Arius
was the first of these teachers of the doctrines of hell — a worthy first in
his pride. He carried his questionings into the very depths of the divine
essence, and rejected consubstantiality on the evidence of texts which he
misunderstood. Upheld principally by the powers of this world, Arianism fell at
the end of a century, having no root but in recently converted nations who had
not had to shed their blood for the divinity of the Son of God.
It
was then that Satan produced Nestorius crowned with a fictitious halo of
sanctity and knowledge. This man, who was to give the clearest expression to
the hatred of the serpent for the woman, was enthroned in the Chair of
Constantinople amid the applause of the whole East, which hoped to see in him a
second Chrysostom. The joy of the good was of short duration. In the very year
of his exaltation, on Christmas Day 428, Nestorius, taking advantage of the
immense concourse which had assembled in honour of the Virgin Mother and her
Child, pronounced from the episcopal pulpit the blasphemous words: ‘Mary did
not bring forth God; her Son was only a man, the instrument of the Divinity.’
The multitude shuddered with horror. Eusebius, a simple layman, rose to give
expression to the general indignation, and protested against this impiety. Soon
a more explicit protest was drawn up and disseminated in the name of the
members of this grief-stricken Church, launching an anathema against anyone who
should dare to say: ‘The Only-begotten Son of the Father and the Son of Mary
are different persons.’ This generous attitude was the safeguard of Byzantium,
and won the praise of Popes and Councils. When the shepherd becomes a
wolf, the first duty of the flock is to defend itself. It is usual and regular,
no doubt, for doctrine to descend from the bishops to the faithful, and those
who are subject in the faith are not to judge their superiors. But in the
treasure of revelation there are essential doctrines which all Christians, by
the very fact of their title as such, are bound to know and defend. The
principle is the same whether it be a question of belief or conduct, dogma or
morals. Treachery like that of Nestorius is rare in the Church, but it may
happen that some pastors keep silence for one reason or another in
circumstances when religion itself is at stake. The true children of Holy
Church at such times are those who walk by the light of their baptism, not the
cowardly souls who, under the specious pretext of submission to the powers that
be, delay their opposition to the enemy in the hope of receiving instructions
which are neither necessary nor desirable.”
-
The Liturgical Year, by Dom Prosper Guéranger (+1875), Volume IV, Benziger
Brothers, New York, 1909, pp. 378-380, “February 9 – St. Cyril of Alexandria,
Bishop and Doctor of the Church.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.