of correct dogmas. Having given a Christian orientation to classical Greek culture through Holy Tradition and the theology of the Church Fathers, Orthodoxy spread to the peoples of Northern and Eastern Europe, making them our brethren in the Lord. With the passage of time, through the subjugation of Western Europe by the Franks—through the agency of the eternal enemy of mankind and adversary of the Lord, the soul-destroying Devil—the West came to espouse various innovations and human philosophies (heresies), the result being the Schism of 1054. One ensuing innovation was the change of the calendar (the Church’s Festal Calendar) by order of Pope Gregory XIII, in 1582. [2] We Orthodox, however, did not accept this novelty, since the Festal Calendar was fixed by the God-bearing Fathers (through the Holy Spirit) and became thereafter a sacred ecclesiastical Tradition of our Orthodox Faith. The Orthodox Church condemned this change in the calendar, and a great many miracles confirmed the incorrectness of this decision by the Roman Catholic (Western) Church to celebrate the Saints on different days than those of their actual celebrations.

Unfortunately for Orthodoxy, at the beginning of the 1920s certain Hierarchs who were ignorant of the magnitude of their responsibilities, of the truth of Orthodoxy, and of Holy Tradition, along with its dogmas and Canons, succeeded in insinuating themselves into the Patriarchate of Constantinople [3] and the Church of Greece. [4] This apostasy of theirs led them into error and innovation, for they accepted and imposed on our Orthodox people the anti-Orthodox Papal (Gregorian) Festal Calendar. They imposed it by force and through persecution, with the aid of the anti-Christian government, [5] on those who desired to remain loyal to traditional Orthodoxy. There have been, however, a multitude of visions and miracles that have demonstrated the erroneous nature of the New Calendar.

Appearances and Miracles Prove the Correctness of the Old Calendar. In 1924, when Patriarch Meletios IV (Metaxakes) and Archbishop Chrysostomos I (Papadopoulos) of Athens and All Greece decided to change the Festal Calendar (which is based on the Julian Calendar) handed down by the Fathers and to adopt the Papal Calendar (the Gregorian Calendar), the latter sent out an Encyclical [6] to be read in all of the Churches in the country, so that the faithful might be informed of the change.

In the village of Myloi, Karystos, in Evboia, the then parish Priest, Father Ioannes (papa [Father]-Giannes [John]) read this Encyclical on Sunday, March 10,1924, which date was altered to March 23. Two days later the faithful were supposed to celebrate the Annunciation of the Theotokos. The simple, yet faithful villagers who were present that Sunday in the Church of St. John the Forerunner in Myloi crossed themselves and whispered to one another: “See, the time has come when Papoulakos said that they would make Latins of us.” [7]

At the end of the reading of the Encyclical, papa-Giannes, acting on the orders of his Bishop, sternly adjured the faithful not to be absent from Church on the following Tuesday, when they would celebrate the Annunciation of the Theotokos according to the New Calendar. The faithful left after the conclusion of the Divine Liturgy, deeply distressed over this imposition of the Papal Calendar upon Greece.

On Monday afternoon, the eve of the putative Annunciation according to the New Calendar, the wife of the mayor of the village, Olga Rongas, sent her eight-year-old son to let out their goat, so that it could graze. On the way, the boy passed in front of the Church of St. Paraskeve, [8] seeing there an unknown Priest with a white beard, who called the boy to him. [9] The devout boy drew near and kissed the hand of the Priest, who asked him: “Whose son are you, young man?” And the young boy replied: “I’m the son of Nikos Rongas, Pappoule [an endearing term for a Priest, derived from the Greek for ‘grandfather’].” “Tell your father not to go to Church tomorrow, since it is not the Annunciation. If, however, he does go, your brother, the soldier, will be in grave danger.” “Alright, Pappoule. I will go and tell him.”

The young boy went to his house and told his mother what the unknown Priest had said to him. Mother and son together returned to St. Paraskeve’s so that the mother could meet the Priest, but the Priest was no longer to be found there. In the evening, the mother recounted all of these things to her husband. They were frightened by this warning of the unknown Priest and so did not go to Church the following day, the day of the “Annunciation.”

Papa-Giannes was incensed that the mayor had not accepted the New Calendar. That evening, in the village coffeehouse, in front of everyone, papa-Giannes said: “The mayor did not obey the decision of the Church, but believed in his son’s fairy tales.” This Orthodox stand of the family of Nikos Rongas was followed by other villagers, who threw away the fish that they had cooked for the “Feast of the Annunciation” and kept the Fast.

A few days later, the Rongas family received a letter from their son, Georgios, who was a soldier, in which he wrote as follows: “My venerable parents, you should know that yesterday, when we were celebrating our national holiday according to the New Calendar, a stray bullet grazed my hand without breaking any of the bones. Everyone here assured me that it was a miracle that I was saved, and that I had a Saint looking out for me! I am fine now.”

On hearing all of this, papa-Giannes tried to excuse himself by saying that these people were right, but that he could not violate the orders of his superiors, since otherwise he would lose his livelihood. This Priest continued to celebrate services according to the New Calendar and to intimidate those Christians who followed the Old Calendar. Within the year, however, at the end of the Feast Day of the Church according to the New Calendar, while crossing the small bridge over the river in his village, papa-Giannes slipped and fell into the river, where, unfortunately, he drowned. [10]

Another event occurred on the Feast of the Prophet Elias according to the Old Calendar (July 20,1925). [11] Evangelos Makres, from the village of Aetos, Karystos (Evboia), did not go to the Church (of the Holy Martyrs Timothy and Maura) to which his wife, who followed the Old Calendar, went by herself, but took his son and his mules and they went to bring wood from the hillside in Kastanies, Oche. His wife had told him that they should not go for wood that day, since it was the Feast of the Prophet Elias, but he did not listen to her.

They chopped the wood and made ready at midday to load up the mules, so that they could return to their village. At that moment, they saw before them an Elder with a white beard and a most radiant and sweet countenance, who said to them: “What are you doing there, my lads?” “We’ve been chopping wood, Elder, and we’re preparing to load up so that we can leave,” answered the elder Makres. “But do people work on a day like this?” asked the Elder. “And what day is it today, Elder?” “Today, my lads, is the Feast of the Prophet Elias,” the Elder replied, and he immediately vanished from their sight, just as he had appeared.

They then realized, both father and son, that this Elder was the Prophet Elias and, trembling with fear, they put aside the wood, knelt, crossed themselves, and returned to their village. There, they related to everyone what they had seen and heard that day at Oche. Thenceforth, die elder Makres and his son followed the Old Calendar, as did the majority of their fellow villagers.

The next event is noteworthy, because it involves an appearance of the Lord Himself. On Sunday, June 27, 1935, our Lord Jesus Christ appeared to a virtuous fifteen-year-old goatherd, Evangelos Anastasiou Tzitzoudes, in the village of Amorion, Didymoteichon, on the River Hebros. [12] During this appearance, the Lord expressed distress over our behavior: people’s denial of Him, our doing away with the Wednesday and Friday fasts and the lenten periods, our failure to keep Sundays and Feast Days as days of rest, and our non-attendance at Church.

He spoke also about the language of the Divine services and that of the Holy Gospel, saying that it should be katharevousa [puristic Greek] and should not be translated into the very impoverished Modem Greek language. The Lord especially stressed the issue of the calendar and said that the faithful should return to the Old Calendar, which He, the Lord, had Himself appointed, since it was by this calendar alone that the Feasts of the Saints, the Apostles, and the Prophets were to be celebrated. “On the days on which you should be celebrating, you work,” He complained. As He said these things about the calendar, the Lord was deeply distressed and wept. He stated repeatedly that it was necessary for us to repent and to take His way and forsake the way of the Devil.

Yet another noteworthy event occurred to the holy Elder Father Ioannes (1899-1966), Abbot of the Holy Monastery of St. Demetrios in Amphiale, Piraeus. [13] During a period of bitter persecutions against true Orthodoxy there was a shortage of Churches for the traditionalist Orthodox, owing to the occupation of the existing Churches by the innovating New Calendarists. For this reason, Father Ioannes [the more formal Greek for “Giannes,” or “John”] restored and refurbished the ruins of an ancient monastery, that of the aforementioned St. Demetrios in Amphiale, Piraeus, and later founded a new monastery, dedicated to the Holy Trinity, in Nea Pentele, north of Athens.

On one occasion, while he was at prayer in the Church, Father Ioannes had a unique vision: Christ showed him an immense plain, where black and white sheep were grazing. Father Ioannes asked the Lord in astonishment: “Why are half of the sheep white and half of them black, and not goats?” He then heard a most harmonious voice saying: “The white ones are all those who uphold the holy dogmas and the holy traditions, and the black ones are those who have violated both dogmas and traditions.” In addition, in another vision of Christ, the Lord told Father Ioannes to receive New Calendarists for Confession. In fact, when New Calendarists approached him for this purpose, they realized their error and returned to the Old Calendar. These revelations of Father Ioannes confirmed that the Old Calendarists (the white sheep) are those who are absolutely correct in their Orthodox Faith.

Epilogue. At various times, on days when Feasts were celebrated according to the Old Calendar, very many miracles and appearances of Saints, the Honorable Cross, Holy Light, a Holy Cloud, and of our Lord Jesus Christ Himself have been noted and recorded, and these all confirm the necessity of returning to the Julian Calendar ordained by the First (Ecumenical Synod, which determines the Feasts of our Holy Orthodox Faith and preserves our Holy Tradition. Nonetheless, numerous innovators, schismatics, ecumenists, and individuals with other purposes, but primarily people who are ignorant of the truth and of the commandments and Canons of the Orthodox Church, follow the New, Gregorian (Papal) Calendar. In essence, these poor folk celebrate on their own, there being no Feasts on those days on which they celebrate, and they sin in working on the days of the actual Feasts and in not honoring them.

The aforementioned miracles in Myloi and in Aetos, the miracle in Amorion involving the appearance of our Lord God Himself, and also the two visions of Elder Ioannes in Amphiale confirm the error of our apostate “spiritual” leaders and of the division that they have created within Orthodoxy, which division the Lord permits by reason of our sins. We need great repentance, unceasing prayer, and humility, and we need to return to the House of the Father (the Old Calendar), so that the Most Compassionate Lord might have mercy on us and forgive our innumerable sins, which have turned Greece, Orthodox countries in general, and the entire planet into a Golgotha. [14] Our individual and collective sin has led us to the loss of Divine Grace, and there is a danger of our being abandoned by the Lord, Who abides with us only on account of the constant entreaties of His and our Mother, the Most Holy Theotokos. I pray and hope for our repentance and for the return of those in error to traditional Orthodoxy, to the end that the abiding Grace of our Lord might be with all of us to the end of our days.

[Translated from the original Greek text by Archimandrite Patapios.]

 

NOTES

1. The Julian Calendar is ascribed to Julius Caesar and was devised by the Greek astronomer Sosigenes (46 B.C.).

2. The New Calendar was proposed by Aloysius Lilius and decreed by Pope Gregory ΧΠΙ on February 24,1582. In a letter, the Pope called on Patriarch Jeremias II (Tranos) to introduce the New Calendar into Orthodoxy, but he refused. A great many supernatural events took place in Italy during this period, demonstrating the erroneous decision of the Pope to impose the New Calendar.

3. The Patriarchs during this period were: Meletios IV (Metaxakes) (1922- 1923), Gregory VII (1923), and Constantine VI (1924-1925). See Archimandrite Basileios Stephanides, Εκκλησιαστική Ιστορία [Church history], 5th ed. (Athens: Ekdotikos Oikos “Aster,” 1990), p. 799.

4. Chrysostomos I (Papadopoulos) (1923-1938).

5. The anti-Christian Liberal Party of Eleutherios Venizelos and the pro-Venizelos officials under the leadership of Plasteras and Gonatas contributed to the imposition of the New Calendar. The governments in this dramatic period were those of Stylianos Gonatas (November 27,1922-January 11, 1924), Eleutherios Venizelos (January 11,1924-February 6,1924), Georgios Kaphantares (February 6,1924-March 12,1924), and Alexandras Papanastasiou (March 12, 1924-July 25, 1924).

6. This Encyclical, numbered 430, of March 1,1924, was published in Εκκλησία [the official publication of the Church of Greece—trans.] on March 8,1924.

7. See Βοανεργές, Vol. XII, No. 69 (September-October 2013), pp. 33-35. Papoulakos passed through the villages of Kavontoro, Evboia, and there are many accounts by grandfathers and grandmothers to this day concerning his admonitions and prophecies. He “embarked” by sea at the village of Evangelismos on an overcoat that he had, and sailed thereon to Andros. A villager who wanted to follow him as his disciple was afraid of getting onto this “boat” (the overcoat) and remained in Evangelismos (according to accounts by the sainted Maria N. Kallianiotou).

[“Papoulakos” was the monk Christophoros (Christos Panagiotopoulos, in the world). In the mid-1800s, Father Christophoros was active in the formation of modem Greece and the reestablishment of the Orthodox cultural heritage of the country after centuries of enslavement under the Turkish Yoke. He became a monk late in life, but his exploits, when combined with those attributed to him in what are in some cases feats exaggerated by myths taken from his nonetheless extraordinary and miraculous deeds, are numberless, rich in moral lessons, and greatly inspiring—trans.]

8. This small Church of St. Paraskeve is located on the property of its owners, the family of the sainted Antonios Kallianiotis.

9. One of my brothers went to Athens some years ago, and one Sunday morning he attended services at the New Calendar Church near the house in which he was staying. At the end of the Six Psalms, a Hieromonk of majestic appearance, wearing an epanokalymmavcho [the veil covering a monastic kalymmavchion] and with a long black beard, emerged from the Altar, approached him, and said to him: “I am leaving and going to another Church, since I am not at peace here.” The man was so baffled that he said not a word to that unexpected Hieromonk.

10. Similar evil incidents befell the civil persecutors of die Old Calendarists and the persecutors from the gendarmerie of Kavontoro, as I was told by a certain elder, Panagiotes Boubalos.

11. See Βοανεργές, Vol. XII, No. 69 (September-October 2013), pp. 35-37.

12. See “Θεία Έμφάνισις σ’ ένα Τσοπανόπαιδο τοΰ Άμορίου” [A Divine appearance to a shepherd boy from Amorion], Holy Hesychasterion of the Transfiguration of the Savior, Avlonarion, Evboia (undated).

13. See Hieromonk Akakios,'Άγιος Ιωάννης Αμφυάλης Πειραιώς: Ό Γέρων τής Αγάπης καϊ Πατήρ των Πτωχών [St. John of Amphiale, Piraeus: The Elder of love and father of the poor] (Avlonarion, Evboia: Hieron Hesychasterion Metamorphoseos tou Soteros, 2012). See also John N. Kallianiotis, ‘“Άγιοι Γέροντες τής Παραδοσιακής ’Ορθοδοξίας: 'Άγιος ’Ιωάννης τής ’Αμφιάλης” [Holy Elders of Traditional Orthodoxy: St. John of Amphiale], http://antioikoumenistes.blogspot.com/2013/12/blogposthtml; idem, ‘Ό Γέροντας Πατήρ ’Ιωάννης ’Αμφιάλης Πειραιώς” [The Elder Father John of Amphiale, Piraeus], Άγιος Αγαθάγγελος Έσφιγμενίτης, Vol. XLIII, No. 255 (January-February 2013), pp. 24-28; idem, “Ό 'Άγιος Γέρων ’Ιωάννης τής ’Αμφιάλης” [The Holy Elder Ioannes of Amphiale], http://christianvivliografia.wordpress.com/2012/ ΙΟ/31/όάγ-γέρων-ίωάννης-τής-άμφιάλης.

14. The catastrophe of Asia Minor and the current crisis in all sectors in Greece are the result of our abandonment by the Lord, on account of our apostasy of nearly a century. Consequently, the repentance of three or more generations will be needed.

 

Source: Orthodox Tradition, Vol. XXXI (2014), No. 3, pp. 19-25.

2002: Old Calendarist Archbishop of Athens Chysostomos: “The Restoration of True Orthodoxy Must Take Place at a Pan-Orthodox Council”

[Blog Admin. note: Translated to emphasize differences of understanding, which unfortunately continue to exist in the Church of the G.O.C. of Greece.]

 

Archbishop Chrysostomos (Kiousis) of Athens is the head of the largest Synod of the True Orthodox (Old Calendarist) Church of Greece, which did not recognize the official Orthodox Church of Greece’s adoption of the new calendar in 1924. In an interview with our portal, the head of this branch of the True Orthodox Church of Greece speaks about the present situation and the positions of the Church under his leadership. Interview posted on July 8, 2002.

 

 

Please tell us about the present situation of your Church: how many dioceses, monasteries, and metochia do you have, and in which countries?

You can find the statistical information you are asking about in the annual calendar published by our Holy Synod. Speaking in general terms, I can tell you that our Holy Synod comprises 10 hierarchs in Greece and two in America. Our Synod includes approximately 180 parishes and 85 monasteries, served by about 145 clergy in Greece and abroad. Outside Greece, we have a presence in North America and in several European countries. We do not have enough clergy to meet the needs of our flock, and many of them serve several parishes.

Do you have contacts with other True Orthodox Churches?

We conducted a dialogue with the Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia. After the schism that occurred within it, there has been no progress, and we remain in a state of waiting until the situation becomes clearer. The dialogue with the Matthewites was interrupted because of their internal problems.

What distinguishes you from the other True Orthodox Churches of Greece? Could you explain the reasons for your recent separation from the Synod of Metropolitan Kallinikos [of Lamia]?

Two Local Churches cannot exist within the same canonical territory [χώρο]. We represent the Church of the True Orthodox Christians of Greece, from which the Matthewites, the Auxentites, the Cyprianites, and those who are with Kallinikos Chaniotis broke away.

With the Matthewites, we have no substantial difference in our understanding of matters of faith. [Emphasis added.] There is—in my opinion—only a difference in mentality. We regard them with sympathy, but the problem is that they do not do the same, and there is a great deal of fanaticism among them. After the divisions that have occurred among them, I think that they have grown weaker and that they have no future.

With the Cyprianites, we have a different understanding of ecclesiology. We reject the concept of a “Mother Church,” which Cyprian and his associates see in the New Calendarist Church [as did St. Chrysostomos the New Confessor – Blog Admin. note]. The Cyprianites have not experienced any significant growth in Greece. For the most part, they are New Calendarists. It is true, however, that they have good “PR,” an area in which we lag behind them.

The Auxentites in Greece have split among themselves, and what remains of them is disappearing.

As for those with Kallinikos Chaniotis of Lamia, that is a different case. They broke away from our Church in 1995 without any dogmatic dispute. In their statement, the six hierarchs of that time pointed to two issues: the procedure by which the former Euthymios of Thessaloniki was condemned for canonical offenses, and the reconsideration of the case of Paisios and Vikentios, who had renounced our Church by going over to the Patriarchate of Jerusalem, but later returned under pressure. This was the cause of the division in 1995, and the Synod deposed them. God, however, condemned the apostates through their eventual disintegration. Two of them, Metropolitan Stephanos of Chios and Ioustinos of Euripos, repented, returned, and were received back into the Church; they were subsequently restored and are now members of our Holy Synod. The other two, Paisios and Vikentios, betrayed their confession and went over to the Patriarch of Constantinople; after going there, they were even reordained. And this is a sign of condemnation and abandonment by God.

The two aforementioned men—Kallinikos Chaniotis and Euthymios Orphanos—proceeded with ordinations and formed an anti-synod and an anti-church. They gathered around themselves all the disreputable clergy in order to give the appearance of some supposed strength. In reality, they have only small groups of supporters, and for that reason, in their calendar they list our own parishes and monasteries in order to conceal their weakness.

As for what you call “reunion,” we see the matter differently. Our Church is not divided, and anyone who has fled from under her shelter may return with repentance. The door of repentance always remains open.

What is your opinion of the present condition of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia (ROCOR) and the Russian Orthodox Autonomous Church (ROAC)? Do you believe that there are True Orthodox Christians in Russia?

We proceed from the understanding that, after the establishment of Communism in Russia, True Orthodoxy in that country was represented by the Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia abroad and by the Catacomb Church within Russia. Over the past fifteen years, however, the situation has become very confused, and there is a great deal of disorder. Here in Greece, we have so many problems awaiting resolution that we have not devoted sufficient attention to studying the state of affairs on Russian territory. Therefore, we cannot give a categorical answer to your question. What we are certain of is that, in Greece, True Orthodoxy is represented by our Church. Beyond that, we cannot say anything further.

The Churches of “World Orthodoxy” are now withdrawing from the ecumenical movement [sic]. Some Churches have already withdrawn from the World Council of Churches (WCC). The Russian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate is also preparing to take such a step. Does this allow us to say that “World Orthodoxy” is gradually breaking with its ecumenical errors and slowly purifying itself?

Your question is hypothetical. We have no grounds for such optimism. If they were all to return to True Orthodoxy, it would be a great joy for us. As for the process of self-purification of which you speak, our view is as follows: if the official Orthodox Churches were to return to True Orthodoxy, their canonical restoration could take place at a Pan-Orthodox Council [emphasis added], which would vindicate the confessors of the Faith and in which, as far as possible, the entire pleroma of Orthodox bishops steadfast in the Traditions would participate, together with the repentant hierarchs, who, in the presence of the Orthodox bishops, would offer repentance in the same manner as the Iconoclasts at the Seventh Ecumenical Council.

In your opinion, how possible is a rupture between the Moscow and Ecumenical Patriarchates? Would this be beneficial for Orthodoxy?

This question too is hypothetical. If the schism were to occur for reasons of faith—that is, because of a return to True Orthodoxy and a renunciation of ecumenism—then, of course, it would be beneficial for Orthodoxy. However, we see nothing of the kind on the horizon.

The present head of the Greek New Calendarists, Archbishop Christodoulos [+2008], is known as a “conservative.” Does this not increase the popularity of the New Calendarists in Greece and lead to a decline in the number of Old Calendarists?

Your information is likely inaccurate. Christodoulos is not regarded as a “conservative” even among the New Calendarists. On the contrary, he is considered a “modernist,” because he wishes to introduce liturgical innovations and recognized the Pope as the Bishop of Rome by receiving him in Athens. Conservative New Calendarists subject him to considerable criticism, especially two university professors who are also clergymen—Fr. George Metallinos and Fr. Theodore Zisis.

We do not know of a single Old Calendarist who has become a New Calendarist under the influence of Mr. Christodoulos. If anything, the opposite is true.

What do you think about the process of Greece’s integration into the European Union? What spiritual dangers does this process pose for True Orthodox Christians?

The danger of secularization always threatens us, both outside and within the European Union. Our efforts are directed toward strengthening a sound Orthodox mindset among the faithful. When believers have been inoculated with the spiritual antibodies of True Orthodoxy, then they are living members of the Church, and they are able to withstand any spiritually harmful environment. No one can harm our soul unless we ourselves betray it. Therefore, spiritual vigilance is necessary.

 

Russian source:

 https://web.archive.org/web/20120614121018/http://portal-credo.ru/site/print.php?act=rating&id=7

Beyond Saving: On the Loss of Substance within the Church

Hubert Windisch

[Blog Admin. note: This article pertains to the Papal Church in Germany, but the symptoms of their contagion clearly parallel what has infected the Orthodox Church today.]

 

 

Inconsistency exists when something is inherently no longer right, i.e., when the outside and the inside no longer match, when words and actions diverge, and when claims and reality contradict one another. This can be the case with individual persons, groups or political parties, major organizations such as the churches, or it can affect an entire commonwealth—that is, a state.

Let us look, for example, at the designation “RC” [Roman Catholic] of the Church. This designation claims an identity that is often no longer present in reality. This is illustrated by just three examples:

1) In the Diocese of Hamburg, parents are up in arms because their children are now expected to consume non-Christian material (LGBT, etc.) in sex education classes at Catholic schools. They turn to Rome. Rome admonishes the diocesan school authority in a response dated July 6, 2026, to the critical parent network, pointing to Catholic doctrine and the Christian image of man as found in the 2019 guidelines “Male and Female He Created Them.” The new sex education curriculum is mandated anyway. Rome remains silent. Contempt for parents, abuse of children!

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

2) In the Diocese of Mainz, the bishop notes the new letter from the Roman Dicastery for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments dated June 17, 2026, banning lay preaching during the celebration of the Eucharist, and even considers it correct, but chooses not to intervene against the now widespread practice of lay preaching. Misplaced tolerance as a pastoral method.

3) The cardinal of Munich issues a guide for the liturgical blessing of irregular, and thus also homosexual, relationships, even though not even the sophisticated Roman document Fiducia Supplicans permits this in this explicit manner. Rome remains silent and tolerates it. Anything goes.

The loss of substance within the Church due to inconsistency is enormous. We can watch the erosion of the “institution of grace” (Michael Ebertz) in fast motion. “RC” is rapidly becoming “DC,” i.e., differently Catholic, as the former chairman of the German Bishops’ Conference, Georg Bätzing, once boasted with regard to the Synodal Path. However, this very quickly turns into an “NC,” a no-longer-Catholic. This development hurts all the men who want to be or become priests in an honestly Catholic way; the faithful who want to experience a dignified celebration of the Eucharist with an authentic sermon on Sunday and who try to shape their daily lives through prayer and the sacramental life. For all of them, the Church is often no longer a home, but an externally still-functioning hollow space in which they freeze and starve spiritually.

The background and driving force for this loss of substance is, to put it metaphorically, a Church that has been moved from solid rock onto quicksand, primarily due to the so-called Bergoglian magisterium with its decisions prone to heresy and indeed apostasy (e.g., Abu Dhabi, Pachamama, Singapore, Amoris laetitia, Fiducia supplicans, among others, cf. Gavin Ashenden, The Quicksand Under the Cathedral). Everything is now called a (pastoral) process; truth is synodal, the journey is the destination. But if the journey is the destination, the journey no longer has a destination. That is the inconsistency of relativism. In reality, the so-called Synodal Path in the Church of Germany is nothing other than an attempt to institutionalize this inconsistency. And Rome is rushing to keep up on a global church scale

From a socio-religious perspective, a Church presenting herself in this manner is beyond saving. This is because the internal events described will create a substantial negative pressure inside the structure of the Church. At a certain point it will rupture the outer shell, and the system will implode. The Church herself, however, will not perish. In oases and on islands of contemporary history, and increasingly in catacombs, a (holy!) remnant of the faithful will gather, celebrating worship reverently with a few priests—whether in the Vetus or the Novus Ordo—having the Word and Sacrament as nourishment for their lives, and hearing anew the word of the Crucified and Risen One: “Be sure of this: I am with you always, even to the end of the world” (Mt 28:20).

 

 

Source: https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/theologian-laments-how-anything-goes-in-the-church-now/

 

The Divine Appearance of the Honoured Cross


 

Introduction

The first appearance of the honored Cross occurred in the year 312, in October, during the time of St. Constantine the Great. It appeared in the sky at noontime and was composed of radiant stars, with the words, “By This, Conquer”. Thus, by this first manifestation, the honored Cross became the labarum, the standard, of the first Christian empire, which served the purpose of proclaiming and conveying our Orthodox Christian faith and piety throughout the known world.

The second majestic appearance of the Cross took place during the reign of Emperor Constantius, the son of St. Constantine the Great, in the holy city of Jerusalem on May 7th, 351, the day of Pentecost, when St. Cyril was bishop of Jerusalem. The honored Cross was comprised entirely of a certain divine light visible to everyone for a week, and in magnitude it stretched from Golgotha and the Church of the Resurrection all the way to the Mount of Olives.

In this pamphlet, we have eye-witness descriptions of the third appearance of the Cross. These descriptions are provided by individuals still living in 1975, when the first edition of this pamphlet appeared in Greek.

In the early 1900s and especially in the 1920s, there were strong anti-Church and secularist forces in power in Greece and in the Ecumenical Patriarchate. These forces introduced the Gregorian calendar. The Gregorian calendar is adequate for the functions of business, the stock exchange, and other worldly, secular activities. Liturgically, however, it is in no way possible to reconcile the Gregorian calendar with our canonical, Orthodox Christian Paschalion. Moreover, the introduction of a Church calendar change by a local church created an unacceptable liturgical disunity within the Church Itself.

Vast numbers of the people of Greece refused to accept these anti-canonical, anti-Church changes being forced upon them by state police power. Such people suffered persecution, imprisonment, and deprivation at the hands of secular police powers. But the spiritual eyes of true Orthodox Christians saw clearly even if, at the time, they did not completely comprehend the evil of the new calendar. It was a forerunner and a sign of the greatest heresy in the history of the world—Ecumenism. Many people, however, became confused. Some began to waver. Just as the Arians were in control of the worldly power in 351 and were able to force their heresy upon the empire, so at this time, the calendar innovators controlled the worldly power of Greece. In such a troubled and dangerous time, the All-Merciful God heeded the needs of His people. Again, as in 351, God sent a wondrous apparition of the sign of the All-Honourable Cross to seal the truth and put the false teachers to shame.

The appearance of the Cross took place in this manner:

In 1925, on the eve of the feast of the Exaltation of the All-Honourable and Life-giving Cross of Our Saviour, September 14 according to the Orthodox Church calendar (September 27, new style), the all-night vigil was served at the Church of St. John the Theologian in suburban Athens. By nine o’clock that evening, more than two thousand of the Orthodox faithful had gathered in and around the church for the service, since very few true-Orthodox churches had been accidentally left open by the civil authorities. Such a large gathering of people could not, however, go unnoticed by the authorities. Around eleven P.M. the authorities dispatched a platoon of police to the church “to prevent any disorders which might arise from such a large gathering.” The gathering was too large for the police to take any direct action or to arrest the priest at that time and so they joined the crowd of worshippers in the already over-flowing courtyard of the church.

Then, regardless of the true motives for their presence, against their own will, but according to the Will which exceeds all human power, they became participants in the miraculous experience of the crowd of believers.

At 11:30 P.M., there began to appear in the heavens above the church, in the direction of northeast, a bright, radiant Cross of light. The light not only illuminated the church and the faithful but, in its rays, the stars of the clear, cloudless sky became dim and the church-yard was filled with an almost tangible light. The form of the Cross itself was an especially dense light and it could be clearly seen as a Byzantine cross with a crossbar toward the bottom. This heavenly miracle lasted for half an hour, until midnight, and then the Cross began slowly to rise up vertically, as the cross in the hands of the priest does in the ceremony of the Elevation of the Cross in church. Having come straight up, the Cross began gradually to fade away.

Human language is not adequate to convey what took place during the apparition. The entire crowd fell prostrate upon the ground with tears and began to sing prayers, praising the Lord with one heart and one mouth. The police were among those who wept, suddenly discovering, in the depths of their hearts, a child-like faith. The crowd of believers and the platoon of police were transformed into one, unified flock of faithful. All were seized with a holy ecstasy. The vigil continued until 4:00 A.M., when all this human torrent streamed back into the city, carrying the news of the miracle because of which they were still trembling and weeping.

Many of the unbelievers, sophists, and innovators, realizing their sin and guilt, but unwilling to repent, tried by every means to explain away or deny this miracle. The fact that the form of the cross had been so sharply and clearly that of the Byzantine Cross, with a crossbar at the bottom for a foot-rest, completely negated any arguments of accidental physical phenomena.

The fact that such an apparition of the Cross had also occurred during the height of the first great heresy must impress the Orthodox with the importance of the calendar question and of all that is connected with it. No sensible person can discuss this issue lightly, with secular reasoning or with worldly arguments. Innovators, like the Arians in 351, are left without extenuation or mitigation.

By this third appearance, our Lord and Saviour has confirmed from on high that we are to remain faithful to the heritage we have received from our Holy Fathers, and which was codified by the First Ecumenical Council and sealed by almost two thousand years of usage by the subsequent Ecumenical, Local and Pan-Orthodox Councils of our Church.

We pray from the depths of our hearts that the honored Cross may enlighten the souls of all mankind and lead them from error to the fulness of the faith in Jesus Christ, our Lord and Saviour, so that not only all Orthodox Christians, but all peoples in every land may, “with one mouth and with one heart,” glorify the all-venerable and majestic name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. Amen.

* * *

THE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER

— Synaxarion —

On the 14th of this month, we observe the feast of the honored and Life-giving Cross, whose Universal Exaltation we celebrate, and whose Appearance over Athens in the year 1925 we commemorate.

Verses:

A new appearance of the Cross of light, O Saviour,
Putteth to shame them who would mingle light with darkness.

On the evening of September 13th, 1925, a large gathering of traditional Orthodox Christians were celebrating a vigil service in honor of the feast of the universal Exaltation of the honored and life-giving Cross of our Lord Jesus Christ. This vigil was held at the small country chapel of St. John the Theologian at the foot of Mount Hymettus near Holargos, a suburb of Athens.

It was about 11:30 in the evening when, above the holy temple and in a direction pointing from the East to the West, a luminous white Cross appeared in the sky. Its brilliance outshone that of the stars on that cloudless night and its light shone only on the church building, the court surrounding the Church and the multitude that had gathered there. The horizontal line of this heavenly Cross inclined toward the right, and there was a smaller second horizontal line lower down on the Cross. Some two thousand people saw this marvelous phenomenon for over half an hour, after which it began to fade little by little. Overwhelmed with sacred emotion, all those present fell to their knees and wept, chanting praises and glorifying God “with one heart and one mind”.

The vigil continued in an atmosphere of unspeakable contrition and finished at about 4:00 in the morning, at which time the entire throng of the faithful returned to the city, speaking of nothing else except that nocturnal manifestation of God’s grace.

This marvel, confirmed and proclaimed by the very police force that had been sent to the site by the new calendar authorities to arrest the priest and disperse the faithful, was a divine confirmation of the noble, lawful and sacred struggle of the traditional Orthodox Christians for the sake of the beliefs and the Holy Traditions of our Orthodox Catholic Faith.

* * *

“I TOO WAS THERE”

Eyewitness Accounts of the Appearance of the Cross
Over the Church of St. John the Theologian
at Mount Hymettus, September 14th, 1925


Since the country chapel of St. John the Theologian was at that time very distant from Athens, our “Association of the Orthodox” used it as our “Metropolitan See”. There, we would gather every Sunday and on the Great Feasts according to the traditional Church calendar and hold our vigils. The first priests who refused to follow the innovators and to serve our pastoral needs were the ever-memorable Father Parthenios of Iveron monastery [on the Holy Mountain, Athos] and Father John Floros.

On that night when the Honored Cross appeared, I was at the Holy Mountain for a certain matter pertaining to our sacred struggle, and, to be specific, I was attending the vigil for the Exaltation of the Honored Cross at the Sacred Monastery of Xeropotamou, which itself celebrates that particular feast day. During the time of the Liti, when a portion of the precious Wood of the Cross is brought forth so that all may venerate It, I knelt and with many tears prayed with these words: “O Cross of Christ, protect our brethren from the persecutions of the innovators, especially tonight when our faithful are keeping vigil at the chapel of Saint John the Theologian.” After a few days, when I was at the Sacred Skete of Saint Anne, I learned of the great miracle of the appearance of the honored Cross.

ANDREW VAPORIDES
Member of the Administrative
Committee of the Association of the Orthodox

* * *

I was one of the men from the Police Institute who were sent to stop the vigil that night, some fifty years ago, at the country church of St. John the Theologian.

The Old Calendarists were keeping vigil there, because it was the eve of the feast of the Exaltation of the Precious Cross.

Since many people had gathered—more than two thousand individuals—we did not attempt to seize the priest as we had been ordered, but we sat down quietly in the nearby court and waited for them to finish.

At about 11:30 at night, we heard a loud and strange uproar coming from the shouts of the multitude. Without any delay, we ran to see what was happening—and we saw. The whole multitude of the faithful was in a state of excitement. Some were weeping and others, crying out “Lord, have mercy,” were kneeling and had turned their eyes toward heaven, and yet others were fainting, overwhelmed with great emotion. Then we too looked and beheld the marvel: an enormous radiant Cross, very high above the church, was illumining the whole area. At first, we were seized with fear, but immediately we came to ourselves, and forgetting the purpose for which we had been sent, we fell to our knees and wept like little children.

Of course, it is superfluous for me to tell you that, filled with emotion, we attended the rest of the vigil to the end—no longer as persecutors, but as faithful Christians. In the morning when we returned to the Institute, we told everyone about the great marvel which we had been deemed worthy to see. Afterwards there was an investigation and all of us swore under oath that we had seen the Precious Cross clearly, high in the sky.

JOHN D. GLYMIS
Retired Police Officer
78 Aristotle Street
Peristeri [a suburb of Athens]

* * *

We went to celebrate the vigil for the feast of the honored Cross in 1925. Because of the persecutions, we used to have our vigils in remote country chapels. At night, the police arrived, led by a lieutenant, in order to arrest the priest. At 11:30 p.m. I was outside with most of the people. Then the Cross appeared with a great deal of light! Everyone knelt and prayed. The police saw the miracle and, from enemies they turned into friends and they joined the congregation! The appearance of the honored Cross lasted well over a quarter of an hour.

ALEXANDER CONTOS
64 Macedonia St.
Tsakós St. Paraskeve

* * *

On that night in 1925 when the Precious Cross appeared, I was making the last run with the tram which I was operating. I had reached Omonoia Square [in downtown Athens], and was going around the square when I saw everyone looking up toward heaven and crying, “Look!—the Cross!—the Cross!” Immediately I stepped on the brakes and stopped the vehicle. I stuck my head out the tram’s door and I, the unworthy one, also saw the Precious Cross of Our Lord—may His Name be glorified; it was shining over Mount Hymettus. I don’t remember how long this lasted. I know only one thing—the Precious Cross which I saw that night turned me into a different man. Since then, everyone in my family has become a faithful child of the Church of the True Orthodox Christians.

ATHANASIOS PRIMALIS
Retired Tram Conductor
17 Kavales Street
Nicaea [a suburb of Athens]

* * *

I was 18 years old then. Together with my mother of blessed memory, I went that night to keep vigil at the chapel of St. John the Theologian near Hymettus. We had prepared to receive Holy Communion. Around 11:30, when, if I remember correctly, the service of Great Vespers for the Exaltation of the Cross was being chanted, a divine appearance of the honored Cross occurred in the sky. Its light was so strong, the entire area was illumined. We all knelt in prayer and could not be satiated in looking upon that divine Gift. What made an equally great impression on me was a blind man who was kneeling beside me and had his closed eyes turned toward heaven; in a voice broken with sobs he was crying out: “Lord, have mercy.”

ELIAS ANGELOPOULOS
78 Adrianopolis St.
Analepis, Pancrati (Athens)

* * *

Others still living when this pamphlet was first published: Euthymia nun, abbess of the Sacred Convent of the Dormition of the Theotokos on Mount Parnitha; George Tzimopoulos, 7 Makrivianni St., Athens; Stamatina Zavalis, Stratigos Liossi St., Ano Liossia, Athens; George Kottis, 35 Photios Konytsas St., Piraeus; John Davaris, Paiania.

* * *

THE PRESS — BOOKS

In conclusion, we include excerpts from the daily press of that time, as well as from books published over the years regarding this awesome miracle of the appearance of the honoured Cross.

 

A photograph of the first page of the Athens daily “Script” for September 28th, 1925 n.s. (Note: by the Gregorian calendar, the feast day of the Cross falls on September 27). The text of the headlines reads as follows:

THEY WHO CELEBRATED THE FEAST
OF THE HONORED CROSS
ACCORDING TO THE OLD CALENDAR
[BECAME] WITNESSES OF A TRUE MIRACLE
— THE SUBSEQUENT COMPUNCTIONATE SCENES —

* * *

“Aside from this, however, we think that the appearance of the Heavenly Cross on the day on which the traditional Church calendar celebrates the Exaltation of the Honored Cross constitutes yet another notable divine confirmation of the correctness of the convictions of those who follow this calendar. Furthermore, it offers the leaders of the Church today [i.e. the new calendar bishops] a helping hand from Heaven, so that they may review their uncanonical decision to introduce unilaterally the new calendar into our Church, [thereby] tearing it away [literally, “schisming it”] from the great Body of Orthodoxy” (GOADS, Athens, 1925, Arsenios Kotteas, monk of the Holy Mountain Athos, p. 67).

* * *

“Two thousand people on their knees and weeping, witnessed this exceptional phenomenon of the grace of God for over half an hour, because the honored Cross hovered directly over the church! The police themselves saw the miracle and were awestruck by the event; they left their weapons aside and joined the faithful to offer glory and supplications to the Lord of Glory! The Archbishop (Chrysostom Papadopoulos) alone, after a few days, in his evil convictions, expressed doubt as to what had happened, thereby imitating in this way Annas and Caiaphas, the Jewish high priests who crucified the Lord; for when they were notified by the Roman authorities of the miracle of our Lord’s resurrection from the dead, they sought to hide the truth from the people. . .” (A Censure of Apostasy, Athens, 1933, by Fathers of the Holy Mountain, pp. 273-4).

* * *

“During one such gathering of the Christians at the sacred temple of Saint John the Theologian near Mount Hymettus, a vigil for the feast of the Exaltation of the Honored Cross was being celebrated with the ever-memorable priest John Floros, a clergyman fervent and zealous for the things of Holy Tradition; at that feast celebrated according to the traditional Church calendar, the sign of the honored Cross appeared in the sky, as it had once appeared to St. Constantine the Great, the Equal to the Apostles” (The Agony in the Garden of Gethsemane, Athens, 1961, by Stavros Karametsos-Gabroulia, p. 63).

* * *

“The great Miracle of September 14th, 1925 will never be forgotten! . . . we offer a description of this miracle to our beloved readers, so that our young people may learn, and so that our adults may never forget, the mighty and marvelous deeds of our Faith” (Orthodox Observer, September-October, 1962).

* * *

“A fiery and brilliant Cross in Heaven shone down and encompassed the holy temple, shining with the intensity of the light of the day. This divine sign of the honored Cross filled the frenzied persecutors with terror and withheld their hands. But it also filled the multitudes of the faithful with gladness and rejoicing as they fell to their knees in tears, praising, thanking and glorifying this sublime act of the Lord. This miracle manifestly demonstrated God’s approval, for the purpose of strengthening our invincible faith” (The Life and Works of Archbishop Matthew, 1861-1950, Athens, 1963, p. 88).

* * *

“We mention this event as a third miracle which confirmed the truth of the Orthodoxy of our Fathers, by the appearance of the honored Cross above the small chapel of St. John the Theologian in the sky, at the foot of Mount Hymettus, during the vigil of the Exaltation of the Honored Cross, September 14th, 1925. More than two thousand people were present at this vigil, together with that singular and ever-memorable priest, Father John [Floros]. The Minister of the Interior at that time was General George Kondylis, who on learning of the assembly of such a great multitude, sent a platoon of police led by a lieutenant to arrest the priest and disperse the throngs of the faithful. It was almost midnight and the Liti of the feast was being chanted, when the sign of the honored Cross appeared over the faithful, shining brilliantly. Overwhelmed with emotion, the entire assembly knelt weeping. The church service stopped, and everyone cried out, ‘Lord, have mercy,’ the police threw down their weapons and cried, ‘We too are Christians!’ The officer in charge submitted a deposition to the Ministry of the Interior, and the widely-read newspaper ‘Hellenic’ published an extensive account about the miracle.” (The Calendar Schism, Athens, 1975, by Mark Haniotes, monk, p. 214).

 

Most of the material presented here was taken from the Greek-language periodical, Ta Patria, published in Piraeus, Greece, in 1975. Translated by the Holy Orthodox Church in North America, 2005.

Old Calendar Bulgarian Church “liquidation” halted

ANNOUNCEMENT FROM THE CHANCERY OF THE HIERARCHICAL SYNOD OF THE BULGARIAN ORTHODOX OLD CALENDAR CHURCH

October 2, 2026

 

 

Beloved brothers and sisters in the Lord!

By a decision of October 1, 2026, the Supreme Court of Cassation (SCC) set aside the decision of the lower court ordering the commencement of liquidation proceedings and the deregistration of the legal entity representing the Old Calendar Orthodox Church of Bulgaria, and remanded the case for a new hearing.

The Court rejects the view that the termination of this legal entity occurred automatically by operation of the amendments to the Religious Denominations Act of January 2025, and holds that this issue must be resolved in adversarial judicial proceedings.

In its reasoning, the Supreme Court of Cassation emphasizes the importance of freedom of religion. According to the Court, the termination of the religious institution would affect both its rights as a legal entity and the constitutionally guaranteed individual right to freedom of religion of each of its members, which also includes the right freely to associate on a religious basis through the registration of a religious community.

It should be noted that the decision of the Supreme Court of Cassation does not dismiss the claims brought by the Prosecutor’s Office and the Directorate of Religious Denominations, nor does it resolve on the merits the dispute concerning the registration of the Old Calendar Orthodox Church of Bulgaria (OCOCB). Nor does the Court rule on whether the statutory prohibition on the use of the word “Orthodox” in the name of the OCOCB is compatible with the freedom of religion guaranteed by the Constitution and international law. These issues are to be examined in the new judicial proceedings. Until those proceedings are concluded, the registration of the legal entity representing the OCOCB remains in force.

From the Chancery of the Hierarchical Synod

 

Bulgarian source: https://bulgarian-orthodox-church.org/ch-life/official/message20261002.html

 

Friday, October 2, 2026

Of Truth and Falsehood: Allegations of the “OCA” against ROCOR and Response from the Holy Mountain (1991)

Source: Living Orthodoxy, #75, Vol. XIII, No. 3, May-June 1991 (actual release March 1992), pp. 12-14.

 

Last fall, a portion of an official press release, sent to several hundred outlets in the secular press, fell into the hands of an attentive and inquisitive layman of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia. Being fairly knowledgeable in Church affairs, it seemed to him that its allegations were improbable... so he took the course of writing letters to several of the abbots of the Holy Mountain to inquire what had really transpired. The press release and the most interesting responses to date are reproduced in the sidebars.

 

 

FROM A PRESS RELEASE DATED 31 OCTOBER 1991
ON THE LETTERHEAD OF THE
OFFICE OF INFORMATION AND PUBLIC RELATIONS
OF THE “ORTHODOX CHURCH IN AMERICA”:

“Mount Athos and the Russian Church in Exile”

[Karyes, Mt. Athos] In an official letter addressed to the late ecumenical patriarch Dimitrios, and signed by all the hegoumens of the twenty monasteries of Mt. Athos (Koine Synaxis), the “Russian church-in-exile” is called “schismatic” and “deprived of grace.” They categorically call “deceit” the information according to which, some spiritual authorities are giving support to the “schism”. Specific condemnation is voiced against the “Church-in-exile” for establishing communities in Russia, where the canonical Russian Church [The Moscow Patriarchate—ed.] is the only recognized Orthodox.

The letter was issued on the occasion of the announcement that kathegoumenon Ephrem, of the Philotheou monastery on Mt. Athos, who had joined the “Church-in-exile.” Indeed, some sources of that church indicated that he might be consecrated bishop.

Facing the express condemnation of the authorities of Mt. Athos, Fr. Ephrem repented, and returned to the jurisdiction of the ecumenical patriarchate.

One of the complaints frequently voiced by the “Church-in-exile” is the use of the Revised Julian calendar by most Orthodox churches. The monasteries of Mt. Athos, which prefer to use the old calendar obviously do not share that view and remain in full communion not only with their bishop, the ecumenical patriarchate (who uses the new calendar), but with the entire Orthodox Church as well.

The foregoing is reproduced in its entirety from page 3 of the aforementioned press release, with all factual and grammatical errors left intact. See main text body for comment on specific allegations.

***

We of course do not have access (at least not yet) to the official documents which passed from the Koine Synaxis of the Holy Mountain to the Ecumenical Patriarchate... but it must be presumed from the content of the press release that it at least claims to be based upon those documents (rather than upon hearsay concerning their content).

Charitably, we might assume that the officials responsible for the promulgation of the press release were in ignorance of the mechanics of the minutes of the Koine Synaxis. At best, however, this would be seriously culpable ignorance. Anyone making such allegations has a responsibility to be certain of their accuracy.

However, the nature and content of the release leave little room for charity... especially when contrasted with the truth of the matter... and the more so in the light of the verbal refusal of Fr. Gregory Havrilak (whose name was given on the release as the source for “more information”), after having seen Abbot Theophanis’ letter, to undertake in any way to issue a corrective release.

The alternative to such a charitable construction is not pleasant. While the sphere of electoral political advertising abounds with such willful lying (or half-lying, in accordance with the dictates of the libel-specialist lawyers), it is certainly wholly out of place—and especially in the domain of the Church, and calls into question not only the Orthodoxy but indeed the very claim to the name “Christian” of those who would perpetrate it.

As is clearly to be seen from Abbot Theophanis’ letter, it is questionable whether even a simple majority of the abbots of the Holy Mountain held views compatible with the phrases “schismatic” and “deprived of divine grace” (quoted, in any case, without their accompanying context... so we don’t really know what was entered in the minutes at all). Certainly, whatever the minutes said, they were by no means “signed by all the hegoumenos of the twenty monasteries.”

We have, of course, no knowledge of who the “some sources” might be who “indicated that [Fr. Ephrem] might be consecrated bishop... but doubtless one could find “some sources” to claim almost anything imaginable!

Indisputably, Fr. Ephrem first petitioned the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia to be received under its jurisdiction. This petition was accepted. Later, under enormous pressures only partly known to us, he rescinded his decision and returned to the jurisdiction of the Ecumenical Patriarchate. Tragically, this led to much spiritual confusion for many. In a letter of 1/14 July 1991, he apologized and begged forgiveness for this confusion.

[See: https://orthodoxmiscellany.blogspot.com/2024/10/why-did-elder-ephraim-of-arizona-leave.html]

It is, of course, arguable whether “most Orthodox Churches” use the “Revised Julian calendar”... indeed, even whether such a statement is true even in the overwhelmingly modernist environment of North America. In any event, the question of the calendar is only one of the less critical (albeit most conspicuous) of the grounds upon which the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia refrains from communion with most of the Orthodox jurisdictions of the world—far more critical are matters of ecumenism and general compromise of the Faith with heterodoxy and modernism.

Parenthetically, it is necessary as well to note, à propos of the letter of Abbot Theophanis, that the position of the Ecumenical Patriarchate, accepted by Abbot Theophanis, that it and it alone has the “right” to grant autocephaly, is inconsistent with the conciliar nature of Orthodox Christianity and smacks of papism—and is of course not accepted by the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia.

* * *

 

 

A LETTER DATED 12/31/91
IN RESPONSE TO MICHAEL WOERL’S INQUIRY,
FROM ARCHIMANDRITE THEOPHANIS
(ARCHIMANDRITE EPHREM’S SUCCESSOR IN OFFICE),
ON THE OFFICIAL LETTERHEAD OF PHILOTHEOU MONASTERY:

Dear Mr. Woerl:

In reply to your letter dated 19 Nov./2 Dec. 1991 we send you the following information: The encyclical that you have sent us, published by the O.C.A., unfortunately does not accurately express the Holy Mountain’s views concerning the subject which you are inquiring about.

We will briefly explain to you the conditions under which the decisions of the Holy Community are ratified. The Iera (or Koine) Synaxis is considered to be in quorum, when 2/3 of its members are in attendance, in other words fourteen representatives. Decisions are taken by majority ballot. All out-going decisions of the Holy Community are not signed by each individual representative, but are rather authorized using the following form: “All of the Koine Synaxi’s representatives and council members of the twenty Holy Monasteries of the Holy Mountain of Athos.” Under no circumstances may a representative refuse to sign the minutes of the synaxis. He has the right though to have his opinion entered in the minutes. Therefore the representative must sign the minutes, even if he is in opposition with the decision or decisions taken.

As for the condemnations mentioned in the official letter of the Iera Synaxis addressed to the late Ecumenical Patriarch Dimitrios we make known to you the following:

The Holy Monastery of Esfigmenou was taken over by zealot fathers some years ago, and lives isolated from the rest of the Holy Mountain, having absolutely nothing to do with the Ecumenical Patriarchate. They of course never send a representative to the Iera Synaxis. Therefore no matter what decisions are taken there can only be at the most nineteen votes. As for the decisions taken in the synaxis mentioned in the encyclical of the O.C.A., a total of four monasteries had an altogether different opinion. The Holy Monasteries of Xeropotamou and Karakallou discreetly disagreed, and at the same time leaving it to be understood that they would defend the Elder Ephraim, if he was to be deposed. The substitute representative for the Holy Monastery of Philotheou strongly protested, submitting upon the signing of the minutes his defence in writing of the Elder Ephraim, and his defence and recognition of the Russian Church Abroad. Finally, his written statement was not entered in the minutes even though it is the inalienable right of each monastery according to the twenty-second paragraph of the charter of the Holy Mountain. The abbot of the Holy Monastery of Konstamonitou, along with the representative of the same monastery, left the Iera Synaxis in a show of protest, without signing the minutes. The abbot of the Holy Monastery of Chilandar confessed, at least during the first day of the proceedings, that between the ranks of the clergy of the Serbian Patriarchate and the Russian Church Abroad, there exists ecclesiastic communion. This statement was altogether omitted from the minutes. Besides the Serbian Patriarchate, it is well known that the Russian Church Abroad is also in ecclesiastic communion with the Patriarchate of Jerusalem, as was mentioned by the representative of the Holy Monastery of Karakallou.

The abbot of the Holy Monastery of St. Paul did not agree with what the Elder Ephrem did, yet he was heard to have said the following: “I cannot judge or condemn anyone.” Surprisingly, this statement was also omitted from the minutes. Not a word was heard from the Holy Monasteries of Zografou and St. Panteleimon during the proceedings. They did not voice their opinion. As for the rumors concerning the Elder Ephraim being consecrated, nothing could be so groundless and far from the truth.

As far as the “autocephaly” of the O.C.A. is concerned, since it was not issued by the Holy Synod of the Ecumenical Patriarchate, as only the Ecumenical Patriarchate possesses the right to issue a tome of autocephaly, or at least recognized officially by the Holy Synod of the Ecumenical Patriarchate, its autocephaly is unsubstantial. The answer to your last question [concerning the status of the “O.C.A.” on the Holy Mountain—ed.] is no; for the aforementioned reasons the clergy of the O.C.A. may not serve in any of the monasteries on Mount Athos, nor may partake in Holy Communion.

The Abbot of the Holy Monastery of Philotheou
Archimandrite Theophanis

* * *

And… From Xeropotamou Monastery

Dear brother in Christ, Mr. Woerl:

I don’t regard the ROCOR as “schismatic” and “deprived of divine grace”, and I think the same [as] do most of the abbots of Mt. Athos. The document you talked about was not signed by the twenty abbots. It was issued by the Holy Community, a body of 19 representatives, who also didn’t sign it. A stamp and a typewritten phrase is the signature. It was a product of pressures and servility. Please pray to God for me, and stand stable where you are.

With blessings and love in Christ,
Archimandrite Joseph

 

Scans of the OCA press release and Athonite letter to Mr. Michael Woerl were published in Orthodox Tradition, Vol. IX (1992), Nos. 2-3, pp. 20-21.

Spiritual Struggle through Prayer and Asceticism

Protopresbyter Dionysios Tatsis | October 2, 2026 | Orthodoxos Typos

 

 

The person who strives according to God must know how to deal effectively with his mind and body. This is a difficult task, which, nevertheless, he must not abandon. The mind is a spiritual workshop that ceaselessly produces products, that is, thoughts of various kinds, which often become desires and actions. Great care is needed in dealing with them. Sinful thoughts must not linger in the mind, but should be disregarded and rejected, without leaving impressions behind, so that they do not become associated with earlier sinful experiences. Of course, thoughts are unceasing, but they must depart quickly and be forgotten. In their place should come and remain thoughts pleasing to God, which calm the mind and nourish the heart, so that a person may also make corresponding decisions.

In dealing with sinful thoughts and in cultivating thoughts pleasing to God, prayer is of great help. At first, prayer may be accompanied by a certain agitation, but afterward calmness comes, the waves subside, sinful pursuits are forgotten, purity prevails in the mind, and deeds pleasing to God are planned. This inner work presupposes absolute trust in the providence of God. By himself, a person cannot become firmly established in what is good. Only by the grace of God can he succeed in carrying out good deeds and acquiring the virtues, through which he will secure favorable conditions for a fruitful spiritual struggle. His virtues will decisively drive away every negative incitement to sin, and the mind will no longer be disorderly and disturbed, nor will it be dominated by fears and unjustified anxieties. At the same time, it will remain unaffected by what is happening in the world.

The spiritual struggler continually keeps his passions under control. He does not admit external provocations, and the allurements of sin do not impress him. It is inconceivable for anyone to believe that he will make spiritual progress while at the same time gratifying his sinful passions. A person needs to be self-controlled, rational, content with little, and trusting in the providence of God. He should be characterized by asceticism, fasting, self-restraint, and the avoidance of satiety, which leads one into the repetition of many sins. What happens around him, and even farther away, through people who have no faith in God and in whose lives moral values are absent, leaves him unaffected. Nevertheless, he is concerned about their low spiritual state and is grieved because he cannot offer substantial help toward their improvement. He tolerates with patience and endures, to some extent, the inevitable influences.

Saint Justin Popovich makes a useful observation: “The man of God will never identify sin with the sinner, nor the crime with the criminal. He will always know how to distinguish sin from the sinner, to condemn the sin and have compassion on the sinner.” He also gives this counsel: “By prayer, wither the passions of your mind; by fasting, the passions of your body. For through these two virtues all the others are brought into action.”

 

Greek source:

https://orthodoxostypos.gr/%cf%80%ce%bd%ce%b5%cf%85%ce%bc%ce%b1%cf%84%ce%b9%ce%ba%cf%8c%cf%82-%e1%bc%80%ce%b3%cf%8e%ce%bd-%ce%bc%ce%ad-%cf%80%cf%81%ce%bf%cf%83%ce%b5%cf%85%cf%87%ce%ae%ce%bd-%ce%ba%ce%b1%ce%af-%e1%bc%84%cf%83/

The Falling Asleep in the Lord of the Blessed Archimandrite Ioustinos

October 1, 2026

 

 

With profound sorrow, it is announced that today, Thursday, 18 September / 1 October 2026, following a prolonged illness, the Holy Sepulchre Archimandrite Ioustinos Mamallos fell asleep in the Lord. He was the renovator of the Holy Shrine of Jacob’s Well and founder of the Church of Saint Foteini the Samaritan within it, in Neapolis (Nablus) of Samaria. His life and many years of service were inextricably bound to the complete restoration and enhancement of this Holy Monastery.

The blessed Father, filled with deep faith and fervent love for Holy Jerusalem, the Mother of the Churches, and the Holy Places, devoted his strength, labours and a great part of his life to the restoration, beautification and preservation of the Holy Monastery, leaving behind a precious legacy and work which will keep alive the memory of his offering.

The Patriarchate of Jerusalem and the Holy Sepulchre Brotherhood, with deep emotion, bid farewell to him who has fallen asleep in the Lord, praying that the Lord may grant rest to his soul “in the land of the living, in the tabernacles of the righteous,” where “there is neither pain, nor sorrow, nor sighing, but life everlasting.”

The necessary procedures are already being examined so that the blessed Father’s body may return to the Holy Land for his Funeral Service and burial.

The place and time of the Funeral Service will be announced in a subsequent announcement.

May his memory be eternal!

From the Chief Secretariat [of the Greek Orthodox Patriarchate of Jerusalem and All Palestine]

 

Source:

https://en.jerusalem-patriarchate.info/announcements/the-falling-asleep-in-the-lord-of-the-blessed-archimandrite-ioustinos/

 

 


Zealot Walling-Off: Further Clarification

The Purpose and Deviation of the G.O.C. Greek source: Ἀποστασία καὶ Διχασμός [Apostasy and Division], by Fathers of Mount Athos (Hieromon...