Source: Orthodox Tradition, Vol. 1 (1984), No. 3, pp. 48-51, 54.
Before the advent of ecumenism,
so much religious bigotry and hate marked the relationship between people of
different religions that one is, on first glance, suspicious of anyone who
questions the contemporary ecumenical movement. This is natural, since no real
Christian—no really humane person—wishes to live in an atmosphere of hate or
animosity. This is antithetical to Christian principles, contrary to spiritual
laws, and a real hindrance to personal growth in the religious realm.
One might ask, then, why we
traditionalist Orthodox are so wholly opposed to ecumenism, which we find to be
not only a heresy, but a “pan-heresy.” Certainly we do not want the hate that
marked the relations between religions before the ecumenical movement was
popularized, many will ask. And our answer is that indeed we do not want such
hate. Accepting the religions of others, whether we agree or not with those who
hold beliefs contrary to our own, is a necessary part of civilized living—a
necessary part which even here in America, which preaches religious freedom, is
not adequately respected. No, our real objection to the ecumenical movement is
that it does not stop at mutual understanding and mutual acceptance. It has a
philosophy, if not an actual goal, behind it that frightens us and that
compromises our witness as Orthodox.
In the first place, we Orthodox
believe that Christ established a Church on earth, that it has never been
divided, that it has never been lost, and that, Christ not being a liar, the
Gates of Hell have never prevailed against it. We believe that we constitute
that Church: founded by Christ, preached by the Apostles, and preserved in our
Holy Tradition. We believe that our ancient customs began in the Apostolic
Church, matured through the guidance of the Holy Spirit, and reach us as the
authentic voice of Christianity. We do not deny that other Churches exist, nor
do we deny that much of what they practice they received from us, the Christian
East, the birthplace of Christianity. However, we believe that they are
separated from the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church which is preserved
within the Orthodox national Churches, and that they are without the fullness
of Christianity which is passed on to us in the Grace of God’s Church. This is
the very cornerstone of our beliefs. And if anyone should wish to join us, we
ask simply that he return to the tenets which belonged to the undivided
Christian Church of the first seven Ecumenical Councils, these being the
very tenets which guide and constitute our Church.
In claiming to be the historical
Church, the standard of Christianity, the “Mother Church,” we feel a great need
to understand our brother Christians and to draw near to them, it being a
natural thing for a mother to draw near to her children. Our claim to primacy
is not an exclusivistic one, but one which embodies a sincere invitation: an
invitation to return to the true Church established by Christ on earth. And
this exclusive claim moves us to compassion for our fellow Christians,
imprinting on our hearts with particular force a sense of responsibility. It
is, to be sure, part of our self-understanding that we are responsible for the
preservation of the Faith, so that our fellow Christians, who have in our eyes
strayed from the true standard of Christianity, may measure themselves against
that which we have preserved. It is an act of love which prompts us to desire
to extend the perimeters of the Church, this love guided in the wisdom by which
we extend those perimeters only within the defined limits of the Church as the
Apostles and the Fathers have defined it for us.
To the view of us Orthodox
traditionalists the ecumenical movement has grown increasingly hostile,
revealing to us the real intentions and goals of many ecumenists. In fact, some
ecumenists have stated that they will not tolerate any religion which
claims to embody the criterion of truth! In the name of understanding each
other’s religion, the ecumenical movement is now preaching an intolerable
intolerance of its own. It is no longer acceptable for me, as a sincere
Orthodox Christian, to stand up in ecumenical circles and say that, while I
believe that my Church is the true Church, I wish to know and understand other
Christians, if not, in love, to attract them to the standard of Christianity
preserved over the centuries in our Faith—not by proselytizing or “pushing” my
views on others, but by maintaining the true Faith, which has an internal power
of its own. And herein lies the problem of the ecumenical movement. Its
ultimate goal is not understanding and dialogue, but (as official statements
now indicate) the formation of one world religion, in which no single
religion can claim to have primacy, but in which all religions, theoretically
containing some aspects of the truth, will join together in finding a
single truth.
We Orthodox Christians believe
that the Church already exists and that what the ecumenists will produce in
these schemes is, at best, an ugly mosaic of half-truths or suppositions about
the truth. And, to be sure, if elements of truth can be brought together in a
composite, so too can elements of untruth. And if each religion, in addition to
containing aspects of the truth, contains also elements of falsehood, then the
end result may be something monstrous: a giant composite of every conceivable
human error about religion. We Orthodox conceive of the truth as an absolute,
inseparable whole, indivisible and present as a single principle, from which
all relative truths are derived. That our view should not be allowed is, again,
a demonstration that the modern-day ecumenical movement is more than meets the
eye.
What, in actuality, has the
ecumenical movement brought to Orthodoxy? Understanding? Hardly. Here in
America there are so many separate Orthodox jurisdictions that one is
overwhelmed in trying to understand their histories and relationship to one
another. Hatred exists between some groups. And what have we done? Rather than
talk to one another, we have been enticed into talking to non-Orthodox, often
showing greater affection for the heterodox than our own brethren. Many
modernist Greek clergy in this country believe that Old Calendarist Greeks are
all miserably illiterate, self-ordained fanatics. This is not true. Many
traditionalists believe that all New Calendarists follow the perilous course
toward modernism and ecumenism of the majority of the modernist Hierarchy.
This, too, is not true. And yet, while we do not talk to one another about
these misconceptions and problems, the ecumenists among us are quick to embrace
Protestants and Roman Catholics, often to the point of violating Holy Canons by
joining with them in prayer and services, thereby clouding the standard of
purity which we are called, as Orthodox, to uphold. No unity and mutual
understanding have come to the Orthodox, then, from the ecumenical movement.
Rather, the movement has diverted our attention away from unity among
ourselves. If its aims were true and sincere, it would seem, ecumenism would
have begun “at home.” Such, among us Orthodox, is not the case.
One must also very frankly
acknowledge that the ecumenical movement has greatly compromised the stand
which the Orthodox Church has for centuries taken against Papism. If there is
much that Roman Catholics and Orthodox share, having once been united in the
Faith, there is one truly significant difference—aside from the great
divergence in spiritual life which has been evidenced since the Great Schism
especially—that stands out: the Orthodox Church recognizes no worldly head
of the Church, but only Jesus Christ as its Head and Founder. The modern
ecumenist movement, which proposes that all religions must join together in one
world religion, also opens the way for a single leader of this one world
religion. And such thinking is compatible with the notions of Papism, which
have plagued Christianity for many centuries. Participation by modernist
Orthodox in the ecumenical movement, then, has compromised the Orthodox stand
against a universal human head of the Church, just as it has compromised the
very ecclesiology of Orthodoxy. We Orthodox have always stood, not against the
pious Roman Catholic Faithful, whom we wish to return to the Orthodoxy of their
past, but against the politics of Papism. Elsewhere in this issue of Orthodox
Tradition the reader may see for himself, in Bishop Cyprian’s laconic
response to Archbishop Seraphim’s Paschal address, evidence of what ecumenism
has done to serve the ends of the Vatican in Greece.
We might just add that the
Uniates (Eastern Christians united to Rome) have benefited little from the
ecumenical movement as well. Their attempts to maintain a separate identity
within the Roman Catholic world have been clouded by the uniformity demanded by
ecumenical philosophies, such that the most hated attempts by the Vatican to
“Latinize” the Uniates have been easily implemented, the Uniates often fearing
to emphasize a unique identity within an ecclesiological atmosphere that
tolerates only similarities. Likewise, the Uniate movement in Greece, as many
Uniates themselves admit, has been ever bolder in the last few decades,
so-called ecumenical understanding again serving the purposes of the Vatican and
the Hierarchy of the State Church of Greece showing great hesitancy to resist
the Uniate movement as it did in the past, fearing that this might alienate it
from the ecumenical movement itself.
Somewhere, too, we Christians
have forgotten what we believe. We believe Christ to be the Incarnation of the
universal God. Yet, in ecumenical gatherings we act as though we did not
believe this. The late and blessed Hieromonk Seraphim (Rose), a man who suffered
much and endured much, spoke, out of his sorrow, some blunt words of love about
what ecumenism has done to our basic Christian beliefs. Let us look at his
words [Orthodoxy and the Religion of the Future, p. 27]:
[Many
non-Christian participants in the ecumenical movement will admit that]
...Christ is an extraordinary and exceptional being and that He was sent by
God. But for us Christians, if Jesus Christ is not God, we cannot
consider Him either as a ‘prophet’ or as ‘one sent by God,’ but only as a great
imposter without compare, having proclaimed Himself ‘Son of God,’ making
Himself thus equal to God! (St. Mark 14: 61, 62.)
In effect, does not ecumenism
betray itself when it extracts from unknowing (though perhaps naive) Christians
views that are antithetical to its tenets —views which were so repugnant to the
Early Church that the great Christian martyrs gave their blood and lives,
rather than confess them? In other words, is not ecumenism extracting from us
views that wholly compromise our basic Christian beliefs in the unique divinity
of Christ? Does it not leave us unable to say that Christianity has a unique
truth, that the Church of Christ is a unique institution, and that Christ
Himself is a unique manifestation?
If, as a Christian, I cannot say
that Christ is, for me, the Son of the Living God, the Truth of truths, the
light from Whom all creation flows, the True God, the God beside Whom there is
none, and the only God worthy of worship, then am I any longer allowed to be
what a Christian is? And if this is ecumenism, then something is wrong. The
result of a movement designed to promote understanding between religions—a
noble end—should not destroy my Faith! Nor should it be intolerant of those who
believe in an absolute. Yet this is exactly, precisely what the ecumenical
movement is doing. And Christians of all denominations, who should be appalled,
are sitting by as their ministers, Priests, Bishops, and Prelates ignore the
insidious core of the ecumenical movement.
If you dare to hate your neighbor
for what he believes, then you are not a Christian. You are basically
inhumane, a cultist, and a misanthrope. But if you refuse to allow your
neighbor to proclaim the primacy of what he believes, and yourself refuse to
stand firm in what you believe as a Christian, then you are a contrived
creature of an unknown future. Let us Orthodox beware of such a future! Let all
Christians stand in fear before this new intolerance in the guise of
understanding and love—an intolerance which has caused strife and dissent in
the Church of Christ.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.