Protopresbyter Dimitrios Athanasiou | April 21, 2026
Introductory
remarks
Following the contemporary
discussion surrounding the participation of women at the sacred analogion,
one observes that it is often conducted in terms of an unjustified exclusion.
This approach tends to overlook the historical and essential role of woman in
worship; from the Deaconesses of the early Christian Church to the great
hymnographers, such as Saint Kassiani, the female presence has always been an
organic and inseparable part of ecclesiastical life.
It is necessary to proceed to a
clear theological distinction: the Apostle Paul defines ecclesiastical order by
restricting the teaching and public preaching of women within the assembly. In
no case does he forbid psalmody. Hymnography constitutes the common prayer and
confession of faith of the whole body of the faithful. When we expend ourselves
on universal prohibitions, we risk losing the essence of the soteriological
message: that Christ abolished every ontological division.
“There is neither male nor
female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus” (Gal. 3:28).
Support for women’s participation
in the chanters’ stand is not identical with a demand for entry into the
special priesthood. It concerns participation in the general priesthood of the
faithful and in the “sacrifice of praise” owed by every baptized soul.
Since Ecclesiastical Music is
preeminently the music of worship and not a means of display, the criteria for
participation ought to be:
1. Piety and reverence.
2. The ability to offer service
to the Body of Christ.
3. A humble mind and spiritual
formation.
If we wish to speak of strict
observance of order, one reminder is necessary: according to the canons, male
chanters ought to be tonsured Readers. In current ecclesiastical practice,
however, strictness is often applied selectively to sex rather than to the
essential canonical prerequisite.
In the face of a conservative
“hyper-Orthodox” position that establishes a new legalism, the Church sets
forth the spirit of love and equality. Any attempt to marginalize woman in
worship is judged foreign to the ethos of the God-Man, Who made His Church an
embrace spacious enough for every person who desires to hymn Him with purity
and reverence.
Next, we shall present the main
points of Ms. E. Spyrakou’s research entitled: “The Female Presence in the Art
of Chanting: The Case of the Urban Churches of the Byzantine Empire.” Evangelia
(Eugenia) Spyrakou, a member of the Special Educational Personnel of the
Department of Music Science and Art at the University of Macedonia, was the
first to analyze systematically the function of the Byzantine choirs,
demonstrating that the woman chanter constituted an institutional and organic
member of the liturgical system.
Those interested can find the
entire study online.
The main points of the study
follow, organized for easier understanding:
The Institutional
Organization of Women Chanters
Historical research shows that
the female chanting presence in Byzantium was not a random phenomenon, but a
strictly organized activity. The women who staffed the analogia were
divided into specific ranks, each with its own role, social position, and
liturgical responsibility.
1. The Asketriai and
the Asketeria
The category of the Asketriai
is the most frequent reference in the sources and forms the basis of female
hymnody. These were semi-monastic sisterhoods that did not live in isolated
cenobitic communities, but in special buildings (“asketeria”) located
within the precincts of the great churches. They constituted the most numerous
body of the women’s choirs. Their presence beside the churches allowed them to
participate daily in the liturgical cycle of the secular parishes, bridging
monasticism and parish life.
2. The Deaconesses as Leading
Figures
Beyond their administrative,
charitable, and auxiliary duties (such as the baptism of women), the
Deaconesses held a pivotal role in psalmody.
The study documents that they
functioned as the heads of the women’s choirs. They were responsible for
coordinating the Asketriai, ensuring the harmonious execution of the
hymns and the observance of the typikon, a fact that gave them
particular standing within the ecclesiastical body.
3. The Graptai and
Professional Chanting
A particularly interesting
category brought to light by the Typikon of the Monastery of the Pantokrator
(12th century) is the Graptai. The term indicates that they were
officially enrolled in the registers of the lower clergy. They were salaried
employees of the Church, which demonstrates the professional character of the
female art of chanting. They participated in specialized services, such as the
Office of Intercession, and their position was regarded as equal to that of the
deaconesses.
4. The Myrrhbearers of
Jerusalem
In the Typikon of
Jerusalem, we encounter the order of the Myrrhbearers, a term rich in symbolism
that refers to the first women witnesses of the Resurrection. Their activity
was centered on the All-Holy Tomb. Their participation in the chanting of that
sacred place highlighted the connection of the female voice with the joyful
proclamation of the Resurrection, strengthening the theological dimension of
their role.
5. The Example of Hagia
Sophia and the Monastery of the Pantokrator
Hagia Sophia in Constantinople
constituted the model of this organization:
The Legislation of Justinian:
It provided for 100 “adousai” (singing women) incorporated into the
clergy. They were divided into two groups (“asketeria”) that alternated
weekly. They lived in special “skenomata” (dwellings) around the
perimeter of the church. This organization made possible a continuous female
chanting presence in the daily services, highlighting the grandeur and rich
vocal character of the capital.
The development of the
institution reaches the 12th century with the order of the Graptai. In
the Foundational Typikon of the Monastery of the Pantokrator (1136),
four women chanters are explicitly mentioned as holding an official place among
the Monastery’s personnel. The designation “Graptai” indicates their
formal registration in the payroll records. It is noteworthy that their
position was considered equivalent to that of the Deaconesses, a fact that
bestowed upon the women chanters particular spiritual and social standing.
6. Liturgical Role and
Antiphonal Singing
The women did not chant in
isolation, but formed part of a broader choral system: they chanted
antiphonally (alternately) with the male chanters, the Readers, or the male
Ascetics. They participated especially in the Amomos (Psalm 118), in troparia
of Orthros, and in funeral services. They were usually positioned in the
women’s gallery, in the narthex, or at specific places to the left of the Holy
Altar (for example, near the Prothesis).
7. The “Polyphony” of the
Byzantine Choir
One of E. Spyrakou’s most
interesting findings concerns the sound color of the period. The Byzantine
choir was not only male, but a composite of:
1. Male voices (Chanters).
2. High female frequencies (Asketriai,
Deaconesses).
3. High eunuch frequencies (very
widespread in Byzantium).
4. Children’s voices (Orphans, Canonarchs).
The female voice accounted for
approximately one third of the total vocal volume, creating a rich timbral
effect that symbolized the unity of creation (“one voice from different
tongues”).
8. Historical Development and
Confusion of Terms
With the passage of the centuries
(especially after the 12th century), the institution of the Deaconesses
declined. This led to a confusion of terms, in which the Asketriai were
often improperly called “deaconesses,” while gradually the female chanting
presence became restricted chiefly to women’s monasteries, losing its
institutional role in the great urban churches.
The study’s answer
The study documents that women
chanted systematically and for pay in the secular churches of the Byzantine
Empire, though not in the same way that they chant today. Their participation
was integrated into a structured choral system with specific conditions and
ranks. The study demonstrates that the female chanting presence in secular
churches was institutionalized and normatively regulated in the Byzantine
Empire. As for the present day, the study does not give a direct answer, but it
does historically establish that the Church had recognized and systematically
incorporated the female voice into worship — in contrast to current practice,
where female participation in the art of chanting in secular churches has to a
great extent disappeared.
Greek source: https://fdathanasiou-parakatathiki.blogspot.com/2026/04/blog-post_8.html
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.