Encyclical “To all the Orthodox Christians found throughout the earth and the islands” (1440–1)
Archimandrite
Meletios Vadrachanis
“Just
as throughout my life I was separated [walled off] from them, so also at
the time of my departure and even after my passing, I reject any relationship
and union with them, and I adjure you and command you:
“Let
none of them approach my funeral or my memorial services or any other event of
our own faction.”
This encyclical was written a few
years before the Fall [of Constantinople], from the island of Lemnos. There,
Saint Mark of Ephesus had been exiled by Emperor John Palaiologos at the demand
of the Latin-minded Romans, because Saint Mark would not close his mouth but
continuously spoke out against the most impious and God-hating Latins.
These unionists, when they saw
that they had failed to impose the false union of Ferrara-Florence, resorted to
underhanded actions and theological sophistries in order to mislead the more
naive.
Later, in the 16th century, these
things would be systematized by the Latins, and thus Unia would be
created. Consequently, the Latin-minded unionist Romans are the forerunners
and preparers of Unia, together with Pope Innocent IV (1243–1254), who in 1254
issued an encyclical and permitted the customs and traditions of the Easterners
to be tolerated, with the ultimate aim of their gradual abolition and the
complete Latinization of those united—thus, of the Orthodox with Rome.
1. This encyclical of Saint
Mark, in which he confronts the Latin-minded Romans and the dogmatic deviations
of the Papists from Orthodoxy, we shall present in a summarized adaptation.
The Papists are heretics and not
merely schismatics, as the Latin-minded claimed.
a. Those among the Papists who
come to Orthodoxy are received through chrismation with holy myrrh—and
sometimes they were even re-baptized—classifying them together with the Arians,
Macedonians, Sabbatians, Novatians, and other heretics of the 4th century.
Silvester Syropoulos, who
recorded the history of the Council of Florence, says that Saint Mark
emphasized this to the Orthodox delegation, “but our Church kept it silent,
because their nation is great and more powerful than ours,” and “those
before us did not wish to officially name the Latins as heretics, awaiting
their return and seeking friendship.”
b. Saint Mark cites the phrase of
Saint John of Damascus: “We do not confess that the Holy Spirit proceeds
from the Son” and the phrase of Saint Photios: “A heretic is he who even
slightly deviates from the right faith, and he is subject to the laws against
heretics.” Therefore, the Latins, on account of the Filioque
alone, are heretics.
c. The Latin-minded say that the
Papists are schismatics because that is how they consider us—since they have
nothing heretical to accuse us of, except that we ceased to submit to them. So
then, shall we repay them in kind and call them schismatics, while in fact they
are heretics?
d. The Patriarch of Alexandria
Mark asked the Patriarch of Antioch, Theodore Balsamon—a renowned canonist of
that time—whether he could give the Holy Mysteries to Latins.
He replied that this could not
be done, since the name of the pope—to whom they are subject—is not
commemorated in the hierarchical Divine Services of the Church.
And it is not commemorated
because the Papists have “customs and dogmas foreign to the Orthodox,” and
therefore heretical.
The Latins must be catechized
in the Orthodox faith, chrismated, and only then received.
Therefore:
I. From where, then, did they
suddenly appear to be Orthodox—those who for so many years, and by the Fathers
and Teachers, were judged to be heretics? Who so easily made them Orthodox?
If you wished us to speak the
truth—and for your own benefit—rather, it is they who were supposedly made
Orthodox, but you, having been made like unto them, were pushed to the side of
the heretics.
II. When will there be unity?
When customs, traditions, and
dogmas are united. And this will come about through the return of the Papists
to the Orthodox tradition and theology.
Now we have two creeds, leavened
and unleavened liturgy, two kinds of baptism (that of the Orthodox by triple
immersion, that of the Papists by pouring; the baptism of the Orthodox with
chrism, that of the Papists without chrism), double and entirely different
customs and traditions, fasts and ecclesiastical orders, and other such things.
How, then, can there be union
when there is no unity in these things?
2. There is no
middle ground in matters of dogma.
In diplomacy and politics, many
ambiguous or vague terms are used—understood by each person according to his
preferences—in order to achieve agreement and rapprochement. But between truth
and falsehood, between affirmation and denial, between light and darkness,
between Christ and Belial, there is no middle.
The Greco-Latins or the
Latin-minded or the Uniates are hybrid creatures, fond of pursuing mixtures;
they are like the centaurs in mythology. Gregory the Theologian calls them kothornoi*
and men who go wherever the wind blows. A modern person might compare them to
“the hodja’s oven.”
The Council of Ferrara-Florence,
which attempted to apply a middle ground in dogma, is like that assembly which
decided to build the Tower of Babel, or like the council of Caiaphas which
condemned Christ. Those who participated in the Council of Florence and agreed
with the Papists are the ones of whom the prophet Jeremiah speaks: “The leaders
of My people did not know Me; they are foolish children and not understanding;
they are wise to do evil, but to do good they have not known.” (Jer. 4:22)
3. What should be
our stance toward the Latin-minded?
Let us avoid them as we would
a snake. Let us avoid them as we would those who exploit and traffic in Christ.
These are the ones who “suppose that godliness is a means of gain” (1 Tim.
6:5). These are “false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves
into apostles of Christ.” These are ministers of Satan, who “transforms himself
into an angel of light” (2 Cor. 11:13–15). “Such men serve not our Lord Jesus
Christ, but their own belly, and by smooth words and blessings they deceive the
hearts of the simple”; “yet the firm foundation of the faith stands, having
this seal” (Rom. 16:18; 2 Tim. 2:19).
“Therefore, flee from them,
brethren, and from communion with them: ‘If anyone preaches to you a gospel
contrary to what you received, even if it be an angel from heaven, let him be
anathema’ (Gal. 1:8–9). ‘If anyone comes to you and does not bring this teaching,
do not receive him into your house, and do not greet him; for he who greets him
partakes in his evil works’ (2 John 10–11).”
We do not know whether the
contemporary ecumenists, both clergy and laity, have in mind what Saint Mark of
Ephesus says. Let them study it, and let them come to their senses—if they wish
to remain Orthodox.
* Literally, “kothornos” was a special type of footwear
used by actors in ancient tragedies, with thick soles and a very high heel.
Because it could be worn on either foot—right or left—it came to signify a
double-dealing person, one of weak character, changeable and opportunistic.
Source: Χριστιανική Σπίθα, May 2006
***
Saint Mark of Ephesus
unequivocally teaches and exhorts to walling off (ἀποτείχισις), even at the end
of his life, through his testament:
“Just as
throughout my life I was separated [walled off] from them, so also at the time
of my departure and likewise after my repose, I reject any relationship and
union with them, and I adjure you and command you:
Let none of them
draw near to my funeral, or to my memorial services, or to any other event of
our own faction, in order to attempt to gather jointly or concelebrate with our
own.
For this would
mean to mix what is unmixed.
And they must in
all things be separated from us, until God grants the good correction and peace
of His Church.”
(Patrologia
Orientalis, Volume 25, Belgium, 1973, pp. 347–348.)
Greek source: https://apotixisi.blogspot.com/2026/01/blog-post_39.html
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.