Monday, April 21, 2025

On inappropriate celebrations of Pascha...

At Pascha and during the days of Bright Week, Christians ought not to fire rifles, pistols, muskets, or other similar firearms, because the Risen Christ not only has no need of such things, but furthermore hates and abhors them: a) because many people are injured by them and often killed; b) because their noise does not allow Christians to hear the service and the spiritual troparia and hymns of the Resurrection. And if in ancient times gunpowder and such firearms had existed, and Christians had wished to use them at Pascha, most certainly all the holy and divine Fathers would have written about this and would have struggled to abolish such a wicked and pagan custom. For it is characteristic of the pagans to use such things during their feasts, and not of the Christians, for it is characteristic of the Christians to ring only the bells and semantra, and to chant Christ is Risen and the other joyful hymns of the Holy Resurrection.

- St. Nikodemos the Hagiorite, Christian Morality, p. 34 (Greek edition).

What the Holy Fathers Say About Avoiding Communion with Heretics

~ Defilement through communion with heretical or wrong-believing bishops ~

 

It is indeed striking, the strictness that the Holy Fathers impose not only upon the heretics but also upon the members of the Church who adopt erroneous beliefs, for the Church is not divided only by the heretics, but also by those who believe and spread similar things: "It is not only by the heretics that it has been cut apart, but it is also divided by those who say the same things and are of like mind with one another."

1. The slightest matter that concerns God is not small, according to Saint Gregory Palamas.

2. St. John Chrysostomos tells us: "Not only those who sin, but also those who praise the sinners undergo the same or even worse punishment."

3. "Every clergyman," says Saint Symeon the Theologian, "whose faith, words, and deeds do not agree with the teachings of the Holy Fathers, we must not receive into our home. Rather, we must turn away from him and hate him as a demon, even if he raises the dead and performs countless other miracles."

4. Is this strictness, then, an arbitrary harshness and a "quirk" of the saints? Of course not! Our very Lord Himself was the first to teach clearly what our response must be when we hear teachings contrary to those which He Himself and His disciples delivered. Jesus Christ taught that His own sheep, when they hear the voice of a strange teacher, flee. "And a stranger [i.e., shepherd] they will not follow, but will flee from him, for they know not the voice of strangers."

5. And immediately after the walling off, the Holy Apostles taught: "…Therefore, it is necessary to flee from the corrupting shepherds."

6. Not a few times have the official shepherds poisoned the flock—through distorted teaching—leading it to the worship of other gods. For "heresy" is not only "faith in a strange god,"

7. but "has been entirely clothed with the devil."

8. In our days the bishops have been openly shown to be false bishops because they defile the Faith by condescending to heretics. "Woe to those who defile the Holy Faith with heresies or condescend to the heretics."

9. Saint Antiochos Pandektos said that the one who does not have the right faith must not only be turned away from, but also anathematized—that is, considered to be outside the Church.

10. "Not even for a short while do we accept any association with those who are lame in the faith."

11. …"even if they seem to us very genuine and official, we must abhor them, we who love the Lord."

12. Saint Theodore the Studite declares: "And if they are friends according to God, how is it that they partake in communion with the heterodox? For such as these are not true and faithful friends."

13. The same Saint says: "The heretics have completely suffered shipwreck concerning the faith. And as for the others, even if they have not sunk in their thoughts, nevertheless by communion with heresy they perish together [because of their communion with the heretics, they will be lost along with them]."

14. He considers it a "betrayal of the Orthodox Confession" for someone to remain in communion with his wrong-believing bishop.

15. These Patristic positions were also incorporated into the Acts of the Seventh Ecumenical Council: "Whoever justifies heresy, let him be anathema."

Saint Athanasios the Great, concerning the one who holds impious doctrines, states: "Avoid him, and thus you will preserve your faith pure."

16. According to Saint Nektarios of Aegina: "Communion with him [the wrong-believing and heretical one] defiles the faith with the responsibilities that this entails. Therefore, external disassociation protects from internal estrangement"… "It is false what they claim, that the paths of piety are many… there is one path only, and that narrow and not broad… one and only God and Lord."

17. If the Evangelist John, the "disciple of love," says that someone who does not accept the teaching of Christ and the Apostles should not even be received into your house, nor should you greet him, because by doing so you partake in his evil works and become an accomplice, how much more, then, should we not accept him in the church as a celebrant?

18. If Saint Basil the Great emphasizes: "A heretical man, reject,"

19. how much more the wrong-believing clergyman?

The holy Chrysostom explains to us: "Not only if some say entirely contrary things that overturn everything, but even if they teach the slightest contrary thing, let them be anathema."

20. "From such people we must leap away as we do when we encounter a serpent, and cut off all communion and flee with all our strength, even if they appear to us as venerable and meek," teaches Saint Photios the Great.

21. What, in truth, do we hope to inherit—we who voluntarily and willingly follow the modern heresy-promoting Bishops, despite the wrath of God and hell?

"If someone pretends to confess the right faith, yet is seen to be in communion with them [if someone, pretending, confesses the right faith but communes with the heretics], exhort such a one to abstain from such a custom; and if he promises, regard such a one as a brother [and if he promises you that he will break communion with the heretics—and does so—consider him your brother]; but if he persists contentiously, renounce such a one [cut off from him]."

22. Saint Job Iasites the Confessor said: "Let us not associate with them, then [the Latin-minded]… We will try with all our strength not to be defiled through ecclesiastical communion with them, and not to partake in their scab or their destructive disease. We will also guard ourselves in every way and completely abstain from their faction."

23. Saint Meletios of Galesion: "The Latins are heretics, and those who are in communion with them perish…".

24. Saint Gregory Palamas adds: "Since Kalekas is in this manner and so many times cut off from the entire body of the Orthodox, it is consequently impossible for anyone who has not separated from him to belong to the pious. On the contrary, whoever for these reasons is separated from Kalekas, such a one truly belongs to the list of Christians and is united with God according to the pious faith."

25. And furthermore: "It is impossible for someone to be in ecclesiastical communion with the Patriarch (Kalekas) and to be Orthodox…, whereas the one who was walled off is united with the pious faith."

26. We must again emphasize—because it is of utmost importance—that when Gregory was teaching these things, he was walled off, and Kalekas had not yet been synodally condemned!

Saint Theodore the Studite recalls the command of Saint Athanasius the Great: "…that we are to have no communion with the heretics, but not even with those who commune with the impious."

27. Thus he "rightly" concludes his final position: "…neither to commune with them [the heretics], nor to commemorate them… during the Divine Liturgy; for the greatest threats have been pronounced by the saints against those who condescend to them even to the point of sharing a meal…".

28. The Apostolic Canons fully support this position: "If anyone prays together with one who is excommunicated, even in a house, let him also be excommunicated."

29. Saint Mark says: "…Advise the priests of God to avoid in every way ecclesiastical communion with their Latin-minded metropolitan, and neither to concelebrate with him, nor to commemorate him at all, nor to consider him a hierarch, but rather as a hireling and a wolf! …Therefore, you also, brethren, avoid ecclesiastical communion with the excommunicated and the commemoration of the uncommemorated. This Latin-minded one will be condemned together with the Latins and will be regarded as a transgressor of the faith."

30. "…They must be fled from, as one flees from a serpent, as those men—or rather, much worse than those—as traffickers in Christ and Christ-merchants… Flee from them, then, brethren, and from communion with them. For such men are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into apostles of Christ."

31. It is important to emphasize that the Saint does not raise issues such as the necessity of Synodal approval, the danger of schism or supposed separation from the Church, nor matters of applying economy, or for the sake of peace or the continuation of preaching.

After the signing of the false union at Ferrara-Florence, Saint Mark said: "I am convinced that the more I distance myself from him [the Patriarch] and from such men [the Latin-minded], the more I draw near to God and to the Saints, and the more I separate myself from them, the more I am united with the truth."

32. The Saint says: "Those who pretend to confess the sound faith, yet commune [commemorate] with those of different mind, if after your admonition they do not separate themselves from them, not only must you regard them as outside the Church, but you must not even call them brothers."

33. And for the venerable Neophytos the Recluse, "ecclesiastical communion with the Papists places the one who communes with them under the anathemas of the Councils and in the depths of Hades."

In conclusion, we will mention the words of the holy Patriarch Germanos, Patriarch of Constantinople, to the Cypriot laypeople concerning the walling off from their clergy, who had submitted to the Latin conquerors in the 12th and 13th centuries: "…All of you who are true children of the Catholic Church, flee with all haste from the priests who have fallen into submission to the Latins, and do not gather with them in church, nor receive from their hands any kind of blessing; for it is better to pray to God alone in your homes than to gather in churches with the Latin-minded; otherwise, you will share the same condemnation as they."

34. "Anathema to those who commune knowingly [with the heretics]."

 

Greek source:

https://www.agioritespateres.com/ti-lene-oi-agioi-pateres-gia-tin-apofygi-koinonias-me-airetikous-%e1%bd%81-molysmos-dia-t%e1%bf%86s-koinonias-me-a%e1%bc%b1retikous-%e1%bc%a4-kakodoksous-%e1%bc%90piskopous/

 

Sunday, April 20, 2025

Ecumenism: The Overturning of the Gospel

Panagiotis Simatis, Professor of Theology


On the occasion of the Gospel of St. John:

“Go ye” compromise with “all nations” “teaching them” to transgress “all things whatsoever I have commanded you”

 

The holy Chrysostom points out that, during the days of the great feasts of the Jews, Christ was systematically found among the Jews who flocked to Jerusalem, in order to celebrate with them and, through His miracles and His teaching, to draw the guileless and simple people. For Christ had a greater concern to heal them and offer them salvation than they themselves had the desire for healing.

“For what reason, then, does Christ continually take up His abode in Jerusalem and during the feasts sojourn among the Jews? In order to lay hold of those who are ailing, that He might draw to Himself the guileless among the multitude. For those who were suffering did not have as great a desire to be freed from their ailments as the Physician displayed zeal to deliver them from their sickness. Therefore, when their gathering was full, He, coming into their midst, would then manifest those things pertaining to the salvation of their souls.” (John Chrysostom, Against the Anomoeans, Homily 12, and Commentary on John)

There are even today people who would like to find the One Truth, who seek to be healed from the paralysis of every sin and false belief. But the unfortunate reality is that the healers are lacking! The majority of today’s shepherds, “in the type and stead of Christ,” have ended up no longer as disciples of Christ, but as mere performers of sacred rites or as a kind of social welfare service with a religious veneer—secularized and indifferent to the essence of what Christ came to offer man. There are, of course, also those spiritual fathers who give all their strength to the guidance of modern man, but they fall into another “temptation from the right”: they appear to be “indifferent” toward the contemporary heretics “within the walls,” toward the combating of heresy and the return of the heretics to the One, Holy, Orthodox Church.

The unfortunate reality, however, is that this apparent “indifference” is not truly indifference, but rather a cowardice to confront the small in number yet well-organized ecumenist faction; and as such, it constitutes acceptance of the conspiracy of silence that has been imposed primarily by the Patriarchate of Constantinople, so that the faithful may not be informed about the heretical policies of the Phanar!!! That is, the spiritual fathers, invoking “discernment,” refuse to approach, to preach, and to heal those who have been afflicted by the paralysis of the heresy of Ecumenism (as well as of Papism and the W.C.C.).

Do they perhaps ignore the patristic teaching that heresy is a contagious and difficult-to-heal disease?

“Do not make friends with heretics, so that you may not partake in their communion; … for each shall reap what he has sown.” (Ephraim the Syrian, On Repentance and Compunction)

“But if there is such great harm concerning those who fall into moral failings, what must one say about those who hold false doctrines about God, whom their heretical opinion does not even allow to be sound in other matters, as they are handed over once and for all, because of it, to the passions of dishonor?” (St. Basil the Great, Shorter Rules, Question 20)

And: “The heretical belief of the heretics always proceeds toward the worse and becomes a greater wound... For this reason, Christians ought to avoid these men and all heretics as plagues and pestilences, lest they too be destroyed along with them...” (Nikodemos the Hagiorite, Commentary on the Fourteen Epistles of the Apostle Paul, vol. 3, pp. 318–319)

How is it, then, possible, by burying their heads in the sand, for the shepherds to overlook the harm suffered by the faithful, who are in communion with local heretical ecumenists (whose very existence and heresy they are unaware of), and also the “blasphemy” that lies in the distortion of the Gospel, of Holy Tradition, and of dogmatic truth, which the Ecumenists commit?

How do they tolerate the invocation of cheap excuses in order not to name the heretics, and how is it possible that they do not realize that these “excuses” express the very essence of the pan-heresy of Ecumenism and have been suggested by the Ecumenists themselves?

1) For example, certain spiritual fathers say that the Patriarch “also” teaches Orthodox things—as if they have never read Church history, as if they do not know that most heretics began as “otherwise” Orthodox, except for the one point in which they taught falsely; as if they do not know (and have themselves taught us) that heresy consists in the transgression of “one jot or one tittle,” according to the teaching of the Lord Himself!

2) They also say (depending on whom they are addressing each time): let us look to ourselves, to the purification from the passions (and this is very correct); matters of Faith and of our relations with heretics belong to the competence of the shepherds (but this, however, is a great error and clearly an unpatristic position).

How is it that the clergy do not realize that in this way they dissolve the unity of Orthodox preaching and Orthodox pastoral care? So then, the Holy Fathers, who inseparably connected Faith and Ethics, who considered progress in the spiritual life unthinkable without the prerequisite of right Faith, without the confession of this Faith and the preservation of the Dogmas inviolate—even unto martyrdom—were all the Saints, then, mistaken? Certainly not.

St. Basil the Great writes: The Lord said:

“‘Go ye therefore and teach all nations, teaching them,’ not to observe some things and neglect others, but ‘to observe all things,’ without overlooking even the smallest of the ‘commanded things,’ since all are necessary for your salvation. But we, thinking that we have fulfilled one of the commandments (for I would not say that we have actually fulfilled it—for all the commandments are interconnected, according to the sound reasoning of the purpose, so that in the breaking of one the rest are inevitably also broken), do not await wrath for the things we have neglected, but expect honor supposedly for the one thing accomplished.” (St. Basil the Great, Ethical Discourses, On Virtue and Vice, Discourse 1)

And here lies the entire responsibility, the personal tragedy, and the fall of contemporary clergy: though they know these things, they silently accept such unpatristic “reasonings” and adopt this stance, thereby manifestly—inasmuch as it depends on them—dividing and dissolving the unity of life in Christ, as a unity of Faith and Ethics, which connects us with the timeless Tradition of the Church, hindering—instead of facilitating—our true union with the Lord.

The holy Chrysostom writes:

“For it is not enough for one single virtue to present us with boldness before the judgment seat of Christ, but there is need of much, and varied, and manifold, and of every kind of virtue. Hear Him, then, saying to His disciples: Go ye therefore and teach all nations, teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you.” (John Chrysostom, Selections from Various Discourses)

The Shepherds officially and—despite repeated warnings—persistently refuse to acknowledge that unity exists where right Faith is found and ecclesiastical Tradition is applied, that is, in the One, Holy Church, thereby allowing the practices of the hundreds of heretical confessions, whose common denominator is Ecumenism, to infiltrate the body of Christians.

This means that they compromise with heresy and surrender without a fight to the leaders of Ecumenism. In this way, the uncatechized faithful become familiarized with heresy, and the healing of the heretics is hindered.

Yet another transgression also takes place: they reject a fundamental Commandment—that of the Evangelization of the heterodox, among whom there are many who thirst for the knowledge of the true Orthodox life and teaching.

They refuse to address and converse with the ignorant people among the heterodox, as the Lord did, and instead—with “joyful feet”—they have for decades engaged in dialogue with the leaders and hardened structures of each heresy, that is, with the “chief priests,” the “Sadducees,” and the “Pharisees” of our time, who are also their table companions.

And they have refused, for decades now, to address and preach Christ to the peoples, because they do not wish to fall out with the powers of this world—the atheist Popes and homosexual priests and priestesses of the heterodox—those who are their feasting dialogue partners, who have introduced a multitude of false doctrines (which should one mention first?), have abolished many of the Commandments of Christ, and show no intention whatsoever of correcting themselves and returning to the One Church.

They have become stricken with amnesia and do not remember the Commandment of Christ: “Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven.”

They have, in other words, entrusted the salvation of the heretics to the leaders of the heresies(!), against whom the Lord pronounced the “woes.” They themselves refuse to imitate Christ, to be present among the places of the simple heretics, to teach that only the Orthodox Church offers true life and salvation, and thus, to confess Christ.

And they refuse, because they have agreed with their heterodox dialogue partners not to teach the truth of the Gospel, not to call the heretics of the West to salvation! That is, they do the exact opposite of what Christ taught, Who gave the Commandment to go forth unto all nations—not compromising in matters of Faith, but preaching “One Faith,” “one Baptism,” “One Church.”

Thus, the Orthodox clergy themselves, through their institutional and authoritative presence, hinder those few Shepherds who persist in an Orthodox manner and strive to fulfill the Commandment of the Word of God for the evangelization of those who do not believe rightly.

But St. Epiphanios writes:

“…(The Lord) taught to proclaim the kingdom of heaven in truth, …and saying ‘make disciples of all nations,’ that is, transform the nations from wickedness to truth, from heresies to one unity, ‘baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,’ into the Lordly appellation of the Trinity, …in order to show by the very name that there is no alteration of the one unity. For where those being baptized are commanded by Him to be ‘sealed’ in the name… of the ‘Holy Spirit,’ the bond is neither divided nor alienated, having the seal of the one divinity.” (Epiphanius of Cyprus, Panarion)

And the ecclesiastical writer Eusebius:

“‘Go ye therefore and make disciples of all nations.’ For the Holy Spirit wills them to carry out the evangelical work with fervent and undivided zeal; for by the phrase ‘day unto day,’ He presents this very thing—that they continually proclaim the message of salvation…” (Eusebius, On the Titles of the Psalms, Interpretation of Selected Ones)

I am aware that I am placing responsibility (with what I write—not for the first time) upon respected spiritual fathers. Many times I have asked myself: who am I, that I dare to point out some of their omissions? Yet I feel within me a strong conviction that what I write is not my own position (for then I would not even dare to express it), but the Orthodox Tradition.

And although similar thoughts have been written many times, I have not seen any rebuttal. Which means that our spiritual fathers either have no answer to give to the patristic texts that are cited, or they are indifferent, as teachers, to present and teach the precise and indisputable position of the Church on the matter—and, as shepherds and fathers, to correct even me with the genuine patristic word, and not with personal opinions that differ from elder to elder, so that I may understand (where I err) the correct position.

 

Greek source: https://www.agioskosmas.gr/antiairetika.asp?isue=88&artid=4282

 

Saturday, April 19, 2025

Concerning the unknown venerable hermits who every Great Saturday would come to receive the Holy Light

When I went to the Holy Places and celebrated Pascha for the first time in 1954, I saw a clergyman with white beard, thin, pale, and barefoot, who was coming with a small lantern in his hand on Great Saturday, followed also by two barefoot nuns.

A deacon then by the name of Chrysostomos, I heard him say:

—These people appear here once a year. Where and how they live, no one knows.

They continued to come for another 4–5 years, that is, until 1959, and since then they disappeared. In various discussions that some had at the time, they said that this hermit was a certain metropolitan of a province in the Peloponnese, and after he resigned from his rank and position, he came to live in asceticism by the River Jordan, near the hermitage of Saint Mary of Egypt, together with the two nuns.

The following year, 1955, I remember, the aforementioned deacon Chrysostomos said to His Eminence Benedict that he wanted to follow those three hermits, to see where they go when they receive the Holy Light. Indeed, he received the blessing of His Eminence, who had not yet become patriarch at that time, and he waited in the tower to see the clergyman with his lantern lit, as he used to do.

Indeed, that hermit arrived with the two nuns in the middle of the courtyard, and the deacon Chrysostomos ran to catch up with them. They, for brevity, passed through the small gate of Saint Mary of Egypt. When the deacon arrived there, he saw them neither to the right, nor to the left, nor ahead, as to where they had gone. No one knows where they went and where exactly they were living in asceticism. After 1959, they ceased to come. It seems that they fell asleep in the Lord.


Excerpts from the sermon of His Eminence Archbishop Ambrosios of Neapolis and Samaria, which was delivered at the Synodikon of the Holy Monastery of Saint Gregory, Mount Athos, on the 24th of October, 1986.

Greek source: https://simeiakairwn.wordpress.com/2025/04/19/%CF%80%CE%B5%CF%81%CE%AF-%CF%84%CF%89%CE%BD-%CE%B1%CE%B3%CE%BD%CF%8E%CF%83%CF%84%CF%89%CE%BD-%CE%BF%CF%83%CE%AF%CF%89%CE%BD-%CE%B5%CF%81%CE%B7%CE%BC%CE%B9%CF%84%CF%8E%CE%BD-%CF%80%CE%BF%CF%85-%CE%BA-2/

 

Friday, April 18, 2025

A Homily on the Burial of the Divine Body of Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, on Joseph of Arimathaea, and on the Lord's Descent into Hades Which, After His Saving Passion, Wondrously Ensued on the Holy and Great Saturday

by St. Epiphanios of Salamis (+403)




What thing is this? Today there is great silence upon the earth, great silence and stillness, verily great silence, for the King sleeps. The earth was frightened and became still, for God fell asleep in the flesh and raised up those who from ages past were sleeping. God died in the flesh and Hades shuddered. God slumbered briefly, and those in Hades He awoke.

Where now that so recent tumult, those cries, that clamour against Christ, O ye lawless? Where the populace, the oppositions, the ranks, the weapons, the spears? Where the kings, the priests, and the judicable judges? Where the lanterns, the swords, the boisterous shouts? Where the rabble, the jeering, the irreverent guard? Verily in truth and in truth verily, "the peoples have meditated things empty and vain." [1]

They have stumbled against the Cornerstone, Christ, and they were broken; they have hurled themselves against the solid Rock, and they were crushed, and their waves dispersed into foam. They struck against the invincible Anvil, and they were shattered. Upon the wood [of the Cross] they raised up the Rock of life, and It brought them down and slew them. They bound the great Sampson, the Sun, God, but He, having loosed the age-old bonds, destroyed the Philistines and iniquitous. God, the Sun, Christ set beneath the earth and wrought for the Jews lasting nocturnal darkness.

Today is salvation for men upon the earth and for those who from ages past are beneath the earth. Today is salvation for the world, the visible and the invisible. Twofold today is the Master's coming, twofold the oeconomy, twofold the love of men, twofold the descent and also the condescension, twofold His visitation of men. From Heaven to earth, and from earth to the nether world God makes His way.

Ye that from ages past have fallen asleep, rejoice! Ye that sit in darkness and the shadow of death, receive the great Light! With the servants is the Master; with the dead is God; with the mortal is Life; with the guilty is the Guiltless; with those in darkness is the unwaning Light; with the captives is the Liberator; and with those in the nethermost is He that is above the very heavens.

Christ [came] upon earth, and we have believed; Christ is among the dead, let us descend with Him and behold those mysteries yonder! Let us come to know the wonders of the Hidden One hidden under the earth! Let us learn how and to whom the kerygma was manifested in Hades!

What then? Did God save absolutely all when He appeared in Hades? In no wise. But there also He saved them that believed. Yesterday oeconomy, today authority; yesterday the tokens of infirmity, today those of majesty; yesterday the tokens of humanity, today those of Divinity. Yesterday, He was slapped; today He smites the tenement of Hades with the lightning of His Divinity. Yesterday He was bound; today He binds the tyrant with infrangible bonds. Yesterday He was condemned; today He bestows liberty on the condemned. Yesterday Pilate's ministers mocked Him; today Hades' gatekeepers saw Him and trembled.

But hearken now to the sublime tale of Christ's suffering! Hearken and offer praise, hearken and glorify, hearken and preach the wondrous works of God: how the Law retires; how grace blossoms forth; how the types pass away; how the shadows vanish; how the Sun fills the whole world; how the Old [Covenant] has grown old; how the New is established; how things of ancient times have perished; how things new have flourished.

There were two peoples on Sion at the time of Christ's Passion, that of the Jews and that of the nations; and two kings, Pilate and Herod; and two high priests, Annas and Caiaphas. And this was so that simultaneously there be two Paschas, the one terminating, and Christ's just beginning.

On that evening two sacrifices were performed, since two salvations, I mean of the living and of the dead, were accomplished. The Jew bound a lamb and sacrificed it by slaughter; but he from the nations [sacrificed] God in the flesh. The former gazed upon the shadow; the latter ran to God, the Sun. The Jews bound Christ and sent Him away; but they from the nations eagerly received Him. The first offered as sacrifice an animal victim; the second the body of God. The Jews commemorated their passing over from Egypt, whilst they from the nations heralded their deliverance from error.

And these things, where did they take place? In Sion, the city of the great King, where He "wrought salvation in the midst of the earth." [2] In the midst of two living beings was Jesus, the Child of God, known, [3] in the midst of the Father and the Spirit, two living Beings; Life from Life, he says, known as a living Being, and in the midst of angels and men He was born in a manger.

In the midst of two peoples He lies as the Cornerstone; in the midst of the Law and the prophets He is preached; in the midst of Moses and Elias He is seen upon the mount; in the midst of two thieves He is recognized as God by the grateful thief; in the midst of the present life and the future He sits as the eternal Judge; and today in the midst of the living and the dead He works a twofold life and salvation. Nay, again I say a twofold life, a twofold birth and also rebirth.

Listen now to the circumstances of Christ's twofold birth and acclaim the wonders. An angel announced to Mary Christ's maternal birth, and an angel announced to Mary of Magdala His awesome rebirth from the grave. At night Christ is born in Bethlehem, and at night in Sion He is reborn. Upon His birth He receives swaddling bands, and here also He is wound round with swaddling bands. When born He received myrrh, and at His burial He receives myrrh and aloes.

There Joseph was the name of Mary's non-husband husband, but here Joseph of Arimathaea proved to be the burier of our Life. In Bethlehem in a manger the former took place, and the latter in the tomb as in a manger. First the shepherds were given news of the birth of Christ, and first the shepherds, Christ's disciples, were given news of His rebirth from the dead. There the angel cried "Rejoice!" to the virgin, whilst here Christ, the Angel of Great Counsel, cried "Rejoice!" to the women.

At His first birth Christ after forty days entered the earthly Jerusalem, and the temple, and as firstborn He offered a pair of turtle-doves to God. But at His resurrection from the dead Christ after forty days ascended to the Jerusalem on high, from whence He departed not, and as the incorruptible First-born from the dead, in the true Holy of Holies He offered to God the Father our soul and body as two spotless turtle-doves; and like some Symeon the ancient, God the Father received Him uncircumscribably into His embrace, into His own bosom.

If, however, thou hearest these things as though they were fables and not with faith, the unbroken seals of the Master's tomb condemn thee with respect to Christ's rebirth. For just as Christ was born from the Virgin whilst the natural gates of the virginal nature remained closed at the opening of the womb, so also Christ's rebirth was wrought whilst the seals of the tomb were unbroken.

But as to how Christ, our Life, was placed in the tomb, and when, and by whom, let us listen to the sacred words.

"When even was come," he says, "there came a rich man of Arimathaea named Joseph, and went boldly unto Pilate and begged from him the body of Jesus." [4] A mortal went in before a mortal, asking to receive God; the God of mortals he begs; clay stands before clay so as to receive the Fashioner of all! Grass asks to receive from grass the Heavenly Fire; the miserable drop seeks to receive from a drop the whole Abyss!

Who ever saw, who ever heard such a thing? A man grants to a man the Creator of men; a lawless man undertakes to surrender the Definition of the Law of [sic — I think they meant "to"] lawless men; a judge deprived of judgment permits the burial of the Judge of judges Who has been judged to death.

"When even was come," he says, "there came a rich man named Joseph." Truly was this man rich who carried away the entire compound hypostasis of the Lord. Verily was he rich, because he received the twofold nature of Christ from Pilate. He was rich indeed, because he was accounted worthy to carry off the priceless Pearl. Truly was he rich, for he bore away the Pouch overflowing with the treasure of Divinity. And how should that man not be rich who acquired the Life and Salvation of the world? How should Joseph not be rich, who received as a gift Him that sustains and rules all things?

"When even was come," for the Sun of Righteousness had then set into Hades. Wherefore, "There came a rich man named Joseph of Arimathaea, who was a secret [disciple] for fear of the Jews. And there came also Nicodemus, which at first came to Jesus by night." [5] O hidden mystery of mysteries! Two secret disciples came to conceal Jesus in a tomb, thus teaching by His concealment the mystery concealed in Hades of the God concealed in the flesh.

Each one of these men surpassed the other in their affection for Christ. For Nicodemus proved his magnanimity by the myrrh and aloes, and Joseph proved worthy of praise by his daring and boldness before Pilate. For he, casting off all fear, went in unto Pilate and begged the body of Jesus.

Now when he went in he acted very shrewdly, so as to obtain his longed-for aim. Wherefore, he did not employ high-sounding and pompous words, lest Pilate be moved to wrath and he fail in his request. Nor did he say to him, "Give me the body of Jesus, Who but a short time ago darkened the sun, split the rocks asunder, shook the earth, opened the sepulchres [sic], and rent the veil of the temple!" Nothing of the kind said he to Pilate.

But what, then? A certain pitiful plea, in every wise lowly. "O judge, I have come to make of thee a trifling of Him that was by thee condemned, Jesus of Nazareth, Jesus the poor, Jesus the homeless, Jesus the crucified, the bound, the shelterless, the Stranger, Who in a strange land is unknown, Jesus the contemptible, Who for all was suspended [on the Cross]."

"Give me this Stranger, for what profit to thee is the body of this Stranger? Give me this Stranger, for from afar He came to this place to save a stranger, to a dark region He descended to draw up a stranger. Give me this Stranger, for He alone is a stranger. Give me this Stranger, whose country we know not, the strangers. Give me this Stranger, whose place and birth and ways we know not, the strangers. Give me this Stranger, Who lived in a strange land, a strange life and existence. Give me this Stranger, whose generation and disposition we know not, the strangers. Give me this Stranger, Who had no where to lay His head. Give me this Stranger, Who as a homeless stranger in a strange land was born in a manger. Give me this Stranger, Who from the very manger fled Herod as a stranger. Give me this Stranger, Who from His very swaddling bands was a stranger in Egypt, Who has no city, no village, no home, no abode, no kindred, for this Stranger is found in foreign lands with His Mother.

Give me, O prince, this naked man on the Cross that I may cover Him that covered my nature's nakedness. Give me Him that is both a dead man and God, that I may shroud Him that has hidden mine iniquities. Give me, O prince, this dead man Who buried my sin in the Jordan. I entreat thee for a dead man Who suffered injustice from all, Who by a friend was sold, Who by a disciple was betrayed, Who by brethren was persecuted, Who by a slave was smitten.

For a dead man I interceded, Who was condemned by them that He freed from slavery, Who by them was given vinegar to drink. Who by them that He healed was wounded, Who by His own disciples was forsaken, Who of His own Mother was bereaved. For a dead man, O prince, I beseech, that homeless One Who was suspended on the Cross, for He has no father near Him upon the earth, no friend, no disciple, no kindred, no burier. Nay, He is alone, the Only-begotten of the Unique, God in the world, and none else save He."

When these things Joseph spake to Pilate on this wise, Pilate commanded that the all-holy body of Jesus be given him. And he went to the place called Golgotha and took God in the flesh down from the Cross and laid Him on the earth, naked God in the flesh, Him that was not merely a man.

Lo, He is beheld lying low Who drew all men on high. And He for a brief time is bereft of breath Who is the Life and Breath of all. He is seen bereft of eyes Who created the many-eyed beings. He lies prostrate Who is the resurrection of all. And God is slain in the flesh Who raised up the dead. The thunder of God the Word is now silent for an instant, and He is borne in the arms of men Who holds the earth in His hand.

Dost thou really, O Joseph, know Whom thou wast given when thou didst ask and receive? Dost thou truly know Whom thou didst carry when thou camest to the Cross and didst bring down Jesus? If in truth thou knowest Whom thou didst carry, thou art now verily become rich.

And how is it that thou givest burial to this most awesome body of God? Praiseworthy is thine ardour, but even more praiseworthy the disposition of thy soul. For dost thou not tremble, bearing in thine arms Him before Whom the Cherubim tremble? With what fear dost thou strip that Divine flesh of the loincloth? And how dost thou reverently restrain thine eye? Art thou not fearful when gazing upon and shrouding the nature of God's flesh, He that surpasses nature?

Tell me, O Joseph, dost thou really bury towards the East a dead man that is the Dayspring of the East? And with thy fingers dost thou close the eyes of Jesus as befits the dead, nay, of Him that with His immaculate finger opened the eyes of the blind? And dost thou bind the mouth of Him that opened the mouth of the stammerer? Dost thou lay out with thy hands Him that extended the withered hands? Or dost thou bind the feet, as befits the dead, of Him that made motionless feet to walk? Dost thou place upon a bed Him that commanded the paralytic, "Take up thy bed and walk"? [6]

Dost thou empty out myrrh upon the celestial Myrrh Who emptied Himself and sanctified the world? Dost thou dare to wipe that Divine side of Jesus bleeding still, the side of God who healed the woman of an issue of blood? Dost thou wash with water God's body which cleanses all and bestows purification? But what lamps dost thou light for the "true Light which enlighteneth every man"? [7]

What funeral odes dost thou chant for Him that is hymned unceasingly by all the Heavenly hosts? And dost thou weep as though He were dead that wept and raised up Lazarus, the four days dead? And dost thou bewail Him that gave joy to all and banished the sorrow of Eve?

Albeit, I bless thy hands, O Joseph, which ministered and clasped the bleeding hands and feet of Jesus' Divine body. I bless thy hands which drew nigh to God's bleeding side before Thomas, the believing disbeliever, the acclaimed inquisitive. I bless thy mouth filled insatiably, and united to the mouth of Jesus, whence it was filled with the Holy Spirit. I bless thine eyes which thou didst press against the eyes of Jesus, whence they partook of the true light. I bless thy countenance which drew nigh to the countenance of God. I bless thy shoulders which bore the Bearer of all. I bless thy head against which Jesus, the Head of all, reclined. I bless thy hands wherewith thou didst carry Him that carries all.

I bless Joseph and Nicodemus, for they replaced the Cherubim by uplifting and carrying God and, as God's ministers, the six-winged Seraphim also, for not with wings but with a winding sheet they covered and rendered honour to the Lord. Him that the Seraphim hold in dread, the Same Joseph and Nicodemus carry upon their shoulders, and all the bodiless orders stand in awe.

When Joseph and Nicodemus came, the entire divine populace of angels swiftly gathered. The Cherubim run before them, the Seraphim hasten with them, the Thrones help them to carry, the Six-winged cover Him, and the Many-eyed are struck with dread, seeing Jesus in the flesh bereft of vision; the Powers aid in shrouding, the Principalities offer hymns, the order of Angels tremble, and all the hosts of the celestial ranks are stupified [sic].

And marvelling [sic] they question and say one to another, "What fearsome thing is this? What this dread? What this trembling? What manner of deed? What is this great, strange and incomprehensible spectacle? He that as naked God on high we cannot see, the Same on earth is easily seen naked by men!"

Him before Whom the Cherubim stand with reverent fear, Joseph and Nicodemus bury fearlessly. When did He descend that never left [the regions] on high? How did He go forth that remains within? How did He that fills all things come upon earth?

In what manner did He slip away that eludes [the sight of] all? He that is on high with His Father as perfect God, is below with His Mother as perfect man. How is He that never appeared to us now manifest to men as both man and the man-befriending God? How was the Invisible One beheld? How was the Unmaterial One incarnate? How did the Impassible One suffer?

How did the Judge stand before a tribunal? How did Life taste of death? How is the Uncontainable One contained in a tomb? How does He sojourn in a sepulchre [sic] Who never left the Father's bosom? How does He enter the gates of a cave Who opened the gates of Paradise, Who broke not the gates of the Virgin, but burst the gates of Hades?

Nay, He Who [entering] for Thomas, opened not the gates, but Who to all men opened the gates of the Kingdom, and kept unopened the gates and seals of the tomb? How is He reckoned among the dead Who is free among the dead? [8] How does the unwaning Light come to the regions of darkness and the shadow of death?

Whither does He go? Where comes His path, He Whom death cannot dominate? What is the reason [of these things]? What the means? What is the intent of His descent into Hades? Perhaps He descends so as to bring up Adam the condemned, our fellow servant?

Verily, He goes to seek out Adam, the first-created, the lost sheep. It is certain that He wishes to visit those sitting in darkness and the shadow of death; it is certain that He goes to loose Adam the captive and his co-captive Eve from affliction, He that is both God and her Son.

But let us descend with Him, but let us rejoice together, but let us hasten, but let us skip, but let us escort Him, but let us praise Him, but let us run quickly, seeing God's reconciliation with men and the release of the condemned by the good Master! The Friend of man by nature goes with great gallantry and might to lead forth them that are there held captive from ages past, them that dwell in the grave, whom bitter, insatiate death has tyrannically swallowed, oppressed, stolen from God and amassed; He goes to free them and number them with the denizens on high.

There Adam is found, the captive, the first-created, the first-born, and who of all those condemned to the nether regions is nethermost. There is Abel, the first to die, the first righteous man, the shepherd and type of Christ the Shepherd's unjust slaughter. There is Noah, the type of Christ, the Fashioner of the great Ark of God's Church, which saved all the bestial nations from the cataclysm of ungodliness by the Dove, the Holy Spirit, which banished from itself the blackish raven. There is Abraham, the sacrificer and father of Christ, Who sacrificed to God that most blessed Sacrifice which with double-edged sword dealt death to death.

There below is Isaac bound, who above [9] was bound of Abraham in olden times as a type of Christ. There is Jacob afflicted in Hades below, who above was once afflicted because of Joseph. There is Joseph the fettered, who in Egypt was cast into prison as a type of Christ the Prisoner and Potentate. There is Moses below in darksome regions, who once was in the cleft amidst the darkness. There is Daniel in the pit of Hades, who once above was in the pit of lions. There Jeremias as in a pit of slime lies in the pit of hades and the corruption of death. There in that world-devouring leviathan of Hades Jonas lies as a type of Christ, the eternal and pre-eternal Jonas Who lives unto the ages and the ages of ages.

And there is David too, God's forefather, from whom Christ sprung after the flesh. But why speak I of David, Jonas, and Solomon? There is found the sublime John himself, who is greater than all the prophets, who as though in a dark womb proclaimed Christ to all in Hades, the twofold forerunner, the preacher of the living and the dead, he that from Herod's dungeon was sent to the common prison of Hades where both righteous and unrighteous from ages past were sleeping.

All the prophets and righteous unceasingly offered up secret, mystical supplications to God, begging for deliverance from that most grievous, gloomy, fiendish murk, and tenebrious, nocturnal black. One cried to God, "From the belly of Hades hearken unto my cry, hear my voice." [10] Another, "Out of the depths have I cried unto thee, O Lord; O Lord, hear my voice." [11] And another, "Cause Thy face to shine, and we shall be saved." [12]

And another, "Thou that sittest on the Cherubim, manifest Thyself." [13] And another, "Stir up Thy might and come to save us." [14] And another, "Let Thy compassions quickly go before us, O Lord." [15] And another, "Deliver my soul from the nethermost Hades." [16] And another, "O Lord, bring up my soul out of Hades." [17] And another, "Abandon not my soul in Hades." [18] And another, "Let my life ascend from corruption unto Thee, O Lord my God." [19]

The God of tender mercies verily heard all these cries, and so Christ judged that it was not right that His love for man should only be shared with them that lived in His days and after Him, but that those also that before His coming had gone down to Hades and that sat in darkness and the shadow of death should be partakers of the same as well. Thus God the Word visited with body and soul men who were still in the flesh, but to the souls which were bereft of bodies He manifested Himself in Hades with His Divine and blameless soul, bereft of a body but not of Divinity.

Wherefore, let us hasten in mind and journey to Hades so as there to see how He masterfully mastered the tyrannical master of a mastership mightly [sic] mastered and how by the lightning flash of His brilliance He without hands captured in His hand [20] the whole soldiery of the ranks of those deathless orders. He took away the doorless doors, nay, Christ the Door shattered those woodless gates by the wood of the Cross; by those divine nails He burst and broke the eternal bars; by the bonds of His Divine hands He dissolved like wax the indissoluble bonds; and by the spear [thrust] in His side He transfixed the heart of the tyrant. "There did He break the power of the bow," [21] when upon the Cross He stretched out the sinews [22] of His Divine arms like a bowman.

Therefore, if thou followest Christ silently thou shalt presently see where He bound the tyrant; where He hung the latter's head; how exhumed that dungeon; whither He led the prisoners; how He trampled upon the serpent; where He suspended its skull; and how He liberated Adam; how He raised up Eve; how He broke down the middle wall; [23] how He punished the bitter dragon; how He made perdition to perish; and where He restored man to his ancient dignity.

Yesterday by way of oeconomy He refused to summon numerous legions of angels, saying to Peter, "Can I not now bring forward more than twelve legions of angels?" [24] But today in a manner befitting God, a warrior and a sovereign, through death He tramples down the tyrant of Hades and death, having with Him the immortal legions — not simply twelve, but thousands of thousands and ten thousand ten thousands — of the bodiless hosts and the invisible ranks: the Dominions, the unthroned Thrones, the unwinged Six-winged, the eyeless Many-eyed and all the celestial bands.

For it is certain that they accompanied, escorted and honoured Christ as their own Master and King; but they were not allies — far be it! — for what assistance could Christ the Almighty need? But both by obligation and as loving to stand beside their Master and God, they are trusty spearmen, hoplites, glorious and astute staff-bearers of the Master's divine offices. At the Divine bidding alone they with zeal and speed anticipate one another in transforming act into deed by His command, and they are crowned with victory over the ranks of enemies and transgressors.

Therefore they descended then in haste, hastening with their God and Master to the subterranean chambers of Hades — which are deeper down than anything terrestrial — and to the under-worldly abodes of them that have fallen asleep from ages past; there He gallantly brought forth them that from of old lay in fetters.

As soon as the glistering, divinely-accompanied presence of the Master reached Hades' windowless, sunless, nocturnal dungeons, hovels, lairs, and caves, Gabriel, the chief marshal was first of all — since, indeed, he is wont to bring men good tiding of joy — to exclaim with a mighty, archangelic, resounding, commanding, lion-like voice to the hostile powers, "Lift up your gates, O ye princes," [25] and with him Michael cries, "Be ye lifted up, ye everlasting gates." [26] Thereafter the Powers say, "Stand back, ye iniquitous gate-keepers!" Then the Dominions say with dominion, "Be broken, unbreakable bonds!" And others, "Be abashed, abominable foes!" And still others, "Fear, ye lawless tyrants!"

Now just as before a fearsome, invincible, all-powerful, regal, trophy-bearing battle array, terror and panic and pangs of dread seize the enemies of an unconquerable king, so and more so it befell those [evil beings] in Hades at the sudden, most strange coming of Christ to the nether world. The blinding bolt of lightning from above darkened the countenances of the hostile powers of Hades and they heard thunder-like voices and the [angelic] host commanding, "Lift up your gates, O ye princes! Do not merely open them, but lift them from the foundations, uproot them, remove them so that they never again be closed. Lift up your gates, O ye princes!

"Although the Master here present could enter even if the doors were shut, yet He commands you like run-away slaves to raise, remove, and break those everlasting gates. He orders not the common sort among you, but them that are esteemed by you to be princes, saying, 'Lift up your gates, O ye princes!' Your gates, none else but yours.

"Wherefore, O princes, though till now ye have wickedly held sway over those fallen asleep from ages past, from henceforth ye shall not be their rulers, nor rulers of others, but only of your own selves, but not even of yourselves. For Christ, the Heavenly Door is present. 'Prepare ye the way for Him that rideth upon the setting of Hades. Lord is His name, and the pathways leading forth from the gates of death are those of the Lords' Lord.' [27] Ye made the ways of entrance, but He came to make the pathways leading forth.

"Therefore tarry not, lift up your gates quickly, take them away and return them not. But if ye think to procrastinate, we shall command the gates to be lifted up automatically of themselves. 'Be ye lifted up, ye everlasting gates!'"

And as soon as the hosts cried these things, straightway the gates were raised up, straightway the bonds were loosed, straightway the bars were broken, straightway the bolts fell away, straightway the foundations of the dungeon quaked, straightway the hostile powers were turned to flight, one pushing the other, one impeding the other, one exclaiming to the other, "Flee!"

They were terrified, they were shaken, they were awestruck, they were confounded, they were altered, they were frightened, they were dumbstruck and stupified [sic], confused and made to quake. One stood agape, another between his knees hid his head, another lay prostrate, another like one dead was motionless, another was possessed by awe, another lay with altered countenance, and another fled to an inner region.

For there Christ "cut asunder the heads of princes with amazement," [28] there "they trembled" at Him, there they "burst their bridles," [29] saying, "'Who is the King of Glory?' [30] Who is the great Being that, with so many, works here such wonders? Who is the King of Glory, that now works in Hades that which has never been wrought in Hades? Who is this, that now leads out from hence them that from ages past have fallen asleep? Who is this that has destroyed and abolished our insuppressible audacity and power, Who leads forth from the prison of Hades those fettered from ages past?"

But to those [wicked spirits] the hosts of the Master cried, "Do ye wish to learn, O lawless tyrants, who is the King of Glory? It is 'The Lord strong and mighty, the Lord, mighty and strong and invincible in war'! [31] This is He that banished and cast you down from the vaults of Heaven, ye spineless and lawless tyrants! This is He that in Jordan 'break the heads of your dragons.' [32] This is He that by the Cross publicly exposed you, triumphed over you, and slew you. This is He that bound, blackened and banished you to the abyss. This is He that consigns you to, and destroys you in, the everlasting fire and in Gehenna.

Wherefore, do not linger, do not delay, but speedily bring forth those in bonds which ye wickedly swallowed till this day. From henceforth your dominion is destroyed, your tyranny is come to an end, your insolence is miserably extinguished, your arrogance is quashed, your might is trampled and ruined."

These things the royal hosts of the King spake to the hostile powers and then made haste. Some excavated the dungeon from its very foundations, while some routed the enemy's hosts from the outer regions, causing them to flee within; but others ran and searched the hovels, the jails, and the caverns; and others brought prisoners before the Master from every quarter; others bound the tyrant with infrangible bonds; others speedily obeyed them; and some ran before the Master and He proceeded to the innermost regions, while others followed Him as the victorious King and God.

As these things, therefore, and more than these were coming to pass, were proclaimed and made known, and all things were in an uproar, and the Master's presence was about to reach the very bottommost realm of the nethermost regions, then Adam, the first of men to be created, the first-fashioned and first-mortal, who lay in the innermost recesses bound with great security, heard the sound of the Master's feet as He came to the imprisoned, and he recognized His voice which sounded in the prison as He walked. Thereupon Adam turned towards all his fellow captives from ages past and said, "I hear the sound of Someone's feet advancing towards us, and if He deigns to come even to this place, we shall be freed of our bonds, nay, if we should but see Him in our midst, we shall be delivered from Hades!"

And as Adam said these things and their like to all his fellow prisoners, the Master entered within, holding the Cross as a weapon of victory. Then Adam the first-fashioned beholding Him, beat his breast in exuberance and cried to all, "My Lord be with you all!" And Christ replied and said to Adam, "And with thy spirit," and grasping his hand, He said, "Stand up, 'Awake, O sleeper, and arise from the dead, and Christ shall shine on thee.' [33]

"I am thy God, Who for thy sake became thy Son, for thy sake and for thy descendants' sake, and now I say and with authority command the shackled, Come forth! and those in darkness, Be enlightened! and those asleep, Arise! Thee I enjoin, Awake, O sleeper! for I did not fashion thee to be held in Hades as a captive. Arise from the dead, for I am the Life of the dead! Arise, My creation, arise, Mine image, who wast also made in My likeness! 'Arise, let us go hence!' [34] for thou art in Me and I in thee; we are one indivisible person.

"For thy sake thy God became thy Son; for thy sake the Master took the image of a slave; for thy sake I Who am above the heavens came down upon earth and even beneath the earth; for thee, who art a man, I became 'as a man without help, free among the dead;' [35] for thee, who wentest forth from the garden [of Paradise], I from a garden was betrayed to the Jews and in a garden I was crucified.

"Behold upon My countenance the spittings which I received for thy sake so as to restore to thee the ancient in-breathing. [36] Behold upon My cheeks the slaps which I accepted so as to set aright thy twisted form in accordance to Mine image. Behold upon My back the scourgings which I accepted so as to scatter the burden of thy sins which weighs upon thy back.

"Behold My hands, which unto good were nailed to the tree [of the Cross] for thee, who unto evil didst stretch forth thy hand to the tree. Behold My feet, which were nailed and transfixed upon the tree [of the Cross] for the sake of thy feet which evilly ran to the tree of disobedience on the sixth day, that same day whereon the decree [of thy condemnation] was pronounced and whereon I wrought thy re-creation and re-opened Paradise. [37]

"For thy sake I tasted gall, so as to heal for thee the bitter pleasure caused by that sweet fruit. I tasted vinegar, so as to nullify thy poignant and contranatural cup of death. I accepted the reed, so as to undersign [the writ of] freedom for the race of men. I slept upon the Cross and by a sword was pierced in the side for thee, from whose side whilst thou wast sleeping in Paradise Eve was brought forth. My side healed the pain of thy side; My sleep shall wrest thee from the sleep of Hades; My sword arrested the sword turned [38] against thee.

"Wherefore arise, let us go hence! The foe led thee out of the land of Paradise; yet no more shall I restore thee to Paradise, but to a celestial throne. I restrained thee from the typical tree of life, but lo, I myself, the [true] Life, am united unto thee. I enjoined the Cherubim to watch over thee like a slave; now I make the Cherubim to worship thee like God. Thou didst hide from God as one naked; but lo, thou hast hidden within thyself naked God. Thou didst put on the skin-made coat of shame, [39] but being God I put on the haematic coat of thy flesh.

"Wherefore arise, let us go hence, from death into life, from corruption in incorruption, from darkness into everlasting light! Arise, let us go hence, from affliction into joy, from slavery into freedom, from prison into the Jerusalem on high, from bonds into repose, from detention into the delight of Paradise, from earth into Heaven! And for this did I die, and arose, that I should be Lord both of the dead and the living.

"Arise, let us go hence! For My Heavenly Father waits for the sheep that was lost. The ninety and nine sheep, the angels, await their fellow servant Adam, when he shall arise, when he shall ascend and go up to God. A cherubic throne is prepared, and the bearers thereof are swift and expectant. The bridal-chamber is made ready, the delicacies are prepared, the eternal tabernacles and abodes are waiting, the treasuries of good things are thrown open, the Kingdom of the Heavens has been prepared before the ages, and that which 'eye hath not seen, nor ear hath heard, neither hath entered into the heart of man,' [40] these same good things await mankind."

When the Master said this and more besides, Adam, being united to Him inwardly, rose up, and Eve arose as well, and the bodies of many others who in faith had fallen asleep from ages past arose41 also, preaching the Master's resurrection on the third day.

The same, O men of faith, let us now joyously welcome; let us behold it and embrace it, as we form one chorus with the angels, and with the bodiless celebrate and glorify Christ Who raised us up from corruption and gave us life, to Whom be glory and dominion with His Father, Who is without beginning, and His all-holy good and life-creating Spirit, both now and ever, and unto the ages of ages. Amen.

 

------------------------

1. Cf. Ps. 2:1

2. Ps. 73:13

3. Cf. Hab. 3:3

4. Cf. Matt. 27:57, 58; Mark 15:43

5. Cf. John 19:38, 39

6. John 5:8

7. John 1:9

8. Ps. 87:4

9. I.e., on the earth. The Greek, although being a play on "below," can also mean "formerly."

10. Cf. Jonas 2:2.

11. Ps. 129:1.

12. Ps. 79:4.

13. Ps. 79:2.

14. Ps. 79:3.

15. Ps. 78:8.

16. Cf. Ps. 85:12.

17. Cf. Ps. 29:3.

18. Cf. Ps. 15:10.

19. Jonas 2:6.

20. I.e., subdued.

21. Ps. 75:3.

22. The Greek word also means "bow-string."

23. Cf. Eph. 2:14.

24. Cf. Matt. 26:53.

25. Ps. 23:7.

26. Ibid.

27. Cf. Ps. 67:4, 21

28. Hab. 3:14.

29. Cf. Ibid.

30. Ps. 23:10.

31. Cf. Ps. 23:8.

32. Cf. Ps. 73:14.

33. Eph. 5:14.

34. John 14:31.

35. Ps. 87:4.

36. Vide Gen. 2:7, "And God…breathed upon his face the breath of life."

37. I.e., on the Holy and Great Friday.

38. Vide Gen. 3:24.

39. Or, "shameful coat of skin."

40. I Cor. 2:9.

41. Vide Matt. 27:52.

 

Source: The Lamentations of Matins of Holy and Great Saturday, published by Holy Transfiguration Monastery, Brookline, MA, 1981.


"Today is suspended upon the Tree He who suspended the land upon the waters..."


 

Thursday, April 17, 2025

The Condemnable Nature of Communion with Heretics

Fr. Theodoretos (Mavros) the Athonite (+2007)



What do God and His Church require Orthodox Christians (clergy and laity) to do when their bishop does not preach heresy himself but communes with those who preach some heretical doctrine in word and deed, even if these (the preachers) have not yet been judged by a Council?

The answer to the above serious question cannot, of course, be brief and simple. Summarily, we could structure it as follows.

A) If heresy is preached for a short time (a few months), the faithful wait and anxiously observe how their bishop, his fellow bishops, or the bishops of other Orthodox Churches will react. (For as the Church of Christ is one, despite its administrative distinctions into patriarchates and archbishoprics, so also the same responsibility falls upon all, clergy and laity alike, regarding the heresy being preached, varying only according to each one's knowledge and rank). And if their bishop reacts in a patristic manner, then they are obliged to support him with all their strength, awaiting the outcome.

B) However, if, contrary to hope, their bishop does not react, but his fellow bishops or even a single Orthodox bishop does, then they are obliged to support him, thus indirectly, at first, reproving the silence of their shepherd, yet without severing communion with him.

However, if the reactions of the bishop who is struggling against heresy escalate and, at the proper time, lead to the cessation of communion with the one who holds heretical views (since he remains obstinate in his heretical beliefs), then the faithful are obligated to commune only with the aforementioned struggling bishop, distancing themselves from the assemblies of their own bishop, who, through his silence or lukewarm reaction, does not cease to commune with the heretic, thus cooperating with him and strengthening the heresy. The patristic word on this matter is absolutely clear: 

“Some have suffered complete shipwreck concerning the faith; others, though not entirely submerged even in their thoughts, nevertheless perish through communion with heresy.” [1]

"All the teachers of the Church, all the Councils, all the divine Scriptures exhort to flee from those of different mind and to withdraw from their communion." [2]

And the great Theodore the Studite adds: "For Chrysostom declared with a great and mighty voice that not only heretics, but also those who commune with such are enemies of God." [3]

The above reactions of the rightly struggling bishop must not cease until the synodical condemnation of the heretic. Otherwise, his struggle must continue unto death, imprisonment, and confinement, in the event that the one holding heretical views possesses political or ecclesiastical power in his favor, as has often occurred in the history of the Church.

It is understood that the position of the Orthodox-reacting bishop may be assumed by a clergyman or a monk, provided that no bishop has reacted in a timely or effective manner. The examples are many. [4]

A fundamental and primary role in all the above will always be played by the factors of time and knowledge, that is, how long the heresy has been preached and to what extent it has become known to the fullness of the Church.

However, it should be noted that the factor of knowledge in our days has been nullified due to the existing means of broadcasting speeches and events, whereas the factor of time, although greatly shortened compared to the past, nevertheless continues and will continue to play a fundamental role due to the necessary strategizing of the response until the Synodical condemnation. A classic case in this regard, to which all good shepherds may look, is the condemnation of the heretic Nestorius, Patriarch of Constantinople, by the Third Ecumenical Council, with the protagonists of his deposition being not some of his fellow bishops, but the patriarchs of Alexandria and Rome, who were at a great distance from him! [5]

Before the "Synodal Judgment"

However, the following question arises: Well and good for those who thus reacted and deposed the heretic; honor and praise belong to them according to the words of the holy Canons.

But what of the others, those who did not sever communion with the heretic and continued to commune with him until his synodical condemnation? How should they be regarded, since the relevant holy Canons make no mention of them?

If the holy Canons [6] do not speak of the fate of those who continued communion with the heresiarch until his synodical condemnation, this does not mean that the nature of the aforementioned canons is permissive and, consequently, that communion with the heretic is blameless or indifferent; quite the contrary!

Proof of this is found in the Acts of the holy Councils, that is, in the Sacred Tradition of Orthodoxy, from which it is emphatically confirmed that the conduct of such bishops and clergy is condemnable, culpable, and punishable. Precisely the opposite was dared to be asserted by Archimandrite Epiphanios Theodoropoulos, who showed complete indifference to the blatant distortion of the truth. He writes: "But the cessation of commemoration 'before synodical judgment' and condemnation does not have the meaning of avoiding defilement from the heresy being preached! No, my brother! If it had this meaning, then the Canons would not merely grant the right to cease commemoration for heresy 'before synodical judgment,' but they would establish a clear and explicit obligation, under the threat of severe penalties in the contrary case… Therefore, there is no danger of… being defiled, neither by commemorating the Patriarch (so long as he has not yet been condemned) nor, much less, by communing with those who commemorate him."

"The canon is permissive and not obligatory"…

"That this is true," the Very Reverend continues, "is also proven by the fact that countless bishops in times of heresy were never punished, nor was any cleric ever even reprimanded for not hastening to separate immediately from the heretical bishop but instead waited for his condemnation by a Council…." "Statements to the contrary are foolish zealotry." [7]

Why, then, in such a case, did the most holy Patriarch of Alexandria, Cyril, contrary to Fr. Epiphanios, exhort the faithful of Constantinople, both clergy and laity, to refrain from communion with Nestorius, who was preaching heresy, even though a Council had not yet convened to condemn him [8]? It should also be noted that when the divine Cyril wrote the above, most of the faithful and clergy of Constantinople had already severed communion with their heretical shepherd, except for a few of the more frivolous and those who flattered him [9].

Why did Saint Hypatius, as soon as he was informed of Nestorius’ heresy, cease his commemoration, even before the Council had convened to condemn the heretic [10]?

Why did Saint Maximus the Confessor sever all ecclesiastical communion before "synodal judgment" with almost all the thrones of both East and West due to the heresy of Monothelitism, to the extent that his opponents considered him to be "outside the Church" [11]?

Why did the iconophile confessors who struggled before the Seventh Ecumenical Council, both clergy and laity, remain out of communion with the iconoclasts for entire decades, dwelling in prisons, mountains, and caves for the sake of the good confession [12]?

Was Theodore the Studite, the leading figure among the iconophiles, also a “foolish zealot” when he wrote: “Communion brings defilement merely from mentioning his (i.e., the iconoclast bishop’s) name, even if the one mentioning it is Orthodox” [13]? Or when, concerning an issue far less grave than iconoclasm—namely, the unlawful marriage of the emperor—he proclaimed with unparalleled boldness: “Everything is bearable for us, even unto death, rather than to partake of his [the priest Joseph’s] communion and of those who concelebrate with him”? (P.G. 99, 972).

However, the falsehood, lack of logic and seriousness, and, above all, the un-Orthodox spirit present in the words of the aforementioned Archimandrite will be demonstrated in greater detail below.

First of all, it is impossible for there to be a canon that punishes a priest or a bishop for not severing communion with a heretic before synodal judgment. Why? Because, in such a case, what role would the Synod play, since it would always be arriving to give its ruling… after the fact? And how could it be a true Synod, one that claims to uphold the Evangelical truth, if it does not protect the clergy and laity under its pastoral care, but rather needs to be protected by them? For, in the final analysis, this is what an obligatory reaction of all others upon the appearance of heresy—except for the Synod, which would always come last—would mean!

Such a canon, if it existed, would resemble a civil law that ordered all soldiers and officers to fight relentlessly as soon as the enemy appeared—except for the generals and chief commanders, who would convene for a meeting last, only to announce that the enemy had indeed attacked unlawfully and that the army and officers had done very well to have reacted in a timely manner!…

Unfortunately, such canons is what Fr. Epiphanios seeks in the Pedalion, and since he does not find them… he labels the existing ones as permissive, brutally misinterpreting their meaning!

But even the contemporary synodal fathers do not seem to differ from the psychology of their self-appointed advocate. For whole decades now, while witnessing the heresy of Ecumenism growing and provocatively overturning the boundaries of the Fathers—which the Most Reverend hierarchs are supposed to guard as the apple of their eye—instead of condemning the heresy when they convene, they persecute the few faithful who dared to resist the heresy, upholding the voice of the holy Canons! Indeed, a precise repetition of the un-Orthodox past of the Church.

But something else as well. By what logic would this supposed canon require the Synod to depose the clergy who had not reacted before its judgment, when those very Synodal members carrying out the deposition would themselves be equally guilty as those they were deposing?!

Such a canon would have a place only when the bishops of the "synodal judgment" had reacted in a timely and patristic manner against the heresy but were unable to convene in synod to condemn the heretic due to state intervention and the protection of the heretic, as often happened, especially during the Iconoclast period. In such a case, when these bishops finally do convene, they certainly have every right to condemn the clergy who did not follow their example, as happened at the Third Ecumenical Council. In that case, of course, the consciences of the remaining clergy are not left untried, nor do they have the opportunity to be tested regarding the stance they ought to take against the heresy, and so forth.

Let the Very Reverend, then, not labor in vain, attempting to pacify his conscience, as well as the consciences of all those who, knowingly and before synodical judgment, commune with the heresy being preached, for on all sides the path is narrow for him and for those he seeks to protect… [14].

The Practice of the Church

But did not the Church of Christ, even before the establishment of the relevant holy Canons, successfully confront the heresies that arose, based on the teaching of Holy Scripture [15] and the holy children of the Church [16], as Saint Theodore clearly testifies? "For we have a command from the Apostle himself: if anyone teaches doctrine or commands us to do something contrary to what we have received, contrary to what the Canons of the various Councils, both Ecumenical and local, have defined, we must regard him as unacceptable and not even consider him among the lot of the saints." (P.G. 99, 988A).

This is precisely what the holy Fathers of the Seventh Ecumenical Council applied during the trial and condemnation of the iconoclasts, despite what Fr. Epiphanios has written to the contrary—namely, that "never was any cleric punished or even reprimanded for not hastening to separate immediately from the heretical bishop…" We immediately present representative texts from the sessions of the Council.

A) Tarasios, the Most Holy Patriarch, said to the Bishop of Neocaesarea: "Did the truth pass by you until now as something unknown, or did you despise it despite knowing it? And if it passed by you as something unknown, do you not feel shame in learning the right doctrine, just as you were not ashamed to embrace the distorted one?"

Gregory, Bishop of Neocaesarea, said: "Believe me, Master, that I was unaware; therefore, I ask to learn, as my master and the holy Synod command."

Tarasios: "Say, what do you wish to learn?"

Gregory said: "When this entire assembly speaks and believes as one, I have learned and been assured that this is the truth, which is now being sought and proclaimed. Therefore, I also ask for forgiveness for my past errors, and I desire, together with all, to be enlightened and instructed. My transgressions and sins are immeasurable, and as God moves the holy Synod and the most holy master to compassion…"

Tarasios: "You ought from times past to have opened your ears and listened to the divine Apostle Paul, who says: 'Stand firm and hold fast to the traditions which you have received, whether by word or by our epistle.' And again, writing to Timothy and Titus: 'Avoid profane and vain babblings.' What could be more profane or more vain than saying that Christians have become idolaters?"

Gregory: "It was evil, and we confess it; it was evil, but thus it was done, and thus we acted. Therefore, we ask for forgiveness for our transgressions. I confess, Master, before your most honorable holiness and all the brethren of the holy Synod, that we have sinned and acted lawlessly, and we have done wrongly, and we ask for forgiveness for this…"

B) Basil, Bishop of Ancyra, said: "Therefore, I also, as the Bishop of the city of Ancyra, desiring to be united with the Catholic Church… make and present to you this written confession of mine, to you who have received authority from apostolic authority. At the same time, I also ask forgiveness from your God-gathered blessedness for my tardiness in this matter. For it was fitting that I should not have delayed in confessing Orthodoxy, but this is due to my utter ignorance, sluggishness, and a mind that has been negligent.

C) To the holy and ecumenical Synod, Theodosios (Bishop of Amorion), the least of Christians, I confess, agree, accept, and embrace… Therefore, I beseech you, holy ones of God, and I cry out: I have sinned against heaven and before you. Receive me as God received the prodigal, the harlot, and the thief. Seek me as Christ sought the lost sheep, which He took upon His shoulders…

Sabbas, the most devout abbot of the Monastery of Stoudios, said: "According to the apostolic decrees and the ecumenical councils, he is worthy of acceptance…"

Tarasios, the Most Holy Patriarch, said: "Those who were once accusers of Orthodoxy have now become defenders of the truth…"

D) The monks, having spoken, said: "But the father (Saint Athanasius) receives those who have been led astray and have suffered coercion. Let them declare, then, whether they were misled or endured violence, that they have fallen away from the truth."

Hypatios and the bishops with him said: "We neither endured coercion nor were we misled, but we were born, raised, and brought up in this heresy…" And again, Thalassios, Eusebios, and Eustathios, the most devout bishops, said: "We have all sinned, we all seek forgiveness…" [17].

Who could desire a better interpretation of the holy Canons in practice? Who does not discern in the aforementioned synodal texts the Apostolic and Patristic practice, as it was lived up to the time of those present at the Council? These synodal fathers, in absolute agreement with both the letter and spirit of Scripture, the Canons, and the universal Tradition, affirm that continuing in communion with someone who preaches a heretical doctrine makes one a part of the faction of the heretic—as even those being judged at the Synod themselves confessed. The leader of this faction is none other than the one who initiated the heresy, the “false bishop” of the Canon. Conversely, those who did not commune with the heretic form the healthy reaction of the Church. In other words, they constitute its sound part, which, when able, will judge all who have joined the faction of the heretic—just as was done by the Seventh Ecumenical Council mentioned above. This is what the history of our Church teaches. This is what we have received to believe from our Fathers. Before such a school of instruction, Fr. Epiphanios ought to have humbled himself, rather than sophisticating excessively and unjustly, thereby harming both himself and those who, in good faith, trust in his words.

Consequently, today, when heresy has been preached for decades, when the heretical actions and errors of the Ecumenical Patriarchate become immediately known to the fullness of the Church, when all perceive and understand the terrible deviation of the bishops of Phanar and their fellow travelers, when all these things are carried out repeatedly and with premeditation, how is it possible for Orthodox bishops throughout the world, as well as the clergy and laity under them, to be justified for their condemnable silence and communion with the aforementioned fallen ones?

And to answer the question posed at the beginning, we write: God and His Church desire nothing else from the Orthodox in times when heresy is being preached, as it is today, other than their separation from the heretics and their confession of the truth unto death, until the time when Orthodoxy shines forth again.


[1] P.G. 99, 1164A.

[2] P.G. 160, 105C.

[3] P.G. 99, 1049A.

[4] See also, in relation to this, the Lives of Saint Maximus the Confessor, John of Damascus, and Theodore the Studite, MANSI 4, 1096, 1256, as well as the beautiful saying of Saint Nikodemos the Hagiorite: "In our hierarchy, when a priest or bishop acts disorderly and thinks wrongly, a deacon or monk, acting orderly and thinking rightly, can admonish and correct them, as there are countless examples of this." (Synaxarion, November 8, note).

[5] Spyridon Melias, Most Comprehensive Collection of the Holy Canons…, Venice 1761, vol. I, p. 448.

[6] 31st Apostolic Canon and 15th Canon of the First-Second Council.

[7] Archim. Epiphanios Theodoropoulos, Articles - Studies - Letters, I, Athens 1981, pp. 215, 234.

[8] MANSI 4, 1096; Spyridon Melias, op. cit., vol. II, pp. 449–450.

[9] "There was in Constantinople a bishop named Dorotheos, who shared the same views as him (Nestorius), a man servile and reckless in speech, as it is written. While the most devout Nestorius was seated on the throne of the Church of Constantinople during an assembly, Dorotheos stood up and, with a loud voice, dared to say: ‘If anyone calls Mary Theotokos, let him be anathema.’ And there arose a great outcry from all the people, and they rushed out, for they no longer wished to commune with those who held such views, so that even now the people of Constantinople remain separated from their assemblies, except for a few of the more frivolous and those who flattered him. Nearly all the monasteries and their archimandrites, as well as many from the Senate, no longer gather with them, fearing that they might suffer wrong in their faith at the hands of Nestorius and those with him, whom he had brought up from Antioch, all of whom spoke perverse things." (Letter of Cyril of Alexandria to Celestine, Bishop of Rome, Acts, vol. I, p. 443. Cf. ibid. pp. 451, 455).

[10] ACTA SANCTORUM, NOV B, p. 267.

[11] "Yesterday… the patriarch said to me: ‘Which Church do you belong to? That of Byzantium? Rome? Antioch? Alexandria? Jerusalem? Behold, all of them, along with the provinces under them, have united. If, therefore, you belong to the Catholic Church, unite yourself with them, lest by innovating a foreign path in life, you suffer what you do not expect.’ To which I replied: 'The Catholic Church is the one whose right and saving confession of faith was blessed by Peter, when he rightly confessed Him, whom God has declared to be the Lord of all.' Then they said to me: ‘Listen, it has seemed good to the master and the patriarch, through the decree of the pope of Rome, to anathematize you if you do not obey, and to carry out the death sentence determined by them.’ And the saint replied: 'May what was ordained for me by God before all ages come to its end, bringing Him glory, as was known before all ages…'" (P.G. 99, 132AC).

[12] P.G. 99, 1177D, 1205B, 1365AB, 1636–1637.

[13] Ibid., 1669A.

[14] Regarding the interpretation of the 15th Canon of the First-Second Council, see also the study of the Athonite Fathers, "Distancing and Division," Athens 1981, pp. 34–38.

[15] A) "A heretical man, after a first and second admonition, reject, knowing that such a one is perverted and sins, being self-condemned." (Titus 3:10).

B) "But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to what we have preached to you, let him be anathema." (Galatians 1:8).

C) "Hold fast to the traditions as you were taught, whether by word or by the epistle of the Apostles, and remain in what you have learned and been assured of. Do not be deceived or shaken by those who oppose, but be watchful, stand firm in the faith, become steadfast and immovable." (1 Thess. 5, 2 Thess. 2, 1 Cor. 15, 16, 2 Cor. 13, 2 Tim. 3).

[16] "Flee from heresies, for they are inventions of the devil." (St. Ignatius).

"Turn away from all heresies, as from beasts with deadly venom, concerning which I have also delivered written instructions to you…" (St. Epiphanius).

[17] Spyridon Melias, Most Comprehensive…, vol. II, pp. 729–742.


Greek source: Ὁ Ἁγιορείτης, December 1981. Greek title: "ΤΟ ΚΑΤΑΚΡΙΤΟΝ ΤΗΣ ΜΕΤΑ ΤΩΝ ΑΙΡΕΤΙΚΩΝ ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΑΣ"

New Cessation of Commemoration from the Official Church: Father Georgios Stavrou

    Priest Georgios Stavrou Parish Priest of the Holy Church of Saint Paraskevi Zagora, Pelion 370 01 Zagora   Zagora, October 11, 2026 To H...