Friday, June 19, 2026

The Prophetic, Apostolic, and Patristic Conscience of the Venerable Elder Philotheos Zervakos

Protopresbyter Theodoros Zisis | May 11, 2014 | Thessaloniki

 

 

And we now come to the presentation, in broad outline, of the elements which show him, beyond the other aspects of his many-sided personality and his manifold activity, as a struggler and confessor of Orthodoxy.

On the basis of these elements, especially the strict but just criticism that he exercises toward the influences from the West in the area of ethos, of moral life, but also in the area of dogma, toward deviations from the Orthodox Faith, the Venerable Elder Philotheos surpasses all the other venerable Elders of the past century and is revealed as a figure equal to the Holy Fathers and Teachers. He composes courageous memoranda to political and ecclesiastical rulers, but also to the people, and as a prophet of repentance he foresees that, if this moral corrosion and apostasy from the Faith continues, God will withdraw His Grace and blessing pedagogically from the Greek nation, just as He did in the past as well.

In many of his written texts, this conscience is entirely evident, the kind one encounters in the prophets of the Old Testament. For this reason, Fr. Theoklitos Dionysiatis is not wrong in his aforementioned book, which begins the “Prolegomena” with the passage of the Evangelist John referring to the Prophet and Forerunner John, as applied analogically also to the Venerable Elder Philotheos Zervakos: “There was a man sent from God, whose name was John; this man came for a witness, to bear witness concerning the Light, that all might believe through him.”

Venerable Philotheos proved to be a prophet and teacher sent by God in the twentieth century, during which prophetic voices were rare, while, on the contrary, loud voices of false prophets, false shepherds, and false teachers were heard, preaching innovations and delusions. He himself wavered as to whether he should follow the hesychastic monastic life, far from the noises and problems of the world, as he desired, or whether he should combine the monastic life with missionary activity in the world, as his spiritual father and teacher, Saint Nektarios, recommended to him; Saint Nektarios had done the same, following the example of great Holy Fathers, especially the Three Hierarchs.

This wavering of his ceased when, by a prophetic sign from God, he was sent to preach to the world. He himself relates that, during his pilgrimage to the Holy Places, he found himself on the God-trodden Mount Sinai. There, during his descent from Mount Horeb, he entered the cave of the Prophet Elias, and, praying, he fervently besought God with tears to reveal to him whether it was His will that he remain there in the cave, far from the vain world, without distractions and cares, so that he might keep his mind continually united with God and think only of heavenly things. And while he was speaking these thoughts, he heard an invisible voice say three times: “Feed My sheep.” He then understood that this was the will of God, and returned to Longovarda.

Concerning the fact that in the twentieth century bold and manly confessors of the Faith were rare, while the adversaries of the Church were multiplying even within the body of bishops and shepherds, there exists a moving text of his prayer to Our Lord Jesus Christ, which was also circulated as a separate pamphlet in 1973. After first pointing out that the Holy Apostles and their successors, the Holy God-bearing Fathers and teachers of the Church, conquered throughout the centuries the visible and invisible enemies, preserved the Holy Church, and led many to the true Faith, the Orthodox one, he adds: “In previous generations there were holy men, wise men, righteous, honorable, prudent, Spirit-bearing, God-bearing, manly in soul, who struggled on behalf of the Church, on behalf of the Apostolic and Patristic Traditions, and with Thine alliance and help, O Lord, conquered the ranks of the enemies and preserved the Church.

“Today such men exist only few in number, rare, hard to find, and not manly, wise, and holy as were our ancient Fathers. But those who war against the Holy Church are many, and the vessel of the Church is in danger of being sunk, because it does not have good shepherds and guardians. Some of the shepherds and bishops, whom they appointed to shepherd and guard Thy rational flock, the Holy Church, have become wolves in sheep’s clothing, complete despisers and transgressors of the Sacred Canons and Apostolic Traditions, seeking their removal and replacement. Others have opened the doors and invite and receive the wolves, the Papists, the Protestants, and all the heretics, so that they may enter unhindered and sacrifice, destroy, and tear apart the rational sheep... And instead of struggling and taking care to unite the Church, they struggle to divide it still further and make it pan-heretical...”

In the face of this image of the increase of the enemies and adversaries of the Church, of the indifference of the shepherds, or even of their transformation into enemies—which, it should be noted, is much worse today—Venerable Philotheos feels all the more his duty and responsibility as a spiritual father and clergyman to struggle and react. He reads God’s recommendations to the prophets to announce to the people their sins with a voice as loud as a trumpet, otherwise they too will be punished, and he writes: “Having read these things, I, the sinful and unworthy one, and having feared lest, as a spiritual father and priest of the Most High, if I remain silent while seeing the sword that is coming, the Lord should require an account from me, I announce the sins of the Greek people and of the clergy, calling all, and first of all myself, since I too happen to be more sinful than all, to repentance and return.”

Writing critically to Patriarch Athenagoras concerning his openings toward the Pope, he expresses the same fear in the event that he should keep silent: “I am compelled to write to you, fearing that I shall sin if I am muzzled and do not confess the truth.”

He expresses the same consciousness of responsibility also when, in 1957, he publishes a special pamphlet against blasphemy against divine things, which had then taken on great extent: “Being conscious, on the one hand, of the sacred duty as a spiritual father and priest, that I must not keep silent, but must preach the truth, reprove, rebuke, admonish, and exhort those who sin... I judged it appropriate to publish the present booklet.”

There were, of course, also critics of this prophetic and confessional stance of Venerable Philotheos, who recommended to him that he practice obedience to his own bishop and to the decisions of synods. Writing in reply in 1930 to his bishop, who was recommending obedience to him, he said: “If all Christians followed this opinion to the letter, namely, to follow the bishops in everything, then alas, neither Orthodoxy, nor the Church, nor an Orthodox Christian would exist today. If Orthodox Christians followed the patriarchs and bishops Apollinarios, Macedonios, Eutyches, Dioskoros, Sabellio-Severos, Eusebios, and many others, and accepted and embraced their opinions, where then would Orthodoxy be? Where a pious and Orthodox Christian?!! And why do I speak of men, patriarchs and metropolitans? And do I not speak of synods, composed not of five or ten and twenty such men, but of 100, 200, and 348 metropolitans and bishops? For 348 in number assembled in the year 754 in Constantinople and issued the decree against the holy icons.”

Completing his argument, he writes that “there are also exceptions, according to which one may disobey without condemnation, as we also said above and as the Holy Fathers and Apostles command us,” and he then gives relevant passages from Holy Scripture and the Holy Fathers.

In a reproving letter that he sent in 1976 “To the venerable Hierarchy” of the Church of Greece, he writes: “Let them not say: Who are you, who wish to teach us hierarchs, you who are inferior teaching us who are your superiors? That I am inferior and unlearned, I know; that I am nothing from nothing. But I too am a man, an Orthodox Christian and a spiritual father, and I am obliged, when my Faith is reviled, not to close my mouth and keep silent. John the Forerunner dwelt in the wilderness, but when he was informed that King Herod had acted lawlessly, he left the wilderness and went to the city and reproved the king who had acted lawlessly. And every man, whoever he may be, is obliged not to close his mouth when he hears his Faith being reviled, but to protest, to counsel, and, if necessary, to reprove.”

He reproves even the Athonite Fathers with persuasive argumentation, because they agreed to organize on Mount Athos, in 1963, the ceremonies for the millennium of Mount Athos, since he considers them to be worldly events foreign to monastic customs and to the history of Monasticism, and that ultimately, they would cause harm rather than benefit.

And refuting a possible objection concerning his involvement in another jurisdiction, he writes: “But perhaps some may say to me: We know how to guard ourselves from the snares of the Devil; you, Father Philotheos, why are you concerned? You are a stranger; look to your monastery. I am concerned as a Christian, as a brother of the same schema, but also because Longovarda was founded by Athonites, the so-called Kollyvades, friends, of one blood and of one mind with those Holy Fathers, Nikodemos of Naxos the Athonite, Athanasios the teacher from Paros, Makarios Notaras, etc. … Therefore, just as I am concerned for my monastery, I am also concerned for Mount Athos… and I have a sacred and incumbent duty, as a monk, and indeed as a Spiritual Father, to be concerned not only for my monastery and the monasteries of Mount Athos, but also for all the monasteries and for all the monks of my homeland and of my Church.”

He addressed his prophetic and patristic rebukes at various times, without fear, to kings, prime ministers, ministers, patriarchs, archbishops, bishops, and other officials, whenever he was informed that they had offended the dogmas and the teaching of the Church. Summarizing his related activity, he writes: “But we, even if many are those who turn a deaf ear and are willfully blind, are obliged to preach and confess the truth. From the moment I became a priest and spiritual father, from the year 1912 until today, I have sent many memoranda to kings, prime ministers, the Holy Synod, metropolitans, and elsewhere. I also sent four awakening trumpet-calls, but they did not listen.

“I have spoken and declared; I bear no guilt. But insofar as men, and I together with them, do not listen to God, how will they listen to me, the sinner? Yet I have not ceased to speak, but I struggle against the despisers of the Apostolic and Patristic traditions, the enemies of Orthodoxy and friends of the schismatic-heretical Papists and Protestants, who deceitfully strive to lead Orthodox Christians astray, so that they may follow them into their delusion... But now I shall cease writing, for I am departing from this temporary life for the eternal and heavenly homeland.”

So great was his prophetic and apostolic zeal, and consequently his boldness and manliness, that during a visit of his to Constantinople in 1934, he had planned to meet Kemal Atatürk, president of the Turkish Republic, and to urge him to embrace Christianity. The patriarch of that time, Photios, however, dissuaded him from this undertaking, because there was a worsening of relations between Kemal and the Ecumenical Patriarchate. When he returned to Longovarda, he wrote a relevant letter, which has been preserved. Having been informed that Kemal was ill, he decided to visit him in Ankara; but when he arrived in Athens, he learned that he had died, and thus the undertaking was definitively cancelled. It nevertheless shows that his missionary zeal reached the point of envisioning the drawing of entire nations to Christianity.

Indeed, since we are speaking of a prophetic conscience, it is not superfluous to mention that among the enemies and adversaries of Christianity he saw Communism, and he often referred to the persecutions suffered by Christians wherever communist regimes had prevailed, and also foretold that they would soon be uprooted, as indeed happened:

“The Bolsheviks of Russia and the Reds of Spain, because they are deprived of the weapons of love, faith, and hope, have made their homelands wretched and unfortunate. They profaned and defiled the holy churches and the holy altars; they savagely slaughtered, and in various ways tortured and put to death, myriads of innocent clergymen and laymen. They shed rivers of innocent blood, and they will leave to the generations after these a stigma and an eternal anathema of their depravity, evil, and wickedness. But ‘every plant which My heavenly Father hath not planted shall be rooted up.’ Bolshevism and Communism are a planting of Satan, because they are deprived of love, faith, and hope; therefore they will swiftly be uprooted. The Reds of Spain have begun to be stripped of their branches and uprooted; the same fate will soon be suffered also by their brethren, the godless Bolsheviks of Russia.”

Until the end of his long life, he was anxious about his personal spiritual course, and for this reason he thanked God, Who had preserved him from the snares and delusions of the Devil; but he was also grieved over the lamentable condition of the Church and of her shepherds. We cite a small relevant excerpt from his words:

“My end has come, and I thank God, because He has preserved me from many dangers, bodily and spiritual, from many delusions and snares of the deceitful dragon; and I beseech Him to preserve me until the last moment of my death and to bring me into the heavenly tabernacles, where is the dwelling of those who rejoice. But in the last moments of my life, my soul is deeply sorrowful and full of pain, seeing the lamentable condition of the Church and of the shepherds.

“...of Her shepherds, who, apart from a few exceptions, instead of becoming light through their good works, became darkness and a cause for the name of our Heavenly Father to be blasphemed among the nations. I believe and hope that the Founder of the Church and Prince of peace will shatter these men like potters’ vessels, but His Church, which He sanctified by His all-immaculate Blood, He will preserve from the danger of sinking. As for me, I depart in peace; but you, as wise and prudent men, save yourselves from this present evil and corrupt generation.”

 

Greek source:

https://alopsis.gr/%CE%B7-%CF%80%CF%81%CE%BF%CF%86%CE%B7%CF%84%CE%B9%CE%BA%CE%AE-%CE%B1%CF%80%CE%BF%CF%83%CF%84%CE%BF%CE%BB%CE%B9%CE%BA%CE%AE-%CE%BA%CE%B1%CE%B9-%CF%80%CE%B1%CF%84%CE%B5%CF%81%CE%B9%CE%BA%CE%AE-%CF%83/

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Observations on the “Thyateira Confession”

Priestmonk Haralampos (Then of Holy Transfiguration Monastery, Brookline, MA; currently of St. John of San Francisco Orthodox Monastery, C...