Friday, August 29, 2025

The Parable of the Cockle (or "Tares") among the Wheat (Matthew 13:24-30)

Sermon 96 of St. Peter Chrysoslogus, Bishop of Ravenna (+450)

 

If the words or deeds of Christ would always be completely grasped by our bodily powers of perception, my mind would grow weary, my ingenuity would be unchallenged and dormant, my heart would pine away, and whatever human vigor or energy I have would be extinguished.

The Gospel text states: 'He set a parable before them.' A potential spark is cold in the flint, and lies hidden in the steel, but it is brought into flame when the steel and flint are struck together. In similar manner, when an obscure word is brought together with its meaning, it begins to glow. Surely, if there were not mystical meanings, [1] no distinction would remain between the infidel [2] and the faithful, between the wicked man and the devout one. The devout man would be like a proud one, the lazy man like a toiler, the watchful man like a sleeper. But, as things are, when the soul asks, the mind knocks, the power of perception seeks, piety hopes, faith demands, and studious attention deserves it, the one who labors in perspiration does see fruit appear. The lazy man, by contrast, is seen to suffer a penalty. The uprightness of a giver appears, too, because things received as gifts give more pleasure than those already possessed, and those newly discovered delight us more than those we have long understood. This is why Christ veils His doctrine by parables, covers it with figures, hides it under symbols, [3] make it obscure by mysteries.

'He set a parable before them.' Before them, that is, not before His own, but before strangers who are His enemies, not His friends; before those gazing intently to find a cause of calumny, not before those listening to gain salvation. 'This is why I speak to them in parables,' the Gospel relates, 'because seeing they do not see, and hearing they do not hear, neither do they understand.' [4] Why? Because he who misrepresents past benefits does not deserve to see present ones, and one who hid the Law to keep it from becoming known is not worthy to recognize Grace. 'Woe to you lawyers!' another Gospel warns. 'Because you have taken away the key of knowledge; you have not entered yourselves, and those who were entering you have hindered.' [5]

'He set before them a parable, saying, The kingdom is like to a man.' In what respect did Christ give offense when He was made like unto man, [6] in order to help the perishing human race? Does the Lord give scandal if, to free His slaves, He appears in the form of their slavery? Then look! Does He give scandal when He compares His future majesty, His second coming, and His kingdom to a man?

'The kingdom,' it says, 'is like a man who sowed good seed in his field; but while men were asleep his enemy came and sowed weeds among the wheat, and went away.' You have heard how the Sower of the world sowed the good principles of things and how no evil proceeded from the Author of the original sowing. The evil is an addition sowed by an Enemy. The evil was not brought forth by the parent of things. 'God saw that all he had made was very good,' [7] Scripture relates. Good, and very good. For, when God made the universe, He called it clean; and when the Enemy was striving to undo it, he made it unclean. God placed man in Paradise that he might have a life of delights. But that foe dragged man down into this life of toil, and brought him to death. God implanted affection as something natural in human flesh. But that foe through his envy changed that affection into parricide. Cain [8] proves this, for he was the first to stain the earth with a brother's blood. He was the genuine originator of murder to get rid of a brother. That is how death which springs from strife always splits human love and keeps it asunder.

To take up all the cases would be tedious. Hence, we feel compelled to show at least by a few examples how the enemy has always sowed evil plants among the good, vices among virtues, deathly things among the life giving, in order to achieve our destruction.

Did not God people the whole earth from one man? Did not this loving Sower start the human race from one seed and multiply it until it became an extensive and promising harvest? But soon the enemy reduced all the men to one again. By sowing evil on top of what had been well sown, he got that promising harvest blotted out by the Deluge, rather than merely watered. In similar manner, the Law was sown of divine and true precepts. But he got it obscured by human and deceitful machinations. Consequently, the priest became a persecutor, the teacher became a corrupter, and the defender of the Law became an enemy.

Creatures were made in order to bring about recognition of their Creator. But, to make God go unknown, the Devil told the lie that these creatures were gods. In this way he turned the wise men of this world into fools. He taught the contemplators of this world to see nothing. He caused the professors of wisdom to have no knowledge. He sent the investigators of all things away ignorant. On top of the growing crop of the Gospel, sown with the seed from heaven, he sowed heretical cockle. Thus, the Enemy caused a puzzling mixture, that he might make the sheaves of faith bundles for hell, that no wheat might get stored in the barns of heaven. Why should I say more? After he himself was changed from an angel into a devil, he hastened to use ingenuity, tricks, devices, and deceit to keep any creature [9] from remaining secure in its own state.

But now let us open up the words of the present parable 'The kingdom of heaven is like to a man.' To what man? Assuredly, to Christ. 'Who sowed good seed'-because the nature of the Creator can put no evil in the very seed of things. 'In his field'-that is, in the world, as the Lord Himself says: 'The field is the world.' [10]

'But while men were asleep' - that is, the holy fathers, patriarchs, prophets, apostles, martyrs, who were resting for a time in the deep sleep of death. For, the death of the saints is a sleep, but that of the sinners is truly a death, in so far as in hell they live only for punishment. As far as life is concerned, the sinners perish.

'His enemy came,' that is, the Devil. 'And sowed weeds.' He sowed the weeds on top of the good seed; he did not sow them above themselves. The good things of the Creator precede, the evil things of the Devil follow afterwards, so that the evil which is from the Devil may be an accident, not a nature.

'He sowed weeds among the wheat' - because the Devil has become accustomed to sow of his own accord heresies among the faithful, sin among the saints, quarrels among the peaceful, deceptions among the simple, and wickedness among the innocent. He does this not to acquire the weeds of cockle, but to destroy the wheat; not to capture the guilty ones, but to steal away the innocent. An enemy seeks the leader rather than a soldier. He does not besiege the dead but attacks the living. Thus, the Devil is not seeking to capture sinners whom he already has under his dominion, but is laboring thus to ensnare the just.

'He sowed weeds among the wheat, and went away' - because with great might the Devil drives men towards destruction. But, after he has prostrated someone, he abandons him. The Devil seeks not the man, but his destruction. Brethren, he rejoices over our evils, he swells with pride over our ruin, he grows strong from our wounds, he thirsts after our blood, he is sated from our flesh, he lives by our death. The Devil does not wish to possess a man, but to destroy him. Why? Because he does not wish, he does not dare, he does not allow the man to arrive at the heaven from which the Devil fell.

Our sermon is detaining us rather long today. Therefore, let us postpone what remains, in order that this work, our common task, may be lighter for us all, and also that we may give fuller consideration to the matters yet to be said. May our God deign to give me the grace of speaking and you the desire of hearing.

 

1. Mystica, meaning symbolical, typical. Cf. Sermon 2 nn. 7.9.

2. Reading infidelem fidelemque, with S. Pauli.

3. sacramentis. On this meaning. d. DeGhellinck, Pour l,histoire du mot sacramentum 54. and Souler. Glossary.

4. Matt. 13.3.

5. Luke 11.52;

6. Phil. 2.7.

7. Gen. 1.31.

8. Gen. 4.8.

9. Reading creatura, with S. Pauli.

10. Matt. 13.38.

 

Source: Saint Peter Chrysologus, Selected Sermons (The Fathers of the Church, A New Translation, Vol. 17), translated by George E. Ganss, CUA Press, Washington, D.C., 1953, pp. 152-156.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

2009 Response of Archbishop Chrysostomos of Etna to Reader Vladimir Moss' criticisms of the Synod in Resistance

Evlogeite.   As usual, [ Dr. Moss' writing is ] externally compelling and intelligent, and not without some valid points (albeit validit...