by Archbishop [Metropolitan] Chrysostomos of Etna (+2019)
One of the most
difficult things for the Orthodox Christian — and especially for converts from
denominations in which confession is almost unknown — is the development of a
true appreciation for the Mystery of Confession, which is, as St. Gregory
Palamas tells us in his very eloquent language, essential to our
spiritual “cleansing” (“Homily XXV,” Hapanta ta Erga, ed.
Panagiotis K. Chrestou, Vol. X, p. 169). Many people think that Confession is
somehow an optional aspect of Orthodox spiritual life, while others imagine
that some personal confession to God, bereft of that emptying-out of the ego
before a Priest that marks a true first step towards genuine repentance, is
somehow a substitute for the Church’s Mystery. Such thinking is quite
unfortunate and leads not a few believers to an inauthentic Orthodoxy and to
spiritual ruin. What is said in the “closet” (St. Matthew 6:6) surely helps one
spiritually, and particularly those few who have that intense “friendship” with
God that comes only with many years of spiritual experience and a certain
charism from God. But even for such individuals, like those of us who are
spiritual neophytes, the Church’s Mystery of Confession is indispensable.
What, indeed, could
ever replace that humbling experience of putting off all social pretense,
posturing, hypocrisy, self-assertion, and ego-generated bravado — the general
self-advocacy that all of us embrace before others and before the world — and
uncovering our inner selves before Christ in the form of a fellow human? We are
lifted up in such humility, transformed by such honesty, and comforted in the
good counsel of our spiritual Father and by the Presence of Christ, Who hears
through the Priest our inner repentance and our fervent desire for
transformation and Who, “alone having the power to forgive sins,” forgives us
through the Priest of our shortcomings. And what experience could ever replace
that wonderful feeling of inner cleanliness and sense of genuineness that
inevitably comes to us when, having opened up our true selves to a Priest,
Christ Himself comes to dwell in that vacuum which is left when our
acknowledged sins, confessed in humility and with sincerity, have been wholly
obliterated? Is there anything more upbuilding for the soul? More comforting
for the mind? Sweeter to the heart?
It behooves us,
then, to seek out this comfort of confession, this tremendous force which
brings us to true knowledge of ourselves and which is such an effective therapy
for the disease of sin that separates us from the image of God within us.
Unfortunately, in this search, we are hindered, not only by the aforementioned
misunderstanding of the indispensability of the formal Mystery of Confession,
but also by our improper grasp of the dimensions of confession. I often
hear our faithful say that they need only to confess that which bothers them.
This is akin to saying that one need only clean the visible spots from a soiled
fabric. In fact, unless one removes the unseen soil and contaminants from the
hidden fibers of a fabric, they will eventually rise to the surface and create
more visible spots. And finally, if these are not cleaned, the surface of the
fabric will become permanently corrupted, as the underlying layers that support
it deteriorate and rot away. So it is with the soul. We must openly and sincerely
confess those sins which naturally bother our consciences; but in seeking
spiritual counsel and in examining our consciences, it is also necessary to
seek out the hidden sins that eat away at our souls without our being aware of
them. Confession greatly helps in this examination, since often the Grace of
God reveals to a Priest or spiritual guide things that we do not see and which
he can help us to see.
It is also the case
that many individuals, even if they avail themselves of regular confession,
will, whether out of shame or pride, conceal things from their spiritual
Father. In this vein, the very finest work that I have read on the Mystery of
Confession is Metropolitan Cyprian’s Écheis Eisitério? Patrick
Barker [now Hieromonk Patapios] and I translated this book into English some
years ago, under the title, Do You Have a Ticket? Published by
the Center for Traditionalist Orthodox Studies in 1994, it is still very
popular among English-speaking readers. The central theme of this simple,
straightforward, but profound book is the danger of concealing sins during
confession and the liberating, transforming effect of revealing such sins, with
the aid and persistent but gentle exhortation of a concerned spiritual Father,
even after years of concealment. I have encountered many individuals, including
some who are present here, today, who, after reading this book, benefited
immensely from His Eminence’s words and, confessing some sin that had remained
secret in their hearts for years, experienced a liberating joy that in many
ways changed and transformed their spiritual lives.
It follows by
inference, from what I have said, that the Mystery of Confession must never
involve superficial, meaninglessly general, and vague revelations of sins. Of
course, and especially with regard to sins of the flesh, details of a graphic
kind are not only unneeded, but inappropriate. However, one must
permit his sins to emerge for what they are, and with enough candor to
facilitate a deeper understanding of their effects on the mind and soul. A true
revelation of sins certainly involves the uncomfortable process. again, of
setting aside social pretense and the “artificial self” that so many present in
daily life, thereby wishing to impress others or to create an untrue impression
of themselves. Each time that we allow our spiritual Father to see us for what
we really are (and a true Confessor benefits himself, too, in this
process, since he is able to see in himself what others reveal about
themselves), we are changed. At least momentarily, we free ourselves from the
tyranny of that “created self” that, if it is not regularly exposed in the
Mystery of Confession, will soon come to overtake us and, in deluding us from
within, alienate us from our true selves and from the image of God which dwells
within us.
There are many
reasons that are invoked to justify ignoring all that I have written about
confession. The most frequent is that many Priests cannot be trusted to abide
by confessional confidence. In the first place, there are few serious clergy who
would use confession to harm or discredit a spiritual ward. In fact, I know of
many instances in which, having confessed this-or-that sin, and then feeling
misgivings about doing so, a penitent will falsely accuse his Confessor of
revealing a sin, either to discredit him (fearing he may in fact reveal
the sin confessed) or as an excuse not to confess sincerely and openly. In the
second place, a truly sincere person is willing, in the end, to suffer the
consequences of his sins, whatever they may be. This point was brought home to
me during the several years that I spent in post-Communist Eastern Europe. I
happened to mention to a very erudite professor, with whom I was discussing the
awful effect of the former atheist regime on his country (one which was
predominantly Orthodox), the many people who had asked to Confess to me, some
after years of avoiding confession because of the fear that a Priest might, in
fact, be an agent or collaborator. This professor replied to me: “Not once did
I let this fear impede me. Confession was more important to me than the
consequences that might have befallen me, had I confessed to the wrong person.
If some Priest had betrayed me. then the sin would have been his. I would still
have benefited from the spiritual relationship that went beyond him as a man.” I
have always remembered that amazing affirmation. We should all keep it in our
minds, as we so unwisely seek reasons not to avail ourselves of the Grace of
the Mystery of Confession.
Let me say that I
am not preaching to you as a Confessor and someone special. I am speaking with
you as a fellow sinner, with all of the deficits, sins, and weaknesses that you
have. I am not advising you to do something that I do not apply to myself. In fact,
it is imperative that Priests and clergy confess frequently, sedulously seeking
spiritual guidance, emptying themselves out. If they do not do this. they can
begin to imagine themselves gurus, offering to others what they need
themselves. They can come to imagine themselves exempt from confession because
of their Priestly status, opening themselves up to the demonic delusion of
thinking that, since they do not confess, their sins do not impede them. A good
Confessor is a Confessor who feels the need to confess. And one who feels that
need is one who is growing in spiritual life. For the closer that we get to God
and the more that we submit ourselves to His guidance and feel and observe His
Goodness, the more aware we become, simultaneously, of our own sins. We come to
see that anything and everything that separates us from the Presence of Christ
within us is a sin of the greatest magnitude. And in the end, it is that
separation which makes sin what it is, and not the extent of our transgression.
Thus, if a man repents of murder and is reconciled to God, the image of God is
restored within him. By the same token, if a man entertains a hidden thought of
enmity towards someone who has deeply wronged him, he is estranged from God and
the image of God within him is obliterated. It is the sincerity of our
confession — not the magnitude of our sin — which effects forgiveness. So it
is, then, that one who serves God, however apparently minor his sin, must feel
the depth of his sin and must seek forgiveness with fervour.
Finally, let me say
something about the breadth of the phenomenon of confession. As I have averred,
there is something beneficial that derives from confessing one’s sin in the
“closet.” It is also the case that confessing to one another — laymen to laymen,
as the Lord’s brother says (St. James 5:|6) — is of spiritual benefit. In older
times, moreover, a Priest often, in addition to Confession, would send his
spiritual children to an experienced monk or spiritual advisor, and even one
who was not a Priest, for spiritual counsel and guidance. Such spiritual
advisors were sought out by the faithful with great fervour, as evidenced by
those who flocked to the pillars of the ascetic Stylites, hoping for some small
word of guidance or spiritual counsel. And in monasteries and convents, the
“confession” (revelation) of thoughts to the Abbot or Abbess of the community
is an ancient and very important custom. Though this kind of “confessional”
activity may lie outside the Mystery of Confession, it has tremendous spiritual
value and often touches at the core of an individual’s spiritual life. Indeed,
it was in seeking the spiritual counsel of the Blessed Fool-for-Christ,
Matushka Paraskeva, that the last Tsar and Tsarina of Russia, revealing their
sins, apparently learned of their tragic future fate from this clairvoyant
woman.
Despite this
breadth of spiritual practice and custom, which we must acknowledge and deeply
honor as a significant part of the charismatic life of the Orthodox Church,
these things are not sufficient. It still stands that absolutely nothing can
replace the Mystery of Confession and the sacerdotal forgiveness of sins,
which, while forgiveness comes from Christ, is bestowed only through the Grace
of the Priesthood. Even if monastics may confess or reveal their thoughts to an
Elder or Eldress; even if enlightened and holy Saints may reveal the hidden
things of God to those who seek their counsel; even if one chooses to seek out
God in the privacy of the “closet of the heart“; and even if our spiritual
Fathers may at times entrust us to the counsel of some spiritual person, the
Mystery of Confession and the Prayer of Absolution, which are administered
solely by a [Bishop or] Priest, remain always and indubitably indispensable.
Thus it was that St. Mary of Egypt, who lived like a citizen of Heaven in the
desert. who was taught by the Holy Spirit, who walked on water, and who
conversed with Angels — thus it was that she, joined by Grace to God, sought
out before her death a Priest to whom she could confess, from whom she could
receive absolution, and from whom she could Commune.
Those who seek to
live without the succor of regular, sincere, and heartfelt confession, who seek
reasons to justify their avoidance of a Priest — on whatever grounds and for
whatever reason, whether real or contrived — imperil their souls, distort the teachings
of the Church, become alienated from themselves and their fellow believers,
and, above all, deny themselves that Mystery by which they are made whole
(psychologically, spiritually, and ontologically), reconciled to God, and truly
enlightened, becoming one with Christ. May we all heed this!
Source: Orthodox Tradition, Volume XXII (2005),
No. 2, pp. 35-38.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.