"Moving the Dialogue Forward": Conclusions from the conference on Eastern-Oriental Orthodox relations
Fr. John Chryssavgis
| February 20, 2026
The dialogue between the Orthodox
(Chalcedonian) and the Oriental Orthodox (non-Chalcedonian) churches began in
its official capacity in 1989, and the official Joint Commission has continued
to operate since then to address centuries-old divisions. Last November saw a
landmark and groundbreaking, albeit unofficial an academic conference
organized by the Huffington Ecumenical Institute at Holy Cross School of
Theology, seeking to support the two families of churches in their ongoing
efforts to affirm and act upon their theological agreements over the last
decades.
At Holy Cross School of Theology,
prominent hierarchs, scholars, and faithful from the Eastern and Oriental
Churches gathered on November 5-6, 2025, for an international conference
intended primarily as an opportunity for Eastern Orthodox to discuss response
to the official dialogues, reception of our joint statements, and understanding
of our historical divisions. But crucially, that reflection was done in the
presence and with critical comments by members of the Oriental traditions:
Coptic, Armenian, Syrian, Ethiopian, and Indian. Their participation ensured
that the conversation was not one-sided, but instead reflected the voices and
experiences of both church families.
After the close of this
gathering, the following statement was drafted by the conference organizers in
order to summarize its findings and propose recommendations to our churches,
parishes, and theological schools about ways in which the two families could
act upon what they had already agreed to officially in the Chambésy Statement
of 1990, but also upon many additional insights that have arisen in the
decades since then, especially on the local level, such as the United
States.
+++
REPORT AND CONCLUSIONS
From the
Conference on Eastern and Oriental Orthodox Relations
“MOVING THE
DIALOGUE FORWARD”
Holy Cross School
of Theology
November 4–6, 2025
1. From November 4–6, 2025 the
Huffington Ecumenical Institute at Holy Cross School of Theology hosted a
conference on Eastern and Oriental Orthodox Relations. This meeting gathered
leading hierarchs, theologians, and scholars before an in-person and online
audience comprising over 150 participants.
2. This conference, the first of
its kind in the United States, had significant impact. With no intention of
interfering with or bypassing the formal processes of the Joint Commission of
the Theological Dialogue between the two church families, it sought rather to
be of help in the reception of these official dialogues. More specifically the
primary intention was to help Eastern Orthodox coordinate amongst themselves,
though in the presence and with the response of Oriental Orthodox participants.
3. To that end, most sessions
featured two Eastern Orthodox speakers and an Oriental Orthodox respondent.
There was ample conversation after each session, and an entire session was
devoted to listening to the voices of younger members of both families, from
the Orthodox Christian Fellowship and from students at Holy Cross School of
Theology.
4. The clearest message that
emerged from this gathering was the participants’ sense of urgency for the
dialogue on the one hand to be revived in substance. The Agreed Statements must
be advanced to the point that they are received within all the local churches.
These statements must either bring us to the point of visible unity and
sacramental communion, or the churches must speak authoritatively as to why
this could not be possible. Otherwise, our continued division is a repudiation
of our own official agreements from more than three decades ago.
5. Those present at this
gathering were well aware that a potential restored unity between Eastern and
Oriental Christians will require local adjustments and temporary arrangements
in order to meet pastoral and liturgical considerations, and transcend psychological
barriers built over centuries of separation and isolation. However, theological
convergence was agreed more than thirty years ago by our discerning and
qualified forebears. We owe it at once to their generation and to the present
generation of our faithful to complete and consummate what they started and
labored for over many years. A restored unity will be a test of humility as
well as charity, but at the same time the proof of respect and honor for their
commitment and conviction.
6. With all of our formal and
informal dialogues, and on the heels of our own gathering in November 2025, we
are also aware of the continued widespread ignorance of one another’s
historical development and Christological thought. We further know that there
are vocal opponents to our progress towards communion, from Mount Athos and
within many sectors of Eastern Europe. In order to remedy persistent
misconception and misinformation, and to build on our progress, our
conference put forward the following as tangible and accessible
recommendations. Some of these are simply more concrete iterations of pastoral
recommendations made by the Joint Commission in the early 1990’s, while others
are new.
7. That all theological colleges
and seminaries provide informed education and course curricula,
with inclusion and participation by representatives of one another’s communion,
in the hope that this instruction would gradually influence and shape sermons
and teaching in our respective parishes and communities.
8. That at the patriarchal and
ecclesiastical level, mutual anathemas of saints in our
respective communions should be lifted, on the basis of historical and
theological findings of the past fifty years. The lifting of anathemas on each
other’s saints would not require us to venerate previously anathematized
persons as saints. But on the whole, it may be wiser and preferable to condemn
theological positions (such as “Eutychianism” and
“Nestorianism”), rather than individual names.
9. That on the local parish
level, geographical proximity permitting, an exchange of visits on
the occasion of one another’s patronal feasts, along with spiritual retreats,
study days, and social events might be jointly organized for purposes of
acquaintance and familiarity.
10. That on the practical level,
the process of reception from one communion to the other should be standardized
in the form of a confession of faith. Zealot voices on both sides should be
highlighted, addressed, and/or censured in support of the overwhelming majority
of faithful who endorse and need such reconciliation. In this regard, over the
course of time, formal documents, especially in educational and academic
contexts, should strictly avoid the old polemical and false terminology, such
as “monophysite” (which refers now only to the heretical position denying
Christ’s consubstantiality with us humans, a position held neither in Eastern
nor Oriental churches).
11. Finally, on the level of
sacramental union, the desired objective should be full communion. If our
bilateral relations and agreed statements are considered with integrity and
sincerity, we must confess that no other dialogue—whether that with the Roman
Catholic Church, the Anglican Communion, or the Lutheran Federation—comes
anywhere near as close as what has been achieved in recent times between our
two family churches, whose separation dates much longer than an East-West or
Protestant divide. On the way toward such full communion, it would be
beneficial to establish intermediary steps, such as a broader—and more
official—acceptance of communion among “inter-Orthodox” couples, as is already
the practice in many parts of the world.
Find a PDF of the
report here:
https://orthodoxobserver.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/EO-OO-Report-2025.pdf
For the Conference
Organizing Committee:
EASTERN
ORTHODOX
Fr. John
Chryssavgis, co-chair
Huffington Ecumenical
Institute at HCHC
Dr. Peter
Bouteneff, co-chair
St. Vladimir’s
Orthodox Theological Seminary
Archbishop
Alexander Golitzin
Orthodox Church in
America
Rev. Dr. Nicolas
Kazarian
Greek Orthodox
Archdiocese of America
Rev. Dr. Philip
Halikias
Holy Cross School of
Theology
Rev. Dr. Gary
Alexander
Holy Cross School of
Theology
ORIENTAL
ORTHODOX
Archbishop Vicken
Aykazian
Armenian Apostolic
Church
World Council of
Churches
Bishop Kyrillos
Coptic Orthodox
Diocese of Los Angeles
St. Athanasius and
St. Cyril Theological School
Bishop Daniel
Findikyan
Gevorgyan Theological
Seminary
St. Nersess Armenian
Seminary
Atsede Elegba
Ethiopian Orthodox
Tewahedo Church
Dr. George Kiraz
Institute for
Advanced Study, Princeton
Beth Mardutho: The
Syriac Institute
Dr. Andrew Youssef
Trinity College,
Toronto
Source:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.