Greek source: Η Ἐκκλησιολογία τοῦ Ἁγίου πρ. Φλωρίνης Χρυσοστόμου καὶ ἡ διαστρέβλωσίς της ἀπὸ τοὺς διαδόχους του [The Ecclesiology of Saint Chrysostomos, formerly of Florina, and its Distortion by His Successors], Nikolaos Mannis (Athens: 2013), p. 43.
Clearly, from the time when the former Metropolitan of
Florina fell asleep [1955] until today, the degree of the fall of the New
Calendarist hierarchy and others is growing. Now, the heresy of Ecumenism is
clearly proclaimed and, at the same time, other heresies have arisen.
However, Orthodox ecclesiology, as developed by the late
Metropolitan Chrysostomos of Florina, remains the same. In particular, it
consists of the following points:
1. The True Orthodox are walled-off
from the New Calendarist hierarchy in Greece (and on a global scale, from the
Orthodox Ecumenists) for reasons of faith and justice (Canons 31 of the Holy
Apostles and 15 of the First-Second Synod).
2. The Church of Greece, and the
likewise-innovated Patriarchates and other Churches, and those who commune
together and indiscriminately with them, have been accused of schism and heresy
because of the change of the calendar and Ecumenism, respectively, and the
walled-off True Orthodox constitute the incorruptible pleroma of the Church, and not a separate Church.
3.
The purpose of the walling-off is to zealously defend the Church from schisms
and divisions (cf. Canon 15 of the
First-Second Synod). We await the convening of a Major General Synod, which
will rule in an Orthodox manner, officially anathematizing the novelty of the
new calendar and the modern pan-heresy of Ecumenism, identifying and
anathematizing the unrepentant heretics, imposing, strictly or economically,
penalties, and accepting or rejecting the Mysteries of the Innovators and those
who commune with them, among other matters.
4.
Any deviation from the Patristic understanding of walling-off (e.g., the creation of a separate Church)
distracts from its purpose, which is, as has been said, to rescue the Church
from division and schisms, and to not become complicit (as commemorators and
communicants) with the Innovators and Ecumenists through the unilateral
innovation of the new calendar and the heresy of Ecumenism.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.